U.S.S.C. denies injunctive relief to N Y State health care workers, won't say why

[johnwk]

.
Today, 12/13/2021, our Supreme Court denied injunctive relief to stop New York's Vaccine Mandate for Health Care Workers which does not contain religious exemptions. The ruling gave no reason for not giving injunctive relief nor did it remark on the protection of "strict scrutiny" in cases where fundamental rights are infringed upon by government actions.

Here is a LINK to the ruling and dissenting opinions.

With regard to New York ignoring the protection of “strict scrutiny” and imposing an authoritarian approach in dealing with the COVID outbreak, I suggest those interested in preserving our fundamental rights study Justice GORSUCH's dissenting opinion in which he wrote:

"But even where such overt animus is lacking, laws that impose burdens on religious exercises must still be both neutral toward religion and generally applicable or survive strict scrutiny. Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. Hialeah, 508 U. S. 520, 546 (1993). To meet its burden under strict scrutiny, the government must demonstrate that its law is narrowly tailored to serve a compelling state interest. Id., at 531–532. Applying these principles to this case, New York’s mandate falters at each step."

JWK

"If the Constitution was ratified under the belief, sedulously propagated on all sides that such protection was afforded, would it not now be a fraud upon the whole people to give a different construction to its powers?"___ Justice Story

 

[BertramN]

.
Today, 12/13/2021, our Supreme Court denied injunctive relief to stop New York's Vaccine Mandate for Health Care Workers which does not contain religious exemptions. The ruling gave no reason for not giving injunctive relief nor did it remark on the protection of "strict scrutiny" in cases where fundamental rights are infringed upon by government actions.

Here is a LINK to the ruling and dissenting opinions.

With regard to New York ignoring the protection of “strict scrutiny” and imposing an authoritarian approach in dealing with the COVID outbreak, I suggest those interested in preserving our fundamental rights study Justice GORSUCH's dissenting opinion in which he wrote:

"But even where such overt animus is lacking, laws that impose burdens on religious exercises must still be both neutral toward religion and generally applicable or survive strict scrutiny. Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. Hialeah, 508 U. S. 520, 546 (1993). To meet its burden under strict scrutiny, the government must demonstrate that its law is narrowly tailored to serve a compelling state interest. Id., at 531–532. Applying these principles to this case, New York’s mandate falters at each step."

JWK

"If the Constitution was ratified under the belief, sedulously propagated on all sides that such protection was afforded, would it not now be a fraud upon the whole people to give a different construction to its powers?"___ Justice Story

After witnessing the many months of severe illness and deaths caused by COVID-19, all people in the medical field should have the right to die the horrible deaths they've fought to prevent.

However, their rights must end when they endanger the lives of others. At risk patients, hospitalized with conditions other than COVID-19 must be protected. So, those medical professionals unwilling to take all necessary precautions against COVID-19 must be willing to opt out of their positions with the employing hospitals, clinics, and individual practitioners.

Protecting the health of those immuno-compromised patients (innocent bystanders) takes priority, since the health of the employee is not impacted by leaving their employer to exercise their individual liberty to not vaccinate.

This is the only available option to serve the interests of both medical professionals and the immuno-compromised patients they could endanger. A win-win for both sides.



.

 

[Ivan88]

The mere fact that this Corona/Covid thing was created by the Drug companies and even have patents on it going back about 20 years; And that they have complete immunity from all liability while they loot America of billions of $'s shows that any court assisting this fraud are completely discredited.... and that's assuming they have not been a bogus system long before, which is very likely.

 

[johnwk]

NYS Justice, Frank Nervo, issues Temporary Restraining Order in NYC vaccine mandate case

.
see Judge Blocks NYC Vaccine Mandate for Detective Who Sued City

December 14th, 2021

"Bloomberg) – A state judge temporarily blocked New York City’s Covid vaccine requirement of municipal workers for a Police Department detective who sued the city.

In a hearing Tuesday, State Supreme Court Justice Frank Nervo granted a temporary restraining order requested by Detective Anthony Marciano, who sued Mayor Bill de Blasio on Dec. 1 on behalf of himself and others “similarly situated.”

JWK