Update: The Illegal Alien Vote

[Faun]

LOLOL

Still waiting for you to show where an illegal alien was registered to vote under that law......

I'm Fawn, I got caught lying

Does that mean you can finally show where one single illegal alien was registered to vote under that law??










.... nah, of course you can’t.

Again? What is this, the 500th time?


{
Tens of thousands of Californians have been registered to vote incorrectly by the state Department of Motor Vehicles, including some who were assigned the wrong political party preference, officials said Wednesday.

Officials insist the errors were limited to 23,000 of the 1.4 million voter registration files sent to elections offices between late April, when California's new automated "motor voter" system went into effect, and early August. Californians who were affected will soon receive notifications in the mail instructing them to check their voter registration status.}

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo..._supposed_to_worry_about_illegals_voting.html


Such a ******* liar.

LOLOL

Dumbfuck , from the source in your own link...

”State officials said no people in the country illegally — who are eligible to get a special driver’s license in California — were mistakenly registered to vote.”

But you said that NEVER HAS HAPPENED, you ******* liar you.

You're a ******* liar, because we've been through this dance dozens of times before, you KNOW what you are posting is false, and do it in hopes of deceiving some people.

You are ******* pile of shit, a shameless lying kunt.

The source in your own link said it didn’t happen.

And to clarify, since you’re clearly insane.... I never said mistakes don’t happen. I said you can’t find a single case where an illegal alien was mistakenly registered to vote in California under that law...

and YOU proved none have been.

 

[ph3iron]

Can you post the link

illegals get driver's licenses that say no voting.....

Really?

I say Democrat's who work the polls ignore that blue bar and simply look at the name on the driver's license.

And guess what?

"It's Official: Clinton's Popular Vote Win Came Entirely From California
If you take California out of the popular vote equation, then Trump wins the rest of the country by 1.4 million votes.
.... if you look at every other measure, Trump was the clear and decisive winner in this election."
It's Official: Clinton's Popular Vote Win Came Entirely From California


Think California is loaded with illegal alien voters??????

You betcha'!!!!





California has the largest number of illegal immigrants in the United States, with an estimated 2.4 million unauthorized immigrants making up about 6.3 percent of the state's total population, according to the Pew Research Center.Sep 14, 2015

oIllegal Immigration Statistics in California - Newsmax.com
www.newsmax.com/FastFeatures/illegal-immigration-California/2015/09/14/.../691462/



Looking for the biggest Cinco de Mayo celebration in the world? Look no further than Fiesta Broadway in Los Angeles, where hundreds of thousands of people come out for food, music and crafts in a celebration of Hispanic heritage.

What comic strip has regularly featured Donald Trump since 1986?

California requires no ID to vote or to register to vote. An electric bill is all you need.

California encourages illegal aliens to vote and protects them if they get caught.

False.

You must be a US Citizen to vote in State elections in California. Can someone file a registration? Sure. You can file paperwork to become an astronaut to. Neither the State of California (if they follow their rules on their website) or NASA would approve either application without credentials.

You know I'm going to humiliate you on your lie again - just like the last 2,000 times you told it.

Yes, Fawn and RDerp will cuddle up to how clever you are as a ******* liar, but anyone rational is going to see you for what you are.

Ready?

___________________________________________________________


This bill would provide that if a person who is ineligible to vote becomes registered to vote by operation of the California New Motor Voter Program in the absence of a violation by that person of the crime described above, that person’s registration shall be presumed to have been effected with official authorization and not the fault of that person. The bill would also provide that if a person who is ineligible to vote becomes registered to vote by operation of this program, and that person votes or attempts to vote in an election held after the effective date of the person’s registration, that person shall be presumed to have acted with official authorization and is not guilty of fraudulently voting or attempting to vote,

Bill Text - AB-1461 Voter registration: California New Motor Voter Program.


SEC. 7.
Section 2269 of the Elections Code is amended to read:


2269.
If a person who is ineligible to vote becomes registered or preregistered to vote pursuant to this chapter and votes or attempts to vote in an election held after the effective date of the person’s registration or preregistration, that person shall be presumed to have acted with official authorization and shall not be guilty of fraudulently voting or attempting to vote pursuant to Section 18560,


Bill Text - AB-1407 California New Motor Voter Program: voter registration.


Lie some more Hamas Gurl

Raving lunatic, that doesn’t register illegals to vote. You’ve been shown this before, but sadly, you’re too insane to understand. That law you cite merely puts the blame on the state, and not the ineligible voter registered to vote, if the state inadvertently registers an ineligible voter to vote with their automated registration process.

The funniest part is.... despite you clinging to that section of the law as though you’re onto something nefarious, the stark reality is .... you still can’t show a single illegal alien has been registered to vote under California’s motor voter law.

