Trump: Touching Base With Our History

[Moonglow]

A swing and

There are, of course, the very same trepidation about Mr. Trump as there were about Obama....no track record, untrained in politics, not a constitutional scholar, and, as far as is known, not a student of history.
Yet...some of the early moves, cabinet picks....seem to suggest better outcomes than expected.
He may just be the right man at the right time.....



1. America was not founded to be a monarchy....much less a dictatorship.
But the ascendant political philosophy, Liberalism, is, as is every totalitarian doctrine, based on a centralized government with all the power and no restrictions.

As are these versions: communism, socialism, Nazism, Fascism and Progressivism.

2. That's not America.

"Our Founders envisioned the states as laboratories of democracy and enshrined into our Constitution the principle of federalism. Under federalist principles, the American people endowed the national government with a defined set of limited, enumerated powers in the Constitution. Any powers beyond those specifically given to the federal government fall entirely within the province of the states. Federalism protects liberty by protecting against the overreaching of any one branch of our federal government, and is part of the uniquely American system of checks and balances."
Paloma Zepeda, "Reinventing the Right."


a. The idea that the reach of the federal government would be restricted to a few enumerated powers is articulated by Madison in Federalist No. 45:

"The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite."


b. And, further explaining the limitations on the federal government, we find the 10th amendment:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.





3. Whether consciously or intuitively, the American people sensed that a Trump victory would nudge the nation back on the path blazed by our Founders, one in which power is shared between the federal government and the states.
How could he have recognized this, given his background....but Mr. Trump has chosen a strict states-rights task master to rule over the most blatant of the power-grabbing of agencies....the EPA.

4. "... Trump had barely finished announcing his pick to lead the Environmental Protection Agency before the left started listing its million reasons why Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt was the worst nomination in the history of the planet: He’s an untrained anti-environmentalist. He’s a polluter. He’s a fossil-fuel fanatic, a lobbyist-lover, a climate crazy.

5. Mr. Pruitt is not any of those things. Here’s what he in fact is, and the real reason the left is frustrated: He’s a constitutional scholar, a federalist (and a lawyer). And for those reasons he is a sublime choice to knock down the biggest conceit of the Obama era—arrogant, overweening (and illegal) Washington rule."
Trump’s Federalist Revival




A return to our heritage?
A government founded on federalism?

One can only hope.

a miss from Saigon's favorite propaganda artist..

What is the satisfaction dolts like you get from posts with no substance?

Or....is it that you really can't manage any substance?

It's better than a load of BS like your post always contains, hoping to drown out opposition with over production with poor literary merit in common sense or decency....Copy-n-paste, for those not acquainted with logic and reason..
Oh please tell me how the use of EO's are tyrannical when done by one side of the political sphere but not the other...Just because you back one side and not the other..

See.....now you are self-identified as a liar.

Everything I post is true, correct and accurate.


Unless you can show otherwise.

"Is not, isssss noootttttt!" doesn't count....you dunce.

It does when dealing with a low information poster child for logic like you..

 

[PoliticalChic]

Remember this from the liar in the White House?

"Among the lies about himself Obama consistently repeats is that he was a constitutional law professor."


Obama was never a professor; he was a lecturer.
He did not have the qualifications to be a professor.
Obama never published a single law paper. He was hired by the University of Chicago when they learned he had been given a book contract on race and law directly after graduating from Harvard. There was no book – just the contract, which he later reneged on.
This is not the normal level of accomplishment for a University of Chicago professor or even lecturer.


And.... Obama did not specialize in the Constitution. Obama cared about and taught only one subject: race. One course was about race in the Constitution. It is on this flimsy basis that he attempts to pawn himself off as a constitutional scholar.

As the New York Times explains, Obama the lecturer taught three subjects only: "race, rights and gender."


In Scott Pruitt, the actual expertise in constitutional law.

10. "... this is the back-to-basics pitch Mr. Pruitt made to Mr. Trump in his interview, and that Mr. Trump absolutely understood the importance. In announcing his nomination, the president-elect took care to note that Mr. Pruitt was an “expert in constitutional law” and that his job would be to restore the “EPA’s essential mission.”
Which is exactly the reform the EPA needs. The agency doesn’t need a technically trained environmentalist at its head, since it is already bubbling over with green regulations. It doesn’t need a climate warrior, as Congress has never passed a climate law, .... What it needs is a lawyer, one with the knowledge of how to cut the agency back to its proper role—restoring not just an appropriate legal partnership with the states, but also with other federal bodies. One who reminds agency staff that the EPA was not created to oppose growth and development.

