Trump’s First Military Action May Target Iran!

[Vigilante]

Wouldn't that be fun

Indeed.....it should be "fun".......The idiot, Viginalante, kind of neglects to mention what a war with Iran may be like.....I mean we did so damn well in Iraq and Iran is 3 times bigger....has an atr force and navy....and if you ever wanted to unite Shi'a and Sunnis, sure launch a war with Iran and see what happens.......

What a bunch of fucking right wing nut jobs.

Yes, instead the jug earred ass in the WH was trying to start WWIII with Putin, one of 2 countries that could really do us cdasmage!

Yet you think Trump will violate an agreement with Putin and destroy the nuclear facility of one of Russia's allies. Hmm.

No dumbass, that is why Putin called Trump, to work out our disagreements....these 2 men have the ability to do that, the arrogant bastard in the WH doesn't!

So you think somewhere in the conversation, Trump said I'm going to kill the deal we made and bomb your ally?

Do you think Putin gives a shit about Iran, if it came down to a war with us?....or are you as stupid as your monicker OldFool is?

 

[TheOldSchool]

Indeed.....it should be "fun".......The idiot, Viginalante, kind of neglects to mention what a war with Iran may be like.....I mean we did so damn well in Iraq and Iran is 3 times bigger....has an atr force and navy....and if you ever wanted to unite Shi'a and Sunnis, sure launch a war with Iran and see what happens.......

What a bunch of fucking right wing nut jobs.

Yes, instead the jug earred ass in the WH was trying to start WWIII with Putin, one of 2 countries that could really do us cdasmage!

Yet you think Trump will violate an agreement with Putin and destroy the nuclear facility of one of Russia's allies. Hmm.

No dumbass, that is why Putin called Trump, to work out our disagreements....these 2 men have the ability to do that, the arrogant bastard in the WH doesn't!

So you think somewhere in the conversation, Trump said I'm going to kill the deal we made and bomb your ally?

Do you think Putin gives a shit about Iran, if it came down to a war with us?....or are you as stupid as your monicker OldFool is?

I think Putin got exactly what he wanted with Trump's win. If Trump starts another fun little pre-emptive war, it will only be after getting Putin's permission. And Putin will use the fallout to raise Russia's position in the world like he did during Dubya's Iraq adventures.

 

[Vigilante]

Yes, instead the jug earred ass in the WH was trying to start WWIII with Putin, one of 2 countries that could really do us cdasmage!

Yet you think Trump will violate an agreement with Putin and destroy the nuclear facility of one of Russia's allies. Hmm.

No dumbass, that is why Putin called Trump, to work out our disagreements....these 2 men have the ability to do that, the arrogant bastard in the WH doesn't!

So you think somewhere in the conversation, Trump said I'm going to kill the deal we made and bomb your ally?

Do you think Putin gives a shit about Iran, if it came down to a war with us?....or are you as stupid as your monicker OldFool is?

I think Putin got exactly what he wanted with Trump's win. If Trump starts another fun little pre-emptive war, it will only be after getting Putin's permission. And Putin will use the fallout to raise Russia's position in the world like he did during Dubya's Iraq adventures.

That's your problem, you don't think. The hostilities over Syria was a cause of so much tension that Putin sent a fleet of ships including Russias only air craft carrier to Syria...his calling Trump is a magnanimous gesture, on his part to diffuse a potentially disasterous situation...the Obomanation was starting to draw more red lines!

 

[cnelsen]

Iran hasn't initiated an attack on another country in 2000 years. We run around invading another country every other week and who even knows why? Do you even remember what our justification was for bombing the shit out of Libya? How about Serbia? We bombed them too, you know. Our allies. We are the only country that has ever used a nuclear weapon on another country, and we've done it twice..and we're going to tell Iran that THEY can't be trusted? Wake up, man. Iran has us in the Persian Gulf throwing our weight around. It has on its borders a nuclear-armed Pakistan, a nuclear-armed India, a nuclear-armed Pakistan, a nuclear-armed Russia, and just a stone's throw away, a nuclear-armed Israel. And we are going to tell them they must remain defenseless? What the hell is wrong with us? Why do we let Israel dance stupidly into which ever war they please (and there is NO END TO JEWISH BLOODLUST).

Watch this video from Wikileaks if you can bear it. THIS IS US DOING THIS!! WHY??? WE AREN'T MONSTERS.

 

[Dubya Da Last Repug Prez]

I’ll bet none of our Navy ships will ever be captured...and we will never pay these terrorist fucks a Ransom again!!!!!!

Debkafiles ^ | nov 2016 ast | Gioria Shamis editor


In more than one campaign speech, President elect Donald Trump declared that his number priority was “to dismantle the disastrous deal” with Iran, which he said was “the worst deal ever”

He was referring to the 2015 accord negotiated with Iran by the 5P+1 (five Permanent Security Council members plus Germany), which the Obama administration presented as putting the lid on Iran’s nuclear weapons program. Trump vowed to use force if necessary to prevent Tehran from acquiring the bomb.

So does Tehran have more to fear from Donald Trump than from Barack Obama in the way of US military intervention? They can’t be sure that he will not set out to show the world – and especially the Iranians - that under his presidency, they can no longer “mess with America.”

Iranian sources report that the ayatollahs are concerned enough to seriously contemplate the following scenario.

The incoming president, after he takes office in the White House on Jan. 20, will act to raise America’s lame image in the Middle East by a surgical strike against an Iranian nuclear facility. One option projected is the blowing up of the Arak heavy water plant for plutonium production at the military complex city of Arak; another would be destroying an Iranian ballistic missile base.

Trump and the Republican-ruled Congress would certainly not tolerate Iranian breaches after America coughed up $150 billion in eased sanctions and released frozen assets.

A Trump administration would be able to marshal seven arguments to justify military action:

1. On Nov. 2, a week before the presidential election, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna reported Iran in violation of the nuclear deal by producing 130.1 tons of heavy water at the Arak plant, 100kg more than allowed. In past cases, the Iranians quickly exported the excess amount. But with a new US president on the way, they may try to use it as a one-ton test of his resolve.

2. In another challenge, Iran is threatening to renege unless more economic benefits are forthcoming. The nuclear restrictions imposed under the deal end in about seven years, when Iran can start going back to its weapons program.

