Shipped in by George Soros... Lol
See, that's the kind of garbage this post is about. His organization champions human rights and is progressive, so they don't think much of Trump. But Soros isn't sending busloads of paid professionals to disrupt Trump's rallies as the right would like everyone to think. Try to catch up, Rustic.
I am on the right and I don't want people to think that the protestors are all paid and bused in by the hundreds. Everyone I know who is on the right does not want people to think that either. Trump never claimed they were bussed in by the thousands. He blamed MoveOn for organizing it...something moveon did not deny.
It seems the left want everyone to believe that the right thinks that. But we don't.
It would be nice if you provided proof that such is what the right wants before spreading the rumor.
I inferred that those who refer to the protesters as "paid professional protesters" or 'organized, paid professionals' or whatever other terms are being used, want to discredit their message. You are right that when we speak of the "right"' and the "left," we are making sweeping generalizations that don't apply to each individual. You look at this issue reasonably, but many don't. News media is just as guilty as the pols in this. It just bugs me, which is why I spoke up about it.
But the media and Trump and talking heads by no means want to imply that the protestors are each individually paid. They don't need to clarify that. It is illogical to think that people are being paid cash to protest.
When they speak of paid protestors...they are referring to one individual; or a group like MoveOn with a political agenda who use their access to cash to organize a protest that otherwise would have never happened.
It Is not to discredit their message. It is to say that their message is the message of one individual or one group and they are being used to get that message across.
And you need to reevaluate the whole situation. When it comes to a political speech....the effort to get the message across that you disagree with it is by supporting for and voting for the opponent.....no9t by preventing that person from speaking...
So if anything, you should be pissed off at them. Not the ones who "discredit" them.
Look at it from a local standpoint.......if you were at a town meeting and the board gave their reason for an initiative....and they allowed those that supported it to speak....but when it was your turn to oppose it vocally, they shouted you down.....
Would you appreciate it?
Protest actions that affect you.....do not protest the sentiments and words of someone you disagree with....words that do not affect you.