If Mr. Pruitt does this successfully, and on the way crushes the current president’s legacy, Mr. Obama will have only himself to blame.
Say hello to the federalist revival." Trump’s Federalist Revival




Federalism.....the cornerstone of the American experiment.

President Trump....bringing America back to what it was meant to be.

A swing and

There are, of course, the very same trepidation about Mr. Trump as there were about Obama....no track record, untrained in politics, not a constitutional scholar, and, as far as is known, not a student of history.
Yet...some of the early moves, cabinet picks....seem to suggest better outcomes than expected.
He may just be the right man at the right time.....



1. America was not founded to be a monarchy....much less a dictatorship.
But the ascendant political philosophy, Liberalism, is, as is every totalitarian doctrine, based on a centralized government with all the power and no restrictions.

As are these versions: communism, socialism, Nazism, Fascism and Progressivism.

2. That's not America.

"Our Founders envisioned the states as laboratories of democracy and enshrined into our Constitution the principle of federalism. Under federalist principles, the American people endowed the national government with a defined set of limited, enumerated powers in the Constitution. Any powers beyond those specifically given to the federal government fall entirely within the province of the states. Federalism protects liberty by protecting against the overreaching of any one branch of our federal government, and is part of the uniquely American system of checks and balances."
Paloma Zepeda, "Reinventing the Right."


a. The idea that the reach of the federal government would be restricted to a few enumerated powers is articulated by Madison in Federalist No. 45:

"The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite."


b. And, further explaining the limitations on the federal government, we find the 10th amendment:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.





3. Whether consciously or intuitively, the American people sensed that a Trump victory would nudge the nation back on the path blazed by our Founders, one in which power is shared between the federal government and the states.
How could he have recognized this, given his background....but Mr. Trump has chosen a strict states-rights task master to rule over the most blatant of the power-grabbing of agencies....the EPA.

4. "... Trump had barely finished announcing his pick to lead the Environmental Protection Agency before the left started listing its million reasons why Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt was the worst nomination in the history of the planet: He’s an untrained anti-environmentalist. He’s a polluter. He’s a fossil-fuel fanatic, a lobbyist-lover, a climate crazy.

5. Mr. Pruitt is not any of those things. Here’s what he in fact is, and the real reason the left is frustrated: He’s a constitutional scholar, a federalist (and a lawyer). And for those reasons he is a sublime choice to knock down the biggest conceit of the Obama era—arrogant, overweening (and illegal) Washington rule."
Trump’s Federalist Revival




A return to our heritage?
A government founded on federalism?

One can only hope.

a miss from Saigon's favorite propaganda artist..

What is the satisfaction dolts like you get from posts with no substance?

Or....is it that you really can't manage any substance?

It's better than a load of BS like your post always contains, hoping to drown out opposition with over production with poor literary merit in common sense or decency....Copy-n-paste, for those not acquainted with logic and reason..
Oh please tell me how the use of EO's are tyrannical when done by one side of the political sphere but not the other...Just because you back one side and not the other..

See.....now you are self-identified as a liar.

Everything I post is true, correct and accurate.


Unless you can show otherwise.

"Is not, isssss noootttttt!" doesn't count....you dunce.

It does when dealing with a low information poster child for logic like you..

A swing and

There are, of course, the very same trepidation about Mr. Trump as there were about Obama....no track record, untrained in politics, not a constitutional scholar, and, as far as is known, not a student of history.
Yet...some of the early moves, cabinet picks....seem to suggest better outcomes than expected.
He may just be the right man at the right time.....



1. America was not founded to be a monarchy....much less a dictatorship.
But the ascendant political philosophy, Liberalism, is, as is every totalitarian doctrine, based on a centralized government with all the power and no restrictions.

As are these versions: communism, socialism, Nazism, Fascism and Progressivism.

2. That's not America.

"Our Founders envisioned the states as laboratories of democracy and enshrined into our Constitution the principle of federalism. Under federalist principles, the American people endowed the national government with a defined set of limited, enumerated powers in the Constitution. Any powers beyond those specifically given to the federal government fall entirely within the province of the states. Federalism protects liberty by protecting against the overreaching of any one branch of our federal government, and is part of the uniquely American system of checks and balances."
Paloma Zepeda, "Reinventing the Right."


a. The idea that the reach of the federal government would be restricted to a few enumerated powers is articulated by Madison in Federalist No. 45:

"The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite."


b. And, further explaining the limitations on the federal government, we find the 10th amendment:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.





