Tulsi Gabbard Drops Truth Bomb on Deep State Corruption — Exposes 51 Intel Officials, Hillary Clinton, and the Democrat Party in Scorching Opening Sta

Are you always this retarded? I'm politically independent. That doesn't mean I don't vote. I just don't vote for RINO's or democrats.

You don't vote for anyone. actually running.

Next week there will be Eagles loyalists and Chiefs loyalists.

Being loyal to any other team and hoping that they will win the super bowl is silly.

That's you.
 
You don't vote for anyone. actually running.

Next week there will be Eagles loyalists and Chiefs loyalists.

Being loyal to any other team and hoping that they will win the super bowl is silly.

That's you.

You've got your panties in a wad because I didn't vote for the same politician that you worship.
Why would I vote for someone who spent $8 trillion in just 4 years. Who only vetoed 1 spending bill. And someone who assaulted our 2A twice?

Because you retarded RINO's think those things are fine, as long as it's a republican doing it?
That's retarded.
 
Did she explain why she met with Syrian leader Assad in 2017 or his lieutenant who wanted to commit violence in America.
~~~~~~
Did you say the same when San Fran Pelosi violated Bush 43' and met with Assad, or Kerry's dinner with Assad?

**********​
**********​
**********​

"Where both parties ritually support perpetual US troop deployment, Gabbard is one of the very few people critical of US foreign policy. Naturally, Gabbard’s criticisms have made her a target; her critics –and indeed the mainstream media – smear her as a “Russian asset,” for example. While Gabbard is not a Russian asset, she certainly deviates from the US consensus.
Yet, the establishment dismisses Gabbard’s views on US warmaking; in the foreign policy establishment’s view, Gabbard is a gadfly. The establishment seems happy to assign credibility to civilian lawyers (Obama, the Clintons) as long as they say the right thing (invade Iraq, bomb Libya)."
Most importantly, and effectively, Tulsi Gabbard has been quite helpful in exposing the Democrats for their true values. No wonder she left the Democratic Party.
 
Doc7505's whataboutism fails.

Gabbard is the wrong person for that job.
 
Are you always this retarded? I'm politically independent. That doesn't mean I don't vote. I just don't vote for RINO's or democrats.
You didn’t reread your post. You said you do participate. Ever heard of double negative?
 

Gabbard’s Senate Critics Are More Interested In Protecting America’s Spy Agencies Than Fixing Them

Tulsi Gabbard is absolutely right to be skeptical of the vast surveillance powers wielded by America’s intel apparatus.
31 Jan 2025 ~~ By Shawn Fleetwood

President Trump’s pick to lead the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, has never been shy about sharing her criticisms of America’s surveillance state. So, it came as no surprise when some of its biggest defenders grilled her on the subject during her Thursday Senate confirmation hearing.
While testifying before the Senate Intelligence Committee, Gabbard was repeatedly pressed by senators to offer a full-throated defense of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which intel agencies abused to spy on unsuspecting Americans and surveil Trump’s 2016 campaign.
As The Federalist’s Logan Washburn recently reported, “Section 702 of the legislation allows federal agencies to collect communications of noncitizens, outside the country, without a warrant.” It furthermore “supposedly bars the government from spying on Americans,” Washburn noted, “but the CIA was caught in 2022 using the law — which Congressional Republicans reauthorized last year — to spy on Americans.”
While serving in Congress, Gabbard co-sponsored legislation alongside Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., that sought to reform FISA and revoke the Patriot Act. She has since been all but forced to change her position on FISA, seemingly to gain support from some Republican senators.
Gabbard was asked about her evolving position on the law by the committee’s ranking member, Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va. Yet when Gabbard attempted to answer Warner’s question about which FISA Section 702 reforms she supports, the Virginia Democrat cut her off and wouldn’t allow her to finish.
~Snip~

~Snip~
In addition to spying on Trump’s 2016 campaign, agencies such as the FBI were instrumental in fomenting the debunked Russia collusion hoax, spying on Catholics, targeting Trump supporters and parents at school board meetings, arresting pro-lifers, and partaking in a whole host of other egregious abuses. And who could forget the infamous letter signed by 51 former intel officials, who falsely claimed contents from Hunter Biden’s laptop exposing the Biden family’s foreign business dealings were part of a Russian “disinformation” campaign.
That so many elected senators — particularly Republican ones — would largely fail to ask Gabbard how she would reverse such politicization and prevent it from happening in the future is a disgrace. If anything, it’s a silent admission that they’re much more interested in protecting these broken agencies than reforming them.
Gabbard is absolutely right to be skeptical of the vast surveillance powers wielded by America’s intel apparatus. Any “Republican” who isn’t has no business being in public office.


Commentary:
Neo-Marxist Democrats and Rino's didn’t grill Tulsi - they highly insulted her, screamed at her, and made utter fools out of themselves showing clearly what hateful condescending pricks they are.
They never expected to be sitting there judging President Trump's appointees and they are now all losing bowel control and soiling their pants at the prospects. Making fools of themselves. Watching them squirm is very entertaining
 
You've got your panties in a wad because I didn't vote for the same politician that you worship.
Why would I vote for someone who spent $8 trillion in just 4 years. Who only vetoed 1 spending bill. And someone who assaulted our 2A twice?

Because you retarded RINO's think those things are fine, as long as it's a republican doing it?
That's retarded.

No wad

I don't expect any help from your ilk
Much easier to simply not contribute and complain about everything.
 

Tulsi Gabbard Drops Truth Bomb on Deep State Corruption

Exposes 51 Intel Officials, Hillary Clinton, and the Democrat Party in Scorching Opening Statement

30 Jan 2025 ~~ By Jim Hoft

Tulsi Gabbard took Washington by storm as she exposed the rot of deep state corruption, slamming 51 intelligence officials, Hillary Clinton, and the Democrat Party for their blatant weaponization of America’s intelligence agencies.
As she stood before the Senate Intelligence Committee for her confirmation hearing as President Trump’s pick for Director of National Intelligence, Gabbard delivered a devastating indictment of the intelligence community’s failures and abuses over the last two decades.




Commentary:
Nothing like fellow Democrats in power putting you on a terrorist watch list to wake you up to government abuse. Tulsi is pissed with good reason. That’s why elitist Neo-Marxist Democrats are so afraid of her.
Seems Tulsi realized what the Democrat Party turned into after her military career was over and started paying attention to the D clowns in DC.
If you're not a liberal by the time you're 20, you have no heart. If you're not a Conservative by the time you're 40, you have no brain.
I can relate to that migration myself, as your level of commitment and responsibility to your children and family, increased fiscal obligations, often significant advancement in business, and recognition about the waste and corruption within "government". After you have paid a lot in taxes, and observed how they're wasted and allocated, IMESHO, your brain recognizes that a conservative approach is best.
I used to be a liberal until Clinton, (Yes, I voted for him) then I woke up and actually started paying attention to the actions rather than the words.
If conformed as Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard will become a sharp and unbreakable stake in the hearts so many who have tried to destroy the health and purpose of this country.

I don't agree with her on the Edward Snowden thing. He was a traitor and should be executed as such. But, she sure nailed everything else.
 
I don't agree with her on the Edward Snowden thing. He was a traitor and should be executed as such. But, she sure nailed everything else.
~~~~~~
Well that's your choice and you fall within the 14% that believe that Snowden was correct in exposing the Obama Administration for their criminal acts.
 
Jose christ

How much makeup is that bitch wearing.
~~~~~~
Obviously she wears a lot less makeup than San Fran Nan, while nothing can hide the fuglyniss of Murkowski, or Collins.
 
~~~~~~
Well that's your choice and you fall within the 14% that believe that Snowden was correct in exposing the Obama Administration for their criminal acts.
What criminality fuckup?
 
~~~~~~
Well that's your choice and you fall within the 14% that believe that Snowden was correct in exposing the Obama Administration for their criminal acts.
???????????????????? How did you get that? I said he was a traitor and should be executed. I don't agree with Tulsi refusing to say he was a traitor.
 
I don't agree with her on the Edward Snowden thing. He was a traitor and should be executed as such. But, she sure nailed everything else.

After he went to the oversight committee and found that they were corrupt, what should have been his next step?
 
After he went to the oversight committee and found that they were corrupt, what should have been his next step?
That's a good question but sharing top secret info with the world was not it. Everyone can justify their actions, no matter what they are.
 
Back
Top Bottom