Twoofer Strategy
- Thread starter candycorn
- Start date
con·spir·a·cy (kn-spîr-s)
n. pl. con·spir·a·cies
1. An agreement to perform together an illegal, wrongful, or subversive act.
The gov has a conspiracy theory that is far more outlandish then the ones you ridicule. It amazes me how truly fucked in the head and gullible you ass kissing loyalists are.
BTW-The Most Shocking Conspiracy Theories That Turned Out to be True
Before It's News
Fuck it, what's the sense in posting anything for you anymore you don't read anything, and aren't smart enough to anyway.
What an imbecile... I'd put you on ignore but it's too funny reading your posts. You're just an anarchist troll, simple as that. You haven't proven what I've said to be false in one post this thread. Instead you've just called me a liar, loyalist, and gullible... I'll start listening when you can post ACTUAL EVIDENCE that I can find no counter to. Don't post some dumb-ass speculation from a fire-fighter, or a dumb-ass video of some guy stacking washers around a dowel rod.
This stupid fuck now is "supposing" this and that without having the slightest bit of of a clue as to what he speaks of, all while putting under his limited microscope shit like the black boxes, and totally bypassing the big and very real picture of the events of 9-11 and how many good credible people have spoke out and blown holes in the entire governments explanation, hell they can't even bring themselves to realize that even the 9-11 commission, the report they worshiped and constantly pointed to as 'proof" is openly and publicly rejected, by its own writers no less.
Foolish trolls.
you are in no position to talk shit about anything, since you readily admit to not reading or objectively look into what is presented to, and you have never once offered any credible counter evidence to anything I said and linked, how can you when you don't read any of it?
And as for the "dumbass" speculation of FDNY that has experience from which to speak, they have way more credibility then some stupid troll that can't read.
Try this one on for size then. According to the government that you are so convinced is telling you the truth, and that in your opinion would never ever harm its own people-they thought this would work-
Operation Northwoods: Justification for U.S. Military Intervention in Cuba, 3/13/62
with remote guidance..back in the '60s no less.
But they would never hurt their own peoples huh?
Wise up dude, you really should know better.
candycorn
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #152
You can fantasize all you want about sexual favors--it's the only sex you'll ever have and we all know that.
Did you know Bush won Ohio; twice? He he he.
Anyway, your movement sucks, you suck, and have you ever explained what took down the light poles if it wasn't AA77? No ? Oh well, I'm sure you'll come up with an answer some day you worthless bitch.
Start losing some weight; I hear they like them nimble in the hole. LOL
Operation Northwoods - US Government - Myths and Conspiracies, Debunked - Conspiracy Science - Conspiracies and Myths Refuted, Debunked, and Explained
Here you go sack-face. Of course you'll say that my site isn't credible...
And for the record, I didn't say the government wasn't willing to either do things, and or make it appear that things have been done to us to justify an attack. I said the government is not going to kill over 3,000 innocent Americans to do so... Notice how some of the lines in your declassified document say "unmanned" or "appear" or "real or not". Most, if not all, of these scenarios in this document involve NOT killing Americans but making it APPEAR as though the Cubans had done something. It even lined one of the plans out so that they would load people on a plane, then load them on a duplicate, then make the actual plane a drone and then shoot it down so it would give the appearance that the plane was shot down with people on it.... Damn your dense
Last edited:
eots
no fly list
Operation Northwoods - US Government - Myths and Conspiracies, Debunked - Conspiracy Science - Conspiracies and Myths Refuted, Debunked, and Explained
Here you go sack-face. Of course you'll say that my site isn't credible...
so it confirms northwoods and the gives an editorial opinion on how its not exactly like 9/11...lol
you didnt even read this did you
Last edited:
Operation Northwoods - US Government - Myths and Conspiracies, Debunked - Conspiracy Science - Conspiracies and Myths Refuted, Debunked, and Explained
Here you go sack-face. Of course you'll say that my site isn't credible...
so it confirms northwoods and the gives an editorial opinion on how its not exactly like 9/11...lol
you didnt even read this did you
Yeah I read it and it's true. You read it. Almost all of it says to make things "appear" a certain way, or "unmanned" vehicles, or "real or not" scenarios. Why don't you read the actual document and quit acting like you know what's going on... I read the document, then found something that explains it, and then compared it to the document...just because you don't have the time to connect the dots, doesn't mean that everyone else is an idiot..
