Trump Leveraging Ukraine Military Aid For Dirt On Joe Biden

[bripat9643]

Biden in newest poll FALLS TO SECOND PLACE BEHIND FAUXAHONTAS 22% TO 20%....even some DemonRATS REALIZE Biden is a lying piece of shit, corrupt as much as theSurrender Monkey and has NO CHANCE against the STABLE GENIUS that just turned this scandal into a BIDEN SCANDAL...pay to play!!!

Oh my....Rasmussen has TRUMP IP TO 52 % APPROVAL

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Friday shows that 52% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Trump’s job performance. Forty-seven percent (47%) disapprove.

The latest figures include 37% who Strongly Approve of the job Trump is doing and 39% who Strongly Disapprove. This gives him a Presidential Approval Index rating of -2. (see trends).

(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com

LOLOL

Cherry picking polls again?

On average, Biden leads Warren 30.2% to 19.8%.

RealClearPolitics - Election 2020 - 2020 Democratic Presidential Nomination

On average, trump's job approval rating is 44.7%

RealClearPolitics - Election Other - President Trump Job Approval

They only use Rasmussen. Because Rasmussen favors republicans. Another disingenuous ploy.

You only use everyone else (but Fox), because they all serve your leftist agenda.

LOL

Fox is in line with all those polls you call "leftist"

Fox: 45%
Others excluding Rasmussen: 43.8%
Rasmussen: 52%

Rasmussen is the outlier.

FOX also guessed the 2016 election wrong.

 

[bripat9643]

You LYING PIECE OF GARBAGE HERE IS JOE THE SEXUAL ABUSER AND CORRUPT POLITICIAN ADMITTING HEHAD THE PROSECUTOR FIRED FOR INVESTING HIS SON!

That is not what he did.

Proof? Link? Evidence? Or do you really think your word is final?

**** you. My word is going to be final now since your punk ass decided to say something. The video is proof. Biden bribed no one. Understand?

No one has accused Biden of bribing anyone, moron. They are accusing him of receiving a bribe.

Still waiting for you to say what he got, ******* moron?

I already have.

 

[IM2]

You LYING PIECE OF GARBAGE HERE IS JOE THE SEXUAL ABUSER AND CORRUPT POLITICIAN ADMITTING HEHAD THE PROSECUTOR FIRED FOR INVESTING HIS SON!

That is not what he did.

Proof? Link? Evidence? Or do you really think your word is final?

**** you. My word is going to be final now since your punk ass decided to say something. The video is proof. Biden bribed no one. Understand?

No one has accused Biden of bribing anyone, moron. They are accusing him of receiving a bribe.

Still waiting for you to say what he got, ******* moron?

They gave him a 2015 Studebaker. Or was it a unicorn? I can't remember what Hannity said it was, but he said it was one of these things.

 

[IM2]

Biden in newest poll FALLS TO SECOND PLACE BEHIND FAUXAHONTAS 22% TO 20%....even some DemonRATS REALIZE Biden is a lying piece of shit, corrupt as much as theSurrender Monkey and has NO CHANCE against the STABLE GENIUS that just turned this scandal into a BIDEN SCANDAL...pay to play!!!

Oh my....Rasmussen has TRUMP IP TO 52 % APPROVAL

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Friday shows that 52% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Trump’s job performance. Forty-seven percent (47%) disapprove.

The latest figures include 37% who Strongly Approve of the job Trump is doing and 39% who Strongly Disapprove. This gives him a Presidential Approval Index rating of -2. (see trends).

(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com

LOLOL

Cherry picking polls again?

On average, Biden leads Warren 30.2% to 19.8%.

RealClearPolitics - Election 2020 - 2020 Democratic Presidential Nomination

On average, trump's job approval rating is 44.7%

RealClearPolitics - Election Other - President Trump Job Approval

They only use Rasmussen. Because Rasmussen favors republicans. Another disingenuous ploy.

You only use everyone else (but Fox), because they all serve your leftist agenda.

LOL

Fox is in line with all those polls you call "leftist"

Fox: 45%
Others excluding Rasmussen: 43.8%
Rasmussen: 52%

Rasmussen is the outlier.

FOX also guessed the 2016 election wrong.

Yawn!

 

[Faun]

That's because it's about Biden. He took a bribe from a Ukrainian company to keep his son from going to jail.

******* moron, no one was investigating his son.

..He was talking about his dead wife?....dumbfuck!

Dumbfuck, his son had nothing to do with it.