3. Tehran never actually signed the 2014 nuclear deal in the first place. It has remained on paper on three pages as “The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action Regarding the Islamic Republic of Iran’s Nuclear Program” announced in Lausanne on July 14, 2015 by US Secretary of State John Kerry and Iran’s Foreign Minister Muhammed Javad Zarif.

Three days later, Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei commented: “Our policy will not change with regard to the arrogant US government.”

4. The document was eventually endorsed by the UN Security Council. This obliged the IAEA to follow up it its presumed commitments by inspections on the ground to confirm Iran’s compliance. However, because much of its content was kept under wraps, American and Iranian obligations have been hard to pin down.

5. The deal’s omissions are a lot clearer. Tehran is not committed to release information on its nuclear program prior to the date of the deal - including how far it had progressed towards a weapon.

6. The nuclear deal did not cover Iran’s long-range ballistic missile program, which continues to develop apace. Ten months ago, the Obama administration tried to correct this omission by imposing fresh sanctions on Iran unless the program was curtailed. There is no information available up until now as to whether this deterrent worked.

7. US military action against Iran’s nuclear or missile programs may also serve the Trump administration to drive a wedge in the partnership between Moscow and Tehran and draw a new line in the sands of the Middle East. The Russians would certainly not step in by force in Iran’s defense, except for possibly sharing some intelligence. Moscow would be shown as failing to back its ally and therefore secure the gains Vladimir Putin managed to amass in the Middle East when Obama was president.

So many words, yet so little brains.

Another disastrous war in the Middle East perpetuated by another hopelessly stupid and incompetent Repug president. We've seen this horror story before.

Remind me again why you Repug goobers voted for Trump?

 

[Care4all]

I guess Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria aren't enough?

The Military Industrial complex Corporations needs to line their pockets with more tax payer gold now that Republicans are in charge...time for them to rape us of our Nation's wealth again.... sure HOPE the Donald does not buy in to their crap!

 

[Vigilante]

I’ll bet none of our Navy ships will ever be captured...and we will never pay these terrorist fucks a Ransom again!!!!!!

Debkafiles ^ | nov 2016 ast | Gioria Shamis editor


In more than one campaign speech, President elect Donald Trump declared that his number priority was “to dismantle the disastrous deal” with Iran, which he said was “the worst deal ever”

He was referring to the 2015 accord negotiated with Iran by the 5P+1 (five Permanent Security Council members plus Germany), which the Obama administration presented as putting the lid on Iran’s nuclear weapons program. Trump vowed to use force if necessary to prevent Tehran from acquiring the bomb.

So does Tehran have more to fear from Donald Trump than from Barack Obama in the way of US military intervention? They can’t be sure that he will not set out to show the world – and especially the Iranians - that under his presidency, they can no longer “mess with America.”

Iranian sources report that the ayatollahs are concerned enough to seriously contemplate the following scenario.

The incoming president, after he takes office in the White House on Jan. 20, will act to raise America’s lame image in the Middle East by a surgical strike against an Iranian nuclear facility. One option projected is the blowing up of the Arak heavy water plant for plutonium production at the military complex city of Arak; another would be destroying an Iranian ballistic missile base.

Trump and the Republican-ruled Congress would certainly not tolerate Iranian breaches after America coughed up $150 billion in eased sanctions and released frozen assets.

A Trump administration would be able to marshal seven arguments to justify military action:

1. On Nov. 2, a week before the presidential election, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna reported Iran in violation of the nuclear deal by producing 130.1 tons of heavy water at the Arak plant, 100kg more than allowed. In past cases, the Iranians quickly exported the excess amount. But with a new US president on the way, they may try to use it as a one-ton test of his resolve.

2. In another challenge, Iran is threatening to renege unless more economic benefits are forthcoming. The nuclear restrictions imposed under the deal end in about seven years, when Iran can start going back to its weapons program.

3. Tehran never actually signed the 2014 nuclear deal in the first place. It has remained on paper on three pages as “The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action Regarding the Islamic Republic of Iran’s Nuclear Program” announced in Lausanne on July 14, 2015 by US Secretary of State John Kerry and Iran’s Foreign Minister Muhammed Javad Zarif.

Three days later, Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei commented: “Our policy will not change with regard to the arrogant US government.”

4. The document was eventually endorsed by the UN Security Council. This obliged the IAEA to follow up it its presumed commitments by inspections on the ground to confirm Iran’s compliance. However, because much of its content was kept under wraps, American and Iranian obligations have been hard to pin down.

5. The deal’s omissions are a lot clearer. Tehran is not committed to release information on its nuclear program prior to the date of the deal - including how far it had progressed towards a weapon.

6. The nuclear deal did not cover Iran’s long-range ballistic missile program, which continues to develop apace. Ten months ago, the Obama administration tried to correct this omission by imposing fresh sanctions on Iran unless the program was curtailed. There is no information available up until now as to whether this deterrent worked.

7. US military action against Iran’s nuclear or missile programs may also serve the Trump administration to drive a wedge in the partnership between Moscow and Tehran and draw a new line in the sands of the Middle East. The Russians would certainly not step in by force in Iran’s defense, except for possibly sharing some intelligence. Moscow would be shown as failing to back its ally and therefore secure the gains Vladimir Putin managed to amass in the Middle East when Obama was president.

So many words, yet so little brains.

Another disastrous war in the Middle East perpetuated by another hopelessly stupid and incompetent Repug president. We've seen this horror story before.

Remind me again why you Repug goobers voted for Trump?

I see you don't understand the significance of Putin calling Trump....As Iran's chief backer, negotiation's start with these 2 men!

 

[Timmy]

I’ll bet none of our Navy ships will ever be captured...and we will never pay these terrorist fucks a Ransom again!!!!!!

Debkafiles ^ | nov 2016 ast | Gioria Shamis editor


In more than one campaign speech, President elect Donald Trump declared that his number priority was “to dismantle the disastrous deal” with Iran, which he said was “the worst deal ever”

He was referring to the 2015 accord negotiated with Iran by the 5P+1 (five Permanent Security Council members plus Germany), which the Obama administration presented as putting the lid on Iran’s nuclear weapons program. Trump vowed to use force if necessary to prevent Tehran from acquiring the bomb.