There is a big difference between saying you want to make something appear a certain way, and actually doing something.
For instance: Saying "Let's load a bunch of people on a plane, fly it over cuba and blow it out of the sky, killing everyone on board." WAY DIFFERENT THAN. "Let's make it appear as though Cuba has shot down an unmanned airliner made to look like an airliner with people on it."
Did I say our government doesn't conjure up false-flag indicidents to propel us into military action...no.
This document demonstrates that the U.S. is willing to make things appear a certain way to justify an attack. It does not demonstrate the U.S. willingness to kill thousands of Americans....
For instance: Saying "Let's load a bunch of people on a plane, fly it over cuba and blow it out of the sky, killing everyone on board." WAY DIFFERENT THAN. "Let's make it appear as though Cuba has shot down an unmanned airliner made to look like an airliner with people on it."
Did I say our government doesn't conjure up false-flag indicidents to propel us into military action...no.
This document demonstrates that the U.S. is willing to make things appear a certain way to justify an attack. It does not demonstrate the U.S. willingness to kill thousands of Americans....
"We could blow up a drone (unmannded) vessel anywhere
in the Cuban waters. We could arrange to cause such incident
in the vicinity of Havana or Santiago as a spectacular result
of Cuban attack from the air or sea, or both. The presense
of Cuban planes or ships merely investigating the intent of
the vessel could be fairly compelling evidence that the ship
was taken under attack. The nearness to Havana or Santiago
would add credibility especially to those people that might
have heard the blast or have seen the fire. The US could
follow with an air/sea rescue operation covered by US
fighters to "evacuate" remaining members of the non-existant
crew."
"6. Use of MIG type aircraft by US pilots could provide
additional provocation. Harassment of civil air, attacks on
surface shipping and destruction of US military drone aircraft
by MIG type planes would be useful as complementary actions. An F-86 properly painted would convince air passengers that they
saw a Cuban MIG, especially if the pilot of the transport were
to announce such fact.
(Harrassment, not shooting down. And the fact that passengers could report the indicent says that they wouldn't have lost their lives in the incident.)
" 7. Hijacking attempts against civil air and surface craft
should appear to continue as harassing measures condoned by the
government of Cuba."
"8. It is possible to create an incident which will demonstrate
convincingly that a Cuban aircraft has attacked and shot down
a chartered civil airliner enroute from the United States to
Jamaica, Guatemala, Panama or Venezuela. The destination would
be chosen only to cause the flight plan route to cross Cuba.
The passengers could be a group of college students off on a
holiday or any grouping of persons with a common interest to
support chartering a non-scheduled flight.
a. An aircraft at Eglin AFB would be painted and
numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered
aircraft belonging to a CIA proprietary organization in the
Miami area. At a designated time the duplicate would be
subsituted for the actual civil aircraft and would be
loaded with the selected passengers, all boarded under
carefully prepared aliases. The actual registered
aircraft would be converted to a drone.[/B]
b. Take off times of the drone aircraft and the actual
aircraft will be scheduled to allow a rendezvous south of
Florida. From the rendezvous point the passenger-carrying
aircraft will descend to minimum altitude and go directly
into an auxiliary field at Eglin AFB where arrangements will
have been made to evacuate the passengers and return the
aircraft to its original status. The drone aircraft
meanwhile will continue to fly the filed flight plan. When
over Cuba the drone will being transmitting on the inter-
national distress frequency a "MAY DAY" message stating he
is under attack by Cuban MIG aircraft. The transmission
will be interrupted by the destruction of aircraft which will
be triggered by radio signal. This will allow IACO radio
Appendix to
Enclosure A
10
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 14
stations in the Western Hemisphere to tell the US what
has happened to the aircraft instead of the US trying to
"sell" the incident.
