protectionist
Diamond Member
- Oct 20, 2013
- 59,765
- 20,296
- 2,250
- Thread starter
- #61
There they go with theTrump lost 90-something court challenges, many of them before Republican-appointed judges.
That fact alone tells us something, and it's not rampant fraud in the electoral system.

"Court challenges" is what Democrats keep harping about, but they have a hollow argument. Ho hum. Some judges were biased Democrats. Some were anti-Trump RINOs, including a few whom Trump appointed. And some, like the Supreme Court, just didn't want to bring politics into the courtroom. And not "ALL" US courts ruled against Trump. Some ruled favorable to him. The "courts" argument doesn't have an ounce of credibility.
What DOES have credibility is THIS >>> I Still Don't Know What It Is That Trump Opponents (Haters) Are Upset About
Post # s >>> 548....549.....550.....551 which you know nothing about.