******* Moron
Dumbfuck
******* Moron
Dumbfuck
******* Moron
Dumbfuck
******* Moron
Dumbfuck

These either must be the only words Faun ever learned in life, the first words he learned as a baby, what his parents called each other, or he thinks they mean, "Dear Sir" from wherever he comes from.

LOLOL

^^^ a dumbfuck who didn't read the rest of my post.

Show me a post of yours worth reading and I'll gladly read it.

The ones you included in your post will suffice. You just have to read past the first word or two. I know, that's taxing your brain so it might just be too much of a struggle for you to handle.

 

[Faun]

Notice how on every thread about trump possibly trying to leverage Ukraine for assistance to bury Biden, the rightards all want to make this about Biden and not trump.

That's because it's about Biden. He took a bribe from a Ukrainian company to keep his son from going to jail.

******* moron, no one was investigating his son.

That's the point. Not investigating his son was the bribe he took.

You really are one dumb mother ******.

Then what was the bribe, ******* moron? What did Joe Biden gain?

I just explained that, you ******* moron.

LOLOL

******* moron, since he didn't take a bribe, you can't say. Trying to bluff your way out of the corner you painted yourself into doesn't help you.

 

[Faun]

Biden in newest poll FALLS TO SECOND PLACE BEHIND FAUXAHONTAS 22% TO 20%....even some DemonRATS REALIZE Biden is a lying piece of shit, corrupt as much as theSurrender Monkey and has NO CHANCE against the STABLE GENIUS that just turned this scandal into a BIDEN SCANDAL...pay to play!!!

Oh my....Rasmussen has TRUMP IP TO 52 % APPROVAL

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Friday shows that 52% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Trump’s job performance. Forty-seven percent (47%) disapprove.

The latest figures include 37% who Strongly Approve of the job Trump is doing and 39% who Strongly Disapprove. This gives him a Presidential Approval Index rating of -2. (see trends).

(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com

LOLOL

Cherry picking polls again?

On average, Biden leads Warren 30.2% to 19.8%.

RealClearPolitics - Election 2020 - 2020 Democratic Presidential Nomination

On average, trump's job approval rating is 44.7%

RealClearPolitics - Election Other - President Trump Job Approval

They only use Rasmussen. Because Rasmussen favors republicans. Another disingenuous ploy.

You only use everyone else (but Fox), because they all serve your leftist agenda.

LOL

Fox is in line with all those polls you call "leftist"

Fox: 45%
Others excluding Rasmussen: 43.8%
Rasmussen: 52%

Rasmussen is the outlier.

FOX also guessed the 2016 election wrong.

******* moron, a job approval poll is not an election poll.

 

[Kilroy2]

Julia (not a typo) is not a government official and is Trumps personal lawyer

Ukraine gets $250 million funding from the US .

Trump all the sudden whats to review this

I am sure Putin is giggling like a school girl.

Russia backs Crimea and is supplying them with weapons and support

Crimea and Ukraine are in a civil war

why does Trump all the sudden, after 3 years in office, what to review it . Is it because he believe Ukraine has political dirt on Biden's Son

or is it to please his maser Putin

if Ukraine had oil then he would probably send in the troops but that would anger Putin

Bottom line Congress has asked for this information and they have refused. Congress has the right to see it by law

Why are they refusing

Release it and it will be over unless there is something there that will embarrass Trump

Still Trump is using the office of the presidency for political gains and politically Russia will like this and continue its meddling in US elections in support of Trump

 

[bigrebnc1775]

You said it wasn't used for Fisa warrants.

I said it was not the reason for the warrants.

The dossier was used to obtain FISA warrants.

The dossier by itself was not what caused the warrants to be issued. Understand?

The dossier was the sole piece of evidence for the fisa warrants

Horowitz investigated that. Quote him saying that or you're lying....

FISA shocker: DOJ official warned Steele dossier was connected to Clinton, might be biased

When the annals of mistakes and abuses in the FBI’s Russia investigation are finally written, Bruce Ohr almost certainly will be the No. 1 witness, according to my sources.

The then-senior Department of Justice (DOJ) official briefed both senior FBI and DOJ officials in summer 2016 about Christopher Steele’s Russia dossier, explicitly cautioning that the British intelligence operative’s work was opposition research connected to Hillary Clinton’s campaign and might be biased.

Ohr’s briefings, in July and August 2016, included the deputy director of the FBI, a top lawyer for then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch and a Justice official who later would become the top deputy to special counsel Robert Mueller.

