Yep....but what they do do is make it easier for anti-gunners to persecute normal gun owners, and it also allows them to demand gun registration...which is the real goal behind the demand for Universal Background checks....
If you really want to stop criminals with guns.....get the democrats to stop releasing violent, repeat gun offenders into our inner city neighborhoods........
The state of California has had a comprehensive background check law on the books for 10 years. Researchers at UC Davis School of Medicine have studied gun violence in CA during that period and found there was no change in the number of gun homicides or gun suicides. The researchers use the term “comprehensive background check” instead of universal background check. And another study by the same authors found that the repeal of comprehensive background check laws in Tennessee and Indiana had no effect on gun homicides or suicide rates in either state.
Johns Hopkins School of Public Health looked at comprehensive background check laws in large, urban counties in the U.S. and found they were actually associated with an increase in firearm homicides in those counties. That study found “no benefit” of a CBC law without an accompanying permit-to-purchase law.
Are they even effective?
wamu.org
Pretty good at weeding out some of the lesser dumbasses, criminals, wife beaters, and people of less than normal self control that do not need to get their weapons through normal supply chains. I am a gun owner, carry permit holder and have had access to legal firearms all my life. I support universal background checks and think everyone should. Even the NRA supported background checks at one time, back when they were about training, safety and sportsmanship, before they found out there is better money in being an advocacy group.
No, it doesn't. My brother got a gun at the side of the highway at a rest stop, on his way home from work.
No background check.
The idea that a law requiring background checks is going to stop someone who doesn't follow the law to begin with is stupid.
All this does is hinder law abiding people, not criminals.
And also the worst thing this entire discussion does, is it takes the focus off the problem, and puts it on something irrelevant.
The problem is crime. The problem is criminals. Only an idiot things that if have you have homicidal nut job, that if you only take away his toys, he'll magically turn into a productive law abiding contributing citizen of society.
When the bully on the play ground hits someone with a stick, the solution isn't to take Billy's stick away. The solution is to punish Billy so that he knows hitting people with sticks is bad.
Just taking the stick, will only cause Billy to pick up another stick, or rocks, and if you somehow manage to rid the entire playground of things to hit people with, Billy will hit people with his hands.
The problem is Billy wanting to do evil, not the random tool Billy used to do evil.
And when you ban every single thing people can use to do wrong... they'll make the tools themselves.
Gun control working so well, they are making guns in the forest.
Automatic guns in Gun-Controlled Australia.
Homemade guns in California.
How are you going to stop that? Ban buying metal? Have a background check on metal purchase?
The solution is deal with the criminals. Gun control does absolutely NOTHING. Nothing.