DERP

The law openly states that it covers for illegals voting.

Yet you morons keep right on lying, no matter how many times the actual law is presented, demonstrating that you are lying.

Oh, and the above isn't worthy of retort, you're a ******* idiot hack. You got busted.

Can you post a link to the law?
Preferably w/o stupid foul mouth?

 

[ph3iron]

California requires no ID to vote or to register to vote. An electric bill is all you need.

California encourages illegal aliens to vote and protects them if they get caught.

False.

You must be a US Citizen to vote in State elections in California. Can someone file a registration? Sure. You can file paperwork to become an astronaut to. Neither the State of California (if they follow their rules on their website) or NASA would approve either application without credentials.

You know I'm going to humiliate you on your lie again - just like the last 2,000 times you told it.

Yes, Fawn and RDerp will cuddle up to how clever you are as a ******* liar, but anyone rational is going to see you for what you are.

Ready?

___________________________________________________________


This bill would provide that if a person who is ineligible to vote becomes registered to vote by operation of the California New Motor Voter Program in the absence of a violation by that person of the crime described above, that person’s registration shall be presumed to have been effected with official authorization and not the fault of that person. The bill would also provide that if a person who is ineligible to vote becomes registered to vote by operation of this program, and that person votes or attempts to vote in an election held after the effective date of the person’s registration, that person shall be presumed to have acted with official authorization and is not guilty of fraudulently voting or attempting to vote,

Bill Text - AB-1461 Voter registration: California New Motor Voter Program.


SEC. 7.
Section 2269 of the Elections Code is amended to read:


2269.
If a person who is ineligible to vote becomes registered or preregistered to vote pursuant to this chapter and votes or attempts to vote in an election held after the effective date of the person’s registration or preregistration, that person shall be presumed to have acted with official authorization and shall not be guilty of fraudulently voting or attempting to vote pursuant to Section 18560,


Bill Text - AB-1407 California New Motor Voter Program: voter registration.


Lie some more Hamas Gurl

Raving lunatic, that doesn’t register illegals to vote. You’ve been shown this before, but sadly, you’re too insane to understand. That law you cite merely puts the blame on the state, and not the ineligible voter registered to vote, if the state inadvertently registers an ineligible voter to vote with their automated registration process.

The funniest part is.... despite you clinging to that section of the law as though you’re onto something nefarious, the stark reality is .... you still can’t show a single illegal alien has been registered to vote under California’s motor voter law.

You can always tell when Jumbo has been owned; there are 70 “alerts”; each one with a useless wall of text nobody reads.

When proven to be a shameless liar, Hamas gurl just pretends that somehow she won the round.,..



It takes a special lack of intellect and integrity to go down that rabbit hole.

The con does it every day

 

[Uncensored2008]

Can you post the link

California requires no ID to vote or to register to vote. An electric bill is all you need.

California encourages illegal aliens to vote and protects them if they get caught.

False.

You must be a US Citizen to vote in State elections in California. Can someone file a registration? Sure. You can file paperwork to become an astronaut to. Neither the State of California (if they follow their rules on their website) or NASA would approve either application without credentials.

You know I'm going to humiliate you on your lie again - just like the last 2,000 times you told it.

Yes, Fawn and RDerp will cuddle up to how clever you are as a ******* liar, but anyone rational is going to see you for what you are.

Ready?

___________________________________________________________


This bill would provide that if a person who is ineligible to vote becomes registered to vote by operation of the California New Motor Voter Program in the absence of a violation by that person of the crime described above, that person’s registration shall be presumed to have been effected with official authorization and not the fault of that person. The bill would also provide that if a person who is ineligible to vote becomes registered to vote by operation of this program, and that person votes or attempts to vote in an election held after the effective date of the person’s registration, that person shall be presumed to have acted with official authorization and is not guilty of fraudulently voting or attempting to vote,

Bill Text - AB-1461 Voter registration: California New Motor Voter Program.


SEC. 7.
Section 2269 of the Elections Code is amended to read:


2269.
If a person who is ineligible to vote becomes registered or preregistered to vote pursuant to this chapter and votes or attempts to vote in an election held after the effective date of the person’s registration or preregistration, that person shall be presumed to have acted with official authorization and shall not be guilty of fraudulently voting or attempting to vote pursuant to Section 18560,


Bill Text - AB-1407 California New Motor Voter Program: voter registration.


Lie some more Hamas Gurl

Raving lunatic, that doesn’t register illegals to vote. You’ve been shown this before, but sadly, you’re too insane to understand. That law you cite merely puts the blame on the state, and not the ineligible voter registered to vote, if the state inadvertently registers an ineligible voter to vote with their automated registration process.

