Turley says the quiet part out loud.

[g5000]

So you disagree, and the evidence is indicative of impeachable offenses.

Got it.

Thanks for clearing that up

Comprehension fail.

I agree with Turley. What you fail to realize or comprehend is that the GOP clowns asked a question which blew up in their stupid faces.

Talk about piss poor preparation!

Turley is not the only one saying the quiet part out loud:

"We don't have the evidence now, but we may find it later." - Michael McCaul (R-TX), impeachment inquiry member.

Textbook definition of a witch hunt.

 

[badger2]

There have been investigations going back to when Weiss started 5 years ago, this one....

GOP report: No wrongdoing in Biden son ties to Ukraine firm, but still 'problematic'

A Senate GOP report issued Wednesday on Joe Biden's son's Hunter and his ties to a Ukrainian energy firm found only that his role was "problematic" for U.S. policymakers.

abcnews.go.com

and many more since then.

Intelligent investigations require that one must go back to at least 2007 for having any potent impact on the upcoming 2024 election.

Biden wrote college recommendation letters for kids of Chinese exec tied to Hunter

Joe Biden wrote a college recommendation letter for the son of a Chinese executive with links to Biden’s son Hunter.

nypost.com

 

[RhodyPatriot]

Comprehension fail.

I agree with Turley. What you fail to realize or comprehend is that the GOP clowns asked a question which blew up in their stupid faces.

False.

Some in the Republican leadership believe the best thing that could happen to Biden right now would be an impeachment.

It would cast him as the victim, right when his Administration is utterly falling apart, not to mention it is a foregone conclusion that it would fail in the Democrat Senate.

This inquiry is seen by House Leadership as red meat for the Freedom Caucus and others, whether we on this message board believe Biden should be impeached or not.

To think it's much simpler than that is to ignore the nuance and kinetic posturing of DC politics.

And as another poster already pointed out, Turley said "yet" - and justified them being there for the hearing.

I'm afraid the only comprehension fail was on your part.

At least you're consistent.

 

[g5000]

Did Turley (a lifelong democrat) say anything about the 21 shell companies?

Please tell us what "21 shell companies" means to you.

Or the 171 Suspicious Activity Reports from international banks, totaling $100 million?

Large transactions automatically generate SARs. Would you care to hear about the SARs generated by Trump's business activities?

Or the hundreds of fake names and illegal private email addresses including Robert L Peters at the PA Dept of Corrections? Or the source of the (6) "opulent" mansions the Bribens own on a government wage? Or the $10 million extra income in 2017 on the Briben 1040 with no source listed? Anything about the FBI FD-1023 reports that detail the Briben racketeering, money laundering and extortion? In particular, the one that quotes the CEO of Burisma saying "$5 million for one Biden, and $5 million for the other Biden"?

Anything?

Joe Biden has a net worth of $11 million. He made a few million in recent years selling his books.

Everything is legit and above board, rube.

Fake names, you say? Why don't you ask David Dennison about that? Or John Barron. Or John Miller. Or even Carolin Gallego? I bet you didn't know The Donald is transgender!

 

[Hutch Starskey]

True. But he also said that there is enough evidence for an Impeachment Inquiry.

But there is currently no evidence of criminality despite you all asserting otherwise then. Right?

 

[g5000]

False.

Some in the Republican leadership believe the best thing that could happen to Biden right now would be an impeachment.

It would cast him as the victim, right when his Administration is utterly falling apart, not to mention it is a foregone conclusion that it would fail in the Democrat Senate.

This inquiry is seen by House Leadership as red meat for the Freedom Caucus and others, whether we on this message board believe Biden should be impeached or not.

To think it's much simpler than that is to ignore the nuance and kinetic posturing of DC politics.

And as another poster already pointed out, Turley said "yet" - and justified them being there for the hearing.

I'm afraid the only comprehension fail was on your part.

At least you're consistent.

"We don't have the evidence now, but we may find it later."

It is very revealing of just how hypocritical you are that you are not outraged by this ACTUAL witch hunt.

