Unemployed need not apply

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Socialism took us to the moon and back with rocket science.

too stupid!! Govt did not own the businesses that made all the equipment needed to go to the moon.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

How much has our Standard of living improved since then.

dear since 1969 the economy had tripled with 1000's of new inventions enjoyed by all!! How stupid and liberal are you??


You don't need to be an economist to see how rich the middle class got by looking at all the new inventions they could suddenly afford in the last 10 years: suddenly we had plasma TV's, LCD TV's, DLP-TV's, iPods, iphones, CD's and CD players, DVDs and DVD players, Blue Ray and Blue Ray players, PCs, desk top PCs, DVRs, color printers, satellite radio, Advantium ovens, HD-TV, Playstations, X-Boxes, X-box live, X-box Konnect, broadband, satellite TV, cell/camera/video phones, digital cameras, OnStar, palm corders, Blackberries, smart phones, home theaters, SUVs, big houses, more houses per capita, TiVo, 3D movies and TV's, built in wine coolers, granite counter tops, $200 sneakers, Go Pro Cameras, GPS navigation, consumer drones, color matched front loader washing machines, internet Facebook, Pandora, LTE-U, run flat tires, matching washer dryer combinations, McMansions, 4K TV, Iphone 6+, burner commercial ranges, Sub Zero refridgerators, Tesla cars, private space flight, more cars than drivers, a $1 billion ring tone industry, a pet industry that just doubled to $34 billion, 10's of millions lining up to buy Apple's I-tablet, Wii, Fit bits, Apple watches, Netflix boxes, jet skis, induction cooking, low profile tires, aluminum/titanium rims, Harley Davidson and Japanese motorcycles. $700 Billion spent Christmas 2010, $10.5 billion movies 2010, 10 million ocean crusies, 44 million taking plane flights over 2012 holiday, $500 billion spent on Christmas 2012.


The list goes on and on. I hope that helps you realize you can't just parrot the communist press and expect to make sense? They have other objectives and are merely using you to promote their point of view.

 

[danielpalos]

Socialism took us to the moon and back with rocket science.

too stupid!! Govt did not own the businesses that made all the equipment needed to go to the moon.

command economics took us there; disingenuous Person on the right.

 

[danielpalos]

Yes, all thanks to our Space Race via command economics for social purposes.

 

[OnePercenter]

Which again would not need as much stimulating had not the money been taken out of it.

The government collects taxes and puts the monies back to be spent which stimulates the economy.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It wouldn't have to be "pumped back into the economy" if it wasn't taken out of the economy in the first place.

Spent to stimulate the economy.

Which again would not need as much stimulating had not the money been taken out of it.

I agree to disagree; in this case, it is also correcting for capitalism's, natural rate of inefficiency and unemployment. socialism can merely bailout capitalism, like usual, by correcting a natural rate of employment inefficiency and solve simple poverty at the same time.

Government intervention CAN soften natural business cycle downturns. The flip side of the coin, of course, is that it also lowers potential upsides as well. Also, socialism does not solve simple poverty when it is applied by force. It can only do that if all participants do so voluntarily. Applied by force, it removes work incentive and the whole thing collapses.

1) there are no natural business cycles, but there are recessions caused by govt interference

2) you cant have socialism unless by force or govt violence.

1) there are no natural business cycles,

You are mistaken.

but there are recessions caused by govt interference

Obviously.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Which again would not need as much stimulating had not the money been taken out of it.

The government collects taxes and puts the monies back to be spent which stimulates the economy.

The government collects taxes and puts the monies back to be spent which stimulates the economy.

Yes, the government destimulates the economy and then stimulates the economy.
With the usual government losses due to overhead and inefficiency.

 

[danielpalos]

how much is that de-stimulus when averaged across the nation versus the stimulus in any given area "under construction".

was "electrifying the South" not worth it?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

was "electrifying the South" not worth it?

the question is was the Soviet, Red Chinese, and East Germany economy worth 120 million who slowly starved to death!!

