Actually it would have meant more solid companies like ford would have seen a huge increase in business and employment.
The bullshit is thinking that by spending borrowed tax money, to prop up a company that could not survive on its own due to bloated compensation packages and poor sales, we did the right thing. I'm not a fan of giving out corporate welfare to big/rich companies like GM. I'm also not a fan of giving govt handouts to union workers that make over 50 bucks an hour in total compensation already (the handout comes in the forum of the bailout to GM to pay their WAY ABOVE THE AVERAGE salaries).
Not hardly. It would have meant less choices for the consumer, a greater dependence on foreign manufacture, and put a dent in national security interests. It would have also resulted in higher prices for the consumer, due to less competition.
GM/Chrysler were on the verge of bankruptcy because capitalism failed. The Bush near depression was a result of Wall Street greed, and a real ponzi scheme using mortgage derivitves, predatory lending, and credit default swaps in a way that was unsustainable. It wasn't a stupid mistake, it was a calculated strategy fo **** over the market. GM, and all automotive companies were on the shit end of the stick, when America lost close to 10% of its wealth, do to the Wall Street scheme.