The funniest part is.... despite you clinging to that section of the law as though you’re onto something nefarious, the stark reality is .... you still can’t show a single illegal alien has been registered to vote under California’s motor voter law.

DERP

The law openly states that it covers for illegals voting.

Yet you morons keep right on lying, no matter how many times the actual law is presented, demonstrating that you are lying.

Oh, and the above isn't worthy of retort, you're a ******* idiot hack. You got busted.

Can you post a link to the law?
Preferably w/o stupid foul mouth?

Stupid ****, it's in the backquote of your message.

Bill Text - AB-1461 Voter registration: California New Motor Voter Program.

 

[Uncensored2008]

I'm Fawn, I got caught lying

Does that mean you can finally show where one single illegal alien was registered to vote under that law??










.... nah, of course you can’t.

Again? What is this, the 500th time?


{
Tens of thousands of Californians have been registered to vote incorrectly by the state Department of Motor Vehicles, including some who were assigned the wrong political party preference, officials said Wednesday.

Officials insist the errors were limited to 23,000 of the 1.4 million voter registration files sent to elections offices between late April, when California's new automated "motor voter" system went into effect, and early August. Californians who were affected will soon receive notifications in the mail instructing them to check their voter registration status.}

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo..._supposed_to_worry_about_illegals_voting.html


Such a ******* liar.

LOLOL

Dumbfuck , from the source in your own link...

”State officials said no people in the country illegally — who are eligible to get a special driver’s license in California — were mistakenly registered to vote.”

But you said that NEVER HAS HAPPENED, you ******* liar you.

You're a ******* liar, because we've been through this dance dozens of times before, you KNOW what you are posting is false, and do it in hopes of deceiving some people.

You are ******* pile of shit, a shameless lying kunt.

The source in your own link said it didn’t happen.

And to clarify, since you’re clearly insane.... I never said mistakes don’t happen. I said you can’t find a single case where an illegal alien was mistakenly registered to vote in California under that law...

and YOU proved none have been.

No retard, you can't "lie it into the cornfield."

Moron.

 

[candycorn]

Up until 1/1/19, the GOP had the governor's mansions and (presumably) the State Secretaries of State offices as well in 30+ states.
Blaming the democrats for this is a false narrative. I know that won't stop you guys but...it is the case.

 

[Faun]

Does that mean you can finally show where one single illegal alien was registered to vote under that law??










.... nah, of course you can’t.

Again? What is this, the 500th time?


{
Tens of thousands of Californians have been registered to vote incorrectly by the state Department of Motor Vehicles, including some who were assigned the wrong political party preference, officials said Wednesday.

Officials insist the errors were limited to 23,000 of the 1.4 million voter registration files sent to elections offices between late April, when California's new automated "motor voter" system went into effect, and early August. Californians who were affected will soon receive notifications in the mail instructing them to check their voter registration status.}

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo..._supposed_to_worry_about_illegals_voting.html


Such a ******* liar.

LOLOL

Dumbfuck , from the source in your own link...

”State officials said no people in the country illegally — who are eligible to get a special driver’s license in California — were mistakenly registered to vote.”

But you said that NEVER HAS HAPPENED, you ******* liar you.

You're a ******* liar, because we've been through this dance dozens of times before, you KNOW what you are posting is false, and do it in hopes of deceiving some people.

You are ******* pile of shit, a shameless lying kunt.

The source in your own link said it didn’t happen.

And to clarify, since you’re clearly insane.... I never said mistakes don’t happen. I said you can’t find a single case where an illegal alien was mistakenly registered to vote in California under that law...

and YOU proved none have been.

No retard, you can't "lie it into the cornfield."

Moron.

LOLOL

You poor, demented thing. You’re sooo insane, I actually have to remind you what YOU said....

You cited a section of California law which states that undocumented aliens who get inadvertently registered to vote under their motor voter law will not be prosecuted, even if they vote, unless they knew it was illegal for them to vote....

So to remind you, you’re talking about undocumented aliens.

Then you posted a link to an article based on an L.A. Times article that mistakes were detected with their new automated system... but the L.A. Times article says that zero of the mistakes involved undocumented aliens...

A small number of the mistakes — officials estimated around 1,600 — involved people who did not intend to register to vote. State officials said no people in the country illegally — who are eligible to get a special driver’s license in California — were mistakenly registered to vote. An unknown number of errors included voters whose political party preferences were changed without their consent.​

See that? You’re such a flaming nut, your article doesn’t corroborate your hallucinations like you deluded yourself into believing.

Savvy?

 

[ph3iron]

Can you post the link

False.

You must be a US Citizen to vote in State elections in California. Can someone file a registration? Sure. You can file paperwork to become an astronaut to. Neither the State of California (if they follow their rules on their website) or NASA would approve either application without credentials.

