Trump's sending of troops to Chicago is not a crime crackdown but a crackdown on brown people.

[Failzero]

You're post #43 seemed to indicate you advocate for something more than BCG.

I’m no fan of getting an Initial Carry Permit online or by Mail in ( if it’s a renewal in a so called Free State / RTC State then perhaps )

 

[OODA_Loop]

I’m no fan of getting an Initial Carry Permit online or by Mail in ( if it’s a renewal in a so called Free State / RTC State then perhaps )

So what are you advocating for exactly ?

 

[Failzero]

So what are you advocating for exactly ?

ALL Initials have minimum 1 hour Classroom to get up to speed on Law changes ( for better or worse changes in your County / Region / State ) and 1 hour Range / Qualification so complete beginners / first time shooters or disabled ( Near blind or Legally Blind … ) can be surmised oh and a cursory BGC ( and hopefully someday the waiver for HIPPA so your seeing two Shrinks and a Psycologist and beeing on SSRIs can be factored into gettin a Concealed Carry permit or have your permit kicked back denied …

.

 

[theHawk]

‘Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, a Democrat, said Friday that the city has not heard from the White House about the deployment or any increased law enforcement presence, adding that such a move would be “uncalled for” and “unlawful.”
[…]
Johnson told MSNBC on Sunday the city would take legal action if Trump sent troops into the city, adding that “the people of this city are accustomed to rising up against tyranny.”

“What he is proposing at this point would be the most flagrant violation of our Constitution in the 21st century. The city of Chicago does not need a military occupation,” Johnson said. “That’s not what we need. In fact, we’ve been very clear about what we need. We need to invest in people to ensure that we can build safe and affordable communities.”’

Officials have been planning for weeks to send National Guard to Chicago as Trump seeks to expand crime crackdown

The Trump administration has been planning for weeks to send the National Guard to Chicago, two officials told CNN, as President Donald Trump looks to expand his anti-crime agenda and crackdown on imm...

www.yahoo.com

It’s a crackdown on black people as well if they’re immigrants.

So the mayor is admitting nearly all the crime is coming from “brown” people?

 

[Hellbilly]

I can handle it just fine.

you, however, seem to have a problem with it.

did it start when you hero appeared on national tv,

Nice try. Not a democrat

 

[OODA_Loop]

ALL Initials have minimum 1 hour Classroom to get up to speed on Law changes ( for better or worse changes in your County / Region / State ) and 1 hour Range / Qualification so complete beginners / first time shooters or disabled ( Near blind or Legally Blind … ) can be surmised oh and a cursory BGC ( and hopefully someday the waiver for HIPPA so your seeing two Shrinks and a Psycologist and beeing on SSRIs can be factored into gettin a Concealed Carry permit or have your permit kicked back denied …

.

So you want them to shoot a qualifier? Whats the qualifier ?

Seeking mental health care is disqualifying ?

 

[Failzero]

So you want them to shoot a qualifier? Whats the qualifier ?

Seeking mental health care is disqualifying ?

Not seeking ( Actually seeing two Shrinks and a Psycologist for years and taking SSRIs ) and the qualifier is to parse out Blind or legally blind or overly unqualified first time Shooters and new to firearms folks who are a danger on the Streets or range and deserving of tutelage more training …

 

[JusticeHammer]

‘Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, a Democrat, said Friday that the city has not heard from the White House about the deployment or any increased law enforcement presence, adding that such a move would be “uncalled for” and “unlawful.”
[…]
Johnson told MSNBC on Sunday the city would take legal action if Trump sent troops into the city, adding that “the people of this city are accustomed to rising up against tyranny.”

“What he is proposing at this point would be the most flagrant violation of our Constitution in the 21st century. The city of Chicago does not need a military occupation,” Johnson said. “That’s not what we need. In fact, we’ve been very clear about what we need. We need to invest in people to ensure that we can build safe and affordable communities.”’

Officials have been planning for weeks to send National Guard to Chicago as Trump seeks to expand crime crackdown

The Trump administration has been planning for weeks to send the National Guard to Chicago, two officials told CNN, as President Donald Trump looks to expand his anti-crime agenda and crackdown on imm...

www.yahoo.com

It’s a crackdown on black people as well if they’re immigrants.

