Unfortunately, Liberal Keep Being Liberals

A liberal said:

A man who has nothing which he is willing to fight for, nothing which he cares more about than he does about his personal safety, is a miserable creature who has no chance of being free, unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself.
Thats why Repubs created the ginormous, Orwellian big brother bureaucracy known as :up: DHS
 
comparison-chart-147282236105.png


PC, you really goofed on this one.

You once again are marooned on a desert island, desperately trying to convince civilization that we are ALL wrong.
 
You should just tell people straight out that you are part of one political team and you're just going to attack the other. You don't need to write loads of stuff, anyone who is going to try and prove you wrong doesn't need a long winded statement on such nonsense.

Save your long writing for when you actually have something that is worth saying.



Comments about everything except the point: Liberals are out to prevent any discussion or debate about their dictums.
Afraid to draw the obvious conclusion that Liberals like nothing better than censoring opposing views.....and no where is this less appropriate than in universities???

Oh give it a break. You've written something that is complete nonsense and not worth the paper it's written on, and it's not even written on paper, which says a lot.

It's just more partisan bullshit which only serves to ignore the actual politics that should be going on but isn't. So don't go playing the victim and claiming I'm destroying your thread, you destroyed your own thread by writing the same old rubbish that always gets written.



"... claiming I'm destroying your thread,..."
I said no such thing...you don't have any such ability.

What I posted is factual, and none of you have been able to deny the totalitarian nature of Liberalism.

Your post....simply more proof of same.

  1. Totalitarianism or totalitarian state is a concept used by some political scientists in which the state holds total authority over the society and seeks to control all aspects of public and private life wherever possible.
PoliticalSpace.jpg


Please note that Totalitarianism is nether left nor right, but actually the polar opposite of anarchy which runs at right angles to the Left/Right dichotomy.

You will NEVER find it as a wing of EITHER the left or right, as it contains tenets of both.
this has to be one of the worst made-up charts I've ever seen. Just look at the descriptions -- they themselves are so ideological partisan it is sick
 
You should just tell people straight out that you are part of one political team and you're just going to attack the other. You don't need to write loads of stuff, anyone who is going to try and prove you wrong doesn't need a long winded statement on such nonsense.

Save your long writing for when you actually have something that is worth saying.



Comments about everything except the point: Liberals are out to prevent any discussion or debate about their dictums.
Afraid to draw the obvious conclusion that Liberals like nothing better than censoring opposing views.....and no where is this less appropriate than in universities???

Oh give it a break. You've written something that is complete nonsense and not worth the paper it's written on, and it's not even written on paper, which says a lot.

It's just more partisan bullshit which only serves to ignore the actual politics that should be going on but isn't. So don't go playing the victim and claiming I'm destroying your thread, you destroyed your own thread by writing the same old rubbish that always gets written.



"... claiming I'm destroying your thread,..."
I said no such thing...you don't have any such ability.

What I posted is factual, and none of you have been able to deny the totalitarian nature of Liberalism.

Your post....simply more proof of same.

  1. Totalitarianism or totalitarian state is a concept used by some political scientists in which the state holds total authority over the society and seeks to control all aspects of public and private life wherever possible.
PoliticalSpace.jpg


Please note that Totalitarianism is nether left nor right, but actually the polar opposite of anarchy which runs at right angles to the Left/Right dichotomy.

You will NEVER find it as a wing of EITHER the left or right, as it contains tenets of both.
this has to be one of the worst made-up charts I've ever seen. Just look at the descriptions -- they themselves are so ideological partisan it is sick

Not at all, Dante - they are about as accurate as I have seen. You disagree? Why?
 
You should just tell people straight out that you are part of one political team and you're just going to attack the other. You don't need to write loads of stuff, anyone who is going to try and prove you wrong doesn't need a long winded statement on such nonsense.

Save your long writing for when you actually have something that is worth saying.



Comments about everything except the point: Liberals are out to prevent any discussion or debate about their dictums.
Afraid to draw the obvious conclusion that Liberals like nothing better than censoring opposing views.....and no where is this less appropriate than in universities???

