Tulsi Gabbardd, the Best Presidential Candidate Running

Tax increases
Free healthcare
Free college
Gun bans
She is against equality and supports special rights for certain people of society
She is willing to throw away american sovereignty in the name of something that cant even be proven and ignores natural variability
But she isnt a leftist "progressive?"
Now, name 1 thing above, besides tax increases, that the fed gov actually has the power to do.
Trump is the free healthcare guy. Dropping the mandate to buy Obamacare is free healthcare, genius. Get t-boned at an intersection and you need a 25K helicopter ride to the hospital...no charge. As the SC Heller ruling told us, guns will continue to be regulated and certain guns can be banned. Free public colleges is a doable thing. We`re not talking about Harvard or Stanford, just public colleges. The rich may have to start paying taxes again or move to a low tax country like Botswana or Somalia.
 
Tax increases
Free healthcare
Free college
Gun bans
She is against equality and supports special rights for certain people of society
She is willing to throw away american sovereignty in the name of something that cant even be proven and ignores natural variability
But she isnt a leftist "progressive?"
Now, name 1 thing above, besides tax increases, that the fed gov actually has the power to do.
Trump is the free healthcare guy. Dropping the mandate to buy Obamacare is free healthcare, genius. Get t-boned at an intersection and you need a 25K helicopter ride to the hospital...no charge. As the SC Heller ruling told us, guns will continue to be regulated and certain guns can be banned. Free public colleges is a doable thing. We`re not talking about Harvard or Stanford, just public colleges. The rich may have to start paying taxes again or move to a low tax country like Botswana or Somalia.

While you continue to live somewhere in a mind oasis in the middle of low IQ-ville....the rich will continue to both pay the majority of the taxes as they already do and continue to be amused by the rantings of trotsky-trolls like yourself who spend all of their time pointing angrily at others with better and more energetic work ethics. OH...and BTW the rich in this nation pay that amount by choice....at any time in the future should they decide to organize themselves and completely shut down taxation on t themselves they are quite capable of doing it.

JO
 
Tax increases
Free healthcare
Free college
Gun bans
She is against equality and supports special rights for certain people of society
She is willing to throw away american sovereignty in the name of something that cant even be proven and ignores natural variability
But she isnt a leftist "progressive?"
Now, name 1 thing above, besides tax increases, that the fed gov actually has the power to do.
Trump is the free healthcare guy. Dropping the mandate to buy Obamacare is free healthcare, genius. Get t-boned at an intersection and you need a 25K helicopter ride to the hospital...no charge. As the SC Heller ruling told us, guns will continue to be regulated and certain guns can be banned. Free public colleges is a doable thing. We`re not talking about Harvard or Stanford, just public colleges. The rich may have to start paying taxes again or move to a low tax country like Botswana or Somalia.
Who cares what Heller said? Show me where the constitution says gun rights can be limited?
In TN, we have free 2 year college and tech school and didnt raise taxes one iota. Of course, we actually think about things and love freedom more than servitude. Mostly.
 
She's an interesting candidate, sort of like Yang is. Ultimately, she won't gain traction. The only female the Establishment Dems want is Harris, Warren has a better chance but would usher in socialism.
Americans love their socialistic Medicare and Social Security. Usher in socialism?
Correct. But that is always used to make sure the rest of the programs are accepted. You charged people 15% and not a word on that. Then spend decades using that 15% in the general spending like corrupted military projects and corrupted social programs and contractors and people abusing the whole system and wallah. The show is in sight now.
 