 

[RhodyPatriot]

But there is currently no evidence of criminality despite you all asserting otherwise then. Right?

Do you know what an "Inquiry" is?

Just because the Democrats impeached Trump without so much as an inquiry, it is a hallowed custom that normally one is conducted prior to a decision whether or not to move forward with said impeachment.

And you think your side are the keepers of "Democracy".

How cute.

 

[Hollie]

Comprehension fail.

I agree with Turley. What you fail to realize or comprehend is that the GOP clowns asked a question which blew up in their stupid faces.

Talk about piss poor preparation!

Turley is not the only one saying the quiet part out loud:

"We don't have the evidence now, but we may find it later." - Michael McCaul (R-TX), impeachment inquiry member.

Textbook definition of a witch hunt.

Day one of the impeachment inquiry.

The Dems / Socialists are already in panic mode.

 

[two_iron]

Please tell us what "21 shell companies" means to you.

You probably heard this often, every time you attempted the 7th grade:

"No mother fucker, you CANNOT copy my homework."

 

[g5000]

Day one of the impeachment inquiry.

The Dems / Socialists are already in panic mode.

Biden was actually laughing about it today. He knows this is a clown show.

This is all theater for you unbelievably credulous rubes who have fallen for thousands of hoaxes.

"We don't have the evidence now, but we may find it later."

 

[badger2]

Did Turley (a lifelong democrat) say anything about the 21 shell companies? Or the 171 Suspicious Activity Reports from international banks, totaling $100 million? Or the hundreds of fake names and illegal private email addresses including Robert L Peters at the PA Dept of Corrections? Or the source of the (6) "opulent" mansions the Bribens own on a government wage? Or the $10 million extra income in 2017 on the Briben 1040 with no source listed? Anything about the FBI FD-1023 reports that detail the Briben racketeering, money laundering and extortion? In particular, the one that quotes the CEO of Burisma saying "$5 million for one Biden, and $5 million for the other Biden"?

Anything?


View attachment 835410

This CEO?

What is Metabiota? Emails reveal Hunter Biden got millions for DoD contractor specializing in infectious diseases

Moscow claims Biden secured millions for Ukraine labs through his firm, which could be true based on emails from the 'laptop from hell'

meaww.com

'Vadym Pozharsky sent an email revealing Biden linked the Ukrainian gas company to Metabiota.'

Because if this is true, the investigation is irreversibly connected to coronavirus investigations.

 

[g5000]

Poor Comer. He tries and tries and tries, and just keeps splooging on his own face, and the rubes rush to lick it off.

Sad.

"We don't have the evidence now, but we may find it later."

 

[Hollie]

"We don't have the evidence now, but we may find it later."

It is very revealing of just how hypocritical you are that you are not outraged by this ACTUAL witch hunt.

Oh, the melodrama.

Dems / Socialists used a phony dossier, one they knew was a fraud to impeach Trump.

Now that's revealing of liars and fraudsters.

 

[berg80]

How long did the Russian collusion debacle go on?

What debacle?

 

[Hollie]

Biden was actually laughing about it today. He knows this is a clown show.

This is all theater for you unbelievably credulous rubes who have fallen for thousands of hoaxes.

"We don't have the evidence now, but we may find it later."

I see your feelings are hurt. Sloppy Joe's laughter is another sign of dementia.

Dems / Socialists:
"We never had evidence to impeach Trump so we just fraudulently invented it"

 

[Lakhota]

OMG, Turley finally said something honest and factual.

 

[berg80]

Fact, he used to appear on MSNBC.

Then you morons lost your ever-lovin' minds.

But his horseshit found a welcoming audience at Faux.

 

[Hollie]

What debacle?

The one that humiliated Dems / Socialists

 

[marvin martian]

View attachment 835424

OMG, Turley finally said something honest and factual.

LOL, you got duped.

 

[berg80]

other than the fact that nobody has been allowed to actually produce any evidence,

Could you clarify that?