3. Whether consciously or intuitively, the American people sensed that a Trump victory would nudge the nation back on the path blazed by our Founders, one in which power is shared between the federal government and the states.
How could he have recognized this, given his background....but Mr. Trump has chosen a strict states-rights task master to rule over the most blatant of the power-grabbing of agencies....the EPA.

4. "... Trump had barely finished announcing his pick to lead the Environmental Protection Agency before the left started listing its million reasons why Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt was the worst nomination in the history of the planet: He’s an untrained anti-environmentalist. He’s a polluter. He’s a fossil-fuel fanatic, a lobbyist-lover, a climate crazy.

5. Mr. Pruitt is not any of those things. Here’s what he in fact is, and the real reason the left is frustrated: He’s a constitutional scholar, a federalist (and a lawyer). And for those reasons he is a sublime choice to knock down the biggest conceit of the Obama era—arrogant, overweening (and illegal) Washington rule."
Trump’s Federalist Revival




A return to our heritage?
A government founded on federalism?

One can only hope.

a miss from Saigon's favorite propaganda artist..

What is the satisfaction dolts like you get from posts with no substance?

Or....is it that you really can't manage any substance?

It's better than a load of BS like your post always contains, hoping to drown out opposition with over production with poor literary merit in common sense or decency....Copy-n-paste, for those not acquainted with logic and reason..
Oh please tell me how the use of EO's are tyrannical when done by one side of the political sphere but not the other...Just because you back one side and not the other..

See.....now you are self-identified as a liar.

Everything I post is true, correct and accurate.


Unless you can show otherwise.

"Is not, isssss noootttttt!" doesn't count....you dunce.

It does when dealing with a low information poster child for logic like you..

Would you like an opportunity to 'deal with' my post?

How about above?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

There are, of course, the very same trepidation about Mr. Trump as there were about Obama....no track record, untrained in politics, not a constitutional scholar, and, as far as is known, not a student of history.
Yet...some of the early moves, cabinet picks....seem to suggest better outcomes than expected.
He may just be the right man at the right time.....



1. America was not founded to be a monarchy....much less a dictatorship.
But the ascendant political philosophy, Liberalism, is, as is every totalitarian doctrine, based on a centralized government with all the power and no restrictions.

As are these versions: communism, socialism, Nazism, Fascism and Progressivism.

2. That's not America.

"Our Founders envisioned the states as laboratories of democracy and enshrined into our Constitution the principle of federalism. Under federalist principles, the American people endowed the national government with a defined set of limited, enumerated powers in the Constitution. Any powers beyond those specifically given to the federal government fall entirely within the province of the states. Federalism protects liberty by protecting against the overreaching of any one branch of our federal government, and is part of the uniquely American system of checks and balances."
Paloma Zepeda, "Reinventing the Right."


a. The idea that the reach of the federal government would be restricted to a few enumerated powers is articulated by Madison in Federalist No. 45:

"The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite."


b. And, further explaining the limitations on the federal government, we find the 10th amendment:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.





3. Whether consciously or intuitively, the American people sensed that a Trump victory would nudge the nation back on the path blazed by our Founders, one in which power is shared between the federal government and the states.
How could he have recognized this, given his background....but Mr. Trump has chosen a strict states-rights task master to rule over the most blatant of the power-grabbing of agencies....the EPA.

4. "... Trump had barely finished announcing his pick to lead the Environmental Protection Agency before the left started listing its million reasons why Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt was the worst nomination in the history of the planet: He’s an untrained anti-environmentalist. He’s a polluter. He’s a fossil-fuel fanatic, a lobbyist-lover, a climate crazy.

5. Mr. Pruitt is not any of those things. Here’s what he in fact is, and the real reason the left is frustrated: He’s a constitutional scholar, a federalist (and a lawyer). And for those reasons he is a sublime choice to knock down the biggest conceit of the Obama era—arrogant, overweening (and illegal) Washington rule."
Trump’s Federalist Revival




A return to our heritage?
A government founded on federalism?

One can only hope.

"Obama....no track record, untrained in politics, not a constitutional scholar..."

LOL!! Love it!!

 

[NoNukes]

Even you know you're lying.

Even you.


Truth is you'd love to have something to say that was intelligent....but lack of ability gets in the way.

Clearly my threads are magnetic, and your head being base metal.....

Yea she gets soooo bored of intelectual discussions..


Politcal chick maybe you should start your post with...

Once again, more intellectual value. Thanks.

Let's rub in your lack of ability again....


Perhaps I can suggest that you focus both of your cerebral neurons, and comment on the import of this thread....

...Federalism, and Scott Pruitt as the answer to the dictatorial EPA.


This might be your once a year actual contribution to a thread.....




You can't, can you.

