Twitter under past ownership LIED about censoring conservatives

notmyfault2020

Platinum Member
Oct 7, 2022
6,542
3,203
893

We recall how Dorsey lied to Congress, saying Twitter didn't shadow ban.. or whatever the exact term was for what they were doing: suppressing conservative voices.

Are they going to be held accountable?

well, they're libs so-------------
 
NO Conservatives were censored
They were just required to stop lying.

Which in their case is the same thing
 
This is what demafacsim looks like, a corrupt partnership between big business and the demafacsit party, to oppress the will of the people, and censor anyone that might hurt the party.
 
NO Conservatives were censored
They were just required to stop lying.

Which in their case is the same thing
But why were Progressives allowed to lie?

Biden lied about the vaccine and it effectiveness and many times on my sites the left went after anyone that proved Biden was incorrect.

So why didn’t Twitter stop that propaganda?

Simple, Trump had to go!
 
But why were Progressives allowed to lie?

Biden lied about the vaccine and it effectiveness and many times on my sites the left went after anyone that proved Biden was incorrect.

So why didn’t Twitter stop that propaganda?

Simple, Trump had to go!

Biden presented the best available information at the time

It was Conservatives spreading lies and killing people
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #7
This is what demafacsim looks like, a corrupt partnership between big business and the demafacsit party, to oppress the will of the people, and censor anyone that might hurt the party.
clarify

don't get it
 

We recall how Dorsey lied to Congress, saying Twitter didn't shadow ban.. or whatever the exact term was for what they were doing: suppressing conservative voices.

Are they going to be held accountable?

well, they're libs so-------------
Twitter doesn’t shadow ban. The author just doesn’t understand what shadow banning means.
 
clarify

don't get it
Maybe you should look up what Fascism is. When former Socialist Benito created it, he called it the "Third Way" he hated captialism, but was disappointed with the failures of Socialism, so he created it. He allowed for some, very few, private businesses to exist, but those companies had to do support and be only for the benefit of the party. Much like how the Demafascist worked with Twitter
 
Maybe you should look up what Fascism is. When former Socialist Benito created it, he called it the "Third Way" he hated captialism, but was disappointed with the failures of Socialism, so he created it. He allowed for some, very few, private businesses to exist, but those companies had to do support and be only for the benefit of the party. Much like how the Demafascist worked with Twitter
look up Fascism?

No, I know what that is. You did not write clearly (was the problem)
 
Look, if Twitter silence one group while promoting another group and those running it lied then put them on trial.

Simple as that and if guilty throw the fucking book at then!

A private company can do anything they want
No requirement to be “fair”
 
Look, if Twitter silence one group while promoting another group and those running it lied then put them on trial.

Simple as that and if guilty throw the fucking book at then!
sounds good

Is that too hard for Rs in Congress to figure out?

Then why a re they in Congress?
 
Look, if Twitter silence one group while promoting another group and those running it lied then put them on trial.

Simple as that and if guilty throw the fucking book at then!
Guilty of what exactly?
 
Guilty of what exactly?
Wow, reading comprehension on the left and right has been terrible of late!

If is the word I used before Guilty!

If and not they are Guilty but alas you will proclaim in today time of mean they are and want proof!

Put them on trial and if found guilty throw the book at them…

Do you understand that?
 
Wow, reading comprehension on the left and right has been terrible of late!

If is the word I used before Guilty!

If and not they are Guilty but alas you will proclaim in today time of mean they are and want proof!

Put them on trial and if found guilty throw the book at them…

Do you understand that?
You realize that to put someone on trial, you need to accuse them of breaking the law.

What laws do you think they broke here?
 

Forum List

Back
Top