Bullshit libtards lies.

 

[JusticeHammer]

No, the OP is saying tht Trump is bypassing around 20-some odd cities with white mayors and majority white populations with higher crime than Chicago. Those troops aren't going to stop crime.

Name a city with a white mayor that has a higher crime rate? It's not the color of the mayor idiot.

 

[IM2]

Name a city with a white mayor that has a higher crime rate? It's not the color of the mayor idiot.

There are a whole bunch.
Maybe Trump should visit Monroe, Louisiana, it's number 2, and it is above DC and Chicago. But here is why he won't.

Friday Ellis.
This is the mayor of Monroe, Louisiana, the second most dangerous city in America. A conservative. A former Republican now independent. And the picture shows the other reason Trump won't send troops there.

Washington, DC is not in the top 25.

 

[OODA_Loop]

Not seeking ( Actually seeing two Shrinks and a Psycologist for years and taking SSRIs ) and the qualifier is to parse out Blind or legally blind or overly unqualified first time Shooters and new to firearms folks who are a danger on the Streets or range and deserving of tutelage more training …

So my 75 year old mom cant have her firearm? She would not pass a formal qualifier. But will punch your ticket at the bad breath ranges these encounters happen at.

Who gets to be the determiner of competent ? Is there a rash of shootings by incompetent law abiding gun owners ? I don't think so.

Slippery slope when you start adding qualifications to Constitutional protections.

 

[Failzero]

So my 75 year old mom cant have her firearm? She would not pass a formal qualifier. But will punch your ticket at the bad breath ranges these encounters happen at.

Who gets to be the determiner of competent ? Is there a rash of shootings by incompetent law abiding gun owners ? I don't think so.

Slippery slope when you start adding qualifications to Constitutional protections.

70% of the High Profile Mass shooters of the last 20 years obtained their Firearms legally . HIPPA waiver would have kicked back 4473 form of half of those . And why does your argument sound like how Trump is separating Families & Deporting Grandmothers …

 

[theHawk]

There are a whole bunch.
Maybe Trump should visit Monroe, Louisiana, it's number 2, and it is above DC and Chicago. But here is why he won't.

Friday Ellis.
This is the mayor of Monroe, Louisiana, the second most dangerous city in America. A conservative. A former Republican now independent. And the picture shows the other reason Trump won't send troops there.

Washington, DC is not in the top 25.

Hey dumbass, that Mayor is an independent, not a Republican.

Independent La. Mayor Finds Success Not Because of Ideology, But Because He Actually Puts Voters First

Concerning his initial election in 2020, Monroe, Louisiana independent Mayor Ellis could have been written off as a fluke. He defeated nearly two-decade incumbent Jamie Mayo, who like 64 percent of the population is black and like 54 percent of the electorate is a Democrat.

ivn.us

The city of Monroe, LA is also 61% black, only 16%.


So umm, thanks for proving my point you low IQ dolt.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Try real hard to follow along. The Posse Comitatus Act, itself, allows for exceptions.
It is ann exception that he would seek to be using. And as I’ve already advised you -and have previously noted and proved by quoting the Insurrection Act, he has an available exception at hand.

Again, from what ive read, the insurrection act appears to be available only when federal law is broken

It is undoubtedly true that you don’t like the exception. Tough luck.

I dont care whether its valid or invalid, im just discussing whether or not he can use the military as police officers in normal local and municipal matters.

It’s available and it’s his determination that controls, not your objection to the use of the exception.

Thou doest protest too much. Read above.

The Insurrection Act as I previously posted about. Read the law. I swear, it wouldn’t kill you. It could only help you.

The Insurrection Act, Explained

The vague and rarely used law gives the president broad power to deploy the military domestically — but it’s not a blank check.

www.brennancenter.org

 

[BackAgain]

Again, from what ive read, the insurrection act appears to be available only when federal law is broken

And again. You’re wrong. Try reading. Even the title of Section 253 provides a “hint.”

10 U.S. Code § 253 - Interference with State and Federal law​

Now try reading the text.