You know I'm going to humiliate you on your lie again - just like the last 2,000 times you told it.

Yes, Fawn and RDerp will cuddle up to how clever you are as a ******* liar, but anyone rational is going to see you for what you are.

Ready?

___________________________________________________________


This bill would provide that if a person who is ineligible to vote becomes registered to vote by operation of the California New Motor Voter Program in the absence of a violation by that person of the crime described above, that person’s registration shall be presumed to have been effected with official authorization and not the fault of that person. The bill would also provide that if a person who is ineligible to vote becomes registered to vote by operation of this program, and that person votes or attempts to vote in an election held after the effective date of the person’s registration, that person shall be presumed to have acted with official authorization and is not guilty of fraudulently voting or attempting to vote,

Bill Text - AB-1461 Voter registration: California New Motor Voter Program.


SEC. 7.
Section 2269 of the Elections Code is amended to read:


2269.
If a person who is ineligible to vote becomes registered or preregistered to vote pursuant to this chapter and votes or attempts to vote in an election held after the effective date of the person’s registration or preregistration, that person shall be presumed to have acted with official authorization and shall not be guilty of fraudulently voting or attempting to vote pursuant to Section 18560,


Bill Text - AB-1407 California New Motor Voter Program: voter registration.


Lie some more Hamas Gurl

Raving lunatic, that doesn’t register illegals to vote. You’ve been shown this before, but sadly, you’re too insane to understand. That law you cite merely puts the blame on the state, and not the ineligible voter registered to vote, if the state inadvertently registers an ineligible voter to vote with their automated registration process.

The funniest part is.... despite you clinging to that section of the law as though you’re onto something nefarious, the stark reality is .... you still can’t show a single illegal alien has been registered to vote under California’s motor voter law.

DERP

The law openly states that it covers for illegals voting.

Yet you morons keep right on lying, no matter how many times the actual law is presented, demonstrating that you are lying.

Oh, and the above isn't worthy of retort, you're a ******* idiot hack. You got busted.

Can you post a link to the law?
Preferably w/o stupid foul mouth?

Stupid ****, it's in the backquote of your message.

Bill Text - AB-1461 Voter registration: California New Motor Voter Program.

The law does NOT COVER ILLEGALS VOTING
I see the interpretation garbage came judge pirro
and knees news
Try reading the context
FACT CHECK: Did California Pass a Law Allowing Undocumented Immigrants to Vote in Federal Elections?
And try to avoid the zero college foul mouth.
I realise it may be difficult
Ps, read fact check once in a while

 

[Uncensored2008]

Up until 1/1/19, the GOP had the governor's mansions and (presumably) the State Secretaries of State offices as well in 30+ states.
Blaming the democrats for this is a false narrative. I know that won't stop you guys but...it is the case.

Quick Hamas gurl, blow smoke so no one notices how badly you Stalinist scum got busted with your moronic lies...

 

[Uncensored2008]

Can you post the link

You know I'm going to humiliate you on your lie again - just like the last 2,000 times you told it.

Yes, Fawn and RDerp will cuddle up to how clever you are as a ******* liar, but anyone rational is going to see you for what you are.

Ready?

___________________________________________________________


This bill would provide that if a person who is ineligible to vote becomes registered to vote by operation of the California New Motor Voter Program in the absence of a violation by that person of the crime described above, that person’s registration shall be presumed to have been effected with official authorization and not the fault of that person. The bill would also provide that if a person who is ineligible to vote becomes registered to vote by operation of this program, and that person votes or attempts to vote in an election held after the effective date of the person’s registration, that person shall be presumed to have acted with official authorization and is not guilty of fraudulently voting or attempting to vote,

Bill Text - AB-1461 Voter registration: California New Motor Voter Program.


SEC. 7.
Section 2269 of the Elections Code is amended to read:


2269.
If a person who is ineligible to vote becomes registered or preregistered to vote pursuant to this chapter and votes or attempts to vote in an election held after the effective date of the person’s registration or preregistration, that person shall be presumed to have acted with official authorization and shall not be guilty of fraudulently voting or attempting to vote pursuant to Section 18560,


Bill Text - AB-1407 California New Motor Voter Program: voter registration.


Lie some more Hamas Gurl

Raving lunatic, that doesn’t register illegals to vote. You’ve been shown this before, but sadly, you’re too insane to understand. That law you cite merely puts the blame on the state, and not the ineligible voter registered to vote, if the state inadvertently registers an ineligible voter to vote with their automated registration process.

The funniest part is.... despite you clinging to that section of the law as though you’re onto something nefarious, the stark reality is .... you still can’t show a single illegal alien has been registered to vote under California’s motor voter law.

