Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
We don't know what they have!!! So you are willing to get attacked again lose millions of lives this time, instead of a few thousand, and you worry about us starting a war with a country we can wipe off the planet, if we want to. You are seriously I'll!!!!!!!God, of course not, are you kidding? Every Monday morning like clockwork N Korea threatens to nuke Los Angeles. And they actually might have the. Iran has nothing nowhere close. NOTHING. Not only that, Israel has 400 nuclear warheads already. They could turn Iran into one big glob of glass in an hour. Iran isn't attacking shit and poses ZERO threat to us. Just like Iraq, but we let Doug Feith and Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Perle lie us into attacking Iraq FOR NO REASON. Jesus, wake up. The Jews are playing their old old game. They are also pushing war with Russia. Don't you see what they are up to? C'mon.A nuclear weapon, and a balisticWhy would we target Iran ? Other than for righty war lust.
What war for Israel? Because the Manchurian muslim gave them the permission to build a bomb, which they are currently cheating on the agreement, they may or may not have the ICBM to reach us as well as Israel, our intelligence isn't sure, and their declared intention to attack us, isn't enough to take proactive measures?This would be another disaster worse--much worse--than Iraq. Donald: NO MORE WARS FOR ISRAEL!!!!!!!!!
A nuclear weapon, and a balisticWhy would we target Iran ? Other than for righty war lust.
What war for Israel? Because the Manchurian muslim gave them the permission to build a bomb, which they are currently cheating on the agreement, they may or may not have the ICBM to reach us as well as Israel, our intelligence isn't sure, and their declared intention to attack us, isn't enough to take proactive measures?This would be another disaster worse--much worse--than Iraq. Donald: NO MORE WARS FOR ISRAEL!!!!!!!!!
You do realize we paid them Ransom for the Navy boat they intercepted, don't you?Look how easily we are manipulated. This author Gioria Shamis uses language like. "Show them we can't be pushed around anymore". Jesus Christ, what are we in the fifth grade. Next she/he/it will be double daring us to show them who's boss. My God. And this shit works. Stop being so stupid and easily chosenled.I’ll bet none of our Navy ships will ever be captured...and we will never pay these terrorist fucks a Ransom again!!!!!!
Debkafiles ^ | nov 2016 ast | Gioria Shamis editor
In more than one campaign speech, President elect Donald Trump declared that his number priority was “to dismantle the disastrous deal” with Iran, which he said was “the worst deal ever”
He was referring to the 2015 accord negotiated with Iran by the 5P+1 (five Permanent Security Council members plus Germany), which the Obama administration presented as putting the lid on Iran’s nuclear weapons program. Trump vowed to use force if necessary to prevent Tehran from acquiring the bomb.
So does Tehran have more to fear from Donald Trump than from Barack Obama in the way of US military intervention? They can’t be sure that he will not set out to show the world – and especially the Iranians - that under his presidency, they can no longer “mess with America.”
Iranian sources report that the ayatollahs are concerned enough to seriously contemplate the following scenario.
The incoming president, after he takes office in the White House on Jan. 20, will act to raise America’s lame image in the Middle East by a surgical strike against an Iranian nuclear facility. One option projected is the blowing up of the Arak heavy water plant for plutonium production at the military complex city of Arak; another would be destroying an Iranian ballistic missile base.
Trump and the Republican-ruled Congress would certainly not tolerate Iranian breaches after America coughed up $150 billion in eased sanctions and released frozen assets.
A Trump administration would be able to marshal seven arguments to justify military action:
1. On Nov. 2, a week before the presidential election, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna reported Iran in violation of the nuclear deal by producing 130.1 tons of heavy water at the Arak plant, 100kg more than allowed. In past cases, the Iranians quickly exported the excess amount. But with a new US president on the way, they may try to use it as a one-ton test of his resolve.
2. In another challenge, Iran is threatening to renege unless more economic benefits are forthcoming. The nuclear restrictions imposed under the deal end in about seven years, when Iran can start going back to its weapons program.
3. Tehran never actually signed the 2014 nuclear deal in the first place. It has remained on paper on three pages as “The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action Regarding the Islamic Republic of Iran’s Nuclear Program” announced in Lausanne on July 14, 2015 by US Secretary of State John Kerry and Iran’s Foreign Minister Muhammed Javad Zarif.
Three days later, Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei commented: “Our policy will not change with regard to the arrogant US government.”
4. The document was eventually endorsed by the UN Security Council. This obliged the IAEA to follow up it its presumed commitments by inspections on the ground to confirm Iran’s compliance. However, because much of its content was kept under wraps, American and Iranian obligations have been hard to pin down.
5. The deal’s omissions are a lot clearer. Tehran is not committed to release information on its nuclear program prior to the date of the deal - including how far it had progressed towards a weapon.
6. The nuclear deal did not cover Iran’s long-range ballistic missile program, which continues to develop apace. Ten months ago, the Obama administration tried to correct this omission by imposing fresh sanctions on Iran unless the program was curtailed. There is no information available up until now as to whether this deterrent worked.
