Zone1 Two continents, different races, which one survives

Captain Caveman

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2020
Messages
21,951
Reaction score
13,736
Points
1,288
Location
England
Imagine you could duplicate a continent so both are the same, say two North Americas.

In one, you have all black people, and in the other all white people. Which one do you think would prosper, survive, fewer problems, flourish etc... and why?

What kind of government would they have?
 
Imagine you could duplicate a continent so both are the same, say two North Americas.

In one, you have all black people, and in the other all white people. Which one do you think would prosper, survive, fewer problems, flourish etc... and why?

What kind of government would they have?

1750157509831.webp



The white North America would thrive until the progressives got control and felt sorry for black North Americans and
started letting them immigrate by the millions.



1750157636470.webp
 
Imagine you could duplicate a continent so both are the same, say two North Americas.

In one, you have all black people, and in the other all white people. Which one do you think would prosper, survive, fewer problems, flourish etc... and why?

What kind of government would they have?
if both have the same constitutional republic that we have and embraced conservatism they would both survive ..
 
Imagine you could duplicate a continent so both are the same, say two North Americas.

In one, you have all black people, and in the other all white people. Which one do you think would prosper, survive, fewer problems, flourish etc... and why?

What kind of government would they have?

At the risk of being called "racist", I'll state some facts:

"The Dominican Republic's population is predominantly of mixed European and African ancestry, with significant white and black minorities. Approximately 70% of Dominicans identify as mixed (Mestizo/Indio or Mulatto), 15% as Black, and 13.5% as White."

"Haiti's population is overwhelmingly of African descent, with approximately 95% identifying as Black or of African origin. The remaining 5% is primarily composed of individuals of mixed European and African ancestry (often referred to as mulattoes) and a small number of people of European descent."
 
Imagine you could duplicate a continent so both are the same, say two North Americas.

In one, you have all black people, and in the other all white people. Which one do you think would prosper, survive, fewer problems, flourish etc... and why?

What kind of government would they have?
This is the OP. It's based on color. When called on his racism, the OP whines:

It's to see who sees colour (like you), and who sees people, which was yidnar at post #4.
So the OP poses a hypothetical based on seeing color and not people, but has the temerity to say something about seeing color as if he isn't.

You see, when a person tries to create a hypothetical based on his or her own racist beliefs, they ignore whole lot of things. In America, if not for blacks, Native Americans, and Asians, the wealth America has would not exist. White American wealth was literally made on the backs of slaves. Not just by their labor, but by selling slave-backed securities globally.

I am going to be generous in my assessment because the history of this country, as well as many white European countries, is based on wealth gained by stealing the resources of non white countries. Given that history, one could reasonably conclude that the white continent would fail.

Now to answer the question, if both countries are allowed to run their own government without interference, colonization, or excluding populations from funds or development, both countries will be equally successful.
 
Why waste time with ridiculous hypotheticals.
 
You see, when a person tries to create a hypothetical based on his or her own racist beliefs, they ignore whole lot of things. In America, if not for blacks, Native Americans, and Asians, the wealth America has would not exist
Crock of shit. White males took this country to its zenith. Now, step away from that white ass computer, turn off your white ass electric, and just sit there, you ingrate...
 
This is the OP. It's based on color. When called on his racism, the OP whines:


So the OP poses a hypothetical based on seeing color and not people, but has the temerity to say something about seeing color as if he isn't.

You see, when a person tries to create a hypothetical based on his or her own racist beliefs, they ignore whole lot of things. In America, if not for blacks, Native Americans, and Asians, the wealth America has would not exist. White American wealth was literally made on the backs of slaves. Not just by their labor, but by selling slave-backed securities globally.

I am going to be generous in my assessment because the history of this country, as well as many white European countries, is based on wealth gained by stealing the resources of non white countries. Given that history, one could reasonably conclude that the white continent would fail.

Now to answer the question, if both countries are allowed to run their own government without interference, colonization, or excluding populations from funds or development, both countries will be equally successful.
Why is Africa not super wealthy? I’ll bite ….Now this has nothing to do with race or anything…. But widespread corruption among African leaders destroying their countries.


In the past for centuries Africans fought each other Even colonized into southern Europe. See Al Andulas the expansion of African Muslims into southern Europe. Building a great empire by the way in southern Spain for a while. Contributing to Spain just like Otoh white Europeans contributed to the very land that they “colonized”. It wasn’t all bad.

Ah but you claimed that European white people “stole resources”. It’s blatant historical nonsense. The entire world is an example of empire’s expanding. Fighting taking on different territory. That includes black and white people building empires. See your just one sided and racist against whites.




You’re just full of it man. You can look at examples like Singapore which was colonized by the British but gained independence in the 20th century and is one of the most successful countries of the world.. … so there’s no excuse at all for the widespread corruption and problems in Africa. It has nothing to do with the White man or European colonization.

The struggles of Africa has nothing to do with the White man.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom