Trump Rewards Student Who Tore Down Tampon Dispenser

[Slade3200]

If dick pics go up on a bathroom wall my friends or family visit, I’m taking it down. Call it vandalism weepers but it’s right, just and correct

Pornography in school is illegal so you’re talking about something illegal hanging on the wall vs something that’s legally mandated to be on the wall. You must be the dumbest poster on this board if you thought you just made a reasonable argument. Wow.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

It’s a free country, people can do whatever they want. The people got together and voted for lawmakers who made this law. That’s how it works. And if it is enabling people to live how they want to live then great. That’s what our country is supposed to represent. Live and let live and to each their own.

Never Mind and You Will Never Matter

 

[Slade3200]

Never Mind and You Will Never Matter

Wow, that’s deep… so deep

 

[Persuader]

So, students are allowed by the rules to remove things, as long as they don't damage them?

This line of "debate" make you seem exactly like the Democrats on here. When they are obviously wrong in an argument, they nit-pick over some little point that a) is meaningless to the main point, and b) about which they are just as wrong.

If you flew a flag outside your home, and some Democrat POS removed it, you'd be fine with it, as long as they did not damage the flag?

Is this a general principle that you are promoting? Anytime we see something with which we disagree, we can remove it? You're going to be fine with Democrats removing the ten commandments from a judge's courtroom, or removing a cross from the grounds of a church?

This is the part you are correct about:



Recommend that you stick with that, and with civil disobedience being an American tradition. Pretending that it didn't violate the rules wastes time.

The legal definition of 'vandalism' was posted.....what the boys did does fit within the parameter of Vandalism....I am sure no jury would convict based on a charge of vandalism.

Post the legal definition of vandalism and show which part you think the boys violated.

 

[Seymour Flops]

The legal definition of 'vandalism' was posted.....what the boys did does fit within the parameter of Vandalism....I am sure no jury would convict based on a charge of vandalism.

Post the legal definition of vandalism and show which part you think the boys violated.

I can’t believe you’re still on this. I would assume that the definition of vandalism fairies by state, and I have no idea what state this is in.

Why don’t you just post the definition of vandalism if you think that really is the key to this whole discussion.

Is it legal for people to take out American flags that they don’t like them? Is it legal for a student to go into the library and take out any books he deems white centric, or politically incorrect for some other reason?

 

[Lord-Humungus]

The legal definition of 'vandalism' was posted.....what the boys did does fit within the parameter of Vandalism....I am sure no jury would convict based on a charge of vandalism.

Post the legal definition of vandalism and show which part you think the boys violated.

You still stuck on that lie even after it’s been debunked. You have a problem then requires professional help

 

[Persuader]

I can’t believe you’re still on this. I would assume that the definition of vandalism fairies by state, and I have no idea what state this is in.

Why don’t you just post the definition of vandalism if you think that really is the key to this whole discussion.

Is it legal for people to take out American flags that they don’t like them? Is it legal for a student to go into the library and take out any books he deems white centric, or politically incorrect for some other reason?

I posted the definition already...and in the above I meant to say what the boys did does not fit into the parameters of vandalism.

Stealing books has no relevance to the topic.

Stay focused.....if you do the only charge that the boys could be legally charged with is civil disobedience aka removing the tampon dispenser.

Irregardless.....I do not think they will be charged with anything...but the state involved in this is Cuntneticut...so I could be giving then toooo much credit... bunch of socialists might do anything.

 

[Persuader]

I can’t believe you’re still on this. I would assume that the definition of vandalism fairies by state, and I have no idea what state this is in.

Why don’t you just post the definition of vandalism if you think that really is the key to this whole discussion.

Is it legal for people to take out American flags that they don’t like them? Is it legal for a student to go into the library and take out any books he deems white centric, or politically incorrect for some other reason?

Here is the cuntneticut law regarding vandalism....

Under C.G.S. § 53a-116, Connecticut makes it a crime to intentionally damage, destroy, or deface another person's property valued at more than $250.

There is no way that tampon dispenser would cost more than $250....irregardless...the picture of the tampon dispenser has been posted.....shows no damage, it was not destroyed nor defaced...thus under the law of Connecticut...what the boys did was not vandalism.