At the time, Ohr was the associate deputy attorney general. Yet his warnings about political bias were pointedly omitted weeks later from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant that the FBI obtained from a federal court, granting it permission to spy on whether the Trump campaign was colluding with Russia to hijack the 2016 presidential election.

 

[IM2]

And that's the reality of this situation. Trump is not abiding by the law. He swore to uphold the law. His not doing so is impeachable.

 

[IM2]

I said it was not the reason for the warrants.

The dossier was used to obtain FISA warrants.

The dossier by itself was not what caused the warrants to be issued. Understand?

The dossier was the sole piece of evidence for the fisa warrants

Horowitz investigated that. Quote him saying that or you're lying....

FISA shocker: DOJ official warned Steele dossier was connected to Clinton, might be biased

When the annals of mistakes and abuses in the FBI’s Russia investigation are finally written, Bruce Ohr almost certainly will be the No. 1 witness, according to my sources.

The then-senior Department of Justice (DOJ) official briefed both senior FBI and DOJ officials in summer 2016 about Christopher Steele’s Russia dossier, explicitly cautioning that the British intelligence operative’s work was opposition research connected to Hillary Clinton’s campaign and might be biased.

Ohr’s briefings, in July and August 2016, included the deputy director of the FBI, a top lawyer for then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch and a Justice official who later would become the top deputy to special counsel Robert Mueller.

At the time, Ohr was the associate deputy attorney general. Yet his warnings about political bias were pointedly omitted weeks later from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant that the FBI obtained from a federal court, granting it permission to spy on whether the Trump campaign was colluding with Russia to hijack the 2016 presidential election.

The Steele dossier has nothing to do with this conversation. John Solomon is known to be inaccurate.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Actually, if there is evidence that Joe Biden used his political influence to fire a prosecutor who was investigating his son, Trump has both the right and the duty to call for an investigation. It appears there is a lot of evidence, including Biden's own statements, that suggests this is exactly what happened. Biden even bragged about it.

This latest stupid attempt to get Trump will backfire as surely as all other attempts have failed. However, this one could send Biden to jail.

Biden also used his position for pecuniary gains.....China gave Hunter a $billion and a half.


Ever notice how many pols go to Washington to do good, and wind up doing well?

 

[Kilroy2]

I said it was not the reason for the warrants.

The dossier was used to obtain FISA warrants.

The dossier by itself was not what caused the warrants to be issued. Understand?

The dossier was the sole piece of evidence for the fisa warrants

Horowitz investigated that. Quote him saying that or you're lying....

FISA shocker: DOJ official warned Steele dossier was connected to Clinton, might be biased

When the annals of mistakes and abuses in the FBI’s Russia investigation are finally written, Bruce Ohr almost certainly will be the No. 1 witness, according to my sources.

The then-senior Department of Justice (DOJ) official briefed both senior FBI and DOJ officials in summer 2016 about Christopher Steele’s Russia dossier, explicitly cautioning that the British intelligence operative’s work was opposition research connected to Hillary Clinton’s campaign and might be biased.

Ohr’s briefings, in July and August 2016, included the deputy director of the FBI, a top lawyer for then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch and a Justice official who later would become the top deputy to special counsel Robert Mueller.

At the time, Ohr was the associate deputy attorney general. Yet his warnings about political bias were pointedly omitted weeks later from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant that the FBI obtained from a federal court, granting it permission to spy on whether the Trump campaign was colluding with Russia to hijack the 2016 presidential election.

Yeah the only problem is the warrant does talk about the Dossier & that it was funded by a political opponent

page 17 of the Carter FISA warrant says Source 1 was considered a reliable source and had been used in the past and has been paid. It goes on to say that Source 1 was hired to conduct research on Candidate 1 which is known to be Trump as the report early says candidate 1 is now the president

Still it goes on to say that Source 1 was hired to research Candidate 1 for political purposes

Ohr statements just reflect that the dossier may be bias based solely on who funded it.
Nothing new here because in the end a Dossier is just an Unsubstantiated accusations.

Its up to the FBI to confirm whether it is true or not and make a case. Yet Trump associates have plead guilty

yet Fox and its associates continue the narrative and the believers have faith in FOX and its related right wing bloggers are not bias

News flash Fox and right wing bloggers are bias yet many still believe in them

So if Ohr says that the dossier is bias it still is just a statement. It still has to be proven.

The FISA warrants mentions the dossier as a source and the FBI believes that the source is credible as he has been used in the past to help gain convictions.