Oh give it a break. You've written something that is complete nonsense and not worth the paper it's written on, and it's not even written on paper, which says a lot.

It's just more partisan bullshit which only serves to ignore the actual politics that should be going on but isn't. So don't go playing the victim and claiming I'm destroying your thread, you destroyed your own thread by writing the same old rubbish that always gets written.



"... claiming I'm destroying your thread,..."
I said no such thing...you don't have any such ability.

What I posted is factual, and none of you have been able to deny the totalitarian nature of Liberalism.

Your post....simply more proof of same.

  1. Totalitarianism or totalitarian state is a concept used by some political scientists in which the state holds total authority over the society and seeks to control all aspects of public and private life wherever possible.
PoliticalSpace.jpg


Please note that Totalitarianism is nether left nor right, but actually the polar opposite of anarchy which runs at right angles to the Left/Right dichotomy.

You will NEVER find it as a wing of EITHER the left or right, as it contains tenets of both.

just as I thought: image from politisite.com

Albert Milliron is the founder of Politisite. Milliron has been credentialed by most major news networks for Presidential debates and major Political Parties for political event coverage. Albert maintains relationships with the White House and State Department to provide direct reporting from the Administration’s Press team. Albert is the former Public Relations Chairman of the Columbia County Republican Party in Georgia. He is a former Delegate. Milliron is a veteran of the US Army Medical Department and worked for Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Psychiatry.
 
Comments about everything except the point: Liberals are out to prevent any discussion or debate about their dictums.
Afraid to draw the obvious conclusion that Liberals like nothing better than censoring opposing views.....and no where is this less appropriate than in universities???

Oh give it a break. You've written something that is complete nonsense and not worth the paper it's written on, and it's not even written on paper, which says a lot.

It's just more partisan bullshit which only serves to ignore the actual politics that should be going on but isn't. So don't go playing the victim and claiming I'm destroying your thread, you destroyed your own thread by writing the same old rubbish that always gets written.



"... claiming I'm destroying your thread,..."
I said no such thing...you don't have any such ability.

What I posted is factual, and none of you have been able to deny the totalitarian nature of Liberalism.

Your post....simply more proof of same.

  1. Totalitarianism or totalitarian state is a concept used by some political scientists in which the state holds total authority over the society and seeks to control all aspects of public and private life wherever possible.
PoliticalSpace.jpg


Please note that Totalitarianism is nether left nor right, but actually the polar opposite of anarchy which runs at right angles to the Left/Right dichotomy.

You will NEVER find it as a wing of EITHER the left or right, as it contains tenets of both.
this has to be one of the worst made-up charts I've ever seen. Just look at the descriptions -- they themselves are so ideological partisan it is sick

Not at all, Dante - they are about as accurate as I have seen. You disagree? Why?

Freedom from coercion
... and safety from... are both relatively recent phrases used to describe sides. Mostly it is biased from a right wing or crazed libertarian view of how things are
 
The truly deluded author has tripped over reality

Our founding fathers felt the same way about ideology, which John Adams described as “the science of idiots.” This is why George Washington did not believe in political parties. If you define yourself as a liberal and are serious about always being liberal, then you are certain to be wrong whenever the truth is conservative, and vice-versa. If you are chiefly concerned about the difference between right and left, you are likely to miss the differences between right and wrong.

Let us embrace therefore the ideology of non-ideology which, if it needs a label, we might call centrism.


Read more: The intellectual dishonesty of liberalism conservatism and politics Washington Times Communities
Follow us: @wtcommunities on Twitter
While Washington supposedly didn't like parties, they formed under his watch and he took sides. John Adams used the term ideology a bit differently than the author is using it.

If you define yourself as a centrist and are serious about always being centrist, then you are certain to be wrong whenever there is truth to be found. For a centrist is somebody who straddles a divide. This is not to say Dante is against centrists as a principle, but a centrist is still an ideologue. When they ran for Oval Office, both Clinton and GW Bush were centrists

On the contrary, I believe what the author is trying to say is that truth doesn't depend on what side of the isle you are on. Being a centrist means having the courage to follow the truth wherever it may lead. And by the way, I find it very difficult to entertain the notion that Bush was a centrist.
I was thinking that he might have been one before he appointed the neocons & vulcans to his cabinet, not to mention his family's Saudi- connections
 
who were using phrases like Economic Liberty versus Personal Liberty to frame debates over ideology? when did this phraseology creep into the public square? with the internet chat rooms or the later world wide web?
 