Tax increases
Free healthcare
Free college
Gun bans
She is against equality and supports special rights for certain people of society
She is willing to throw away american sovereignty in the name of something that cant even be proven and ignores natural variability
But she isnt a leftist "progressive?"
Now, name 1 thing above, besides tax increases, that the fed gov actually has the power to do.
Trump is the free healthcare guy. Dropping the mandate to buy Obamacare is free healthcare, genius. Get t-boned at an intersection and you need a 25K helicopter ride to the hospital...no charge. As the SC Heller ruling told us, guns will continue to be regulated and certain guns can be banned. Free public colleges is a doable thing. We`re not talking about Harvard or Stanford, just public colleges. The rich may have to start paying taxes again or move to a low tax country like Botswana or Somalia.
Who cares what Heller said? Show me where the constitution says gun rights can be limited?
In TN, we have free 2 year college and tech school and didnt raise taxes one iota. Of course, we actually think about things and love freedom more than servitude. Mostly.
So you`re not in agreement with the Heller decision that affirmed your right to play with guns?
 
How could you possibly know if the woman has (more) courage, honesty, integrity and character? Just because she said that impeachment would be divisive? If she had any integrity she wouldn't be a democrat.
 
Any democrat can say anything but they’re all ultimately held hostage by AGW and its economic destruction and socialist aims; racism and segregation; gender and homo issues and the fatherlessness and social demise caused by all of the above; blaming the police for crime; anti-gun advocacy; usurping American culture and blaming America for anti-American terrorism and murder.
You are not familiar with Gabbards policy positions.

She is a moderate and wants AGW corrections but done in a way to not damage industry, though she is willing to goad energy companies into smaller profit margins for a short time. Tulsi supports the OFF Act which is a more moderate approach to leaving fossil fuels over a 16 year period and has funded efforts to protect job availability.
"The OFF Act transitions the U.S. to 100% clean and renewable energy by 2035 and includes provisions to stimulate the economy and transition workers to jobs in the renewable energy sector."

I dont see a need to transition that quickly but if we use Thorium Molten Salt Reactors as the new backbone of our energy grid it is plenty of time.

She is progun rights but thinks we can do more to regulate guns, and I agree, though the devil is in the details, as always. But the key point is that she only wants BIPARTISAN gun control legislation, which means in effect it would be moderated.
"In working towards enacting real gun control measures, Tulsi is focusing on bipartisan measures that have a chance of actually becoming passed into law, rather than using the issue as a political football."

As far as Immigration reform goes, she is pro-DACA Dreamers, but wants the laws respected, and is against open borders.

But these are issues that are bgroiler plate Democrat issues that wont change anything in law because Tulsi is committed to using bipartisanship to pass laws, and not steamroll the opposition.

But here are the issues I totally agree with her on that need to happen:
1) Breaking up the Too Big To Fail Banks.
2) Removing direct or indirect corporate contributions to our elections.
3) Her defense of Religious Freedom
Tulsi has stated: “Our country’s Founding Fathers invoked our inalienable God-given right to life and liberty, and enshrined that right of freedom of religion in our U.S. Constitution, recognizing that everyone must be free to follow his or her conscience without fear of persecution. This right is something that comes from God, bestowed on every one of us, no matter who we are or where we are from, and which no one has the right or ability to take away.
“It is truly wonderful that embedded in the very bedrock of our nation is this recognition of free will; of this intrinsic right of every individual to worship God as one chooses, or to not worship God; to adhere to any spiritual path or to no spiritual path. No one can make that decision for another person. It is our duty to guard and protect the right of all people to worship or not worship according to their conscience. This is the nature of love. Every person has the freedom to choose to give their heart and give their life to God or not. You can't force someone to love God, or to love anyone.” <- Tulsi is against the anti-Christian intolerance that is so widespread in the secular leadership of this country today.
4) End regime change wars
5) Restore Glass Steagal
6) End the failed war on drugs and stop privatizing prisons
7) Legalize Marijuana
8) Stop the plague of Sex Trafficking
9) Protect and improve our drinking water resources - she is about the only one talking about this
10) Campaign finance reform to clean up and protect our election methodology
11) Against trade deals that would lose American jobs
12) Wants tighter relationship with India <- Trump does too, but this is critical for our future foreign policy. India will become more important to us than the degenerate and corrupt EU.
13) Protect our veterans and continue improvements to VA

I also admire and feel uplifted by Gabbards idealism and belief in America. I think she would be a great leader for our nation after so much partisan rancor and bile.