(This particular one shows the extreme measure that they were going to go through to ensure that none of the people involved would be hurt.)
"9. It is possible to create an incident which will make it
appear that Communist Cuban MIGs have destroyed a USAF aircraft
over international waters in an unprovoked attack.
a. Approximately 4 of 5 F-101 aircraft will be dispatched
in trail from Homestead AFB, Florida, to the vicinity of Cuba.
Their mission will be to reverse course and simulate fakir
aircraft for an air defense exercise in southern Florida.
These aircraft would conduct variations of these flights at
frequent intervals. Crews would be briefed to remain at
least 12 miles off the Cuban coast; however, they would be
required to carry live ammunition in the event that hostile
actions were taken by the Cuban MIGs.
b. On one such flight, a pre-briefed pilot would fly
tail-end Charley at considerable interval between aircraft.
While near the Cuban Island this pilot would broadcast that
he had been jumped by MIGs and was going down. No other
calls would be made. The pilot would then fly directly
west at extremely low altitude and land at a secure base, an
Eglin auxiliary. The aircraft would be met by the proper
people, quickly stored and given a new tail number. The
pilot who had performed the mission under an alias, would
resume his proper identity and return to his normal place
of business. The pilot and aircraft would then have
disappeared. "
You guys are too easy.... I got this from the Document on the site YOU SENT ME. STRAIGHT FROM THE DOCUMENT ITSELF
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/Northwoods.html
in the Cuban waters. We could arrange to cause such incident
in the vicinity of Havana or Santiago as a spectacular result
of Cuban attack from the air or sea, or both. The presense
of Cuban planes or ships merely investigating the intent of
the vessel could be fairly compelling evidence that the ship
was taken under attack. The nearness to Havana or Santiago
would add credibility especially to those people that might
have heard the blast or have seen the fire. The US could
follow with an air/sea rescue operation covered by US
fighters to "evacuate" remaining members of the non-existant
crew."
"6. Use of MIG type aircraft by US pilots could provide
additional provocation. Harassment of civil air, attacks on
surface shipping and destruction of US military drone aircraft
by MIG type planes would be useful as complementary actions. An F-86 properly painted would convince air passengers that they
saw a Cuban MIG, especially if the pilot of the transport were
to announce such fact.
(Harrassment, not shooting down. And the fact that passengers could report the indicent says that they wouldn't have lost their lives in the incident.)
" 7. Hijacking attempts against civil air and surface craft
should appear to continue as harassing measures condoned by the
government of Cuba."
"8. It is possible to create an incident which will demonstrate
convincingly that a Cuban aircraft has attacked and shot down
a chartered civil airliner enroute from the United States to
Jamaica, Guatemala, Panama or Venezuela. The destination would
be chosen only to cause the flight plan route to cross Cuba.
The passengers could be a group of college students off on a
holiday or any grouping of persons with a common interest to
support chartering a non-scheduled flight.
a. An aircraft at Eglin AFB would be painted and
numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered
aircraft belonging to a CIA proprietary organization in the
Miami area. At a designated time the duplicate would be
subsituted for the actual civil aircraft and would be
loaded with the selected passengers, all boarded under
carefully prepared aliases. The actual registered
aircraft would be converted to a drone.[/B]
b. Take off times of the drone aircraft and the actual
aircraft will be scheduled to allow a rendezvous south of
Florida. From the rendezvous point the passenger-carrying
aircraft will descend to minimum altitude and go directly
into an auxiliary field at Eglin AFB where arrangements will
have been made to evacuate the passengers and return the
aircraft to its original status. The drone aircraft
meanwhile will continue to fly the filed flight plan. When
over Cuba the drone will being transmitting on the inter-
national distress frequency a "MAY DAY" message stating he
is under attack by Cuban MIG aircraft. The transmission
will be interrupted by the destruction of aircraft which will
be triggered by radio signal. This will allow IACO radio
Appendix to
Enclosure A
10
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 14
stations in the Western Hemisphere to tell the US what
has happened to the aircraft instead of the US trying to
"sell" the incident.