Oh give it a break. You've written something that is complete nonsense and not worth the paper it's written on, and it's not even written on paper, which says a lot.

It's just more partisan bullshit which only serves to ignore the actual politics that should be going on but isn't. So don't go playing the victim and claiming I'm destroying your thread, you destroyed your own thread by writing the same old rubbish that always gets written.



"... claiming I'm destroying your thread,..."
I said no such thing...you don't have any such ability.

What I posted is factual, and none of you have been able to deny the totalitarian nature of Liberalism.

Your post....simply more proof of same.

  1. Totalitarianism or totalitarian state is a concept used by some political scientists in which the state holds total authority over the society and seeks to control all aspects of public and private life wherever possible.
PoliticalSpace.jpg


Please note that Totalitarianism is nether left nor right, but actually the polar opposite of anarchy which runs at right angles to the Left/Right dichotomy.

You will NEVER find it as a wing of EITHER the left or right, as it contains tenets of both.
this has to be one of the worst made-up charts I've ever seen. Just look at the descriptions -- they themselves are so ideological partisan it is sick

Not at all, Dante - they are about as accurate as I have seen. You disagree? Why?

Freedom from coercion
... and safety from... are both relatively recent phrases used to describe sides. Mostly it is biased from a right wing or crazed libertarian view of how things are

political-spectrum_25per.png


Here is a very similar map, but you can find many that are different; mostly partisan, tainted, polishing rags from the political freak-shows.
 
who were using phrases like Economic Liberty versus Personal Liberty to frame debates over ideology? when did this phraseology creep into the public square? with the internet chat rooms or the later world wide web?

I dunno, Dante - before the internet we couldn't write OR debate.

:eusa_doh:
 
You should just tell people straight out that you are part of one political team and you're just going to attack the other. You don't need to write loads of stuff, anyone who is going to try and prove you wrong doesn't need a long winded statement on such nonsense.

Save your long writing for when you actually have something that is worth saying.



Comments about everything except the point: Liberals are out to prevent any discussion or debate about their dictums.
Afraid to draw the obvious conclusion that Liberals like nothing better than censoring opposing views.....and no where is this less appropriate than in universities???

Oh give it a break. You've written something that is complete nonsense and not worth the paper it's written on, and it's not even written on paper, which says a lot.

It's just more partisan bullshit which only serves to ignore the actual politics that should be going on but isn't. So don't go playing the victim and claiming I'm destroying your thread, you destroyed your own thread by writing the same old rubbish that always gets written.



"... claiming I'm destroying your thread,..."
I said no such thing...you don't have any such ability.

What I posted is factual, and none of you have been able to deny the totalitarian nature of Liberalism.

Your post....simply more proof of same.

  1. Totalitarianism or totalitarian state is a concept used by some political scientists in which the state holds total authority over the society and seeks to control all aspects of public and private life wherever possible.
PoliticalSpace.jpg


Please note that Totalitarianism is nether left nor right, but actually the polar opposite of anarchy which runs at right angles to the Left/Right dichotomy.

You will NEVER find it as a wing of EITHER the left or right, as it contains tenets of both.

just as I thought: image from politisite.com

Albert Milliron is the founder of Politisite. Milliron has been credentialed by most major news networks for Presidential debates and major Political Parties for political event coverage. Albert maintains relationships with the White House and State Department to provide direct reporting from the Administration’s Press team. Albert is the former Public Relations Chairman of the Columbia County Republican Party in Georgia. He is a former Delegate. Milliron is a veteran of the US Army Medical Department and worked for Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Psychiatry.

Jesus, Dante - post your own, then.
 
