He already did that, now it's the scum under the barrel.He sure is scraping the bottom of the barrel.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
He already did that, now it's the scum under the barrel.He sure is scraping the bottom of the barrel.
Let's put it this way, Mr. Liberal Who Lives In A Gated Community, it's in your nature to ridicule anyone who disagrees with you based on facts.
I don't know what happened to you in your childhood, but it must have really messed you up.
If you took your head out of your ass, you would realize that Reuters and AP News provide the rest of the news outlets with 99% of their content.I can only go by what you say. You said my favorite sources are Liberal. Those would be Reuters and the AP. Didn't you say you like those too?
"a million protesters".....................There were a million protesters at the Capitol - if they had wanted to topple the government, they would have.
A hundred troops would have bourn witness to the FBI shenanigans - which would have kept the the riot from breaking out. They may have kept the Palace Guard from assaulting protesters - which was the cause of most of the violence - people fighting back as goons savaged them with metal batons.
If you took your head out of your ass, you would realize that Reuters and AP News provide the rest of the news outlets with 99% of their content.
Fox and CNN merely massage the info to their audience.
Where did I explicitly state such?Which is one reason Reuters and the AP are my favorite. You think they're Liberal.
Damn..he's gone full Q! You should never go full Q. All I'm saying is that if there had been a hundred troops there it would have been far worse..IMO.
MSN
www.msn.com
Fresh off hosting a QAnon conference at Mar-a-Lago and bringing a Holocaust denier over for dinner, former President Donald Trump on Wednesday promoted a conspiracy theory about the January 6 riot at the United States Capitol building.
On his Truth Social network, the former president boosted a post from an anonymous user who baselessly claimed that the Capitol riot was a setup of Trump supporters.
"Those people do not deserve this... this was a false flag and it was planned out very meticulously," the post stated. "If there were a hundred National Guard troops at the Capitol that day none of this would have happened. Nancy Pelosi rejected Donald J Trump's recommendation for having troops at the Capitol that day."
In fact, Trump was the only person who could have ordered the National Guard to go to the Capitol, and he actively encouraged his supporters to march to the Capitol on January 6, 2021, despite allegedly knowing many of them were armed at the time.
Trump waited more than three hours after the start of the riots to publicly call on the rioters to go home, and even then he told the rioters that "we love you, you're very special."
View attachment 736099
Where did I explicitly state such?
Thye issue is you never post anything from those sites without adding your own Liberal POV.They're my favorite. You said my favorite are Liberal sources.
Thye issue is you never post anything from those sites without adding your own Liberal POV.
I requested the post where I explicitly stated that and you have failed to provide such.Has nothing to do with you calling them Liberal sources.
I requested the post where I explicitly stated that and you have failed to provide such.
You are, as usual, Mr. Ad Hominem.
That's because you inject your bullshit Liberalism into what the articles actually say.You didn't ask for a post. You asked...
Where did I explicitly state such?
And so I explained...
They're my favorite. You said my favorite are Liberal sources.
That's because you inject your bullshit Liberalism into what the articles actually say.
You see, I actually read the article and you, perhaps, read the headline.
Now Link to the article in question so we can have some context.
You know that thing you hate...context.
An ad hominem...how Faun.What article?
You said of me, "coming from the guy who loves Liberal News Links."
My favorite news outlets are Reuters and the AP. That means according to you, Reuters and the AP are "Liberal News Links."
Are ya feeling stupid yet?
Let's ask Ray Epps....Let's Nanski Peloski....Let's ask the pipe bomber.Was it a "False Flag?" I don't know....why don't you ask all the FBI agents, FBI informants, BLM/antifa thugs who were pretending to be Trump supporters as they attacked the police.....
An ad hominem...how Faun.
Context is everything which means context is your enemy.
That's obviously not the context.The context is -- you said Reuters and the AP are "Liberal News Links."
That's obviously not the context.
I want to see the posts beforehand and the article.
The problem is that you leave behind a trail of lies whenever you post.
You're good at finding things...find the posts.
Why should I waste my time when you are lying?LOL
Who the fuck is stopping you from looking??
What a yutz you are.