UN watchdog group says US strike on Iran fell short of destroying core nuclear capabilities

JimH52

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2007
Messages
52,086
Reaction score
31,055
Points
2,645
Location
US

The head of the UN’s nuclear watchdog says US strikes on Iran fell short of causing total damage to its nuclear program and that Tehran could restart enriching uranium “in a matter of months,” contradicting President Donald Trump’s claims the US set Tehran’s ambitions back by decades.

Rafael Grossi’s comments appear to support an early assessment from the Pentagon’s Defense Intelligence Agency, first reported on by CNN, which suggests the United States’ strikes on key Iranian nuclear sites last week did not destroy the core components of its nuclear program, and likely only set it back by months.

This agrees with the preliminary report from US intel. So, we spent millions of tax payer's dollars on an attack that sets back Iran's nuclear program for months. But since trump will fix the data, the final report will say the program was "obliterated." Nothing out of this regime can be taken as true...
 

The head of the UN’s nuclear watchdog says US strikes on Iran fell short of causing total damage to its nuclear program and that Tehran could restart enriching uranium “in a matter of months,” contradicting President Donald Trump’s claims the US set Tehran’s ambitions back by decades.

Rafael Grossi’s comments appear to support an early assessment from the Pentagon’s Defense Intelligence Agency, first reported on by CNN, which suggests the United States’ strikes on key Iranian nuclear sites last week did not destroy the core components of its nuclear program, and likely only set it back by months.

This agrees with the preliminary report from US intel. So, we spent millions of tax payer's dollars on an attack that sets back Iran's nuclear program for months. But since trump will fix the data, the final report will say the program was "obliterated." Nothing out of this regime can be taken as true...
I think by now everyone knows the tRump *administration's claims of "total destruction" are bullshit.
 

The head of the UN’s nuclear watchdog says US strikes on Iran fell short of causing total damage to its nuclear program and that Tehran could restart enriching uranium “in a matter of months,” contradicting President Donald Trump’s claims the US set Tehran’s ambitions back by decades.

Rafael Grossi’s comments appear to support an early assessment from the Pentagon’s Defense Intelligence Agency, first reported on by CNN, which suggests the United States’ strikes on key Iranian nuclear sites last week did not destroy the core components of its nuclear program, and likely only set it back by months.

This agrees with the preliminary report from US intel. So, we spent millions of tax payer's dollars on an attack that sets back Iran's nuclear program for months. But since trump will fix the data, the final report will say the program was "obliterated." Nothing out of this regime can be taken as true...
remember when the UN told US they could trust them for Saddam’s “oil for food program?” And then there was the UN’s WHO organization’s guidelines for COVID.
 

The head of the UN’s nuclear watchdog says US strikes on Iran fell short of causing total damage to its nuclear program and that Tehran could restart enriching uranium “in a matter of months,” contradicting President Donald Trump’s claims the US set Tehran’s ambitions back by decades.

Rafael Grossi’s comments appear to support an early assessment from the Pentagon’s Defense Intelligence Agency, first reported on by CNN, which suggests the United States’ strikes on key Iranian nuclear sites last week did not destroy the core components of its nuclear program, and likely only set it back by months.

This agrees with the preliminary report from US intel. So, we spent millions of tax payer's dollars on an attack that sets back Iran's nuclear program for months. But since trump will fix the data, the final report will say the program was "obliterated." Nothing out of this regime can be taken as true...
Well no shit “they could start to rebuild” it someday.

We destroyed their current stockpile and facilities.
 
I think by now everyone knows the tRump *administration's claims of "total destruction" are bullshit.
What happened to “Iran isn’t making a nuclear weapon” the left parroted before the bombing?

Now suddenly the bombing wasn’t enough,

Do you want to drop more bombs? Or an invasion to get all the “WMD”?

Or do you just want to complain about anything President Trump does?
 
What happened to “Iran isn’t making a nuclear weapon” the left parroted before the bombing?

Now suddenly the bombing wasn’t enough,

Do you want to drop more bombs? Or an invasion to get all the “WMD”?

Or do you just want to complain about anything President Trump does?
A. I never said they weren't just that they were years away from being able to do it. That's also the assessment of the domestic security agencies here in the US as well, BTW.

B. I'm not hoping for more bombs, I laughing at tRump and his oompa-loompas. The incompetence is absolutely EPIC!
 
A. I never said they weren't just that they were years away from being able to do it. That's also the assessment of the domestic security agencies here in the US as well, BTW.

B. I'm not hoping for more bombs, I laughing at tRump and his oompa-loompas. The incompetence is absolutely EPIC

So you said it was years away, yet now after the massive bombings they are just months away? 😂

Of course you wouldn’t want more bombs if they restart their nuclear program, because you want them to have a nuke.
 
So you said it was years away, yet now after the massive bombings they are just months away? 😂

Of course you wouldn’t want more bombs if they restart their nuclear program, because you want them to have a nuke.
A. I never said anything about "months away.

B. If that's the case now I bet they have understandable accelerated their program.
 
1751249221171.webp
 
15th post

Read the entirety of the first tweet by clicking on Show more.

Here is some of it:


More: there is evidence of extreme fire and its aftermath in the commercial satellite after photos, shown as a grey blue ash all over the mountain coming from the GBU-57 aimpoints, and this matches numerous videos and pictures taken by locals. There is photographic and video evidence that an intense fire inside the facility burned for up to eight hours after the strike shooting fire hundreds of feet in to the air for hours.

So what was it in Al Fordow that burned so intensely? The answer is in the reports. Official word has been released here on X that the Administration and US Military is sure that the Iranian Regime had moved the HEU 60% to Al Fordow for safe keeping as they didnt believe the site could be penetrated. This is likely true, given the facility had been under Intelligence/Surveillance/Reconnaissance watchy by ISR drones 24 hours a day, 7 days a week for months.

So what was it that burned?? The Highly Enriched Uranium. I checked the Material Safety Data Sheet on Uranium 235 powder and here is what it says:
...

 
Back
Top Bottom