So does Tehran have more to fear from Donald Trump than from Barack Obama in the way of US military intervention? They can’t be sure that he will not set out to show the world – and especially the Iranians - that under his presidency, they can no longer “mess with America.”

Iranian sources report that the ayatollahs are concerned enough to seriously contemplate the following scenario.

The incoming president, after he takes office in the White House on Jan. 20, will act to raise America’s lame image in the Middle East by a surgical strike against an Iranian nuclear facility. One option projected is the blowing up of the Arak heavy water plant for plutonium production at the military complex city of Arak; another would be destroying an Iranian ballistic missile base.

Trump and the Republican-ruled Congress would certainly not tolerate Iranian breaches after America coughed up $150 billion in eased sanctions and released frozen assets.

A Trump administration would be able to marshal seven arguments to justify military action:

1. On Nov. 2, a week before the presidential election, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna reported Iran in violation of the nuclear deal by producing 130.1 tons of heavy water at the Arak plant, 100kg more than allowed. In past cases, the Iranians quickly exported the excess amount. But with a new US president on the way, they may try to use it as a one-ton test of his resolve.

2. In another challenge, Iran is threatening to renege unless more economic benefits are forthcoming. The nuclear restrictions imposed under the deal end in about seven years, when Iran can start going back to its weapons program.

3. Tehran never actually signed the 2014 nuclear deal in the first place. It has remained on paper on three pages as “The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action Regarding the Islamic Republic of Iran’s Nuclear Program” announced in Lausanne on July 14, 2015 by US Secretary of State John Kerry and Iran’s Foreign Minister Muhammed Javad Zarif.

Three days later, Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei commented: “Our policy will not change with regard to the arrogant US government.”

4. The document was eventually endorsed by the UN Security Council. This obliged the IAEA to follow up it its presumed commitments by inspections on the ground to confirm Iran’s compliance. However, because much of its content was kept under wraps, American and Iranian obligations have been hard to pin down.

5. The deal’s omissions are a lot clearer. Tehran is not committed to release information on its nuclear program prior to the date of the deal - including how far it had progressed towards a weapon.

6. The nuclear deal did not cover Iran’s long-range ballistic missile program, which continues to develop apace. Ten months ago, the Obama administration tried to correct this omission by imposing fresh sanctions on Iran unless the program was curtailed. There is no information available up until now as to whether this deterrent worked.

7. US military action against Iran’s nuclear or missile programs may also serve the Trump administration to drive a wedge in the partnership between Moscow and Tehran and draw a new line in the sands of the Middle East. The Russians would certainly not step in by force in Iran’s defense, except for possibly sharing some intelligence. Moscow would be shown as failing to back its ally and therefore secure the gains Vladimir Putin managed to amass in the Middle East when Obama was president.

So many words, yet so little brains.

Another disastrous war in the Middle East perpetuated by another hopelessly stupid and incompetent Repug president. We've seen this horror story before.

Remind me again why you Repug goobers voted for Trump?

I see you don't understand the significance of Putin calling Trump....As Iran's chief backer, negotiation's start with these 2 men!

Putin was calling in orders to Trump .

Russian hackers won the election for him . He owes vlad big time .

 

[Vigilante]

Iran hasn't initiated an attack on another country in 2000 years. We run around invading another country every other week and who even knows why? Do you even remember what our justification was for bombing the shit out of Libya? How about Serbia? We bombed them too, you know. Our allies. We are the only country that has ever used a nuclear weapon on another country, and we've done it twice..and we're going to tell Iran that THEY can't be trusted? Wake up, man. Iran has us in the Persian Gulf throwing our weight around. It has on its borders a nuclear-armed Pakistan, a nuclear-armed India, a nuclear-armed Pakistan, a nuclear-armed Russia, and just a stone's throw away, a nuclear-armed Israel. And we are going to tell them they must remain defenseless? What the hell is wrong with us? Why do we let Israel dance stupidly into which ever war they please (and there is NO END TO JEWISH BLOODLUST).

Watch this video from Wikileaks if you can bear it. THIS IS US DOING THIS!! WHY??? WE AREN'T MONSTERS.

Iran didn't have religious fanatics running it untiln1979!...iI see you are also an antisemite!...It helps in your state of mind!

 

[Vigilante]

I’ll bet none of our Navy ships will ever be captured...and we will never pay these terrorist fucks a Ransom again!!!!!!

Debkafiles ^ | nov 2016 ast | Gioria Shamis editor


In more than one campaign speech, President elect Donald Trump declared that his number priority was “to dismantle the disastrous deal” with Iran, which he said was “the worst deal ever”

He was referring to the 2015 accord negotiated with Iran by the 5P+1 (five Permanent Security Council members plus Germany), which the Obama administration presented as putting the lid on Iran’s nuclear weapons program. Trump vowed to use force if necessary to prevent Tehran from acquiring the bomb.

So does Tehran have more to fear from Donald Trump than from Barack Obama in the way of US military intervention? They can’t be sure that he will not set out to show the world – and especially the Iranians - that under his presidency, they can no longer “mess with America.”

Iranian sources report that the ayatollahs are concerned enough to seriously contemplate the following scenario.

The incoming president, after he takes office in the White House on Jan. 20, will act to raise America’s lame image in the Middle East by a surgical strike against an Iranian nuclear facility. One option projected is the blowing up of the Arak heavy water plant for plutonium production at the military complex city of Arak; another would be destroying an Iranian ballistic missile base.

Trump and the Republican-ruled Congress would certainly not tolerate Iranian breaches after America coughed up $150 billion in eased sanctions and released frozen assets.

A Trump administration would be able to marshal seven arguments to justify military action:

1. On Nov. 2, a week before the presidential election, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna reported Iran in violation of the nuclear deal by producing 130.1 tons of heavy water at the Arak plant, 100kg more than allowed. In past cases, the Iranians quickly exported the excess amount. But with a new US president on the way, they may try to use it as a one-ton test of his resolve.

2. In another challenge, Iran is threatening to renege unless more economic benefits are forthcoming. The nuclear restrictions imposed under the deal end in about seven years, when Iran can start going back to its weapons program.

