My thanks to GT for an excellent presentation. I think no thread in years has so clearly shown the willful ignorance of the deniers here. Anyone with the slightest doubt as to which side of this argument has the facts on their side and which has discarded honesty and integrity in order to try to hold an absolutely unsupportable position for reasons having NOTHING to do with the science or the facts, need do NOTHING more than read this thread. It could not be illustrated any more clearly. Again, GT, thank you.
How much more retarded can it get?
What kind of experimental proof is an experiment that does not even state a result ?
..
.but asks how much warmer is it with 700 ppm CO2 after 5 minutes of cooling.
and all the while the CO2 inside that foil covered glass jar is totally irrelevant
because the
glass walls absorb way more 15 µm IR than CO2 can and the foil on top reflects it back down into the jar.
Whatever cooling you get now
is not by heat radiation, but by heat conduction to the glass and from there to the ambient air.
Retards like you first of all assume that with the extra CO2 it stayed warmer after 5 minutes elapsed because CO2 does indeed absorb IR.
Nobody ever disputed that CO2 absorbs IR !!!
I guess I have to lead you by the hand because you are just way too obtuse to understand what I said in my previous post about this utterly stupid experiment.
This bozo first heats that jar with a heat lamp till the air inside is 15 deg hotter.
That won`t take long,
but it would take a lot longer till the mass of the glass is also 15 deg hotterand it won`t be.
Now switches off the heat lamp and notes the temperature after 5 minutes.
Because the glass is still cooler, it will therefore drop faster than the second time around when he adds 1.6 milligrams of Alka Seltzer.
(B.t.w. I`ld like to see him do that...how he says to do that,
no Chemist would even try to do it like that
But never mind, after the 5 minute cooling time he adds the Alka Seltzer and turns on the heat lamp again.
It doesn`t dawn on you that the second time around the glass is now way warmer than the first time, does it?
Of course the air inside will be warmer after 5 minutes of cooling because of that and would be even if he did not add any CO2.
So all he demonstrated is that a glass jar full of air stays warmer if the glass was warmer than before he added Alka Seltzer
But you and the idiot who posted that crap never realized that.
Nowhere does he say that he let the glass cool down for x- amount of time till it was at ambient temperature before he turned on his heat lamp again.
No wonder he does not publish any numbers because the results would be ridiculous.
He is telling you to do it, that`s all and never even bothered to state a result.
This does not even qualify as a "thought experiment" and peer review is impossible
Pardon me, there are a few morons here who passed it and approved the results, without even knowing the results:
My thanks to GT for an excellent presentation...
Anyone with the slightest doubt as to which side of this argument has the facts
It could not be illustrated any more clearly. Again, GT, thank you.
You retards clamor to anything, even the dumbest crap you can find on the internet.
It illustrates clearly that you are still the same idiot before when you called yourself "Abraham3" and pretty soon you`ll have to change your name again