The FISA warrant is available for anyone to read. Yes it is heavily redacted but if your smart enough you can figure out who candidate 1 is and who source 1 is

 

[Faun]

I said it was not the reason for the warrants.

The dossier was used to obtain FISA warrants.

The dossier by itself was not what caused the warrants to be issued. Understand?

The dossier was the sole piece of evidence for the fisa warrants

Horowitz investigated that. Quote him saying that or you're lying....

FISA shocker: DOJ official warned Steele dossier was connected to Clinton, might be biased

When the annals of mistakes and abuses in the FBI’s Russia investigation are finally written, Bruce Ohr almost certainly will be the No. 1 witness, according to my sources.

The then-senior Department of Justice (DOJ) official briefed both senior FBI and DOJ officials in summer 2016 about Christopher Steele’s Russia dossier, explicitly cautioning that the British intelligence operative’s work was opposition research connected to Hillary Clinton’s campaign and might be biased.

Ohr’s briefings, in July and August 2016, included the deputy director of the FBI, a top lawyer for then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch and a Justice official who later would become the top deputy to special counsel Robert Mueller.

At the time, Ohr was the associate deputy attorney general. Yet his warnings about political bias were pointedly omitted weeks later from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant that the FBI obtained from a federal court, granting it permission to spy on whether the Trump campaign was colluding with Russia to hijack the 2016 presidential election.

That's an opinion piece, PussyBitch, not the results of Horowitz's investigation into the FISA warrants. Even worse for you -- the challenge to you, which you can't handle, was to prove your moronic claim that the dossier was the sole piece of evidence to obtain the FISA warrants; yet here you are, idiotically linking an op/ed bitching about how the FBI didn't inform the FISC of political bias.

You lose because you're a loser.

 

[IM2]

Actually, if there is evidence that Joe Biden used his political influence to fire a prosecutor who was investigating his son, Trump has both the right and the duty to call for an investigation. It appears there is a lot of evidence, including Biden's own statements, that suggests this is exactly what happened. Biden even bragged about it.

This latest stupid attempt to get Trump will backfire as surely as all other attempts have failed. However, this one could send Biden to jail.

Biden also used his position for pecuniary gains.....China gave Hunter a $billion and a half.


Ever notice how many pols go to Washington to do good, and wind up doing well?

Didn't happen.

 

[IM2]

The dossier was used to obtain FISA warrants.

The dossier by itself was not what caused the warrants to be issued. Understand?

The dossier was the sole piece of evidence for the fisa warrants

Horowitz investigated that. Quote him saying that or you're lying....

FISA shocker: DOJ official warned Steele dossier was connected to Clinton, might be biased

When the annals of mistakes and abuses in the FBI’s Russia investigation are finally written, Bruce Ohr almost certainly will be the No. 1 witness, according to my sources.

The then-senior Department of Justice (DOJ) official briefed both senior FBI and DOJ officials in summer 2016 about Christopher Steele’s Russia dossier, explicitly cautioning that the British intelligence operative’s work was opposition research connected to Hillary Clinton’s campaign and might be biased.

Ohr’s briefings, in July and August 2016, included the deputy director of the FBI, a top lawyer for then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch and a Justice official who later would become the top deputy to special counsel Robert Mueller.

At the time, Ohr was the associate deputy attorney general. Yet his warnings about political bias were pointedly omitted weeks later from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant that the FBI obtained from a federal court, granting it permission to spy on whether the Trump campaign was colluding with Russia to hijack the 2016 presidential election.

That's an opinion piece, PussyBitch, not the results of Horowitz's investigation into the FISA warrants. Even worse for you -- the challenge to you, which you can't handle, was to prove your moronic claim that the dossier was the sole piece of evidence to obtain the FISA warrants; yet here you are, idiotically linking an op/ed bitching about how the FBI didn't inform the FISC of political bias.

You lose because you're a loser.

It's all they have. Make it up then repeat it over and over.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Actually, if there is evidence that Joe Biden used his political influence to fire a prosecutor who was investigating his son, Trump has both the right and the duty to call for an investigation. It appears there is a lot of evidence, including Biden's own statements, that suggests this is exactly what happened. Biden even bragged about it.

This latest stupid attempt to get Trump will backfire as surely as all other attempts have failed. However, this one could send Biden to jail.

Biden also used his position for pecuniary gains.....China gave Hunter a $billion and a half.


Ever notice how many pols go to Washington to do good, and wind up doing well?

Didn't happen.

Of course it happened, liar.