3. Tehran never actually signed the 2014 nuclear deal in the first place. It has remained on paper on three pages as “The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action Regarding the Islamic Republic of Iran’s Nuclear Program” announced in Lausanne on July 14, 2015 by US Secretary of State John Kerry and Iran’s Foreign Minister Muhammed Javad Zarif.

Three days later, Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei commented: “Our policy will not change with regard to the arrogant US government.”

4. The document was eventually endorsed by the UN Security Council. This obliged the IAEA to follow up it its presumed commitments by inspections on the ground to confirm Iran’s compliance. However, because much of its content was kept under wraps, American and Iranian obligations have been hard to pin down.

5. The deal’s omissions are a lot clearer. Tehran is not committed to release information on its nuclear program prior to the date of the deal - including how far it had progressed towards a weapon.

6. The nuclear deal did not cover Iran’s long-range ballistic missile program, which continues to develop apace. Ten months ago, the Obama administration tried to correct this omission by imposing fresh sanctions on Iran unless the program was curtailed. There is no information available up until now as to whether this deterrent worked.

7. US military action against Iran’s nuclear or missile programs may also serve the Trump administration to drive a wedge in the partnership between Moscow and Tehran and draw a new line in the sands of the Middle East. The Russians would certainly not step in by force in Iran’s defense, except for possibly sharing some intelligence. Moscow would be shown as failing to back its ally and therefore secure the gains Vladimir Putin managed to amass in the Middle East when Obama was president.

So many words, yet so little brains.

Another disastrous war in the Middle East perpetuated by another hopelessly stupid and incompetent Repug president. We've seen this horror story before.

Remind me again why you Repug goobers voted for Trump?

I see you don't understand the significance of Putin calling Trump....As Iran's chief backer, negotiation's start with these 2 men!

Putin was calling in orders to Trump .

Russian hackers won the election for him . He owes vlad big time .

Did the mother ship tell you where it would land, also?

 

[Timmy]

I’ll bet none of our Navy ships will ever be captured...and we will never pay these terrorist fucks a Ransom again!!!!!!

Debkafiles ^ | nov 2016 ast | Gioria Shamis editor


In more than one campaign speech, President elect Donald Trump declared that his number priority was “to dismantle the disastrous deal” with Iran, which he said was “the worst deal ever”

He was referring to the 2015 accord negotiated with Iran by the 5P+1 (five Permanent Security Council members plus Germany), which the Obama administration presented as putting the lid on Iran’s nuclear weapons program. Trump vowed to use force if necessary to prevent Tehran from acquiring the bomb.

So does Tehran have more to fear from Donald Trump than from Barack Obama in the way of US military intervention? They can’t be sure that he will not set out to show the world – and especially the Iranians - that under his presidency, they can no longer “mess with America.”

Iranian sources report that the ayatollahs are concerned enough to seriously contemplate the following scenario.

The incoming president, after he takes office in the White House on Jan. 20, will act to raise America’s lame image in the Middle East by a surgical strike against an Iranian nuclear facility. One option projected is the blowing up of the Arak heavy water plant for plutonium production at the military complex city of Arak; another would be destroying an Iranian ballistic missile base.

Trump and the Republican-ruled Congress would certainly not tolerate Iranian breaches after America coughed up $150 billion in eased sanctions and released frozen assets.

A Trump administration would be able to marshal seven arguments to justify military action:

1. On Nov. 2, a week before the presidential election, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna reported Iran in violation of the nuclear deal by producing 130.1 tons of heavy water at the Arak plant, 100kg more than allowed. In past cases, the Iranians quickly exported the excess amount. But with a new US president on the way, they may try to use it as a one-ton test of his resolve.

2. In another challenge, Iran is threatening to renege unless more economic benefits are forthcoming. The nuclear restrictions imposed under the deal end in about seven years, when Iran can start going back to its weapons program.

3. Tehran never actually signed the 2014 nuclear deal in the first place. It has remained on paper on three pages as “The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action Regarding the Islamic Republic of Iran’s Nuclear Program” announced in Lausanne on July 14, 2015 by US Secretary of State John Kerry and Iran’s Foreign Minister Muhammed Javad Zarif.

Three days later, Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei commented: “Our policy will not change with regard to the arrogant US government.”

4. The document was eventually endorsed by the UN Security Council. This obliged the IAEA to follow up it its presumed commitments by inspections on the ground to confirm Iran’s compliance. However, because much of its content was kept under wraps, American and Iranian obligations have been hard to pin down.

5. The deal’s omissions are a lot clearer. Tehran is not committed to release information on its nuclear program prior to the date of the deal - including how far it had progressed towards a weapon.

6. The nuclear deal did not cover Iran’s long-range ballistic missile program, which continues to develop apace. Ten months ago, the Obama administration tried to correct this omission by imposing fresh sanctions on Iran unless the program was curtailed. There is no information available up until now as to whether this deterrent worked.

7. US military action against Iran’s nuclear or missile programs may also serve the Trump administration to drive a wedge in the partnership between Moscow and Tehran and draw a new line in the sands of the Middle East. The Russians would certainly not step in by force in Iran’s defense, except for possibly sharing some intelligence. Moscow would be shown as failing to back its ally and therefore secure the gains Vladimir Putin managed to amass in the Middle East when Obama was president.

So many words, yet so little brains.

Another disastrous war in the Middle East perpetuated by another hopelessly stupid and incompetent Repug president. We've seen this horror story before.

Remind me again why you Repug goobers voted for Trump?

I see you don't understand the significance of Putin calling Trump....As Iran's chief backer, negotiation's start with these 2 men!

Putin was calling in orders to Trump .

Russian hackers won the election for him . He owes vlad big time .

Did the mother ship tell you where it would land, also?

I learned the "is rigged /fixed" line from watching right wingers .

 

[Vigilante]

I’ll bet none of our Navy ships will ever be captured...and we will never pay these terrorist fucks a Ransom again!!!!!!

