Trump threatens to send national guard to control blacks in Minneapolis

George, a convicted felon, would be alive today if the asshole hadn't tried to steal money from a Black owned business.

Just shows you how stupid it is to be involved in criminal activity.

Sometimes it doesn't go the way you think it will go.

Perhaps you're right about his crime, but that particular crime should not have had a death sentence and the policeman's inept and callous application of force was criminal.


A lot of criminal activity may not be worthy of a "death sentence" but shit happens when you break the law and try to steal things.

My point is that had the convicted felon not chose to commit a crime he would be alive today.

He wouldn't have been confronted by the police had he just went to the store to buy some Dr Pepper.

We have no clue if he had committed a crime. He was accused by the store owner but that doesn't mean he did it.

They had the right to stop him and get his information but really, until they investigated and determined an actual crime happened they had no right to arrest him.

The prosecutor initially said they had to perform an investigation before any arrests of the police officers could be made and that might take nine months to a year.

Seems it took 4 days. It wouldn't have if not for the violence.


Criminal activity is always risky businesses because you are doing things to harm other people.

You can deny it all you want by the asshole was trying to steal from a Black owned store and they called the police on his sorry ass.

Had the sonsofbitch not decided to engage in criminal activity that day he would be alive today.

He started the shit and now he is dead. Just like when that little piece of shit Travvon decided he was going to attack the "Cracker" he sealed his own fate.

"Criminals" are still protected by the Constitution even if you believe it only applies to well off white people.
That means they can't be arrested for committing crimes?
 
George, a convicted felon, would be alive today if the asshole hadn't tried to steal money from a Black owned business.

Just shows you how stupid it is to be involved in criminal activity.

Sometimes it doesn't go the way you think it will go.

Perhaps you're right about his crime, but that particular crime should not have had a death sentence and the policeman's inept and callous application of force was criminal.


A lot of criminal activity may not be worthy of a "death sentence" but shit happens when you break the law and try to steal things.

My point is that had the convicted felon not chose to commit a crime he would be alive today.

He wouldn't have been confronted by the police had he just went to the store to buy some Dr Pepper.

We have no clue if he had committed a crime. He was accused by the store owner but that doesn't mean he did it.

They had the right to stop him and get his information but really, until they investigated and determined an actual crime happened they had no right to arrest him.

The prosecutor initially said they had to perform an investigation before any arrests of the police officers could be made and that might take nine months to a year.

Seems it took 4 days. It wouldn't have if not for the violence.

So who says they didn't have evidence of a crime? Also, you need a charge to arrest somebody. The police might have put him in cuffs so he didn't run away while investigating the complaint.

They had a reason to question him, not arrest him.


hard to question someone when he is fighting you.

No one was fighting.

Right, he was cooperating fully, and they just decided to throw him on the ground for no reason.
 
George, a convicted felon, would be alive today if the asshole hadn't tried to steal money from a Black owned business.

Just shows you how stupid it is to be involved in criminal activity.

Sometimes it doesn't go the way you think it will go.

Perhaps you're right about his crime, but that particular crime should not have had a death sentence and the policeman's inept and callous application of force was criminal.


A lot of criminal activity may not be worthy of a "death sentence" but shit happens when you break the law and try to steal things.

My point is that had the convicted felon not chose to commit a crime he would be alive today.

He wouldn't have been confronted by the police had he just went to the store to buy some Dr Pepper.

We have no clue if he had committed a crime. He was accused by the store owner but that doesn't mean he did it.

They had the right to stop him and get his information but really, until they investigated and determined an actual crime happened they had no right to arrest him.

The prosecutor initially said they had to perform an investigation before any arrests of the police officers could be made and that might take nine months to a year.

Seems it took 4 days. It wouldn't have if not for the violence.


Criminal activity is always risky businesses because you are doing things to harm other people.

You can deny it all you want by the asshole was trying to steal from a Black owned store and they called the police on his sorry ass.

Had the sonsofbitch not decided to engage in criminal activity that day he would be alive today.

He started the shit and now he is dead. Just like when that little piece of shit Travvon decided he was going to attack the "Cracker" he sealed his own fate.

