Missourian
Diamond Member
My guess is that you want to "beat" the other side
Correct.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My guess is that you want to "beat" the other side
Anti Unity:There's another current thread that uses the term "unity" but under a different context. So rather than derail that one, let's try one that is specific to the term itself.
In that thread and pretty much all threads here, the term "unity" is scoffed at and mocked. No surprise. Personally, given this country's present condition, I thought it was dumb when Biden tried to use it when he was first elected. We're just not close enough to it to even discuss it right now.
Anyway, here's what I'm wondering: Since so many here are pretty much on the other side of the fence from unity, what would "disunity" look like to you? My guess is that you want to "beat" the other side and impose your will on them (with specific laws and legislation, I guess) going forward. Is that correct?
So can anyone here go into detail on what "anti-unity" would look like, in practice, on a day-to-day basis? Think out of the box and lay it out. What is the goal here?
![]()
Americans Agree Nation Is Divided on Key Values
Eight in 10 Americans, a new high, perceive the U.S. as being greatly divided on the most important values.news.gallup.com
Poland! We will conquer Poland!
You are a Democrat, at least try to be honest in your discussions, you have said so in the past.Nope, just independent. I don't claim to belong to a tribe that has all the answers.
Care to take a stab at an articulate response?
Still playing vicitimDisunity looks like all 248 years of U.S. history. There are issues that must be faced and reconciled, until that happens, there will be no unity.
IM2 already did. It looks like American history but its really the history of man kind. All your threads come down to crying that people have desires that are occasionally if not often at odds with one another. No one here is particularly shy on saying how they would like to impose their will on others they're just over you crying about it.I wonder why no one wants to just answer the question.
Well, I can guess why not, but I'd rather wait.
Where do you see the word victim in there, illiterate moron?Still playing vicitim
There’s always LiberiaDisunity looks like all 248 years of U.S. history. There are issues that must be faced and reconciled, until that happens, there will be no unity.
The question this thread poses requires independent, original thought and the ability to organize thoughts in a coherent manner.The question this thread poses requires independent, original thought and the ability to organize thoughts in a coherent manner. MAGA media doesn't cover this, so there's nothing to reference for help. That was done on purpose. But so far, we've just seen mostly the standard deflection, off-topic talking points and personal insults.
This is the concerning part of this whole ugly period. While I agree, to at least some degree, on many issues, this "movement" is based on emotion, not logic & reason. If that's the way it's implemented going forward, it will be unstable and temporary -- unless we devolve into a pure authoritarian autocracy in the next four years. Many seem to want that.
trump 1.0 and trump 2.0.So can anyone here go into detail on what "anti-unity" would look like, in practice
Here. Ill say it in crayon for you.The question this thread poses requires independent, original thought and the ability to organize thoughts in a coherent manner. MAGA media doesn't cover this, so there's nothing to reference for help. That was done on purpose. But so far, we've just seen mostly the standard deflection, off-topic talking points and personal insults.
This is the concerning part of this whole ugly period. While I agree, to at least some degree, on many issues, this "movement" is based on emotion, not logic & reason. If that's the way it's implemented going forward, it will be unstable and temporary -- unless we devolve into a pure authoritarian autocracy in the next four years. Many seem to want that.
Trump caled people vermin. STFU.Their entire platform is BASED on victimhood and division.
Trump has already expressed more interest in unity than Biden did his whole four years.
We are the Garbage.
And do not forget when an audience fan said Jesus Was King, Kamala told him he was at THE WRONG RALLY and go down the street.
Apparently a whole LOT of people heeded her advice.
Id be saying worse than that after 8 years of your sides BSTrump caled people vermin. STFU.
Trump is scum and if you support him, so are you.Id be saying worse than that after 8 years of your sides BS
There there.The question this thread poses requires independent, original thought and the ability to organize thoughts in a coherent manner. MAGA media doesn't cover this, so there's nothing to reference for help. That was done on purpose. But so far, we've just seen mostly the standard deflection, off-topic talking points and personal insults.
This is the concerning part of this whole ugly period. While I agree, to at least some degree, on many issues, this "movement" is based on emotion, not logic & reason. If that's the way it's implemented going forward, it will be unstable and temporary -- unless we devolve into a pure authoritarian autocracy in the next four years. Many seem to want that.
There's another current thread that uses the term "unity" but under a different context. So rather than derail that one, let's try one that is specific to the term itself.
In that thread and pretty much all threads here, the term "unity" is scoffed at and mocked. No surprise. Personally, given this country's present condition, I thought it was dumb when Biden tried to use it when he was first elected. We're just not close enough to it to even discuss it right now.
Anyway, here's what I'm wondering: Since so many here are pretty much on the other side of the fence from unity, what would "disunity" look like to you? My guess is that you want to "beat" the other side and impose your will on them (with specific laws and legislation, I guess) going forward. Is that correct?
So can anyone here go into detail on what "anti-unity" would look like, in practice, on a day-to-day basis? Think out of the box and lay it out. What is the goal here?
![]()
Americans Agree Nation Is Divided on Key Values
Eight in 10 Americans, a new high, perceive the U.S. as being greatly divided on the most important values.news.gallup.com
Mac asked what disunity looks like. I don't know what hes looking for but like I said, the 248 years of American history is that example.There there.![]()