Two Federal District Court Judges order a hold on SNAP cutoff

[1srelluc]

A federal judge in Rhode Island on Friday afternoon blocked the Trump administration from suspending all food aid for millions of Americans amid the ongoing government shutdown, in a case brought by a group of US cities, nonprofit organizations and a trade union.

And at almost the same time, in a separate but similar case, a federal judge in Massachusetts ruled that the government must continue to fund the program that helps low-income households stave off food insecurity, in a case brought by the Democratic attorneys general from 22 states and the District of Columbia and three governors who sued the administration.

MSN

Well, now that two district court judges said it I guess it will be ignored twice as hard.

Slapped down in 3, 2, 1.

 

[hadit]

A federal judge in Rhode Island on Friday afternoon blocked the Trump administration from suspending all food aid for millions of Americans amid the ongoing government shutdown, in a case brought by a group of US cities, nonprofit organizations and a trade union.

And at almost the same time, in a separate but similar case, a federal judge in Massachusetts ruled that the government must continue to fund the program that helps low-income households stave off food insecurity, in a case brought by the Democratic attorneys general from 22 states and the District of Columbia and three governors who sued the administration.

MSN

Well, now that two district court judges said it I guess it will be ignored twice as hard.

Slapped down in 3, 2, 1.

Did they specify how this is supposed to happen when democrats are refusing to allow the money to flow?

 

[1srelluc]

I don't see how anyone even had standing as the funds had not been cut off yet......Who was harmed?

The vile dems be skeered.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

Democrats are not refusing this particular money to flow. They were in court asking the judge to let this money flow. Trump’s minions didn’t want it to flow.

 

[WEATHER53]

USSC ruled that national decrees cannot come from one district
They are in contempt

 

[WEATHER53]

Kangaroo where one party who wants what they want finds a friendly judge and government does not get to have anyone at the hearings

 

[struth]

Democrats are not refusing this particular money to flow

Yes they are, there is no money for anything, they shut the govt down

 

[struth]

A federal judge in Rhode Island on Friday afternoon blocked the Trump administration from suspending all food aid for millions of Americans amid the ongoing government shutdown, in a case brought by a group of US cities, nonprofit organizations and a trade union.

And at almost the same time, in a separate but similar case, a federal judge in Massachusetts ruled that the government must continue to fund the program that helps low-income households stave off food insecurity, in a case brought by the Democratic attorneys general from 22 states and the District of Columbia and three governors who sued the administration.

MSN

Well, now that two district court judges said it I guess it will be ignored twice as hard.

Slapped down in 3, 2, 1.

So will chuck Schumer ignore the courts orders and continue to shut thr govt down?

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

USSC ruled that national decrees cannot come from one district
They are in contempt

 

[BackAgain]

A federal judge in Rhode Island on Friday afternoon blocked the Trump administration from suspending all food aid for millions of Americans amid the ongoing government shutdown, in a case brought by a group of US cities, nonprofit organizations and a trade union.

And at almost the same time, in a separate but similar case, a federal judge in Massachusetts ruled that the government must continue to fund the program that helps low-income households stave off food insecurity, in a case brought by the Democratic attorneys general from 22 states and the District of Columbia and three governors who sued the administration.

MSN

Well, now that two district court judges said it I guess it will be ignored twice as hard.

Slapped down in 3, 2, 1.

The judges are out of their depths and out of their lanes.

And since the President can’t simply control the House and the Senate, as a practical matter, the judges are demanding that the President do what he has no ability to do.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

So will chuck Schumer ignore the courts orders and continue to shut thr govt down?

What an idol. The judge ordered Donald Trump‘s administration to pay this money, even during the shut down because the money was already set aside.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

The judges are out of their depths and out of their lanes.

And since the President can’t simply control the House and the Senate, as a practical matter, the judges are demanding that the President do what he has no ability to do.

Hey idiot. The emergency fund doesn’t have to be voted on by Congress. It’s already set aside for emergencies such as the shutdown. Do research sometimes.

 

[1srelluc]

So will chuck Schumer ignore the courts orders and continue to shut thr govt down?

They are trying to get the 5B in emergency funding from the USDA....The USDA determined (and rightfully so) that it's a political situation and not a emergency.

Of course this could be a planned out for Schumer, then he could act all self-righteous about "following the law".

 

[struth]

What an idol. The judge ordered Donald Trump‘s administration to pay this money, even during the shut down because the money was already set aside.

The govt is shutdown. There is nobody available at the Dept of Ag to doll out any money

 

[BackAgain]

Hey idiot. The emergency fund doesn’t have to be voted on by Congress. It’s already set aside for emergencies such as the shutdown. Do research sometimes.

Emergency includes a shutdown according to what daffynition, you fuckin’ dishonest **** rash?

:

 

[struth]

They are trying to get the 5B in emergency funding from the USDA....The USDA determined (and rightfully so) that it's a political situation and not a emergency.

Of course this could be a planned out for Schumer, then he could act all self-righteous about "following the law".

An emergency would be a flood or a hurricane destroying crops

 

[WEATHER53]

Well in effect this is a ruling that the government must be reopened so that SNAP can roll out the dime to deadbeats

 

[1srelluc]

Well in effect this is a ruling that the government must be reopened so that SNAP can roll out the dime to deadbeats

LOL....Hell, if it was that easy the gop could have found a friendly judge to reopen the .gov....But I don't think it works that way.

 

[Edgetho]

View attachment 1179466

You're not only a lying sack of ******* shit, you're ******* stupid as well.

Supreme Court Rules Federal District Courts Likely Lack Authority for Universal Injunctions

On June 27, 2025, the Supreme Court of the United States held that federal district courts likely lack the authority to issue universal injunctions blocking presidential actions nationwide, a ruling that is likely to allow the Trump administration to continue enforcing executive orders (EO) or...

ogletree.com

scumbag

 

[1srelluc]

There is a lesson to be learned.....From here on out all Fed district court judges should be deemed unessential during a shutdown.