Trumps hotels to help pay down treasury debt....

some on the left would be more impressed with the capitalist of the right, if he lived on his public servant salary while in public office.
You do that Trump said he wouldn't take the money while he is president?
not taking personal profit doesn't mean that firm won't making, potentially more money from an increase in tourism.
 
some on the left would be more impressed with the capitalist of the right, if he lived on his public servant salary while in public office.
You do that Trump said he wouldn't take the money while he is president?
not taking personal profit doesn't mean that firm won't making, potentially more money from an increase in tourism.
Trump is giving the profit to the treasury....which part is over your education level?
 
some on the left would be more impressed with the capitalist of the right, if he lived on his public servant salary while in public office.
You do that Trump said he wouldn't take the money while he is president?
not taking personal profit doesn't mean that firm won't making, potentially more money from an increase in tourism.
He said he won't take a salary for being president. Thanks for proving your bias. You said you would be impressed if he took a civil servant salary. Well he isn't taking any salary.
 
some on the left would be more impressed with the capitalist of the right, if he lived on his public servant salary while in public office.
You do that Trump said he wouldn't take the money while he is president?
not taking personal profit doesn't mean that firm won't making, potentially more money from an increase in tourism.
Trump is giving the profit to the treasury....which part is over your education level?
just clueless and Causeless?

not taking personal profit doesn't mean that firm won't making, potentially more money from an increase in tourism.

One good way for CEOs to give their stocks a boost: Visit Trump Tower--http://www.cnbc.com/2017/01/11/stock-market-trump-tower-visits-prove-profitable-for-corporate-ceos.html
 
never before has a POTUS made such an affirmative action to personally help America.....

All profits from foreign transactions will go directly to the treasury....

Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country....

That is part of a plan to avoid conflicts of interest under the new administration. Reports of foreign diplomats staying at Trump's hotels have raised concerns that these individuals could curry favor with the incoming president.

why the rich can get richer while the poor get their wealth taken away, through means testing.

Er..umm.. since when have the poor had any wealth to take away? The poor remain poor while the "rich" get richer thanks (to name a few) to the distribution effects of inflation, government over-regulation of the economy, crony capitalism and government programs which incentivize remaining poor not because of means testing entitlements.
means testing means they can't keep their bonus while on social welfare; corporate welfare lets the rich keep their multimillion dollar bonuses, even with means testing.
You're clearly confused about what means testing is and what it does.

Means testing is simply a cap on social welfare subsidies so that those with sufficient incomes do not milk the tax payer any more than they already are being milked by an inefficient and corrupt welfare state.

You remove those caps and you'll completely dis-incentivize the poor from ever becoming self sufficient while incentivizing every American (including the "rich") to grab every tax payer funded subsidy they can get their hands on, regardless of how much income they have, as it stands now the poor (those below the poverty line) only see around $0.13 of every subsidy dollar paid out, your proposal would SIGNIFICANTLY reduce that number.

Corporate welfare is a completely separate issue and personally I think every penny of it should be done away with since it's the foundation of the crony capitalism that we're suffering under.
 
some on the left would be more impressed with the capitalist of the right, if he lived on his public servant salary while in public office.
You do that Trump said he wouldn't take the money while he is president?
not taking personal profit doesn't mean that firm won't making, potentially more money from an increase in tourism.
Trump is giving the profit to the treasury....which part is over your education level?
just clueless and Causeless?

not taking personal profit doesn't mean that firm won't making, potentially more money from an increase in tourism.
Let's hope so...we can pay your Obamas debt down even quicker!!!!
 
some on the left would be more impressed with the capitalist of the right, if he lived on his public servant salary while in public office.
You do that Trump said he wouldn't take the money while he is president?
not taking personal profit doesn't mean that firm won't making, potentially more money from an increase in tourism.
He said he won't take a salary for being president. Thanks for proving your bias. You said you would be impressed if he took a civil servant salary. Well he isn't taking any salary.
so what; it means he can care less about the position for public servant purposes.
 
some on the left would be more impressed with the capitalist of the right, if he lived on his public servant salary while in public office.
You do that Trump said he wouldn't take the money while he is president?
not taking personal profit doesn't mean that firm won't making, potentially more money from an increase in tourism.
He said he won't take a salary for being president. Thanks for proving your bias. You said you would be impressed if he took a civil servant salary. Well he isn't taking any salary.
so what; it means he can care less about the position for public servant purposes.
Seems that's the only reason he cares about....
 
never before has a POTUS made such an affirmative action to personally help America.....

All profits from foreign transactions will go directly to the treasury....

Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country....

That is part of a plan to avoid conflicts of interest under the new administration. Reports of foreign diplomats staying at Trump's hotels have raised concerns that these individuals could curry favor with the incoming president.

why the rich can get richer while the poor get their wealth taken away, through means testing.