(This particular one shows the extreme measure that they were going to go through to ensure that none of the people involved would be hurt.)
"9. It is possible to create an incident which will make it
appear that Communist Cuban MIGs have destroyed a USAF aircraft
over international waters in an unprovoked attack.
a. Approximately 4 of 5 F-101 aircraft will be dispatched
in trail from Homestead AFB, Florida, to the vicinity of Cuba.
Their mission will be to reverse course and simulate fakir
aircraft for an air defense exercise in southern Florida.
These aircraft would conduct variations of these flights at
frequent intervals. Crews would be briefed to remain at
least 12 miles off the Cuban coast; however, they would be
required to carry live ammunition in the event that hostile
actions were taken by the Cuban MIGs.
b. On one such flight, a pre-briefed pilot would fly
tail-end Charley at considerable interval between aircraft.
While near the Cuban Island this pilot would broadcast that
he had been jumped by MIGs and was going down. No other
calls would be made. The pilot would then fly directly
west at extremely low altitude and land at a secure base, an
Eglin auxiliary. The aircraft would be met by the proper
people, quickly stored and given a new tail number. The
pilot who had performed the mission under an alias, would
resume his proper identity and return to his normal place
of business. The pilot and aircraft would then have
disappeared. "
You guys are too easy.... I got this from the Document on the site YOU SENT ME. STRAIGHT FROM THE DOCUMENT ITSELF
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/Northwoods.html
Last edited:
Lol dream on candyfaggot, you pretend to know what people you've never seen look like now?
Looks like your self projection tendencies are showing again, wow you're so easy to read. Pathetic little loser.
You still know damned well that you have been lied to, and that you are nothing more then a scared little pussy that can't face reality.
Here is you to a T-
Psychological projection or projection bias is a psychological defense mechanism where a person unconsciously denies his or her own attributes, thoughts, and emotions, which are then ascribed to the outside world, such as to other people. Thus, projection involves imagining or projecting the belief that others have those feelings.[1]
Projection reduces anxiety by allowing the expression of the unwanted unconscious impulses or desires without letting the conscious mind recognize them.
An example of this behavior might be blaming another for self failure. The mind may avoid the discomfort of consciously admitting personal faults by keeping those feelings unconscious, and by redirecting libidinal satisfaction by attaching, or "projecting," those same faults onto another person or object.
Psychological projection - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
BTW I'm 6'0 195, now off you go to masturbate again LOL.
Yeah pretty amazing that our government actually conceived this plan, and to know the mindset of the bastards you so loyally adhere to.
Here's a copy of the actual document per FOIA. The link to it was on the site.
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/doc1.pdf
Common Jonesy boy. What do you think of your precious top secret document now. If anything, that document proves the extreme length that the U.S. was willing to go to ensure no American lives were lost in the false-flag operations....even to the extent of painting aircraft and droning commercial planes....lol. Maybe try reading documents before you post them.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Race and the American Prospect: Essays on the Racial Realities of Our Nation and Our Time, edited by Samuel Francis
- Started by Hector12
- Replies: 0
-
-
The Left Exposes Itself Over White South African Émigrés- Started by excalibur
- Replies: 5
-
BREAKING: DNC moves to void leadership election of David Hogg, Malcolm Kenyatta"
- Started by excalibur
- Replies: 4
-
How red states are the biggest victims of Trump's cuts- Started by C_Clayton_Jones
- Replies: 8