"Criminals" are still protected by the Constitution even if you believe it only applies to well off white people.
That means they can't be arrested for committing crimes?

After getting the same considerations the officer expected.
 
George, a convicted felon, would be alive today if the asshole hadn't tried to steal money from a Black owned business.

Just shows you how stupid it is to be involved in criminal activity.

Sometimes it doesn't go the way you think it will go.

Perhaps you're right about his crime, but that particular crime should not have had a death sentence and the policeman's inept and callous application of force was criminal.


A lot of criminal activity may not be worthy of a "death sentence" but shit happens when you break the law and try to steal things.

My point is that had the convicted felon not chose to commit a crime he would be alive today.

He wouldn't have been confronted by the police had he just went to the store to buy some Dr Pepper.

We have no clue if he had committed a crime. He was accused by the store owner but that doesn't mean he did it.

They had the right to stop him and get his information but really, until they investigated and determined an actual crime happened they had no right to arrest him.

The prosecutor initially said they had to perform an investigation before any arrests of the police officers could be made and that might take nine months to a year.

Seems it took 4 days. It wouldn't have if not for the violence.

So who says they didn't have evidence of a crime? Also, you need a charge to arrest somebody. The police might have put him in cuffs so he didn't run away while investigating the complaint.

They had a reason to question him, not arrest him.


hard to question someone when he is fighting you.

No one was fighting.

Right, he was cooperating fully, and they just decided to throw him on the ground for no reason.


The arrest warrant for the officer said they had Floyd handcuffed and in the back seat of a cruiser and pulled him back out.
 
No truer words...from Matt Taibbi.

Following all of this amazing protest news underscores the folly of all those cover-ups in cases like Eric Garner's - the numbing certainty that even obvious brutality cases won't be punished leaves people furious not just with police, but the whole system.

My former coworker was a retired Cleveland police officer. He asked "So WTF do they expect us to do? When a suspect fights you while being arrested, we're supposed to say, okay, if you don't want to be arrested, we'll go away. Perhaps another time."


except in this case the guy was subdued and cuffed, he was no longer able to fight, but the cop kept his knee on his neck when there was no fight left. It was murder. That cop and the ones who watched and did nothing should get the maximum sentence. But that does not excuse the looting and destructive violence in our large cities.

In this case, correct. In the Garner case, he resisted arrest, and it's common for police to subdue a suspect by taking them to the ground in such a case.

They had NO reason to arrest Garner. He had done nothing wrong. It was an attempt at an illegal search. (Now here is where you lie again about the facts)

A store owner called the police because he was selling single cigarettes to people outside his business. That's illegal, and he's been arrested in the past for doing the same thing.
 
George, a convicted felon, would be alive today if the asshole hadn't tried to steal money from a Black owned business.

Just shows you how stupid it is to be involved in criminal activity.

Sometimes it doesn't go the way you think it will go.

Perhaps you're right about his crime, but that particular crime should not have had a death sentence and the policeman's inept and callous application of force was criminal.


A lot of criminal activity may not be worthy of a "death sentence" but shit happens when you break the law and try to steal things.

My point is that had the convicted felon not chose to commit a crime he would be alive today.

He wouldn't have been confronted by the police had he just went to the store to buy some Dr Pepper.

We have no clue if he had committed a crime. He was accused by the store owner but that doesn't mean he did it.

They had the right to stop him and get his information but really, until they investigated and determined an actual crime happened they had no right to arrest him.

The prosecutor initially said they had to perform an investigation before any arrests of the police officers could be made and that might take nine months to a year.

Seems it took 4 days. It wouldn't have if not for the violence.

So who says they didn't have evidence of a crime? Also, you need a charge to arrest somebody. The police might have put him in cuffs so he didn't run away while investigating the complaint.

They had a reason to question him, not arrest him.


hard to question someone when he is fighting you.

No one was fighting.

Right, he was cooperating fully, and they just decided to throw him on the ground for no reason.


The arrest warrant for the officer said they had Floyd handcuffed and in the back seat of a cruiser and pulled him back out.