7. US military action against Iran’s nuclear or missile programs may also serve the Trump administration to drive a wedge in the partnership between Moscow and Tehran and draw a new line in the sands of the Middle East. The Russians would certainly not step in by force in Iran’s defense, except for possibly sharing some intelligence. Moscow would be shown as failing to back its ally and therefore secure the gains Vladimir Putin managed to amass in the Middle East when Obama was president.
serve the Trump administration to drive a wedge in the partnership between Moscow and Tehran
Wouldn't that be fun
A nuclear weapon, and a balistic inWhy would we target Iran ? Other than for righty war lust.
What war for Israel? Because the Manchurian muslim gave them the permission to build a bomb, which they are currently cheating on the agreement, they may or may not have the ICBM to reach us as well as Israel, our intelligence isn't sure, and their declared intention to attack us, isn't enough to take proactive measures?This would be another disaster worse--much worse--than Iraq. Donald: NO MORE WARS FOR ISRAEL!!!!!!!!!
Iran has no such capability. Why does the right continually want war in the Mid East !? Have you not learned that lesson!?
BullshitYou do realize we paid them Ransom for the Navy boat they intercepted, don't you?Look how easily we are manipulated. This author Gioria Shamis uses language like. "Show them we can't be pushed around anymore". Jesus Christ, what are we in the fifth grade. Next she/he/it will be double daring us to show them who's boss. My God. And this shit works. Stop being so stupid and easily chosenled.I’ll bet none of our Navy ships will ever be captured...and we will never pay these terrorist fucks a Ransom again!!!!!!
Debkafiles ^ | nov 2016 ast | Gioria Shamis editor
In more than one campaign speech, President elect Donald Trump declared that his number priority was “to dismantle the disastrous deal” with Iran, which he said was “the worst deal ever”
He was referring to the 2015 accord negotiated with Iran by the 5P+1 (five Permanent Security Council members plus Germany), which the Obama administration presented as putting the lid on Iran’s nuclear weapons program. Trump vowed to use force if necessary to prevent Tehran from acquiring the bomb.
So does Tehran have more to fear from Donald Trump than from Barack Obama in the way of US military intervention? They can’t be sure that he will not set out to show the world – and especially the Iranians - that under his presidency, they can no longer “mess with America.”
Iranian sources report that the ayatollahs are concerned enough to seriously contemplate the following scenario.
The incoming president, after he takes office in the White House on Jan. 20, will act to raise America’s lame image in the Middle East by a surgical strike against an Iranian nuclear facility. One option projected is the blowing up of the Arak heavy water plant for plutonium production at the military complex city of Arak; another would be destroying an Iranian ballistic missile base.
Trump and the Republican-ruled Congress would certainly not tolerate Iranian breaches after America coughed up $150 billion in eased sanctions and released frozen assets.
A Trump administration would be able to marshal seven arguments to justify military action:
1. On Nov. 2, a week before the presidential election, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna reported Iran in violation of the nuclear deal by producing 130.1 tons of heavy water at the Arak plant, 100kg more than allowed. In past cases, the Iranians quickly exported the excess amount. But with a new US president on the way, they may try to use it as a one-ton test of his resolve.
2. In another challenge, Iran is threatening to renege unless more economic benefits are forthcoming. The nuclear restrictions imposed under the deal end in about seven years, when Iran can start going back to its weapons program.
3. Tehran never actually signed the 2014 nuclear deal in the first place. It has remained on paper on three pages as “The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action Regarding the Islamic Republic of Iran’s Nuclear Program” announced in Lausanne on July 14, 2015 by US Secretary of State John Kerry and Iran’s Foreign Minister Muhammed Javad Zarif.
Three days later, Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei commented: “Our policy will not change with regard to the arrogant US government.”
4. The document was eventually endorsed by the UN Security Council. This obliged the IAEA to follow up it its presumed commitments by inspections on the ground to confirm Iran’s compliance. However, because much of its content was kept under wraps, American and Iranian obligations have been hard to pin down.
5. The deal’s omissions are a lot clearer. Tehran is not committed to release information on its nuclear program prior to the date of the deal - including how far it had progressed towards a weapon.
6. The nuclear deal did not cover Iran’s long-range ballistic missile program, which continues to develop apace. Ten months ago, the Obama administration tried to correct this omission by imposing fresh sanctions on Iran unless the program was curtailed. There is no information available up until now as to whether this deterrent worked.
7. US military action against Iran’s nuclear or missile programs may also serve the Trump administration to drive a wedge in the partnership between Moscow and Tehran and draw a new line in the sands of the Middle East. The Russians would certainly not step in by force in Iran’s defense, except for possibly sharing some intelligence. Moscow would be shown as failing to back its ally and therefore secure the gains Vladimir Putin managed to amass in the Middle East when Obama was president.
Not true !
That deal was already in place . We got the boat as a bonus .