Debkafiles ^ | nov 2016 ast | Gioria Shamis editor


In more than one campaign speech, President elect Donald Trump declared that his number priority was “to dismantle the disastrous deal” with Iran, which he said was “the worst deal ever”

He was referring to the 2015 accord negotiated with Iran by the 5P+1 (five Permanent Security Council members plus Germany), which the Obama administration presented as putting the lid on Iran’s nuclear weapons program. Trump vowed to use force if necessary to prevent Tehran from acquiring the bomb.

So does Tehran have more to fear from Donald Trump than from Barack Obama in the way of US military intervention? They can’t be sure that he will not set out to show the world – and especially the Iranians - that under his presidency, they can no longer “mess with America.”

Iranian sources report that the ayatollahs are concerned enough to seriously contemplate the following scenario.

The incoming president, after he takes office in the White House on Jan. 20, will act to raise America’s lame image in the Middle East by a surgical strike against an Iranian nuclear facility. One option projected is the blowing up of the Arak heavy water plant for plutonium production at the military complex city of Arak; another would be destroying an Iranian ballistic missile base.

Trump and the Republican-ruled Congress would certainly not tolerate Iranian breaches after America coughed up $150 billion in eased sanctions and released frozen assets.

A Trump administration would be able to marshal seven arguments to justify military action:

1. On Nov. 2, a week before the presidential election, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna reported Iran in violation of the nuclear deal by producing 130.1 tons of heavy water at the Arak plant, 100kg more than allowed. In past cases, the Iranians quickly exported the excess amount. But with a new US president on the way, they may try to use it as a one-ton test of his resolve.

2. In another challenge, Iran is threatening to renege unless more economic benefits are forthcoming. The nuclear restrictions imposed under the deal end in about seven years, when Iran can start going back to its weapons program.

3. Tehran never actually signed the 2014 nuclear deal in the first place. It has remained on paper on three pages as “The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action Regarding the Islamic Republic of Iran’s Nuclear Program” announced in Lausanne on July 14, 2015 by US Secretary of State John Kerry and Iran’s Foreign Minister Muhammed Javad Zarif.

Three days later, Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei commented: “Our policy will not change with regard to the arrogant US government.”

4. The document was eventually endorsed by the UN Security Council. This obliged the IAEA to follow up it its presumed commitments by inspections on the ground to confirm Iran’s compliance. However, because much of its content was kept under wraps, American and Iranian obligations have been hard to pin down.

5. The deal’s omissions are a lot clearer. Tehran is not committed to release information on its nuclear program prior to the date of the deal - including how far it had progressed towards a weapon.

6. The nuclear deal did not cover Iran’s long-range ballistic missile program, which continues to develop apace. Ten months ago, the Obama administration tried to correct this omission by imposing fresh sanctions on Iran unless the program was curtailed. There is no information available up until now as to whether this deterrent worked.

7. US military action against Iran’s nuclear or missile programs may also serve the Trump administration to drive a wedge in the partnership between Moscow and Tehran and draw a new line in the sands of the Middle East. The Russians would certainly not step in by force in Iran’s defense, except for possibly sharing some intelligence. Moscow would be shown as failing to back its ally and therefore secure the gains Vladimir Putin managed to amass in the Middle East when Obama was president.

So many words, yet so little brains.

Another disastrous war in the Middle East perpetuated by another hopelessly stupid and incompetent Repug president. We've seen this horror story before.

Remind me again why you Repug goobers voted for Trump?

I see you don't understand the significance of Putin calling Trump....As Iran's chief backer, negotiation's start with these 2 men!

Putin was calling in orders to Trump .

Russian hackers won the election for him . He owes vlad big time .

Did the mother ship tell you where it would land, also?

I learned the "is rigged /fixed" line from watching right wingers .

Now you should try reading WikiLeaks to see how the corrupt, and criminal DNC and Cunton campaigned did it!

 

[Care4all]

Gosh almighty....

What happened to NO MORE USELESS WARS? Send his sons, make them enlist, and only when they are ready to go on the battle field in Iran, should this be done.

This is bull crap....

Maine is a close target for an Iranian ICBM!

Not enough people concentrated in one spot here for it to make an impact, and of course, there is the fact that if anyone from anywhere, attacked the US in that kind of manner, they might as well kiss their asses goodbye....we would annihilate them and they KNOW this....

 

[Vigilante]

Gosh almighty....

What happened to NO MORE USELESS WARS? Send his sons, make them enlist, and only when they are ready to go on the battle field in Iran, should this be done.

This is bull crap....

Maine is a close target for an Iranian ICBM!

Not enough people concentrated in one spot here for it to make an impact, and of course, there is the fact that if anyone from anywhere, attacked the US in that kind of manner, they might as well kiss their asses goodbye....we would annihilate them and they KNOW this....

Iran is the birthplace of the suicide bomber!

 

[JimH52]

''

I’ll bet none of our Navy ships will ever be captured...and we will never pay these terrorist fucks a Ransom again!!!!!!

Debkafiles ^ | nov 2016 ast | Gioria Shamis editor


In more than one campaign speech, President elect Donald Trump declared that his number priority was “to dismantle the disastrous deal” with Iran, which he said was “the worst deal ever”

He was referring to the 2015 accord negotiated with Iran by the 5P+1 (five Permanent Security Council members plus Germany), which the Obama administration presented as putting the lid on Iran’s nuclear weapons program. Trump vowed to use force if necessary to prevent Tehran from acquiring the bomb.

So does Tehran have more to fear from Donald Trump than from Barack Obama in the way of US military intervention? They can’t be sure that he will not set out to show the world – and especially the Iranians - that under his presidency, they can no longer “mess with America.”

Iranian sources report that the ayatollahs are concerned enough to seriously contemplate the following scenario.

The incoming president, after he takes office in the White House on Jan. 20, will act to raise America’s lame image in the Middle East by a surgical strike against an Iranian nuclear facility. One option projected is the blowing up of the Arak heavy water plant for plutonium production at the military complex city of Arak; another would be destroying an Iranian ballistic missile base.

Trump and the Republican-ruled Congress would certainly not tolerate Iranian breaches after America coughed up $150 billion in eased sanctions and released frozen assets.

A Trump administration would be able to marshal seven arguments to justify military action:

1. On Nov. 2, a week before the presidential election, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna reported Iran in violation of the nuclear deal by producing 130.1 tons of heavy water at the Arak plant, 100kg more than allowed. In past cases, the Iranians quickly exported the excess amount. But with a new US president on the way, they may try to use it as a one-ton test of his resolve.