DERP

The law openly states that it covers for illegals voting.

Yet you morons keep right on lying, no matter how many times the actual law is presented, demonstrating that you are lying.

Oh, and the above isn't worthy of retort, you're a ******* idiot hack. You got busted.

Can you post a link to the law?
Preferably w/o stupid foul mouth?

Stupid ****, it's in the backquote of your message.

Bill Text - AB-1461 Voter registration: California New Motor Voter Program.

The law does NOT COVER ILLEGALS VOTING
I see the interpretation garbage came judge pirro
and knees news
Try reading the context
FACT CHECK: Did California Pass a Law Allowing Undocumented Immigrants to Vote in Federal Elections?
And try to avoid the zero college foul mouth.
I realise it may be difficult
Ps, read fact check once in a while

SNOPES

I'll take the actual law, rather than lies from shit head leftists.

 

[candycorn]

You ever notice how any sourcing is automatically rejected by Trumpians unless the source is Trump itself? And even then, if it is pointed out that he has changed his story 90 times, the Trumpians still support the latest version of events.

 

[Slyhunter]

You ever notice how any sourcing is automatically rejected by Trumpians unless the source is Trump itself? And even then, if it is pointed out that he has changed his story 90 times, the Trumpians still support the latest version of events.

you should quote who you are replying to.
The left uses biased nutbags for sources don't be surprised we laugh at your sources.

 

[beautress]

You ever notice how any sourcing is automatically rejected by Trumpians unless the source is Trump itself? And even then, if it is pointed out that he has changed his story 90 times, the Trumpians still support the latest version of events.

you should quote who you are replying to.
The left uses biased nutbags for sources don't be surprised we laugh at your sources.

They quote people who make them feel good. It's all too human, Sly.

 

[Uncensored2008]

You ever notice how any sourcing is automatically rejected by Trumpians unless the source is Trump itself? And even then, if it is pointed out that he has changed his story 90 times, the Trumpians still support the latest version of events.

You ever notice how leftists created this fake "fact checking," where the radical left is supposedly imbued with mystical powers to claim what is true and false, even after notorious hacks like Snopes are busted dozens of times flat out lying to promote their radical left agenda?

{
Recently, however, the site has tried to pose as a political fact-checker. But Snopes’ “fact-checking” looks more like playing defense for prominent Democrats like Hillary Clinton and it’s political “fact-checker” describes herself as a liberal and has called Republicans “regressive” and afraid of “female agency.”

Snopes’ main political fact-checker is a writer named Kim Lacapria. Before writing for Snopes, Lacapria wrote for Inquisitr, a blog that — oddly enough — is known for publishing fake quotes and even downright hoaxes as much as anything else.

While at Inquisitr, the future “fact-checker” consistently displayed clear partisanship (RELATED: Snopes Caught Lying About Lack Of American Flags At Democratic Convention)

She described herself as “openly left-leaning” and a liberal. She trashed the Tea Party as “teahadists.” She called Bill Clinton “one of our greatest” presidents. She claimed that conservatives only criticized Lena Dunham’s comparison of voting to sex because they “fear female agency.”

She once wrote: “Like many GOP ideas about the poor, the panic about using food stamps for alcohol, pornography or guns seems to have been cut from whole cloth–or more likely, the ideas many have about the fantasy of poverty.” (A simple fact-check would show that food stamp fraud does occur and costs taxpayers tens of millions.)

Lacapria even accused the Bush administration of being “at least guilty of criminal negligience” in the September 11 attacks. (The future “fact-checker” offered no evidence to support her accusation.)}
Fact-Checking Snopes: Website’s Political ‘Fact-Checker’ Is Just A Failed Liberal Blogger

 

[beautress]

You ever notice how any sourcing is automatically rejected by Trumpians unless the source is Trump itself? And even then, if it is pointed out that he has changed his story 90 times, the Trumpians still support the latest version of events.

You ever notice how leftists created this fake "fact checking," where the radical left is supposedly imbued with mystical powers to claim what is true and false, even after notorious hacks like Snopes are busted dozens of times flat out lying to promote their radical left agenda?

{
Recently, however, the site has tried to pose as a political fact-checker. But Snopes’ “fact-checking” looks more like playing defense for prominent Democrats like Hillary Clinton and it’s political “fact-checker” describes herself as a liberal and has called Republicans “regressive” and afraid of “female agency.”

Snopes’ main political fact-checker is a writer named Kim Lacapria. Before writing for Snopes, Lacapria wrote for Inquisitr, a blog that — oddly enough — is known for publishing fake quotes and even downright hoaxes as much as anything else.

