Trump's National Debt Insanity.

[BULLDOG]

How is giving it to the wealthy? Why can’t you fkers ever explain it

Why can't you ever pay attention when it's pointed out that the tax breaks give hundreds of thousands to the rich, but only a tiny amount in comparison to the rest of us.

 

[dudmuck]

How is giving it to the wealthy? Why can’t you fkers ever explain it

 

[jc456]

No one ever taught you math

 

[whitehall]

Interesting that socialist lefties seem to feel free to use inflammatory words like "seize" during republican administrations, as in in seize money from American citizens but there was no effort to do the same thing during the insanity of the Biden administration.

 

[jc456]

Because they are LYING out their filthy festering lying mouths that's why.

They have nothing!

 

[dudmuck]

No one ever taught you math

dont need math to see bigger numbers for the wealthy.

 

[jc456]

dont need math to see bigger numbers for the wealthy.

And why you don’t know math

 

[Leo123]

As everybody knows, Trump says he wants to lower the National Debt. And he wants to do it by giving tax breaks to the wealthy. As if some "trickle down" BS is going to solve that problem. That is pure insanity. Or maybe you could call it evil. The choice is yours. I will tell you how things stand. The U.S. is around 36 trillion in debt. The top 1% in the U.S. owns around 49 trillion. The top 50% in the U.S. owns around 156 trillion. The bottom 50% in the U.S. owns around 4 trillion. Who can be insane or evil enough to believe that the bottom 50% who own 4 trillion are going to be "trickled down" upon enough to pay off 36 trillion.

There is only one way to pay off the National Debt. TAX THE SHIT OUT OF THE WEALTHY!!! Or how about this. Outright seize 36 trillion from the top 50% and pay off our National Debt with it. The top 50% can then decide how to divide up the remaining 117 trillion between them.

Trump never said any of that. Your whole post is based in fiction. Your 'everybody knows' is also weak, as everybody can see.

 

[HikerGuy83]

I see my thread flew right over your head. If they taxed the wealthy, they would have had all the money they needed.
Neither would there be a National debt.

Nope....see this all before.

You have a government that behaves badly and you want to enable it by covering for them by soaking the rich.

I don't like the wealth distribution either.

But I am not going to not call out a government that spends more than it needs to for stuff it doesn't need.

We do tax the wealthy. More than others. And I am willing to tax them more. When we have people who can behave like adults, I'll sign on. That means big spending cuts.

 

[HikerGuy83]

The 156 trillion I quoted for the wealth of the top 50% isn't a fantasy. It is a reality. Look it up for yourself. As for cutting spending, what do you think we should do without. Doctors? Nurses? Teachers? Scientists? The Military? Etc. etc. etc.

Lots of stuff.

 

[OKTexas]

THREAD CLOSED, LACKS REQUIRED LINK/S TO SUPPORT CLAIM/S OF FACT IN THE OP

When starting a new thread and declaring something as fact in your opening post, you must link to a source.