2. In another challenge, Iran is threatening to renege unless more economic benefits are forthcoming. The nuclear restrictions imposed under the deal end in about seven years, when Iran can start going back to its weapons program.

3. Tehran never actually signed the 2014 nuclear deal in the first place. It has remained on paper on three pages as “The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action Regarding the Islamic Republic of Iran’s Nuclear Program” announced in Lausanne on July 14, 2015 by US Secretary of State John Kerry and Iran’s Foreign Minister Muhammed Javad Zarif.

Three days later, Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei commented: “Our policy will not change with regard to the arrogant US government.”

4. The document was eventually endorsed by the UN Security Council. This obliged the IAEA to follow up it its presumed commitments by inspections on the ground to confirm Iran’s compliance. However, because much of its content was kept under wraps, American and Iranian obligations have been hard to pin down.

5. The deal’s omissions are a lot clearer. Tehran is not committed to release information on its nuclear program prior to the date of the deal - including how far it had progressed towards a weapon.

6. The nuclear deal did not cover Iran’s long-range ballistic missile program, which continues to develop apace. Ten months ago, the Obama administration tried to correct this omission by imposing fresh sanctions on Iran unless the program was curtailed. There is no information available up until now as to whether this deterrent worked.

7. US military action against Iran’s nuclear or missile programs may also serve the Trump administration to drive a wedge in the partnership between Moscow and Tehran and draw a new line in the sands of the Middle East. The Russians would certainly not step in by force in Iran’s defense, except for possibly sharing some intelligence. Moscow would be shown as failing to back its ally and therefore secure the gains Vladimir Putin managed to amass in the Middle East when Obama was president.

Look how easily we are manipulated. This author Gioria Shamis uses language like. "Show them we can't be pushed around anymore". Jesus Christ, what are we in the fifth grade. Next she/he/it will be double daring us to show them who's boss. My God. And this shit works. Stop being so stupid and easily chosenled.

I’ll bet none of our Navy ships will ever be captured...and we will never pay these terrorist fucks a Ransom again!!!!!!

Debkafiles ^ | nov 2016 ast | Gioria Shamis editor


In more than one campaign speech, President elect Donald Trump declared that his number priority was “to dismantle the disastrous deal” with Iran, which he said was “the worst deal ever”

He was referring to the 2015 accord negotiated with Iran by the 5P+1 (five Permanent Security Council members plus Germany), which the Obama administration presented as putting the lid on Iran’s nuclear weapons program. Trump vowed to use force if necessary to prevent Tehran from acquiring the bomb.

So does Tehran have more to fear from Donald Trump than from Barack Obama in the way of US military intervention? They can’t be sure that he will not set out to show the world – and especially the Iranians - that under his presidency, they can no longer “mess with America.”

Iranian sources report that the ayatollahs are concerned enough to seriously contemplate the following scenario.

The incoming president, after he takes office in the White House on Jan. 20, will act to raise America’s lame image in the Middle East by a surgical strike against an Iranian nuclear facility. One option projected is the blowing up of the Arak heavy water plant for plutonium production at the military complex city of Arak; another would be destroying an Iranian ballistic missile base.

Trump and the Republican-ruled Congress would certainly not tolerate Iranian breaches after America coughed up $150 billion in eased sanctions and released frozen assets.

A Trump administration would be able to marshal seven arguments to justify military action:

1. On Nov. 2, a week before the presidential election, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna reported Iran in violation of the nuclear deal by producing 130.1 tons of heavy water at the Arak plant, 100kg more than allowed. In past cases, the Iranians quickly exported the excess amount. But with a new US president on the way, they may try to use it as a one-ton test of his resolve.

2. In another challenge, Iran is threatening to renege unless more economic benefits are forthcoming. The nuclear restrictions imposed under the deal end in about seven years, when Iran can start going back to its weapons program.

3. Tehran never actually signed the 2014 nuclear deal in the first place. It has remained on paper on three pages as “The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action Regarding the Islamic Republic of Iran’s Nuclear Program” announced in Lausanne on July 14, 2015 by US Secretary of State John Kerry and Iran’s Foreign Minister Muhammed Javad Zarif.

Three days later, Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei commented: “Our policy will not change with regard to the arrogant US government.”

4. The document was eventually endorsed by the UN Security Council. This obliged the IAEA to follow up it its presumed commitments by inspections on the ground to confirm Iran’s compliance. However, because much of its content was kept under wraps, American and Iranian obligations have been hard to pin down.

5. The deal’s omissions are a lot clearer. Tehran is not committed to release information on its nuclear program prior to the date of the deal - including how far it had progressed towards a weapon.

6. The nuclear deal did not cover Iran’s long-range ballistic missile program, which continues to develop apace. Ten months ago, the Obama administration tried to correct this omission by imposing fresh sanctions on Iran unless the program was curtailed. There is no information available up until now as to whether this deterrent worked.

7. US military action against Iran’s nuclear or missile programs may also serve the Trump administration to drive a wedge in the partnership between Moscow and Tehran and draw a new line in the sands of the Middle East. The Russians would certainly not step in by force in Iran’s defense, except for possibly sharing some intelligence. Moscow would be shown as failing to back its ally and therefore secure the gains Vladimir Putin managed to amass in the Middle East when Obama was president.

Trump is gathering all the warmongers under one roof. The body bags will pile up.

Remember "I LOVE WAR!" "Tell me again why we can't use nuclear weapons."

I hope you find the mushroom cloud aesthetically pleasing.

YOU PEOPLE ARE NUTS!

 

[Vigilante]

''

I’ll bet none of our Navy ships will ever be captured...and we will never pay these terrorist fucks a Ransom again!!!!!!

Debkafiles ^ | nov 2016 ast | Gioria Shamis editor


In more than one campaign speech, President elect Donald Trump declared that his number priority was “to dismantle the disastrous deal” with Iran, which he said was “the worst deal ever”

He was referring to the 2015 accord negotiated with Iran by the 5P+1 (five Permanent Security Council members plus Germany), which the Obama administration presented as putting the lid on Iran’s nuclear weapons program. Trump vowed to use force if necessary to prevent Tehran from acquiring the bomb.