While at Inquisitr, the future “fact-checker” consistently displayed clear partisanship (RELATED: Snopes Caught Lying About Lack Of American Flags At Democratic Convention)

She described herself as “openly left-leaning” and a liberal. She trashed the Tea Party as “teahadists.” She called Bill Clinton “one of our greatest” presidents. She claimed that conservatives only criticized Lena Dunham’s comparison of voting to sex because they “fear female agency.”

She once wrote: “Like many GOP ideas about the poor, the panic about using food stamps for alcohol, pornography or guns seems to have been cut from whole cloth–or more likely, the ideas many have about the fantasy of poverty.” (A simple fact-check would show that food stamp fraud does occur and costs taxpayers tens of millions.)

Lacapria even accused the Bush administration of being “at least guilty of criminal negligience” in the September 11 attacks. (The future “fact-checker” offered no evidence to support her accusation.)}
Fact-Checking Snopes: Website’s Political ‘Fact-Checker’ Is Just A Failed Liberal Blogger

Quote: You ever notice how leftists created this fake "fact checking," where the radical left is supposedly imbued with mystical powers to claim what is true and false, even after notorious hacks like Snopes are busted dozens of times flat out lying to promote their radical left agenda?
​

I noticed that when that happens, they follow up with the "you're a liar" bit.

 

[Faun]

You ever notice how any sourcing is automatically rejected by Trumpians unless the source is Trump itself? And even then, if it is pointed out that he has changed his story 90 times, the Trumpians still support the latest version of events.

You ever notice how leftists created this fake "fact checking," where the radical left is supposedly imbued with mystical powers to claim what is true and false, even after notorious hacks like Snopes are busted dozens of times flat out lying to promote their radical left agenda?

{
Recently, however, the site has tried to pose as a political fact-checker. But Snopes’ “fact-checking” looks more like playing defense for prominent Democrats like Hillary Clinton and it’s political “fact-checker” describes herself as a liberal and has called Republicans “regressive” and afraid of “female agency.”

Snopes’ main political fact-checker is a writer named Kim Lacapria. Before writing for Snopes, Lacapria wrote for Inquisitr, a blog that — oddly enough — is known for publishing fake quotes and even downright hoaxes as much as anything else.

While at Inquisitr, the future “fact-checker” consistently displayed clear partisanship (RELATED: Snopes Caught Lying About Lack Of American Flags At Democratic Convention)

She described herself as “openly left-leaning” and a liberal. She trashed the Tea Party as “teahadists.” She called Bill Clinton “one of our greatest” presidents. She claimed that conservatives only criticized Lena Dunham’s comparison of voting to sex because they “fear female agency.”

She once wrote: “Like many GOP ideas about the poor, the panic about using food stamps for alcohol, pornography or guns seems to have been cut from whole cloth–or more likely, the ideas many have about the fantasy of poverty.” (A simple fact-check would show that food stamp fraud does occur and costs taxpayers tens of millions.)

Lacapria even accused the Bush administration of being “at least guilty of criminal negligience” in the September 11 attacks. (The future “fact-checker” offered no evidence to support her accusation.)}
Fact-Checking Snopes: Website’s Political ‘Fact-Checker’ Is Just A Failed Liberal Blogger

What I notice is we’re on a thread where almost 2 years later and thousands of posts and a multitude of rightards, some claiming tens of millions of votes were cast by illegal aliens......

.... and not one of you has been able to find even one single illegal alien who voted in the 2016 election.

 

[22lcidw]

You ever notice how any sourcing is automatically rejected by Trumpians unless the source is Trump itself? And even then, if it is pointed out that he has changed his story 90 times, the Trumpians still support the latest version of events.

You ever notice how leftists created this fake "fact checking," where the radical left is supposedly imbued with mystical powers to claim what is true and false, even after notorious hacks like Snopes are busted dozens of times flat out lying to promote their radical left agenda?

{
Recently, however, the site has tried to pose as a political fact-checker. But Snopes’ “fact-checking” looks more like playing defense for prominent Democrats like Hillary Clinton and it’s political “fact-checker” describes herself as a liberal and has called Republicans “regressive” and afraid of “female agency.”

Snopes’ main political fact-checker is a writer named Kim Lacapria. Before writing for Snopes, Lacapria wrote for Inquisitr, a blog that — oddly enough — is known for publishing fake quotes and even downright hoaxes as much as anything else.

While at Inquisitr, the future “fact-checker” consistently displayed clear partisanship (RELATED: Snopes Caught Lying About Lack Of American Flags At Democratic Convention)

She described herself as “openly left-leaning” and a liberal. She trashed the Tea Party as “teahadists.” She called Bill Clinton “one of our greatest” presidents. She claimed that conservatives only criticized Lena Dunham’s comparison of voting to sex because they “fear female agency.”

