Trump told his ATTY to FIRE MUELLER, now lies about it. Also asking witness what they told Mueller!

one must wonder how "Trumps lawyer" can fire anyone?

That was the OBVIOUS question. But I have to assume the dumbass either wanted McGahan to fire Sessions first or just STILL DOESN'T GET IT!! And equally absurd, McGahan can't FIRE SESSIONS either!

You know with Trumps 'great brain', he should have remembered he's been told this--HOW MANY TIMES? (A potted plant in the Oval Office understands these rules now).
So, just another made up story by imbeciles such as yourself. Got it.

This story is EVERYWHERE--well maybe except on Fox News!

You guys really are pathetic. It's astonishing.
OmNPztx.gif


Regressive liberal ROE


....
7. Lie, make false assumptions

...

16. Russia

17. Fox News/Alex Jones/Brietbart/infowars/Stormfront/Gateway/hannity
 
they'll fix it. shit happens. one time my signal on my phone that i was using for a hotspot went out and i kept hitting "reply" on the forum waiting for the page to refresh and it never would. by the time it did refresh it posted like 12 replies instead of one. it wasnt on this forum it was on a motorcycle forum. the mods had a good time deleting all those replies lol

S--t seems to get hung up in my browser and I don't think it 'sent' but it did. (Seems to be more of an issue on message boards, rather than just a email something--maybe because there's more being transmitted at one time??)
 
Mueller wasn't fired.....end of story!
That's because lawyers can't fire people, unless they work for that lawyer. Are you loons saying Mueller works for Trumps lawyer? Great move Trump!
 
MC GAHAN was told to FIRE MUELLER which we all knew about a couple of weeks ago. TRUMP SAYS HE NEVER TOLD HIM THAT! I don't believe a trained lawyer, even one that SUCKS, would get that little directive WRONG. Do you? Of course he didn't though he himself threatened to quit at the time.

By now I am more than sure MCGAHAN, Trump's lawyer has told his top (only?) client that anyone who talks to Mueller is NOT ALLOWED TO DISCUSS what questions were asked or what they told Mueller in response. It is a big fat fucking no no!!

Trump has asked witnesses what Mueller asked and what they responded. No matter how much ANY PERSON would want to know, it is not ALLOWED. Even I know that!

Trump is also claiming he never told MC GAHAN to 'get rid of Mueller' (that's obstruction of justice). I'm pretty fucking sure even the janitor, or a secretary but especially HIS LAWYER would remember if Trump told them to fire Mueller. Wouldn't you?

Trump Spoke to Witnesses About Matters They Discussed With Special Counsel

By MICHAEL S. SCHMIDT and MAGGIE HABERMANMARCH 7, 2018

Continue reading the main storyShare This Page
  • a New York Times article in January. The article said Mr. McGahn told investigators that the president once asked him to fire the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III. Mr. McGahn never released a statement and later had to remind the president that he had indeed asked Mr. McGahn to see that Mr. Mueller was dismissed, the people said.

    In the other episode, Mr. Trump asked his former chief of staff, Reince Priebus, how his interview had gone with the special counsel’s investigators and whether they had been “nice,” according to two people familiar with the discussion.

    The episodes demonstrate that even as the special counsel investigation appears to be intensifying, the president has ignored his lawyers’ advice to avoid doing anything publicly or privately that could create the appearance of interfering with it...
Trump Spoke to Witnesses About Matters They Discussed With Special Counsel

Where did you hear that? CNN? NPR? MSNBC?

You need to quit watching that stuff.
 
The left: “We got him now!”
Reality: Nothing happens
Time goes by...

The left: “We got him now!”
Reality: Nothing happens
Time goes by...

The left: “We got him now!”
Reality: Nothing happens
Time goes by...

The left: “We got him now!”
Reality: Nothing happens
Time goes by...
 
Mueller wasn't fired.....end of story!
Mueller will decide if it is the end of the story. It is ANOTHER blatant example of "obstruction of justice". Even if YOU don't get it.
What I do get is discussing the wisdom of doing something with lawyers and then decided not to do it because it might be "obstruction of justice" is not obstruction of justice Because He Didn't Actually Do It!
 

Forum List

Back
Top