But my single greatest reason for wanting Gabbard to succeed is that she would represent a shift away from the Marxist far left wing of the Democratic party. She is a patriot, a veteran and she would help to pull the democratic Pary back into the realm of America First patriotic policies.

In a two party political system, allowing one of those parties to be run by communists is a very risky and intolerable situation and it has to be addressed.

Gabbard gaining the Democratic nomination is the way to do that.
 
How could you possibly know if the woman has (more) courage, honesty, integrity and character? Just because she said that impeachment would be divisive? If she had any integrity she wouldn't be a democrat.

The very fact that she is willing to oppose impeachment and says so openly I think demonstrates the point.
 
She's an interesting candidate, sort of like Yang is. Ultimately, she won't gain traction. The only female the Establishment Dems want is Harris, Warren has a better chance but would usher in socialism.
Americans love their socialistic Medicare and Social Security. Usher in socialism?
Tulsi is against ending the ACA and wants to modify it to work better. There are many ways to do this.
 
How could you possibly know if the woman has (more) courage, honesty, integrity and character? Just because she said that impeachment would be divisive? If she had any integrity she wouldn't be a democrat.
so if she would become a republican then she would actually have courage, honesty, integrity and character?......
 
How could you possibly know if the woman has (more) courage, honesty, integrity and character? Just because she said that impeachment would be divisive? If she had any integrity she wouldn't be a democrat.
so if she would become a republican then she would actually have courage, honesty, integrity and character?......
This is just one more example of our partisan disease that is crippling our countries ability to fix its problems and move forward.

I agree with Gabbard, we should be addressing critical issues, not wasting time on impeachment.
 
How could you possibly know if the woman has (more) courage, honesty, integrity and character? Just because she said that impeachment would be divisive? If she had any integrity she wouldn't be a democrat.
so if she would become a republican then she would actually have courage, honesty, integrity and character?......
This is just one more example of our partisan disease that is crippling our countries ability to fix its problems and move forward.

I agree with Gabbard, we should be addressing critical issues, not wasting time on impeachment.
no argument there....
 
Tax increases
Free healthcare
Free college
Gun bans
She is against equality and supports special rights for certain people of society
She is willing to throw away american sovereignty in the name of something that cant even be proven and ignores natural variability
But she isnt a leftist "progressive?"
Now, name 1 thing above, besides tax increases, that the fed gov actually has the power to do.
Trump is the free healthcare guy. Dropping the mandate to buy Obamacare is free healthcare, genius. Get t-boned at an intersection and you need a 25K helicopter ride to the hospital...no charge. As the SC Heller ruling told us, guns will continue to be regulated and certain guns can be banned. Free public colleges is a doable thing. We`re not talking about Harvard or Stanford, just public colleges. The rich may have to start paying taxes again or move to a low tax country like Botswana or Somalia.

While you continue to live somewhere in a mind oasis in the middle of low IQ-ville....the rich will continue to both pay the majority of the taxes as they already do and continue to be amused by the rantings of trotsky-trolls like yourself who spend all of their time pointing angrily at others with better and more energetic work ethics. OH...and BTW the rich in this nation pay that amount by choice....at any time in the future should they decide to organize themselves and completely shut down taxation on t themselves they are quite capable of doing it.

JO
The rich pay the majority of taxes because they have the overwhelming majority of the money and they don`t pay by choice. You learned that at Trump University? Tell us more about the Trump family "work ethic".
 
The rich pay the majority of taxes because they have the overwhelming majority of the money and they don`t pay by choice. You learned that at Trump University? Tell us more about the Trump family "work ethic".
The rich don't pay the majority of taxes, the Middle Class does.