So does Tehran have more to fear from Donald Trump than from Barack Obama in the way of US military intervention? They can’t be sure that he will not set out to show the world – and especially the Iranians - that under his presidency, they can no longer “mess with America.”

Iranian sources report that the ayatollahs are concerned enough to seriously contemplate the following scenario.

The incoming president, after he takes office in the White House on Jan. 20, will act to raise America’s lame image in the Middle East by a surgical strike against an Iranian nuclear facility. One option projected is the blowing up of the Arak heavy water plant for plutonium production at the military complex city of Arak; another would be destroying an Iranian ballistic missile base.

Trump and the Republican-ruled Congress would certainly not tolerate Iranian breaches after America coughed up $150 billion in eased sanctions and released frozen assets.

A Trump administration would be able to marshal seven arguments to justify military action:

1. On Nov. 2, a week before the presidential election, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna reported Iran in violation of the nuclear deal by producing 130.1 tons of heavy water at the Arak plant, 100kg more than allowed. In past cases, the Iranians quickly exported the excess amount. But with a new US president on the way, they may try to use it as a one-ton test of his resolve.

2. In another challenge, Iran is threatening to renege unless more economic benefits are forthcoming. The nuclear restrictions imposed under the deal end in about seven years, when Iran can start going back to its weapons program.

3. Tehran never actually signed the 2014 nuclear deal in the first place. It has remained on paper on three pages as “The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action Regarding the Islamic Republic of Iran’s Nuclear Program” announced in Lausanne on July 14, 2015 by US Secretary of State John Kerry and Iran’s Foreign Minister Muhammed Javad Zarif.

Three days later, Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei commented: “Our policy will not change with regard to the arrogant US government.”

4. The document was eventually endorsed by the UN Security Council. This obliged the IAEA to follow up it its presumed commitments by inspections on the ground to confirm Iran’s compliance. However, because much of its content was kept under wraps, American and Iranian obligations have been hard to pin down.

5. The deal’s omissions are a lot clearer. Tehran is not committed to release information on its nuclear program prior to the date of the deal - including how far it had progressed towards a weapon.

6. The nuclear deal did not cover Iran’s long-range ballistic missile program, which continues to develop apace. Ten months ago, the Obama administration tried to correct this omission by imposing fresh sanctions on Iran unless the program was curtailed. There is no information available up until now as to whether this deterrent worked.

7. US military action against Iran’s nuclear or missile programs may also serve the Trump administration to drive a wedge in the partnership between Moscow and Tehran and draw a new line in the sands of the Middle East. The Russians would certainly not step in by force in Iran’s defense, except for possibly sharing some intelligence. Moscow would be shown as failing to back its ally and therefore secure the gains Vladimir Putin managed to amass in the Middle East when Obama was president.

Look how easily we are manipulated. This author Gioria Shamis uses language like. "Show them we can't be pushed around anymore". Jesus Christ, what are we in the fifth grade. Next she/he/it will be double daring us to show them who's boss. My God. And this shit works. Stop being so stupid and easily chosenled.

I’ll bet none of our Navy ships will ever be captured...and we will never pay these terrorist fucks a Ransom again!!!!!!

Debkafiles ^ | nov 2016 ast | Gioria Shamis editor


In more than one campaign speech, President elect Donald Trump declared that his number priority was “to dismantle the disastrous deal” with Iran, which he said was “the worst deal ever”

He was referring to the 2015 accord negotiated with Iran by the 5P+1 (five Permanent Security Council members plus Germany), which the Obama administration presented as putting the lid on Iran’s nuclear weapons program. Trump vowed to use force if necessary to prevent Tehran from acquiring the bomb.

So does Tehran have more to fear from Donald Trump than from Barack Obama in the way of US military intervention? They can’t be sure that he will not set out to show the world – and especially the Iranians - that under his presidency, they can no longer “mess with America.”

Iranian sources report that the ayatollahs are concerned enough to seriously contemplate the following scenario.

The incoming president, after he takes office in the White House on Jan. 20, will act to raise America’s lame image in the Middle East by a surgical strike against an Iranian nuclear facility. One option projected is the blowing up of the Arak heavy water plant for plutonium production at the military complex city of Arak; another would be destroying an Iranian ballistic missile base.

Trump and the Republican-ruled Congress would certainly not tolerate Iranian breaches after America coughed up $150 billion in eased sanctions and released frozen assets.

A Trump administration would be able to marshal seven arguments to justify military action:

1. On Nov. 2, a week before the presidential election, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna reported Iran in violation of the nuclear deal by producing 130.1 tons of heavy water at the Arak plant, 100kg more than allowed. In past cases, the Iranians quickly exported the excess amount. But with a new US president on the way, they may try to use it as a one-ton test of his resolve.

2. In another challenge, Iran is threatening to renege unless more economic benefits are forthcoming. The nuclear restrictions imposed under the deal end in about seven years, when Iran can start going back to its weapons program.

3. Tehran never actually signed the 2014 nuclear deal in the first place. It has remained on paper on three pages as “The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action Regarding the Islamic Republic of Iran’s Nuclear Program” announced in Lausanne on July 14, 2015 by US Secretary of State John Kerry and Iran’s Foreign Minister Muhammed Javad Zarif.

Three days later, Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei commented: “Our policy will not change with regard to the arrogant US government.”

4. The document was eventually endorsed by the UN Security Council. This obliged the IAEA to follow up it its presumed commitments by inspections on the ground to confirm Iran’s compliance. However, because much of its content was kept under wraps, American and Iranian obligations have been hard to pin down.

5. The deal’s omissions are a lot clearer. Tehran is not committed to release information on its nuclear program prior to the date of the deal - including how far it had progressed towards a weapon.

6. The nuclear deal did not cover Iran’s long-range ballistic missile program, which continues to develop apace. Ten months ago, the Obama administration tried to correct this omission by imposing fresh sanctions on Iran unless the program was curtailed. There is no information available up until now as to whether this deterrent worked.