That may be true. They do that when a suspect does something violent like kick the windows or bounce his head against the door. Didn't you ever watch the show C.O.P.S????
 
That stupid Democrat Governor of Minnesota is blaming the riots on White Supremacists. Really he is. He said that last night. What a fucking dumbshit!

In the big picture he is right.
What white supremacists?

Read many of the posts here. They are the same all over.
We're talking about in Minneapolis, the liberal paradise. Nobody in this forum had anything to do with the riots. Neither did any "White supremacists" in Minneapolis.
 
No truer words...from Matt Taibbi.

Following all of this amazing protest news underscores the folly of all those cover-ups in cases like Eric Garner's - the numbing certainty that even obvious brutality cases won't be punished leaves people furious not just with police, but the whole system.

My former coworker was a retired Cleveland police officer. He asked "So WTF do they expect us to do? When a suspect fights you while being arrested, we're supposed to say, okay, if you don't want to be arrested, we'll go away. Perhaps another time."


except in this case the guy was subdued and cuffed, he was no longer able to fight, but the cop kept his knee on his neck when there was no fight left. It was murder. That cop and the ones who watched and did nothing should get the maximum sentence. But that does not excuse the looting and destructive violence in our large cities.

In this case, correct. In the Garner case, he resisted arrest, and it's common for police to subdue a suspect by taking them to the ground in such a case.

They had NO reason to arrest Garner. He had done nothing wrong. It was an attempt at an illegal search. (Now here is where you lie again about the facts)

A store owner called the police because he was selling single cigarettes to people outside his business. That's illegal, and he's been arrested in the past for doing the same thing.

That's a lie and you know it is because we have covered this more than once.

He was recognized as someone that had sold loose cigarettes in the past and the cop decided he wanted to search him again.

That's an illegal search and why the family got millions for civil rights violations.

No doubt you will repeat this lie again in the future.
 
That stupid Democrat Governor of Minnesota is blaming the riots on White Supremacists. Really he is. He said that last night. What a fucking dumbshit!

In the big picture he is right.
What white supremacists?

Read many of the posts here. They are the same all over.
We're talking about in Minneapolis, the liberal paradise. Nobody in this forum had anything to do with the riots. Neither did any "White supremacists" in Minneapolis.

It's the same in most places.
 
George, a convicted felon, would be alive today if the asshole hadn't tried to steal money from a Black owned business.

Just shows you how stupid it is to be involved in criminal activity.

Sometimes it doesn't go the way you think it will go.

Perhaps you're right about his crime, but that particular crime should not have had a death sentence and the policeman's inept and callous application of force was criminal.


A lot of criminal activity may not be worthy of a "death sentence" but shit happens when you break the law and try to steal things.

My point is that had the convicted felon not chose to commit a crime he would be alive today.

He wouldn't have been confronted by the police had he just went to the store to buy some Dr Pepper.

We have no clue if he had committed a crime. He was accused by the store owner but that doesn't mean he did it.

They had the right to stop him and get his information but really, until they investigated and determined an actual crime happened they had no right to arrest him.

The prosecutor initially said they had to perform an investigation before any arrests of the police officers could be made and that might take nine months to a year.

Seems it took 4 days. It wouldn't have if not for the violence.


Criminal activity is always risky businesses because you are doing things to harm other people.

You can deny it all you want by the asshole was trying to steal from a Black owned store and they called the police on his sorry ass.

Had the sonsofbitch not decided to engage in criminal activity that day he would be alive today.

He started the shit and now he is dead. Just like when that little piece of shit Travvon decided he was going to attack the "Cracker" he sealed his own fate.

"Criminals" are still protected by the Constitution even if you believe it only applies to well off white people.
That means they can't be arrested for committing crimes?

After getting the same considerations the officer expected.
I agree with platforms from both sides. However, I will support a breakup of this nation into less contentious smaller ones. With people picking where they want to go. This way, you get yours and most of the population can only bitch about emigrating. Sounds equitable?
 
That stupid Democrat Governor of Minnesota is blaming the riots on White Supremacists. Really he is. He said that last night. What a fucking dumbshit!

In the big picture he is right.
What white supremacists?