She once wrote: “Like many GOP ideas about the poor, the panic about using food stamps for alcohol, pornography or guns seems to have been cut from whole cloth–or more likely, the ideas many have about the fantasy of poverty.” (A simple fact-check would show that food stamp fraud does occur and costs taxpayers tens of millions.)

Lacapria even accused the Bush administration of being “at least guilty of criminal negligience” in the September 11 attacks. (The future “fact-checker” offered no evidence to support her accusation.)}
Fact-Checking Snopes: Website’s Political ‘Fact-Checker’ Is Just A Failed Liberal Blogger

What I notice is we’re on a thread where almost 2 years later and thousands of posts and a multitude of rightards, some claiming tens of millions of votes were cast by illegal aliens......

.... and not one of you has been able to find even one single illegal alien who voted in the 2016 election.

When white baby boomers were denied good jobs in the 1970's and at least half of the 1980's I started to read literature on our system. Progresive socialists were in power back then also. Anyway in the city I lived in the economy was terrible and a Republican running actually had a chance to win about 25 years or so ago or more. The candidate was winning by a margin of at least several thousand vote and more but at the last minute form the worst neighborhoods in the city a massive wave of votes showed up to beat him. That is when I started to believe in voter fraud. For every accusation is hate.

 

[Faun]

You ever notice how any sourcing is automatically rejected by Trumpians unless the source is Trump itself? And even then, if it is pointed out that he has changed his story 90 times, the Trumpians still support the latest version of events.

You ever notice how leftists created this fake "fact checking," where the radical left is supposedly imbued with mystical powers to claim what is true and false, even after notorious hacks like Snopes are busted dozens of times flat out lying to promote their radical left agenda?

{
Recently, however, the site has tried to pose as a political fact-checker. But Snopes’ “fact-checking” looks more like playing defense for prominent Democrats like Hillary Clinton and it’s political “fact-checker” describes herself as a liberal and has called Republicans “regressive” and afraid of “female agency.”

Snopes’ main political fact-checker is a writer named Kim Lacapria. Before writing for Snopes, Lacapria wrote for Inquisitr, a blog that — oddly enough — is known for publishing fake quotes and even downright hoaxes as much as anything else.

While at Inquisitr, the future “fact-checker” consistently displayed clear partisanship (RELATED: Snopes Caught Lying About Lack Of American Flags At Democratic Convention)

She described herself as “openly left-leaning” and a liberal. She trashed the Tea Party as “teahadists.” She called Bill Clinton “one of our greatest” presidents. She claimed that conservatives only criticized Lena Dunham’s comparison of voting to sex because they “fear female agency.”

She once wrote: “Like many GOP ideas about the poor, the panic about using food stamps for alcohol, pornography or guns seems to have been cut from whole cloth–or more likely, the ideas many have about the fantasy of poverty.” (A simple fact-check would show that food stamp fraud does occur and costs taxpayers tens of millions.)

Lacapria even accused the Bush administration of being “at least guilty of criminal negligience” in the September 11 attacks. (The future “fact-checker” offered no evidence to support her accusation.)}
Fact-Checking Snopes: Website’s Political ‘Fact-Checker’ Is Just A Failed Liberal Blogger

What I notice is we’re on a thread where almost 2 years later and thousands of posts and a multitude of rightards, some claiming tens of millions of votes were cast by illegal aliens......

.... and not one of you has been able to find even one single illegal alien who voted in the 2016 election.

When white baby boomers were denied good jobs in the 1970's and at least half of the 1980's I started to read literature on our system. Progresive socialists were in power back then also. Anyway in the city I lived in the economy was terrible and a Republican running actually had a chance to win about 25 years or so ago or more. The candidate was winning by a margin of at least several thousand vote and more but at the last minute form the worst neighborhoods in the city a massive wave of votes showed up to beat him. That is when I started to believe in voter fraud. For every accusation is hate.

Thanks for your input but it has absolutely nothing to do with my post you responded to.

 

[Uncensored2008]

You ever notice how any sourcing is automatically rejected by Trumpians unless the source is Trump itself? And even then, if it is pointed out that he has changed his story 90 times, the Trumpians still support the latest version of events.

You ever notice how leftists created this fake "fact checking," where the radical left is supposedly imbued with mystical powers to claim what is true and false, even after notorious hacks like Snopes are busted dozens of times flat out lying to promote their radical left agenda?

{
Recently, however, the site has tried to pose as a political fact-checker. But Snopes’ “fact-checking” looks more like playing defense for prominent Democrats like Hillary Clinton and it’s political “fact-checker” describes herself as a liberal and has called Republicans “regressive” and afraid of “female agency.”