You were just sitting in Brooklyn waiting for me to get out of my school meeting. How sad.

Soooo....are you in full or half-day Day Care?

I am part of a group who started an school that is an alternative to the present model of education. I am also a member of the staff.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Yea she gets soooo bored of intelectual discussions..


Politcal chick maybe you should start your post with...

Once again, more intellectual value. Thanks.

Let's rub in your lack of ability again....


Perhaps I can suggest that you focus both of your cerebral neurons, and comment on the import of this thread....

...Federalism, and Scott Pruitt as the answer to the dictatorial EPA.


This might be your once a year actual contribution to a thread.....




You can't, can you.

You were just sitting in Brooklyn waiting for me to get out of my school meeting. How sad.

Soooo....are you in full or half-day Day Care?

I am part of a group who started an school that is an alternative to the present model of education. I am also a member of the staff.

"I am part of a group who started an (sic) school ..."

I'd so much love to hear about your exciting biography but I’m very busy…I have several more quarters to flip.

 

[NoNukes]

Once again, more intellectual value. Thanks.

Let's rub in your lack of ability again....


Perhaps I can suggest that you focus both of your cerebral neurons, and comment on the import of this thread....

...Federalism, and Scott Pruitt as the answer to the dictatorial EPA.


This might be your once a year actual contribution to a thread.....




You can't, can you.

You were just sitting in Brooklyn waiting for me to get out of my school meeting. How sad.

Soooo....are you in full or half-day Day Care?

I am part of a group who started an school that is an alternative to the present model of education. I am also a member of the staff.

"I am part of a group who started an (sic) school ..."

I'd so much love to hear about your exciting biography but I’m very busy…I have several more quarters to flip.

Started to say an alternative, sorry.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Let's rub in your lack of ability again....


Perhaps I can suggest that you focus both of your cerebral neurons, and comment on the import of this thread....

...Federalism, and Scott Pruitt as the answer to the dictatorial EPA.


This might be your once a year actual contribution to a thread.....




You can't, can you.

You were just sitting in Brooklyn waiting for me to get out of my school meeting. How sad.

Soooo....are you in full or half-day Day Care?

I am part of a group who started an school that is an alternative to the present model of education. I am also a member of the staff.

"I am part of a group who started an (sic) school ..."

I'd so much love to hear about your exciting biography but I’m very busy…I have several more quarters to flip.

Started to say an alternative, sorry.

The essence of the thread is a wished for return to federalism.

Know what that means?

Fer it, or agin it???

 

[JQPublic1]

Yeah, we need to keep him away from the Statue of Liberty... he just might TOUCH her historical vulva!

Pure sickness.

INDEED, but that is the man YOU voted for!

No, that came straight out of your trashy leftist brain which evidently resides in the gutter.

Thank you!..at least I am not impotent like YOU. But now that you mention it... I have to ask you this....Are you saying that Trump has a leftist brain which, evidently resides in the gutter?
After all, without his creepy admission my reference to it wouldn't be possible. You would have to condemn HIM before condemning me...heh heh heh. KMA

 

[JQPublic1]

No scum, your remarks.

well, SLIME, my remarks are based on Trump's admission that he could grab em by the P---y.
He is touchy feely... don't blame me for pointing that out

The Statue of Liberty doesn't have a vulva, JQPubic.

Oh, really? I think it does have one.. they just haven't found it yet... I think Trump would find it if there is one there...Shall we give him a chance with Lady Liberty? Metaphorically, I think he is about to rape her. The symbol that welcomes immigrants to America is going to be sullied and the words that are engraved on her pedestal shall be made a mockery!

 

[JQPublic1]

Yeah, we need to keep him away from the Statue of Liberty... he just might TOUCH her historical vulva!

Pure sickness.

Just another demented fascist liberal snowflake...

Surely you jest. My epithet is but a metaphorical allusion to a publicized account of lustful depravities uttered by your hero. Where was your outrage THEN?

 

[JQPublic1]

Yeah, we need to keep him away from the Statue of Liberty... he just might TOUCH her historical vulva!

I love the smell of liberal fear in the morning. Ahhhhhhhh

I fear for the virtue of lady liberty for it is the aim of the GRR OP ers to divest her of all she represents.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Screaming from the headlines is one more proof that the Democrats, the Liberals, want noting more than an all-powerful central government......one baby-step from a dictatorship.

Their wish to end Federalism....the requirement that caused the ratification of our Constitution, is the basis of their begging for the end of the electoral college.


Nothing would make these neo-Fascists happier than to see the states further denuded of any power at all.


So....they beg electors to throw away the election results.


Not gonna happen....this time, at least.