Trump Now Courting Kazillionaire Cash! Clinton Proposing To Free Federal Reserve of Kazillionaires!

[mascale]

Senator Warren actually endorsed Secretary Clinton for the Democratic Presidential Nomination. Senator Senators actually proposed sending all the new federal deficit money to the already prosperous, the public college faculty instead--excluding any regarded somehow Schvartz, or something. Donald Trump is spending the day after the Democratic Kentucky primary looking for money from Kazillionaires as usual. Secretary Clinton has now proposed the start of eliminating bankers from Federal Reserve. For Clinton that was days ago. For that, Trump's new campaign started hours ago.

Clinton Wants Bankers Off Regional Fed Boards

After four million years afoot, humans finally developed farming only about 5000 years ago. The timeline is similar to ancient years of calendars. Consciousness happened relatively recently. After farming, a loan of three bags of barley could be repaid with four. Coincidentally, pests of all kinds were ecstatic. Soon a loan of four units of silver could be repaid with five.

No bankers, but usury--like bankers do, happened. Civilization arose, and divided itself into many. A problem with transactions was noted in the basic, "anti-aggravation" statutes of Code of Hammurabi. A male could sell off the wife and kinds into short-term slavery. Debts were considered repaid. The wife and kids were housed, fed, clothed, employed, and put to useful pursuits. A kind of little Socialist paradise happened, complete with an Imperial Administration(?). So what bankers?

Moses, the Imperial educated, would create in Deuteronomy, 23:19-20, the modern understanding of usury and interest rates. Among the Hebrews, no riba (Moslem interest rate language), but as for the foreign--go ahead and create arithmetic subjugation, (it is nowhere so-translated)!

At U. S. Federal Reserve, Fixed Percentage Usury is every bit the business of the bankers, who often have the similar reputation of the Jews--loan sharks of Europe, or Seraphs of the Moslem Middle East. And so In America we lawfully, screw one another(?). Hefner and Cosby are even now the subject of a lawsuit, or something(?), unrelated to banking(?)!

Senator George McGovern had proposed an Inverse Usury, $1000 for every Man, Woman and Child. Nixon had gone with the method of usury, fixed percentage wage and price guidelines. The former follows a story in Matthew 20:1-16, like the later-on Obama Refundable Income Tax Credit, "Make Work Pay." The Nixon concept was more Greek of heritage, like in Matthew 25:14-30, where the Pythagorean Theorem can be applied. 2008 is therein described. Bankers have the reputation they deserve.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Many come to Lands of Many Nations, where Great Spirit, "Seven Come Eleven," is not about bankers either!)

 

[Auld Phart]

IF Hillary wins the Office, what do you consider the over/under on the number of Wall Street bankers in her administration?

I'm saying at least 5

 

[mascale]

Congress had raised and indexed the standard deduction, and personal exemptions, in the 1986 Tax Reform. Those tend to be equal amounts, creating an "Inverse Usury," excepting that mostly half the people filling federal income tax, now have no liability. That is also a result of the equal-amount per child, Clinton tax credit. All that by-passed the Republicans. Bush-Cheney opined that a tax cut would stimulate the economy. How that was going to happen was not described, since people with no tax liability would get no extra money. So it became a tax cut for the rich.

The Make Work Pay, Refundable Income Tax Credit under Obama-Biden, Pelosi-Reid, was "Inverse Usury," actually applied. People got the equal amounts, even if they had owed nothing, and even if they had not worked all the year. The Republicans took that away two years later. The Fair Labor Standards Act is only being reinvigorated, just today. $400 to a person with $20,000 per year income, is more usury than is $400 to a person with $100,000 per year income.

So Bankers do Wealth From Riba, (Outlawed in Moslem Quran), and mostly lend to their own. What they find is that accumulated hoards can be flushed down the toilet almost as fast as saying, "2008," a veritable end to financial stability. Famously The Jewish House, Lehman Brothers, also came tumbling on down. Modern Christian giving is often announced with basis in the pest control problem of ancient Sumer, if not so-stated. A basic, socialist, spreading of the wealth around is encouraged. Adam Smith would tend to promote hoarding, and even the regulation of usury. Spreading crap around was not that brand. The arithmetic flaw of economics was still not known about at all.

So instead of usury, read in "subjugation." The ancients knew not so much--about the arithmetic of commercial enterprise. Keynes knew business cycles, and on that basis suggested federal public works in economic downturns. An arithmetic of "Inverse Usury" was never mentioned, directly. The public works, clearly, would be providing money to people with none. They are put to relatively forced and directed, Imperial labor: Is the problem. It is a subjugation brand.

Hording a Money Supply is subjugating brand. The subjugators lend to the credit-worthy borrowers, like themselves. Nothing at all trickles down. The problem is arithmetic and has nothing to do with policy: Except that it is lawful. It has also been lawful, going way back. Socialist Subjugation really happens.

Did Secretary Clinton have a coal country problem in Kentucky, or what? There is clearly an arithmetic, subjugation problem. The election outcome turned out worse than 2008. Not yet proposed, a kind of Clinton-Gore, "Let's Invent a New High-Tech Technology," would be a good choice for Vice President of the United States(?)! Even redistributive, spread the crap around, credit unions, farm banks, tech banks, housing banks--doing equal dollar amount raises, and supporting that in lending credits or special offers: Then create demand for more good and services. Lots of little hoarders could be on board. They could implement the "Inverse Usury" kind of math.

A specialist in fixed percentage usury might be aghast. Bank of Dubai, oddly enough, and others might be interested.

An ancient Roman could hire laborers at different times of the day, and pay them equal amounts. The already rich could put the pay to the exchangers. Any with need of goods and services could go to the market place. Any needing "rest" and "relaxation" could go to the games, do the other entertainments: Maybe like Cosby and Hefner, role models of the West. (See Matthew 20:1-16, which has no sociology outcomes described.)

It is not clear that a big bank would be around at all, since likely as not more community or specialized hoarding and lending mechanisms would be created. Even Bank of Dubai understands about making a buck or two, after spreading Islamic passages around. They cannot become wealthy from fixed percentage Riba.

It is not clear that Bank of Dubai, even: Would have that much of a role in a Clinton Administration. It is also not clear just what role Trump intends for "Bank of North Korea," if there is one, or even anymore(?).

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred."
(Lands of Many Nations, under Great Spirit, "Seven Come Eleven," hear often, "Give us. . . Eleven!" "Now Give Us Seven," in rituals of spring, year 'round(?)!