Snopes’ main political fact-checker is a writer named Kim Lacapria. Before writing for Snopes, Lacapria wrote for Inquisitr, a blog that — oddly enough — is known for publishing fake quotes and even downright hoaxes as much as anything else.

While at Inquisitr, the future “fact-checker” consistently displayed clear partisanship (RELATED: Snopes Caught Lying About Lack Of American Flags At Democratic Convention)

She described herself as “openly left-leaning” and a liberal. She trashed the Tea Party as “teahadists.” She called Bill Clinton “one of our greatest” presidents. She claimed that conservatives only criticized Lena Dunham’s comparison of voting to sex because they “fear female agency.”

She once wrote: “Like many GOP ideas about the poor, the panic about using food stamps for alcohol, pornography or guns seems to have been cut from whole cloth–or more likely, the ideas many have about the fantasy of poverty.” (A simple fact-check would show that food stamp fraud does occur and costs taxpayers tens of millions.)

Lacapria even accused the Bush administration of being “at least guilty of criminal negligience” in the September 11 attacks. (The future “fact-checker” offered no evidence to support her accusation.)}
Fact-Checking Snopes: Website’s Political ‘Fact-Checker’ Is Just A Failed Liberal Blogger

What I notice is we’re on a thread where almost 2 years later and thousands of posts and a multitude of rightards, some claiming tens of millions of votes were cast by illegal aliens......

.... and not one of you has been able to find even one single illegal alien who voted in the 2016 election.

When white baby boomers were denied good jobs in the 1970's and at least half of the 1980's I started to read literature on our system. Progresive socialists were in power back then also. Anyway in the city I lived in the economy was terrible and a Republican running actually had a chance to win about 25 years or so ago or more. The candidate was winning by a margin of at least several thousand vote and more but at the last minute form the worst neighborhoods in the city a massive wave of votes showed up to beat him. That is when I started to believe in voter fraud. For every accusation is hate.

Fawn believes in voter fraud as well, he and his evil party DEPEND on voter fraud.

 

[Faun]

You ever notice how any sourcing is automatically rejected by Trumpians unless the source is Trump itself? And even then, if it is pointed out that he has changed his story 90 times, the Trumpians still support the latest version of events.

You ever notice how leftists created this fake "fact checking," where the radical left is supposedly imbued with mystical powers to claim what is true and false, even after notorious hacks like Snopes are busted dozens of times flat out lying to promote their radical left agenda?

{
Recently, however, the site has tried to pose as a political fact-checker. But Snopes’ “fact-checking” looks more like playing defense for prominent Democrats like Hillary Clinton and it’s political “fact-checker” describes herself as a liberal and has called Republicans “regressive” and afraid of “female agency.”

Snopes’ main political fact-checker is a writer named Kim Lacapria. Before writing for Snopes, Lacapria wrote for Inquisitr, a blog that — oddly enough — is known for publishing fake quotes and even downright hoaxes as much as anything else.

While at Inquisitr, the future “fact-checker” consistently displayed clear partisanship (RELATED: Snopes Caught Lying About Lack Of American Flags At Democratic Convention)

She described herself as “openly left-leaning” and a liberal. She trashed the Tea Party as “teahadists.” She called Bill Clinton “one of our greatest” presidents. She claimed that conservatives only criticized Lena Dunham’s comparison of voting to sex because they “fear female agency.”

She once wrote: “Like many GOP ideas about the poor, the panic about using food stamps for alcohol, pornography or guns seems to have been cut from whole cloth–or more likely, the ideas many have about the fantasy of poverty.” (A simple fact-check would show that food stamp fraud does occur and costs taxpayers tens of millions.)

Lacapria even accused the Bush administration of being “at least guilty of criminal negligience” in the September 11 attacks. (The future “fact-checker” offered no evidence to support her accusation.)}
Fact-Checking Snopes: Website’s Political ‘Fact-Checker’ Is Just A Failed Liberal Blogger

What I notice is we’re on a thread where almost 2 years later and thousands of posts and a multitude of rightards, some claiming tens of millions of votes were cast by illegal aliens......

.... and not one of you has been able to find even one single illegal alien who voted in the 2016 election.

When white baby boomers were denied good jobs in the 1970's and at least half of the 1980's I started to read literature on our system. Progresive socialists were in power back then also. Anyway in the city I lived in the economy was terrible and a Republican running actually had a chance to win about 25 years or so ago or more. The candidate was winning by a margin of at least several thousand vote and more but at the last minute form the worst neighborhoods in the city a massive wave of votes showed up to beat him. That is when I started to believe in voter fraud. For every accusation is hate.

Fawn believes in voter fraud as well, he and his evil party DEPEND on voter fraud.