Blind faith in soviet Solyndra Hoover/FDR/Obama central planning only serves to reaffirm your pure liberal ignorance.

 

[danielpalos]

was "electrifying the South" not worth it?

the question is was the Soviet, Red Chinese, and East Germany economy worth 120 million who slowly starved to death!!

Blind faith in soviet Solyndra Hoover/FDR/Obama central planning only serves to reaffirm your pure liberal ignorance.

How much was capitalism worth in 1929 when one person died of starvation every seven hours?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

How much was capitalism worth in 1929 when one person died of starvation every seven hours?

too stupid has learned 143 times that there was little capitalism in 1929 and massive liberal govt intervention to the point where the money supply was allowed to drop 34% and thus start the Great Depression.

The liberal was taught to parrot socialism saved capitalism and now is too embarrassed to admit he was stupid and brainwashed.

 

[Darkwind]

Republicans like to blame all the unemployed on Obama but they don't ask the corporations they serve to stop the practice of not hiring people who are out of work.

Corporations are being really picky. I think they like unemployment high. It keeps wages down. I remember an article years ago explaining that's what Greenspan said it was his responsibility to keep wages low they need unemployment to be high but not too high.

So, in your world....

Picky != un-Qualified?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Corporations are being really picky. I think they like unemployment high.

100% stupid!!! there are 100 million corporations so there is no "they" you idiot unless you think they meet somewhere to set the international employment.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Corporations are being really picky..

totally stupid!! of course they are being as picky as possible and hoping their competition is not so they can put their competition out of business!! THe company the gets the best employees gets to survive.

Do you understand???

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

How much was capitalism worth in 1929 when one person died of starvation every seven hours?

too stupid has learned 143 times that there was little capitalism in 1929 and massive liberal govt intervention to the point where the money supply was allowed to drop 34% and thus start the Great Depression.

The liberal was taught to parrot socialism saved capitalism and now is too embarrassed to admit he was stupid and brainwashed.

there was little capitalism in 1929 and massive liberal govt intervention to the point where the money supply was allowed to drop 34%

The money supply dropped due to massive numbers of bank failures, not because of government intervention.
We needed the Fed to expand the money supply, but they didn't.
Bernanke didn't make that same mistake during the crisis.

 

[sealybobo]

Corporations are being really picky. I think they like unemployment high.

100% stupid!!! there are 100 million corporations so there is no "they" you idiot unless you think they meet somewhere to set the international employment.

Switzerland, macanaw island, mi all over.

 

[danielpalos]

How much was capitalism worth in 1929 when one person died of starvation every seven hours?

too stupid has learned 143 times that there was little capitalism in 1929 and massive liberal govt intervention to the point where the money supply was allowed to drop 34% and thus start the Great Depression.

The liberal was taught to parrot socialism saved capitalism and now is too embarrassed to admit he was stupid and brainwashed.

dear, there was much more Capitalism then, than there is now.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

dear, there was much more Capitalism then,[1929] than there is now.

100% stupid as always of course since then they shrunk or deflated the money supply 34%, and thus bankrupted millions of capitalist businesses and caused the Great Depression.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

The money supply dropped due to massive numbers of bank failures, not because of government intervention.

once every 2 years or so you make a mistake it seems. A great record overall. Banks failed because there was no money created by Fed. Bank failures were not caused by bad loans or something but simply because banks did not have enough money to pay enough depositors. They really had no idea how money worked then. Only Friedman figured it out and now it seems common knowledge among conservatives and most libertarians. Liberals totally lack the IQ to grasp any of it.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

dear, there was much more Capitalism then,[1929] than there is now.

100% stupid as always of course since then they shrunk or deflated the money supply 34%, and thus bankrupted millions of capitalist businesses and caused the Great Depression.

they shrunk or deflated the money supply 34%

The government did not do that.
They did fail to counteract the collapse of the money supply.