TX GOP Slashes Funding For Agency Battling Wildfires, While Also Blasting Obama

Modbert

Daydream Believer
Sep 2, 2008
33,178
3,055
48
ThinkProgress » TX GOP Slashes Funding For Agency Battling Wildfires, While Also Blasting Obama For Not Spending More

For months, Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R) has berated President Obama and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for not giving the state more federal money to combat historic wildfires that have so far burned 2.5 million acres. Despite the fact that the administration has offered 26 different kinds of federal assistance to combat the fires, Rep. Ted Poe (R-TX) claimed that Obama is waging “a war on Texas.” After months of blaming the President for not doing enough, Reuters reported yesterday that Perry is poised to sign a budget that slashes funding for the state agency that is battling the wildfires.

Republicans control all three branches of government in Texas and are close to an agreement on a budget that makes deep cuts to the Texas Forest Service during an unprecedented and destructive wildfire season:

The Texas Forest Service faces almost $34 million in budget cuts over the next two years, roughly a third of the agency’s total budget. The cuts are in both the House and Senate versions of the proposed state budget. [...]

Assistance grants [for volunteer fire departments] are likely to take the biggest hit. Volunteers — two of whom were killed in fighting this year’s fires — make up nearly 80 percent of the state’s fire-fighting force and are first responders to roughly 90 percent of wildfires in Texas.

Chris Barron, executive director of the State Firemen’s and Fire Marshals’ Association, says the funding on the chopping block is indispensable. Many volunteer fire departments already have worn-down equipment, and without funding for new equipment, “response times will almost certainly increase.”

Despite the fact that FEMA’s manpower and money have been stretched thin by a series of disasters, they’ve been deeply involved in the effort to fight the Texas fires and have given the state aid that “covers 75 percent of Texas’s costs for emergency response work, such as evacuations, equipment, field camps and meals for firefighters.”

Cognitive dissonance at it's finest in more ways than one.
 
Is it a real budget cut, or a less-than-requested raise?

TP doesn't give the numbers. Gasp.

Except TP is quoting Reuters. Would of just directly linked to the Reuters article except it's on the Huffington Post site. However, if you follow the link on the TP page you should find it quite easily. You're more than welcome to do your own research and prove me wrong though. I have no problem admitting so when I am.
 
ThinkProgress » TX GOP Slashes Funding For Agency Battling Wildfires, While Also Blasting Obama For Not Spending More

For months, Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R) has berated President Obama and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for not giving the state more federal money to combat historic wildfires that have so far burned 2.5 million acres. Despite the fact that the administration has offered 26 different kinds of federal assistance to combat the fires, Rep. Ted Poe (R-TX) claimed that Obama is waging “a war on Texas.” After months of blaming the President for not doing enough, Reuters reported yesterday that Perry is poised to sign a budget that slashes funding for the state agency that is battling the wildfires.

Republicans control all three branches of government in Texas and are close to an agreement on a budget that makes deep cuts to the Texas Forest Service during an unprecedented and destructive wildfire season:

The Texas Forest Service faces almost $34 million in budget cuts over the next two years, roughly a third of the agency’s total budget. The cuts are in both the House and Senate versions of the proposed state budget. [...]

Assistance grants [for volunteer fire departments] are likely to take the biggest hit. Volunteers — two of whom were killed in fighting this year’s fires — make up nearly 80 percent of the state’s fire-fighting force and are first responders to roughly 90 percent of wildfires in Texas.

Chris Barron, executive director of the State Firemen’s and Fire Marshals’ Association, says the funding on the chopping block is indispensable. Many volunteer fire departments already have worn-down equipment, and without funding for new equipment, “response times will almost certainly increase.”

Despite the fact that FEMA’s manpower and money have been stretched thin by a series of disasters, they’ve been deeply involved in the effort to fight the Texas fires and have given the state aid that “covers 75 percent of Texas’s costs for emergency response work, such as evacuations, equipment, field camps and meals for firefighters.”

Cognitive dissonance at it's finest in more ways than one.
Oh, that's just precious.
 
