EdwardBaiamonte
Platinum Member
- Nov 23, 2011
- 34,612
- 2,159
- 1,100
Before you go, you never explained how the Fed could easily double prices.
dear, they have doubled prices many times since 1913.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Before you go, you never explained how the Fed could easily double prices.
dear, that really is so special; how much has the price of gold changed in the last thirty years.Before you go, you never explained how the Fed could easily double prices.
dear, they have doubled prices many times since 1913.
dear, that really is so special; how much has the price of gold changed in the last thirty years.Before you go, you never explained how the Fed could easily double prices.
dear, they have doubled prices many times since 1913.
Boom and bust is normal under capitalism.
citation, please; capitalism IS boom and bust cycles which brings about structural forms of "dis-employment" and Capitalism's natural rate of inefficiency in full employment.dear, that really is so special; how much has the price of gold changed in the last thirty years.Before you go, you never explained how the Fed could easily double prices.
dear, they have doubled prices many times since 1913.
Boom and bust is normal under capitalism.
capitalism is self-correcting so boom and bust is impossible
Before you go, you never explained how the Fed could easily double prices.
dear, they have doubled prices many times since 1913.
Before you go, you never explained how the Fed could easily double prices.
dear, they have doubled prices many times since 1913.
Your claim was they could do it tomorrow, easily.
Were you wrong?
Before you go, you never explained how the Fed could easily double prices.
dear, they have doubled prices many times since 1913.
Your claim was they could do it tomorrow, easily.
Were you wrong?
ah so you admit they can double prices and have done it many times since 1913, but they don't control the money supply?? So who does control it?
Before you go, you never explained how the Fed could easily double prices.
dear, they have doubled prices many times since 1913.
Your claim was they could do it tomorrow, easily.
Were you wrong?
ah so you admit they can double prices and have done it many times since 1913, but they don't control the money supply?? So who does control it?
ah so you admit they can double prices
And you claim they can do it easily. Precisely.
So if they wanted to double prices by December, what could they do?
Before you go, you never explained how the Fed could easily double prices.
dear, they have doubled prices many times since 1913.
Your claim was they could do it tomorrow, easily.
Were you wrong?
ah so you admit they can double prices and have done it many times since 1913, but they don't control the money supply?? So who does control it?
ah so you admit they can double prices
And you claim they can do it easily. Precisely.
So if they wanted to double prices by December, what could they do?
ah so you admit they can double prices and have done it many times since 1913, but they don't control the money supply?? So who does control it?
Face reality, give Washington more money and they'll not only immediately spend it, they'll borrow more. Income is not the problem when we have record revenues to the Treasury and STILL face a 1/2 trillion dollar Obama deficit.The economy wouldn't need as much stimulating if we didn't take as much money out of it every year.Which again would not need as much stimulating had not the money been taken out of it.
The government collects taxes and puts the monies back to be spent which stimulates the economy.
Bills aren't the problem, income is the problem.
Which again would not need as much stimulating had not the money been taken out of it.
The government collects taxes and puts the monies back to be spent which stimulates the economy.
I believe Capitalists should lose their capital gains preference for any positions "rolled over" from quarter to quarter; there should be no unfilled positions under any form of Capitalism due to the laws of demand and supply.
that, any positions that are unfilled in any given quarter and continue to be unfilled at the beginning of a new quarter, should not be preferred for capital gains distinction purposes.
Here is a clue and a Cause, for your ease and convenience:
Here is a clue and a Cause, for your ease and convenience:
only a liberal could be dumb enough to speak gibberish so badly and think its English. Anybody know what the idiot is trying to say??how special of you dear; are the laws of demand and supply not up to a laissez-fair work ethic today?