If we define the Middle Class as those who are not living paycheck-to-paycheck and yet still have to work to make ends meet, then this is the third and fourth quintile and the lower 15% of the top quintile. Defining the middle Class this functional way gives us the majority of tax payers and about 55% of all Federali income tax intake.

upload_2019-9-25_16-39-45.png
 
Last edited:
Any democrat can say anything but they’re all ultimately held hostage by AGW and its economic destruction and socialist aims; racism and segregation; gender and homo issues and the fatherlessness and social demise caused by all of the above; blaming the police for crime; anti-gun advocacy; usurping American culture and blaming America for anti-American terrorism and murder.
You are not familiar with Gabbards policy positions.

She is a moderate and wants AGW corrections but done in a way to not damage industry, though she is willing to goad energy companies into smaller profit margins for a short time. Tulsi supports the OFF Act which is a more moderate approach to leaving fossil fuels over a 16 year period and has funded efforts to protect job availability.
"The OFF Act transitions the U.S. to 100% clean and renewable energy by 2035 and includes provisions to stimulate the economy and transition workers to jobs in the renewable energy sector."

I dont see a need to transition that quickly but if we use Thorium Molten Salt Reactors as the new backbone of our energy grid it is plenty of time.

She is progun rights but thinks we can do more to regulate guns, and I agree, though the devil is in the details, as always. But the key point is that she only wants BIPARTISAN gun control legislation, which means in effect it would be moderated.
"In working towards enacting real gun control measures, Tulsi is focusing on bipartisan measures that have a chance of actually becoming passed into law, rather than using the issue as a political football."

As far as Immigration reform goes, she is pro-DACA Dreamers, but wants the laws respected, and is against open borders.

But these are issues that are bgroiler plate Democrat issues that wont change anything in law because Tulsi is committed to using bipartisanship to pass laws, and not steamroll the opposition.

But here are the issues I totally agree with her on that need to happen:
1) Breaking up the Too Big To Fail Banks.
2) Removing direct or indirect corporate contributions to our elections.
3) Her defense of Religious Freedom
Tulsi has stated: “Our country’s Founding Fathers invoked our inalienable God-given right to life and liberty, and enshrined that right of freedom of religion in our U.S. Constitution, recognizing that everyone must be free to follow his or her conscience without fear of persecution. This right is something that comes from God, bestowed on every one of us, no matter who we are or where we are from, and which no one has the right or ability to take away.
“It is truly wonderful that embedded in the very bedrock of our nation is this recognition of free will; of this intrinsic right of every individual to worship God as one chooses, or to not worship God; to adhere to any spiritual path or to no spiritual path. No one can make that decision for another person. It is our duty to guard and protect the right of all people to worship or not worship according to their conscience. This is the nature of love. Every person has the freedom to choose to give their heart and give their life to God or not. You can't force someone to love God, or to love anyone.” <- Tulsi is against the anti-Christian intolerance that is so widespread in the secular leadership of this country today.
4) End regime change wars
5) Restore Glass Steagal
6) End the failed war on drugs and stop privatizing prisons
7) Legalize Marijuana
8) Stop the plague of Sex Trafficking
9) Protect and improve our drinking water resources - she is about the only one talking about this
10) Campaign finance reform to clean up and protect our election methodology
11) Against trade deals that would lose American jobs
12) Wants tighter relationship with India <- Trump does too, but this is critical for our future foreign policy. India will become more important to us than the degenerate and corrupt EU.
13) Protect our veterans and continue improvements to VA

I also admire and feel uplifted by Gabbards idealism and belief in America. I think she would be a great leader for our nation after so much partisan rancor and bile.

But my single greatest reason for wanting Gabbard to succeed is that she would represent a shift away from the Marxist far left wing of the Democratic party. She is a patriot, a veteran and she would help to pull the democratic Pary back into the realm of America First patriotic policies.

In a two party political system, allowing one of those parties to be run by communists is a very risky and intolerable situation and it has to be addressed.

Gabbard gaining the Democratic nomination is the way to do that.
I am familiar with Gabbards. If she really wanted to implement her policies she wouldn’t run as a democrat.
It doesn’t matter what she says. As a democrat she is saddled with all of those anti-American policies. Just like a republican governor in Maryland. They’re imprisoned by democrats.
 

Forum List

Back
Top