Er..umm.. since when have the poor had any wealth to take away? The poor remain poor while the "rich" get richer thanks (to name a few) to the distribution effects of inflation, government over-regulation of the economy, crony capitalism and government programs which incentivize remaining poor not because of means testing entitlements.
means testing means they can't keep their bonus while on social welfare; corporate welfare lets the rich keep their multimillion dollar bonuses, even with means testing.
You're clearly confused about what means testing is and what it does.

Means testing is simply a cap on social welfare subsidies so that those with sufficient incomes do not milk the tax payer any more than they already are being milked by an inefficient and corrupt welfare state.

You remove those caps and you'll completely dis-incentivize the poor from ever becoming self sufficient while incentivizing every American (including the "rich") to grab every tax payer funded subsidy they can get their hands on, regardless of how much income they have, as it stands now the poor (those below the poverty line) only see around $0.13 of every subsidy dollar paid out, your proposal would SIGNIFICANTLY reduce that number.

Corporate welfare is a completely separate issue and personally I think every penny of it should be done away with since it's the foundation of the crony capitalism that we're suffering under.
means testing has a place. it should be reserved for those for whom solving for a simple poverty of money, may not be enough.

for the rest, unemployment compensation simply for being unemployed, should be enough.
 
some on the left would be more impressed with the capitalist of the right, if he lived on his public servant salary while in public office.
You do that Trump said he wouldn't take the money while he is president?
not taking personal profit doesn't mean that firm won't making, potentially more money from an increase in tourism.
He said he won't take a salary for being president. Thanks for proving your bias. You said you would be impressed if he took a civil servant salary. Well he isn't taking any salary.
so what; it means he can care less about the position for public servant purposes.
Seems that's the only reason he cares about....
not on his one percent salary.
 
some on the left would be more impressed with the capitalist of the right, if he lived on his public servant salary while in public office.
You do that Trump said he wouldn't take the money while he is president?
not taking personal profit doesn't mean that firm won't making, potentially more money from an increase in tourism.
He said he won't take a salary for being president. Thanks for proving your bias. You said you would be impressed if he took a civil servant salary. Well he isn't taking any salary.
so what; it means he can care less about the position for public servant purposes.
Oh so now you find out he won't take a salary you change your story. Lol
dogtail.gif
 
some on the left would be more impressed with the capitalist of the right, if he lived on his public servant salary while in public office.
You do that Trump said he wouldn't take the money while he is president?
not taking personal profit doesn't mean that firm won't making, potentially more money from an increase in tourism.
He said he won't take a salary for being president. Thanks for proving your bias. You said you would be impressed if he took a civil servant salary. Well he isn't taking any salary.
so what; it means he can care less about the position for public servant purposes.
Oh so now you find out he won't take a salary you change your story. LolView attachment 106379
same story, just Your reading incomprehension problem.
 
never before has a POTUS made such an affirmative action to personally help America.....

All profits from foreign transactions will go directly to the treasury....

Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country....

Will the government then be liable for Trump bankruptcies?
 
Trump.....the left better hold on tight, this man is going to run rings around them for the next 8 years.....and build a power house of a country again.......
 
Trump isn't doing this out of charitable motivations. He's doing it to avoid violating the Emoluments Clause. That's probably why the fucktard who started this thread didn't give you a link.
 
never before has a POTUS made such an affirmative action to personally help America.....

All profits from foreign transactions will go directly to the treasury....

Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country....

Will the government then be liable for Trump bankruptcies?


Wow....did you think about that post for a long time.......you should have thought longer......
 
never before has a POTUS made such an affirmative action to personally help America.....

All profits from foreign transactions will go directly to the treasury....

Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country....

Will the government then be liable for Trump bankruptcies?


Wow....did you think about that post for a long time.......you should have thought longer......

Read post 55 and see if you have anything to refute that.
 
never before has a POTUS made such an affirmative action to personally help America.....

All profits from foreign transactions will go directly to the treasury....

Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country....

Will the government then be liable for Trump bankruptcies?


Wow....did you think about that post for a long time.......you should have thought longer......

Read post 55 and see if you have anything to refute that.


He didn't have to...he doesn't have to do any of it...he is exempt...
 
never before has a POTUS made such an affirmative action to personally help America.....

All profits from foreign transactions will go directly to the treasury....

Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country....

Will the government then be liable for Trump bankruptcies?


Wow....did you think about that post for a long time.......you should have thought longer......

Read post 55 and see if you have anything to refute that.


He didn't have to...he doesn't have to do any of it...he is exempt...


Known as the “emoluments clause,” the provision says “no person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign state.”
 
never before has a POTUS made such an affirmative action to personally help America.....

All profits from foreign transactions will go directly to the treasury....

Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country....

Will the government then be liable for Trump bankruptcies?


Wow....did you think about that post for a long time.......you should have thought longer......

Read post 55 and see if you have anything to refute that.


He didn't have to...he doesn't have to do any of it...he is exempt...


Known as the “emoluments clause,” the provision says “no person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign state.”
Everything was explained in the press conference. We don't need your opinion on what it means.
 

Forum List

Back
Top