I dont care whether its valid or invalid, im just discussing whether or not he can use the military as police officers in normal local and municipal matters.

As I said already, he can because the law says so.

Thou doest protest too much. Read above.

I’m here as a public service to try to educate you. That’s not a protest. It is a correction of your numerous and clear errors. There’s no purpose served in my re-reading your ignorant suppositions. You’re still wrong.

The Insurrection Act, Explained

The vague and rarely used law gives the president broad power to deploy the military domestically — but it’s not a blank check.

www.brennancenter.org

Just because the Brennan center says what you’d like to believe doesn’t mean their “explanation” is accurate. The words of the statute control, not their spin on it.

 

[ThisIsMe]

And again. You’re wrong. Try reading. Even the title of Section 253 provides a “hint.”

10 U.S. Code § 253 - Interference with State and Federal law​

Now try reading the text.

As I said already, he can because the law says so.

I’m here as a public service to try to educate you. That’s not a protest. It is a correction of your numerous and clear errors. There’s no purpose served in my re-reading your ignorant suppositions. You’re still wrong.



Just because the Brennan center says what you’d like to believe doesn’t mean their “explanation” is accurate. The words of the statute control, not their spin on it.

Again, thou doest protest too much. Its not "what id like to believe", im just having a discussion, presenting what I read. Youre right, my beliefs are irrelevant, the law is what matters.

 

[Invisibleflash]

‘Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, a Democrat, said Friday that the city has not heard from the White House about the deployment or any increased law enforcement presence, adding that such a move would be “uncalled for” and “unlawful.”
[…]
Johnson told MSNBC on Sunday the city would take legal action if Trump sent troops into the city, adding that “the people of this city are accustomed to rising up against tyranny.”

“What he is proposing at this point would be the most flagrant violation of our Constitution in the 21st century. The city of Chicago does not need a military occupation,” Johnson said. “That’s not what we need. In fact, we’ve been very clear about what we need. We need to invest in people to ensure that we can build safe and affordable communities.”’

Officials have been planning for weeks to send National Guard to Chicago as Trump seeks to expand crime crackdown

The Trump administration has been planning for weeks to send the National Guard to Chicago, two officials told CNN, as President Donald Trump looks to expand his anti-crime agenda and crackdown on imm...

www.yahoo.com

It’s a crackdown on black people as well if they’re immigrants.

Blacks do most of the crime, bub. If you want $, you go to the bank. If you want to crack down on crime, go to the black hood.

 

[BackAgain]

Again, thou doest protest too much. Its not "what id like to believe", im just having a discussion, presenting what I read. Youre right, my beliefs are irrelevant, the law is what matters.

Again, nonprofit at all. You clearly don’t understand what you’ve read even if you ever read the Act itself.

And bloviating, as you do, out of your bottomless supply of ignorance isn’t the same as having a discussion.

Carry on.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

‘Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, a Democrat, said Friday that the city has not heard from the White House about the deployment or any increased law enforcement presence, adding that such a move would be “uncalled for” and “unlawful.”
[…]
Johnson told MSNBC on Sunday the city would take legal action if Trump sent troops into the city, adding that “the people of this city are accustomed to rising up against tyranny.”

“What he is proposing at this point would be the most flagrant violation of our Constitution in the 21st century. The city of Chicago does not need a military occupation,” Johnson said. “That’s not what we need. In fact, we’ve been very clear about what we need. We need to invest in people to ensure that we can build safe and affordable communities.”’

Officials have been planning for weeks to send National Guard to Chicago as Trump seeks to expand crime crackdown

The Trump administration has been planning for weeks to send the National Guard to Chicago, two officials told CNN, as President Donald Trump looks to expand his anti-crime agenda and crackdown on imm...

www.yahoo.com

It’s a crackdown on black people as well if they’re immigrants.

The racial makeup of Chicago is 36% White and 29% Black. Are you saying that only Black people are committing crime in Chicago ?

 

[drudge X]

Brandon didn't get the memo. Past weekend, 6 were shot dead and 27 injured. How much are taxpayers on the hook every weekend and every year?