7. US military action against Iran’s nuclear or missile programs may also serve the Trump administration to drive a wedge in the partnership between Moscow and Tehran and draw a new line in the sands of the Middle East. The Russians would certainly not step in by force in Iran’s defense, except for possibly sharing some intelligence. Moscow would be shown as failing to back its ally and therefore secure the gains Vladimir Putin managed to amass in the Middle East when Obama was president.

Trump is gathering all the warmongers under one roof. The body bags will pile up.

Remember "I LOVE WAR!" "Tell me again why we can't use nuclear weapons."

I hope you find the mushroom cloud aesthetically pleasing.

YOU PEOPLE ARE NUTS!

DemocRATS bomb any aspirin factories lately?...lololol

 

[Dubya Da Last Repug Prez]

I’ll bet none of our Navy ships will ever be captured...and we will never pay these terrorist fucks a Ransom again!!!!!!

Debkafiles ^ | nov 2016 ast | Gioria Shamis editor


In more than one campaign speech, President elect Donald Trump declared that his number priority was “to dismantle the disastrous deal” with Iran, which he said was “the worst deal ever”

He was referring to the 2015 accord negotiated with Iran by the 5P+1 (five Permanent Security Council members plus Germany), which the Obama administration presented as putting the lid on Iran’s nuclear weapons program. Trump vowed to use force if necessary to prevent Tehran from acquiring the bomb.

So does Tehran have more to fear from Donald Trump than from Barack Obama in the way of US military intervention? They can’t be sure that he will not set out to show the world – and especially the Iranians - that under his presidency, they can no longer “mess with America.”

Iranian sources report that the ayatollahs are concerned enough to seriously contemplate the following scenario.

The incoming president, after he takes office in the White House on Jan. 20, will act to raise America’s lame image in the Middle East by a surgical strike against an Iranian nuclear facility. One option projected is the blowing up of the Arak heavy water plant for plutonium production at the military complex city of Arak; another would be destroying an Iranian ballistic missile base.

Trump and the Republican-ruled Congress would certainly not tolerate Iranian breaches after America coughed up $150 billion in eased sanctions and released frozen assets.

A Trump administration would be able to marshal seven arguments to justify military action:

1. On Nov. 2, a week before the presidential election, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna reported Iran in violation of the nuclear deal by producing 130.1 tons of heavy water at the Arak plant, 100kg more than allowed. In past cases, the Iranians quickly exported the excess amount. But with a new US president on the way, they may try to use it as a one-ton test of his resolve.

2. In another challenge, Iran is threatening to renege unless more economic benefits are forthcoming. The nuclear restrictions imposed under the deal end in about seven years, when Iran can start going back to its weapons program.

3. Tehran never actually signed the 2014 nuclear deal in the first place. It has remained on paper on three pages as “The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action Regarding the Islamic Republic of Iran’s Nuclear Program” announced in Lausanne on July 14, 2015 by US Secretary of State John Kerry and Iran’s Foreign Minister Muhammed Javad Zarif.

Three days later, Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei commented: “Our policy will not change with regard to the arrogant US government.”

4. The document was eventually endorsed by the UN Security Council. This obliged the IAEA to follow up it its presumed commitments by inspections on the ground to confirm Iran’s compliance. However, because much of its content was kept under wraps, American and Iranian obligations have been hard to pin down.

5. The deal’s omissions are a lot clearer. Tehran is not committed to release information on its nuclear program prior to the date of the deal - including how far it had progressed towards a weapon.

6. The nuclear deal did not cover Iran’s long-range ballistic missile program, which continues to develop apace. Ten months ago, the Obama administration tried to correct this omission by imposing fresh sanctions on Iran unless the program was curtailed. There is no information available up until now as to whether this deterrent worked.

7. US military action against Iran’s nuclear or missile programs may also serve the Trump administration to drive a wedge in the partnership between Moscow and Tehran and draw a new line in the sands of the Middle East. The Russians would certainly not step in by force in Iran’s defense, except for possibly sharing some intelligence. Moscow would be shown as failing to back its ally and therefore secure the gains Vladimir Putin managed to amass in the Middle East when Obama was president.

So many words, yet so little brains.

Another disastrous war in the Middle East perpetuated by another hopelessly stupid and incompetent Repug president. We've seen this horror story before.

Remind me again why you Repug goobers voted for Trump?

I see you don't understand the significance of Putin calling Trump....As Iran's chief backer, negotiation's start with these 2 men!

So was it Professor Plum who committed the murder with the candlestick?

 

[idb]

I think he should do it...what could possibly go wrong?

 

[cnelsen]

Iran hasn't initiated an attack on another country in 2000 years. We run around invading another country every other week and who even knows why? Do you even remember what our justification was for bombing the shit out of Libya? How about Serbia? We bombed them too, you know. Our allies. We are the only country that has ever used a nuclear weapon on another country, and we've done it twice..and we're going to tell Iran that THEY can't be trusted? Wake up, man. Iran has us in the Persian Gulf throwing our weight around. It has on its borders a nuclear-armed Pakistan, a nuclear-armed India, a nuclear-armed Pakistan, a nuclear-armed Russia, and just a stone's throw away, a nuclear-armed Israel. And we are going to tell them they must remain defenseless? What the hell is wrong with us? Why do we let Israel dance stupidly into which ever war they please (and there is NO END TO JEWISH BLOODLUST).

Watch this video from Wikileaks if you can bear it. THIS IS US DOING THIS!! WHY??? WE AREN'T MONSTERS.

Iran didn't have religious fanatics running it untiln1979!...iI see you are also an antisemite!...It helps in your state of mind!

I'm an anti-Semite? So?

 

[Timmy]

So many words, yet so little brains.

Another disastrous war in the Middle East perpetuated by another hopelessly stupid and incompetent Repug president. We've seen this horror story before.

Remind me again why you Repug goobers voted for Trump?

I see you don't understand the significance of Putin calling Trump....As Iran's chief backer, negotiation's start with these 2 men!

Putin was calling in orders to Trump .

Russian hackers won the election for him . He owes vlad big time .

Did the mother ship tell you where it would land, also?

I learned the "is rigged /fixed" line from watching right wingers .

Now you should try reading WikiLeaks to see how the corrupt, and criminal DNC and Cunton campaigned did it!

How about those GOP emails ?