Trump's fans sent him $1.5 million in 3 days after he falsely predicted that he'd be arrested Tuesday

Trump is the bellows behind the ill wind blowing across the nation since he entered the body politic, and all is affected in ways many, especially those on the right, do not understand.
Now we fully understand the danger America faces from people from shit hole countries.
 
Now we fully understand the danger America faces from people from shit hole countries.

Incompetent point: highlighted are weasel words, which are vague, often politically charged words, but essentially incoherent, and often reflecting an angry, mushy mentality. Note that thought-terminating clichés are buzzkill words designed to curtail critical thinking and discourage dissent. In other words, your comment is not very conducive to constructive dialog, discussion and debate.

This is not good, lennypartiv.

But, it begs the question: do you care?

Say it is so, lennypartiv.
 
"Under Obama", but he was not appointed as US Attorney Delaware by Obama.


Weiss served as the First Assistant United States Attorney (2007-2009; 2012-2018) and both the Acting and Interim United States Attorney for the District of Delaware (2009 to 2011).

David C. Weiss was appointed by President Trump
to serve as the United States Attorney for the District of Delaware and was sworn in on February 22, 2018


Note there is no mention as to whether he was appointed to these LESSER positions by Obama in any of the resumes online that I could fine.

So, what I'm saying to you, struth, is that David Weiss was appointed to United States Attorney Delaware in 2018 by one Donald J. Trump, and there Weiss remains to this day.

And that, struth, is a fact.

Please refile the comment in question in the "Rumpole's inescapable and wonderfully irrefutable facts" file.
i didn’t say he was…he however was acting since obama.


Weiss is a company man that does what he is told…obviously since xiden took office he’s been ordered not to prosecute hunter…we know that from all the agents that have come forward

this abuse of power by xiden will likely be looked at by rhe special prosecutor that’s looking into the president’s involvement in the classified material larceny that’s been going on since he was a senator
 
i didn’t say he was…he however was acting since obama.


Weiss is a company man that does what he is told…
And you know this, how?

obviously since xiden took office he’s been ordered not to prosecute hunter…
Evidence?
we know that from all the agents that have come forward
Evidence?
this abuse of power by xiden
What is your path or reasoning for this contention, and what evidence can you provide?
will likely be looked at by rhe special prosecutor that’s looking into the president’s involvement in the classified material larceny that’s been going on since he was a senator
A wild assumption, at best, asserted without evidence.
 
And you know this, how?


Evidence?

Evidence?

What is your path or reasoning for this contention, and what evidence can you provide?

A wild assumption, at best, asserted without evidence.
1) Because I read his bio
2) He isn't being prosecuted
3)

Federal agents think they have enough evidence to charge Hunter Biden with tax and gun-buy crimes, report says​


4) because the agents want to prosecute and the Xiden admin hasn't allowed them
5) It's hardly wild...there is a Special Prosecutor
 
1) Because I read his bio
Please quote the line in his bio that proves he 'does what he is told because he is a company man'.
That would be evidence, your reading his bio is NOT evidence.
2) He isn't being prosecuted
3)

Federal agents think they have enough evidence to charge Hunter Biden with tax and gun-buy crimes, report says​


They 'think' they have enough evidence. Thought it NOT evidence.
4) because the agents want to prosecute and the Xiden admin hasn't allowed them
You have not provided evidence of this claim. Please provide it.
5) It's hardly wild...there is a Special Prosecutor
The special prosecutor did not make your claim. You did, and it is not a fair accusation. Biden's acquisition of classified materials could have easily been inadvertent. So, the honest way to put it would be to assert that the Special Prosecutor is investigating whether or not Biden intentionally, OR inadvertently acquired the materials. The 5 or so years could be an argument to support that he was unaware he had the materials, hence the length of time in possession. Additionally, any allegation of severity will depend on DNI damage assessments, which haven't been published as of this comment.
 
Fake thread title
Trump passed on what was leaked to him and lib loons ran with it like lunatics and when it blew up in their face they came up with The All Time Weakest “He made us say it”
 

riot​

1 of 2

noun

ri·ot ˈrī-ət

: a violent public disorder

terrorism​


noun
the unlawful use of violence or threats to intimidate or coerce a civilian population or government, with the goal of furthering political, social, or ideological objectives.

Violently storming the Capitol to threaten and intimidate the government with the goal of stopping the certification of the president-elect...

Is terrorism according to the definition you posted.
 
Gotta hand it to Trump, I fell for the con, too. However, I didn't send him money.
But his fans did, and it is, as it always as been , a case of the grift that keeps on grifting.

  • Donald Trump wasn't arrested Tuesday, but he got a big fundraising boost after claiming he would be.
  • He raised $1.5 million in the three days after saying he'd be arrested, per multiple reports.
  • That's nearly double the daily average he got in the weeks before and after launching his 2024 bid.

Nice work if you can get it.

There is nothing dumber than a Trumplican. They never learn.
 
Violently storming the Capitol to threaten and intimidate the government with the goal of stopping the certification of the president-elect...

Is terrorism according to the definition you posted.
Diversion fail
 
Fake thread title
The story was carried by Foxnews, the NYPost, Businessinsider, Daily Mail, Independent, Washington Times, and others --
that would not suggest the story is false. In most circumstances, with that kind of coverage, the original posting source provided at least three sources confirming the story before other news orgs will run with the story, as, in journalism, three sources is normally the threshold required before they run with the originators story, and this has it on both sides of the political spectrum. That suggests you are not correct.
Trump passed on what was leaked to him
What evidence can you provide that it was leaked to him, and, in fact, he didn't make the story up in order to grift his base?

and lib loons ran with it like lunatics
When a major candidate for the Presidency makes an astounding claim, it would be irresponsible for the news to ignore the story.

Therefore, you characterization of 'lunatics' is without merit.

and when it blew up in their face
This does not appear to be an accurate characterization, however, it does appear to be partisan spin.
they came up with The All Time Weakest “He made us say it”

Please provide evidence that 'they' said 'he made us say it', and clarify who 'they' are.
 

Forum List

Back
Top