Is it a real budget cut, or a less-than-requested raise?

TP doesn't give the numbers. Gasp.

Except TP is quoting Reuters. Would of just directly linked to the Reuters article except it's on the Huffington Post site. However, if you follow the link on the TP page you should find it quite easily. You're more than welcome to do your own research and prove me wrong though. I have no problem admitting so when I am.

The Reuters article doesn't have numbers, either.
 
Is it a real budget cut, or a less-than-requested raise?

TP doesn't give the numbers. Gasp.

Except TP is quoting Reuters. Would of just directly linked to the Reuters article except it's on the Huffington Post site. However, if you follow the link on the TP page you should find it quite easily. You're more than welcome to do your own research and prove me wrong though. I have no problem admitting so when I am.

Do your own research?
A lazy OP with a half-assed link. :eusa_whistle:
 
Do your own research?
A lazy OP with a half-assed link. :eusa_whistle:

Nope. However, a claim has been made with evidence laid out. I'm not going to do Dave's work for him. :lol:

Though perhaps Dave and yourself feel like commenting on the story, unless you're just going to complain about the link itself.
 
Do your own research?
A lazy OP with a half-assed link. :eusa_whistle:

Nope. However, a claim has been made with evidence laid out. I'm not going to do Dave's work for him. :lol:

Though perhaps Dave and yourself feel like commenting on the story, unless you're just going to complain about the link itself.

Your thread. Not my responsibility that you posted a story with incomplete evidence.
 
The federal government has 26 different kinds of assistance to fight wildfires? No wonder things are so screwed up in Washington. The feds have to appoint 26 taxpayer funded committies to figure out how to get to work in the morning.
 
Do your own research?
A lazy OP with a half-assed link. :eusa_whistle:

Nope. However, a claim has been made with evidence laid out. I'm not going to do Dave's work for him. :lol:

Though perhaps Dave and yourself feel like commenting on the story, unless you're just going to complain about the link itself.
But we don't have the whole story, which is my point. All we have is "ZOMG teh stoopid Texans!!"
 
ThinkProgress » TX GOP Slashes Funding For Agency Battling Wildfires, While Also Blasting Obama For Not Spending More

For months, Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R) has berated President Obama and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for not giving the state more federal money to combat historic wildfires that have so far burned 2.5 million acres. Despite the fact that the administration has offered 26 different kinds of federal assistance to combat the fires, Rep. Ted Poe (R-TX) claimed that Obama is waging “a war on Texas.” After months of blaming the President for not doing enough, Reuters reported yesterday that Perry is poised to sign a budget that slashes funding for the state agency that is battling the wildfires.

Republicans control all three branches of government in Texas and are close to an agreement on a budget that makes deep cuts to the Texas Forest Service during an unprecedented and destructive wildfire season:

The Texas Forest Service faces almost $34 million in budget cuts over the next two years, roughly a third of the agency’s total budget. The cuts are in both the House and Senate versions of the proposed state budget. [...]
Assistance grants [for volunteer fire departments] are likely to take the biggest hit. Volunteers — two of whom were killed in fighting this year’s fires — make up nearly 80 percent of the state’s fire-fighting force and are first responders to roughly 90 percent of wildfires in Texas.

Chris Barron, executive director of the State Firemen’s and Fire Marshals’ Association, says the funding on the chopping block is indispensable. Many volunteer fire departments already have worn-down equipment, and without funding for new equipment, “response times will almost certainly increase.”
Despite the fact that FEMA’s manpower and money have been stretched thin by a series of disasters, they’ve been deeply involved in the effort to fight the Texas fires and have given the state aid that “covers 75 percent of Texas’s costs for emergency response work, such as evacuations, equipment, field camps and meals for firefighters.”
Cognitive dissonance at it's finest in more ways than one.

What are they supposed to do. Texas, like most states, cannot spend money it does not have. That means that they have to cut funds when the money does not exist. How does them following the law and the state constitution make for cognitive dissonance? Are they supposed ignore those things and run the state at a massive deficit just because the federal government and a few progressive states do?
 

Forum List

Back
Top