- Nov 10, 2019
- 52,492
- 33,329
- 2,490
- Moderator
- #21
And he was standing by it on the 27th of OctoberHis prediction was from Sept 5.![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And he was standing by it on the 27th of OctoberHis prediction was from Sept 5.![]()
But but but but
She grew up in a middle class family with a lawn.
I guess we will see. Of course, 90% of the time, he has been right, which (the point of my post) does put him well ahead of the pollster and gambling markets, no matter how much you trumpers like to gamble.Some people refuse to admit they were wrong even in the face of overwhelming evidence. Especially Dimwinger Cultists.
HTH
We ll see. I cannot fathom voting for someone who is for raising taxes, open borders and pro ending the filibuster. But you do you.I guess we will see. Of course, 90% of the time, he has been right, which (the point of my post) does put him well ahead of the pollster and gambling markets, no matter how much you trumpers like to gamble.
Just as I cannot fathom voting for someone of low moral character, who wants to institute top down fascist control in American politics, governance, using of the military to enforce it, along with abandoning, support for allies and democratic countries around the world.We ll see. I cannot fathom voting for someone who is for raising taxes, open borders and pro ending the filibuster. But you do you.
You sure have your bullshit Dimtard talking points down.Just as I cannot fathom voting for someone of low moral character, who wants to institute top down fascist control in American politics, governance, using of the military to enforce it, along with abandoning, support for allies and democratic countries around the world.
Funny, as I just made that up for posting, as it is the reason, I could never vote for somebody like trump, though have been saying this for years, so not a Democrat talking point, unless they just happen to agree. I have no idea where they are published, but doing fine with my own talking points without them. Purely White 6 position, based on observing that candidate over the years.You sure have your bullshit Dimtard talking points down.
Ok, link us up to his “Top down fascist control”Funny, as I just made that up for posting, as it is the reason, I could never vote for somebody like trump, though have been saying this for years, so not a Democrat talking point, unless they just happen to agree. I have no idea where they are published, but doing fine with my own talking points without them. Purely White 6 position, based on observing that candidate over the years.
Have you been accurate on all but one election since 1984?
He has a 90% average.
The gambling money and the polling only have 77% and 78% respectively.
![]()
Predicting elections: betting markets vs. polls - Due
Speculation surrounds the potential election results. The current betting odds favor Trump, while the polling data leans towards Kamala.due.com
Can’t wait for the spin. Probably whining and crying bout the source.
She is tanking on every major issue, and the national vote.
Not only does Trump have the edge, but there's more bad news for Harris from there with less than two weeks to go before Election Day. Trump, however, continues to improve his image:
Trump also fares better in other areas, including when it comes to his characteristics over Harris:
- By 46-44 percent, voters believe Trump "cares more about people like you," while Harris had led 44-43 percent in the August poll
- By 49-43 percent, voters believe Trump "will stand up for American workers"
- By 49-40 percent, voters believe Trump is the one who "would bring about needed change"
- By 45-43 percent, voters believe Trump is the candidate who "has a vision for the future"
- By 50-39 percent, voters believe Trump "has the experience needed to lead the country."
That’s also HarrisJust as I cannot fathom voting for someone of low moral character, who wants to institute top down fascist control in American politics, governance, using of the military to enforce it, along with abandoning, support for allies and democratic countries around the world.
Ok, link us up to his “Top down fascist control”
Oh, hints and calls for.....View attachment 1033303
![]()
Donald Trump wants to reinstate a spoils system in federal government by hiring political loyalists regardless of competence
if political loyalty replaces merit as the basis of key federal appointments, Americans can expect government to be less competent – as Andrew Jackson learned during his administrationtheconversation.com
![]()
Trump hints at expanded role for military within U.S. A legacy law gives him few guardrails
Experts in constitutional law and the military say the Insurrection Act gives presidents tremendous power with few restraints.www.latimes.com
I guess it's how you look at it. He told dems in the Summer that dropping Biden would lose the election.I guess we will see. Of course, 90% of the time, he has been right, which (the point of my post) does put him well ahead of the pollster and gambling markets, no matter how much you trumpers like to gamble.
This election is about what he wants to do, by his own word and by his 2024 plan. I am against it. I am against letting him do it to my country.Oh, hints and calls for.....
Nothing he has actually done. Got it![]()
![]()
![]()
You really shouldn’t let opinion writers from lefty rags tell you what to think.This election is about what he wants to do, by his own word and by his 2024 plan. I am against it. I am against letting him do it to my country.
I did not like, the time he signed the budget, bragged of it being the best ever, then a couple of weeks later, stole and redirected money set forth by line and paragraph, specifically for repairing military bases damaged on the coast by hurricane damage, along with clean water on a Marine base for drinking, and sewage treatment and clean up at the same base to stop polluting thier water, along with that of non-military living close to the base, downstream from where they were dumping raw sewage, plus the funding to build a junior high school on a military base to educate enlisted soldier's kids. All these were line/paragraph numbered approved expenditures in his signed budget. Instead, he ordered the money redirected, to build his wall, a project, both houses of congress refused to put in the budget. He simply asserted top down control over an already passed and signed budget from both houses of congress, usurping the power of the purse strings from congress, as if he had been granted line/paragraph veto over the budget. He who controls the purse, controls the nation. The was not meant to be a one man presidential power, ever, and line/paragraph veto has been rejected by Congress as unconstitutional for 200 years.You really shouldn’t let opinion writers from lefty rags tell you what to think.
Do you have any examples from his first term to back up your lunatic claims?