There are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns — the ones we don't know we don't know. And that's why we should go to pre-emptive war everyone. Go 'Murica!!!!!!!A nuclear weapon, and a balistic inWhy would we target Iran ? Other than for righty war lust.
What war for Israel? Because the Manchurian muslim gave them the permission to build a bomb, which they are currently cheating on the agreement, they may or may not have the ICBM to reach us as well as Israel, our intelligence isn't sure, and their declared intention to attack us, isn't enough to take proactive measures?This would be another disaster worse--much worse--than Iraq. Donald: NO MORE WARS FOR ISRAEL!!!!!!!!!
Iran has no such capability. Why does the right continually want war in the Mid East !? Have you not learned that lesson!?
Bullshit, the fact is we don't know what they have, and your president gave them the money, and the Hildebeast gave Russia 25% of our uranium reserves that Russians have been selling to Iran...it's idiots, like you, that have caused these problems!
Yes, instead the jug earred ass in the WH was trying to start WWIII with Putin, one of 2 countries that could really do us damage!Wouldn't that be fun
Indeed.....it should be "fun".......The idiot, Viginalante, kind of neglects to mention what a war with Iran may be like.....I mean we did so damn well in Iraq and Iran is 3 times bigger....has an atr force and navy....and if you ever wanted to unite Shi'a and Sunnis, sure launch a war with Iran and see what happens.......
What a bunch of fucking right wing nut jobs.
You have proven to be an idiot! We don't want war, but when your leftist president does stupid things that lead to it, you sit on the side and watch!There are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns — the ones we don't know we don't know. And that's why we should go to pre-emptive war everyone. Go 'Murica!!!!!!!A nuclear weapon, and a balistic inWhy would we target Iran ? Other than for righty war lust.
What war for Israel? Because the Manchurian muslim gave them the permission to build a bomb, which they are currently cheating on the agreement, they may or may not have the ICBM to reach us as well as Israel, our intelligence isn't sure, and their declared intention to attack us, isn't enough to take proactive measures?This would be another disaster worse--much worse--than Iraq. Donald: NO MORE WARS FOR ISRAEL!!!!!!!!!
Iran has no such capability. Why does the right continually want war in the Mid East !? Have you not learned that lesson!?
Bullshit, the fact is we don't know what they have, and your president gave them the money, and the Hildebeast gave Russia 25% of our uranium reserves that Russians have been selling to Iran...it's idiots, like you, that have caused these problems!
John Bolton of the Dubya adventures is being eyed for Trump's SOS. Make sure you find yourself a good bug out spot.Why would we target Iran ? Other than for righty war lust.
Thank god weed is now legal in Mass ! I'll come out of my haze in 4 years .
Welcome to the party!
*cries in the prohibition corner*
Yet you think Trump will violate an agreement with Putin and destroy the nuclear facility of one of Russia's allies. Hmm.Yes, instead the jug earred ass in the WH was trying to start WWIII with Putin, one of 2 countries that could really do us cdasmage!Wouldn't that be fun
Indeed.....it should be "fun".......The idiot, Viginalante, kind of neglects to mention what a war with Iran may be like.....I mean we did so damn well in Iraq and Iran is 3 times bigger....has an atr force and navy....and if you ever wanted to unite Shi'a and Sunnis, sure launch a war with Iran and see what happens.......
What a bunch of fucking right wing nut jobs.
No dumbass, that is why Putin called Trump, to work out our disagreements....these 2 men have the ability to do that, the arrogant bastard in the WH doesn't!Yet you think Trump will violate an agreement with Putin and destroy the nuclear facility of one of Russia's allies. Hmm.Yes, instead the jug earred ass in the WH was trying to start WWIII with Putin, one of 2 countries that could really do us cdasmage!Wouldn't that be fun
Indeed.....it should be "fun".......The idiot, Viginalante, kind of neglects to mention what a war with Iran may be like.....I mean we did so damn well in Iraq and Iran is 3 times bigger....has an atr force and navy....and if you ever wanted to unite Shi'a and Sunnis, sure launch a war with Iran and see what happens.......
What a bunch of fucking right wing nut jobs.
So you think somewhere in the conversation, Trump said I'm going to kill the deal we made and bomb your ally?No dumbass, that is why Putin called Trump, to work out our disagreements....these 2 men have the ability to do that, the arrogant bastard in the WH doesn't!Yet you think Trump will violate an agreement with Putin and destroy the nuclear facility of one of Russia's allies. Hmm.Yes, instead the jug earred ass in the WH was trying to start WWIII with Putin, one of 2 countries that could really do us cdasmage!Wouldn't that be fun
Indeed.....it should be "fun".......The idiot, Viginalante, kind of neglects to mention what a war with Iran may be like.....I mean we did so damn well in Iraq and Iran is 3 times bigger....has an atr force and navy....and if you ever wanted to unite Shi'a and Sunnis, sure launch a war with Iran and see what happens.......
What a bunch of fucking right wing nut jobs.
Wouldn't that be fun
