Rump broke the law in a big way. You can try and deflect all you want to but it won't work this time. Too bad it didn't happen in June of next year.
NYT reported there was no Quid Pro Quo as Ukraine didnt find out about funds later on. What law did he exactly break again as a chief law enforcement officer?
Whatever. he asked the president of Ukraine to do him a favor and get dirt on Biden and his son. Against constitutional law. He was even warned about this and still did it. He's a liar fraud and con man and should scare everyone. Oh and I should have said he was a mobbed-up Manhattan real estate failure.
Franco, I've yet to read a a rational post you've written. Perhaps you spend too much time watching prog-news? Those will damage the brain. Here are FACTS:
Trump's DOJ clears president of violating campaign finance law in Ukraine-Biden call
The Department of Justice revealed Wednesday that the
whistleblower complaint related to
President Trump's controversial phone call with the Ukrainian president sparked a referral to the DOJ's criminal division about whether Trump potentially violated campaign finance law.
However, the criminal division, after reviewing the matter, determined there was no campaign finance violation and "has concluded the matter," a DOJ spokesperson Kerri Kupec said Wednesday. The news comes as
Trump faces an impeachment inquiry in the House and a
growing number of House Democrats who support such an
A Justice Department official told reporters that the DOJ spoke to "knowledgeable people in the White House" but their determination that
there was no criminal violation was primarily based off a memorandum of the call, released by the White House. Questions regarding the Trump Administration's
hold-up of military aid was not a factor in their investigation at all, the official explained, saying they see that as more of a foreign policy issue.
Further explaining the DOJ's handling of the referral, the official said the criminal division concluded that the information they had gathered did not amount to a criminal violation of campaign finance law because nothing "of value" was clearly promised or exchange as a result of the call.
The official said there was no disagreement among the prosecutors in the criminal division, even among career prosecutors, that the call did not amount to a potential campaign finance violation. The Assistant AG for the Criminal Division made the "final call" to conclude the matter, and said Attorney General William Barr was "not involved in the analysis by the criminal division." There was no consideration for the AG to formally recuse himself from the matter, the official said, and no consideration of the appointment of a special counsel.
And the DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) opinion that a sitting president could not be indicted did not play a role in the DOJ's review, the officials said.