In interview, Trump breaks sharply with U.S. foreign policy tradition - CNNPolitics.com
Is this guy for real? Maybe he is a plant by Poooootin? Truman and Reagan are turning over in their graves. He is going to lose so HUUUUUGE in November. He cannot even get the Republicans to vote for him.
At least he will go away...
What if there no aggression? Only brainwashed morons like you can't understand.
Bryan MacDonald is an Irish journalist:
The main reason is because there is very little profit in combating the, self-styled, ISIS. And NATO is primarily a money racket which provides a lot of influential people with a very comfortable lifestyle, flying around the globe on private jets and generating well-paid jobs, both directly and via the think-tank circuit.
Let’s be clear here. You don’t require submarines or nuclear weapons to engage ISIs, but you would in a putative conflict with Russia. It
desires to use Moscow as a convenient bogeyman in order to maintain US defense spending, which grew 9 percent annually from 2000-2009 during the “war on terror.”
Why has NATO chosen Russia as its enemy instead of ISIS?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Russian President Vladimir Putinmade the point that
NATO needs a foreign enemy otherwise there would be no reason for its existence.
_ In his speech on April 27, 2016 Trump was critical of NATO, in which only f
our of the 28 countries, besides the U.S., are spending the minimum required 2% of GDP on defense.
More important, Trump called for the upgrading of
NATO’s outdated mission and structure, stemming from the Cold War, which was designed to meet the threat from the Soviet Union that doesn’t exist anymore. That objective is obsolete. Together with Russia, NATO, he argued should confront shared challenges, especially migration and Islamic terrorism. NATO should be changed to fight terrorism.
Articles: Putin and Trump on NATO