Dante was a PIA on politics before the internet. It happened shortly after birth. Politics was the result of an infection -- called intelligence
 
Dante was a PIA on politics before the internet. It happened shortly after birth. Politics was the result of an infection -- called intelligence

Sorry, I'm a tad slow, today. Sick and very cold.
 
Last edited:
You should just tell people straight out that you are part of one political team and you're just going to attack the other. You don't need to write loads of stuff, anyone who is going to try and prove you wrong doesn't need a long winded statement on such nonsense.

Save your long writing for when you actually have something that is worth saying.



Comments about everything except the point: Liberals are out to prevent any discussion or debate about their dictums.
Afraid to draw the obvious conclusion that Liberals like nothing better than censoring opposing views.....and no where is this less appropriate than in universities???

Oh give it a break. You've written something that is complete nonsense and not worth the paper it's written on, and it's not even written on paper, which says a lot.

It's just more partisan bullshit which only serves to ignore the actual politics that should be going on but isn't. So don't go playing the victim and claiming I'm destroying your thread, you destroyed your own thread by writing the same old rubbish that always gets written.



"... claiming I'm destroying your thread,..."
I said no such thing...you don't have any such ability.

What I posted is factual, and none of you have been able to deny the totalitarian nature of Liberalism.

Your post....simply more proof of same.

Factual huh? Under what basis do you make out there are any "facts" there?

That people assume that "rights" mean they can do whatever the hell they like?
 
Your argument consists of what? One college professor who didn't want her students debating gay issues in her class. While that might be a fact, it is an irrelevant fact in relation to any broad generalization you might be arguing can be reasonably applied to Liberalism.

As a Korean-American woman, would you accept that all Korean-American women are prostitutes if I produced two or three examples of Korean-American women who were prostitutes? Would you even accept an argument that most Korean-American women are likely to be prostitutes based on those few examples?

Is the flaw in your argument that difficult to see?
 
15th post
So....some dolt accidentally admitted that the OP is, in fact, true...but his objection was that it is true only in the one or two cases mentioned.

Post #93, case in point.


So....here comes some more 'mentions' by the very leaders of the Liberal institution.




11. " The student first complained to the office of the Dean of Arts & Sciences, and talked to an Associate Dean, one Suzanne Foster. Foster sent the student to the Chair of the Philosophy Department, saying that department chairs usually handle such cases. The chair, Nancy Show, pretty much blew off the issue.

Interestingly, both Snow and Foster have been involved in cases of politically correct attacks on free expression at Marquette.

Snow, in a class on the “Philosophy of Crime and Punishment” tried to shut up a student who offered a response, from the perspective of police, to Snow’s comments about supposed “racial profiling.” The student said talk about racial profiling makes life hard for cops, since it may make minorities hostile and uncooperative.

Snow tried to silence him, claiming “this is a diverse class.” This was an apparent reference to two black students in the class, who were, Snow assumed, likely offended on hearing that.




The majority of the class, contacted by The Marquette Warrior, felt the comments were reasonable and relevant, but Snow insisted that the student write an apology to the black students.

So how is a student to get vindication from University officials who hold the same intolerant views as Abbate? "
Marquette Warrior Marquette Philosophy Instructor Gay Rights Can t Be Discussed in Class Since Any Disagreement Would Offend Gay Students



Disgusting Liberal intolerance for any opinions not in tune with Liberal doctrine, huh?
 
PC, you completely ignored the posts where I proved you wrong about "Liberal Totalitarianism."

Who's running, now?

:lmao:
 
PC, you completely ignored the posts where I proved you wrong about "Liberal Totalitarianism."

Who's running, now?

:lmao:




You proved no such thing.

The actions of the Liberals in the OP, and those in this thread are the real proof of the totalitarian nature of Liberals.
 
PC, you completely ignored the posts where I proved you wrong about "Liberal Totalitarianism."

Who's running, now?

:lmao:




You proved no such thing.

The actions of the Liberals in the OP, and those in this thread are the real proof of the totalitarian nature of Liberals.

Sorry, that's a school, not the government. It was not sanctioned by anyone involved with the government, nor was it a government function.

How did Liberals in this thread act as totalitarians?

They used free speach to expose you as a mere troll.
 

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom