Tulsi fired all 100+ sex chatters...

Well, are they in violation of Government Chat Room policy?
Do you think this is appropriate workplace behavior?

So the way I see it, Tulsi's department could be facing a serious sexual orientation discrimination lawsuit...

:auiqs.jpg: Yeah, good luck with that, bro.
 
When you can prove whatever point you think you're trying to make, let us know.
Else your mindless musings are, well, just that.
I’m not seeing a lot of proof here. There’s a lot of questions as far as where these “chats” took place and how they were discovered
 
I’m not seeing a lot of proof here.
-You- don't need to see an iota of proof - and as the chats were set up so people with security clearances could discuss things related to national security, you likely never will.

So:
When you can prove whatever point you think you're trying to make, let us know.
Else your mindless musings are, well, just that.
 
I'm surprised there's actually 100 trannies in an agency given the actual numbers are like.01%

The tranny stuff was just part of it, it was all sorts of non work related bullshit.

Sex talk, political talk denigrating the right, all things not what the board was designed for.
 
The tranny stuff was just part of it, it was all sorts of non work related bullshit.

Sex talk, political talk denigrating the right, all things not what the board was designed for.
Oh, so white victimhood?

Great marty
 
Oh, so white victimhood?

Great marty

Out of scope discussions for which the board was not designed for.

Attacking fellow citizens and discussing vulgar topics on a work board specifically for work topics should be permitted?
 
Interesting that you made that conclusion. Do you believe lurid, illegal discussions of trans sex is solely the domain of non-white people?
No, apparently you missed his "denigrating the right" statement of victimhood.
 
No, apparently you missed his "denigrating the right" statement of victimhood.

Our supposedly neutral government workers should use taxpayer funded work boards for their own personal politics?
 
15th post
Out of scope discussions for which the board was not designed for.

Attacking fellow citizens and discussing vulgar topics on a work board specifically for work topics should be permitted?
Do you have any proof of that marty beyond gabbert searching "trans" in the email system.
 
Back
Top Bottom