.
In Biden v. Missouri, the Majority opinion never established the constitutionality of an agency, unelected by the people __ the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), acting through the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) ___ to adopt a rule demanding and enforcing medical...
.
Today, 12/13/2021, our Supreme Court denied injunctive relief to stop New York's Vaccine Mandate for Health Care Workers which does not contain religious exemptions. The ruling gave no reason for not giving injunctive relief nor did it remark on the protection of "strict scrutiny" in cases...
December 8, 2021
Judge to review New York City vaccine mandate for public sector
"NEW YORK (Reuters) - A New York judge has scheduled a hearing for next Tuesday to consider whether to block New York City from enforcing its COVID-19 vaccine mandate for public-sector workers."
So, I guess we...
SEE: Federal judge denies effort to block Oregon’s vaccine mandate by 7 workers who had COVID-19 (msn.com)
In the court’s Opinion and Order we find the following by Judge Ann Aiken:
"Plaintiffs contend that the vaccine mandates implicate a fundamental right to bodily integrity and privacy and...
Recently, NYC healthcare workers were granted an injunction protecting them from the NYC’s vaccine mandate.
The facts are:
The Plaintiffs’ asserted a constitutionally protected right was being infringed upon by the NYC vaccine mandate.
That such an infringement is subject to review by the...
.
The protection of strict scrutiny is required to be applied by the court whenever a fundamental right is infringed upon by a government action. And, we now have another case where the court provides the protection of strict scrutiny in a COVID vaccine mandate case!
See Federal judge rules in...
here is the latest.
Appeals Court sides with Christian athletes against Western Michigan University’s COVID shot mandate
October 9, 2021
“The Court of Appeals said because the Kalamazoo-based university offered to consider medical or religious exemptions on a case-by-case basis, the shot...
.
In their ARGUMENTS the lawyers representing the teachers have failed to reference the following critical line of thought and cases:
Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210, 229 (1990) we find “The forcible injection of medication into a nonconsenting person’s body represents a substantial...
.
I thought it would be interesting to discuss a government mandated vaccine and the rule of law.
The fact is, legally speaking, any government mandated vaccine, in order to not violate personal protected rights guaranteed under our system of law, must meet a “strict scrutiny” standard so as...