- Jun 18, 2009
- 34,497
- 18,804
- 1,915
With little exception -- climate science isn't one of them -- an issue rarely has one single right answer and a healthy society debates the correct course of action. The AWG fanatics provide questionable science and then use gestapo tactics to silence any opposition. If they were confident in their science, they'd not need to do anything but present the information (uncorrected) and allow the people to determine the validity of the conclusion.So, they oppose people who are a skeptic of and have valid arguments against climate change, being given a voice.
Typical nazi nonsense.
Actually it is a requirement for the Trump administrations Climate Science Report and the NCA report to meet in public, subject to public records requests and them being forced to include a representative membership.
All these including the requirement for a representative voice have been removed. This is literally the one excluding.
I agree... It's the typical Nazi nonsense where if you don't like what the representative group is, you just create your own propoganda study to come up with your own belief system instead.
But the idiots can't even get a mean temperature correct, have misidentified the greenhouse gas that may or may not be responsible for warming, and to top it all off, they cannot assure anyone that the current change in climate is anything BUT natural.
These and about a thousand other questions and issues MUST be discussed openly BY ALL SIDES, before we even consider allowing anyone to destroy a significant portion of the economy, just on their say so.