Read many of the posts here. They are the same all over.
We're talking about in Minneapolis, the liberal paradise. Nobody in this forum had anything to do with the riots. Neither did any "White supremacists" in Minneapolis.

It's the same in most places.
Please identify a White supremacist that had anything to do with the riots. Otherwise, shut the fuck up.
 
George, a convicted felon, would be alive today if the asshole hadn't tried to steal money from a Black owned business.

Just shows you how stupid it is to be involved in criminal activity.

Sometimes it doesn't go the way you think it will go.

Perhaps you're right about his crime, but that particular crime should not have had a death sentence and the policeman's inept and callous application of force was criminal.


A lot of criminal activity may not be worthy of a "death sentence" but shit happens when you break the law and try to steal things.

My point is that had the convicted felon not chose to commit a crime he would be alive today.

He wouldn't have been confronted by the police had he just went to the store to buy some Dr Pepper.

We have no clue if he had committed a crime. He was accused by the store owner but that doesn't mean he did it.

They had the right to stop him and get his information but really, until they investigated and determined an actual crime happened they had no right to arrest him.

The prosecutor initially said they had to perform an investigation before any arrests of the police officers could be made and that might take nine months to a year.

Seems it took 4 days. It wouldn't have if not for the violence.


Criminal activity is always risky businesses because you are doing things to harm other people.

You can deny it all you want by the asshole was trying to steal from a Black owned store and they called the police on his sorry ass.

Had the sonsofbitch not decided to engage in criminal activity that day he would be alive today.

He started the shit and now he is dead. Just like when that little piece of shit Travvon decided he was going to attack the "Cracker" he sealed his own fate.

"Criminals" are still protected by the Constitution even if you believe it only applies to well off white people.
That means they can't be arrested for committing crimes?

After getting the same considerations the officer expected.
I agree with platforms from both sides. However, I will support a breakup of this nation into less contentious smaller ones. With people picking where they want to go. This way, you get yours and most of the population can only bitch about emigrating. Sounds equitable?

If the country remains broken I am all for it breaking up.
 
George, a convicted felon, would be alive today if the asshole hadn't tried to steal money from a Black owned business.

Just shows you how stupid it is to be involved in criminal activity.

Sometimes it doesn't go the way you think it will go.

Perhaps you're right about his crime, but that particular crime should not have had a death sentence and the policeman's inept and callous application of force was criminal.


A lot of criminal activity may not be worthy of a "death sentence" but shit happens when you break the law and try to steal things.

My point is that had the convicted felon not chose to commit a crime he would be alive today.

He wouldn't have been confronted by the police had he just went to the store to buy some Dr Pepper.

We have no clue if he had committed a crime. He was accused by the store owner but that doesn't mean he did it.

They had the right to stop him and get his information but really, until they investigated and determined an actual crime happened they had no right to arrest him.

The prosecutor initially said they had to perform an investigation before any arrests of the police officers could be made and that might take nine months to a year.

Seems it took 4 days. It wouldn't have if not for the violence.


Criminal activity is always risky businesses because you are doing things to harm other people.

You can deny it all you want by the asshole was trying to steal from a Black owned store and they called the police on his sorry ass.

Had the sonsofbitch not decided to engage in criminal activity that day he would be alive today.

He started the shit and now he is dead. Just like when that little piece of shit Travvon decided he was going to attack the "Cracker" he sealed his own fate.

"Criminals" are still protected by the Constitution even if you believe it only applies to well off white people.
That means they can't be arrested for committing crimes?

After getting the same considerations the officer expected.
I agree with platforms from both sides. However, I will support a breakup of this nation into less contentious smaller ones. With people picking where they want to go. This way, you get yours and most of the population can only bitch about emigrating. Sounds equitable?

I've made similar proposals in the past. We should divide this country from north to south right down the middle. We have one national vote on what party gets what side of the country--east or west. People that don't have any interest in politics can stay where they are or choose which side to live on.

If we pick the east side for Republicans, that would be great for me, because after all the Democrats are gone, my property value will double or triple overnight. Then we build a huge Trump wall to keep the Democrats from moving to our side.
 

Forum List

Back
Top