I can’t believe you’re still on this. I would assume that the definition of vandalism fairies by state, and I have no idea what state this is in.

Why don’t you just post the definition of vandalism if you think that really is the key to this whole discussion.

Is it legal for people to take out American flags that they don’t like them? Is it legal for a student to go into the library and take out any books he deems white centric, or politically incorrect for some other reason?

Removing flags or stealing books is not relevant to this topic.

 

[Seymour Flops]

I posted the definition already...and in the above I meant to say what the boys did does not fit into the parameters of vandalism.

Stealing books has no relevance to the topic.

Stay focused.....if you do the only charge that the boys could be legally charged with is civil disobedience aka removing the tampon dispenser.

Irregardless.....I do not think they will be charged with anything...but the state involved in this is Cuntneticut...so I could be giving then toooo much credit... bunch of socialists might do anything.

I doubt seriously that there is a charge called “civil disobedience “

“Civil disobedience” means breaking laws in order to make some sort of point about politics or freedom, or religion, or whatever. Usually, it would be a minor crime, like refusing to give up a seat on the bus, or chaining oneself to a confederate statue to prevent it from being taken away. Anything more serious, like blowing up a statue, or shooting a bus, driver is terrorism, rather than civil dis

I believe vandalizing that tampon dispenser was indeed an act of civil disobedience. But when one commits civil disobedience the idea is to demonstrate that you are willing to accept the legal consequences in order to protest or make whatever point you’re making.

Whining about it and trying to find some hyper legal definition that somehow legalizes what is clearly a crime isn’t the way to make the point. the way to make the point is for the boys to say “if I’m punished for what I did I’m willing to accept that. I’m not willing to be miss-sexed by being forced to use the bathroom with a tampon dispenser that I would clearly never use, nor would anyone else who belongs in the boys bathroom.”

I believe that they basically said that, and I support them. thank you for posting the definition of vandalism earlier. Hopefully it made its contribution to this thread. As for me, I’m not going to go searching for it because I really don’t see the relevance.

 

[Persuader]

I doubt seriously that there is a charge called “civil disobedience “

“Civil disobedience” means breaking laws in order to make some sort of point about politics or freedom, or religion, or whatever. Usually, it would be a minor crime, like refusing to give up a seat on the bus, or chaining oneself to a confederate statue to prevent it from being taken away. Anything more serious, like blowing up a statue, or shooting a bus, driver is terrorism, rather than civil dis

I believe vandalizing that tampon dispenser was indeed an act of civil disobedience. But when one commits civil disobedience the idea is to demonstrate that you are willing to accept the legal consequences in order to protest or make whatever point you’re making.

Whining about it and trying to find some hyper legal definition that somehow legalizes what is clearly a crime isn’t the way to make the point. the way to make the point is for the boys to say “if I’m punished for what I did I’m willing to accept that. I’m not willing to be miss-sexed by being forced to use the bathroom with a tampon dispenser that I would clearly never use, nor would anyone else who belongs in the boys bathroom.”

I believe that they basically said that, and I support them. thank you for posting the definition of vandalism earlier. Hopefully it made its contribution to this thread. As for me, I’m not going to go searching for it because I really don’t see the relevance.

You do not see the relevance of the legal definition of vandalism in connecticut where the boys were charged with vandalism???

You keep claiming they comitted vandalism based on nothing more than what the MSM reported....you should know better than that.


Under C.G.S. § 53a-116, Connecticut makes it a crime to intentionally damage, destroy, or deface another person's property valued at more than $250.
From the photo of the tampon dispenser posted on this board....there is no damage seen and it is highly unlikely what is essentially just a metal box would cost more than $250 anyhow.....I expect the case will be dropped.


Civil disobedience is the active, professed refusal of a citizen to obey certain laws, demands, orders or commands of a government (or any other authority). By some definitions, civil disobedience has to be nonviolent to be called "civil". Hence, civil disobedience is sometimes equated with peaceful protests or nonviolent resistance

By law it is punishable.