"The troubling reason why Biden is so soft on China
In 2013, then-Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden flew aboard Air Force Two to China. Less than two weeks later, Hunter Biden’s firm inked a $1 billion private equity deal with a subsidiary of the Chinese government’s Bank of China. The deal was later expanded to $1.5 billion. In short, the Chinese government funded a business that it co-owned along with the son of a sitting vice president."
https://nypost.com/2019/05/11/the-troubling-reason-why-biden-is-so-soft-on-china/


Sounds a lot like the $145 million Putin gave the Clintons.




You Leftists can never post without lying......they teach that in government school????

 

[Faun]

Actually, if there is evidence that Joe Biden used his political influence to fire a prosecutor who was investigating his son, Trump has both the right and the duty to call for an investigation. It appears there is a lot of evidence, including Biden's own statements, that suggests this is exactly what happened. Biden even bragged about it.

This latest stupid attempt to get Trump will backfire as surely as all other attempts have failed. However, this one could send Biden to jail.

Biden also used his position for pecuniary gains.....China gave Hunter a $billion and a half.


Ever notice how many pols go to Washington to do good, and wind up doing well?

Didn't happen.

Of course it happened, liar.


"The troubling reason why Biden is so soft on China
In 2013, then-Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden flew aboard Air Force Two to China. Less than two weeks later, Hunter Biden’s firm inked a $1 billion private equity deal with a subsidiary of the Chinese government’s Bank of China. The deal was later expanded to $1.5 billion. In short, the Chinese government funded a business that it co-owned along with the son of a sitting vice president."
https://nypost.com/2019/05/11/the-troubling-reason-why-biden-is-so-soft-on-china/


Sounds a lot like the $145 million Putin gave the Clintons.




You Leftists can never post without lying......they teach that in government school????

LOL

Putin never gave the Clinton's $145 million, ya lyin' skank.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The dossier was used to obtain FISA warrants.

The dossier by itself was not what caused the warrants to be issued. Understand?

The dossier was the sole piece of evidence for the fisa warrants

Horowitz investigated that. Quote him saying that or you're lying....

FISA shocker: DOJ official warned Steele dossier was connected to Clinton, might be biased

When the annals of mistakes and abuses in the FBI’s Russia investigation are finally written, Bruce Ohr almost certainly will be the No. 1 witness, according to my sources.

The then-senior Department of Justice (DOJ) official briefed both senior FBI and DOJ officials in summer 2016 about Christopher Steele’s Russia dossier, explicitly cautioning that the British intelligence operative’s work was opposition research connected to Hillary Clinton’s campaign and might be biased.

Ohr’s briefings, in July and August 2016, included the deputy director of the FBI, a top lawyer for then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch and a Justice official who later would become the top deputy to special counsel Robert Mueller.

At the time, Ohr was the associate deputy attorney general. Yet his warnings about political bias were pointedly omitted weeks later from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant that the FBI obtained from a federal court, granting it permission to spy on whether the Trump campaign was colluding with Russia to hijack the 2016 presidential election.

That's an opinion piece, PussyBitch, not the results of Horowitz's investigation into the FISA warrants. Even worse for you -- the challenge to you, which you can't handle, was to prove your moronic claim that the dossier was the sole piece of evidence to obtain the FISA warrants; yet here you are, idiotically linking an op/ed bitching about how the FBI didn't inform the FISC of political bias.

You lose because you're a loser.

Ohr warning the FBI about using the Steele dossier is not an opinion it was a fact.
Why was Ohr fired *****?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The dossier by itself was not what caused the warrants to be issued. Understand?

The dossier was the sole piece of evidence for the fisa warrants

Horowitz investigated that. Quote him saying that or you're lying....

FISA shocker: DOJ official warned Steele dossier was connected to Clinton, might be biased

When the annals of mistakes and abuses in the FBI’s Russia investigation are finally written, Bruce Ohr almost certainly will be the No. 1 witness, according to my sources.

The then-senior Department of Justice (DOJ) official briefed both senior FBI and DOJ officials in summer 2016 about Christopher Steele’s Russia dossier, explicitly cautioning that the British intelligence operative’s work was opposition research connected to Hillary Clinton’s campaign and might be biased.

Ohr’s briefings, in July and August 2016, included the deputy director of the FBI, a top lawyer for then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch and a Justice official who later would become the top deputy to special counsel Robert Mueller.

At the time, Ohr was the associate deputy attorney general. Yet his warnings about political bias were pointedly omitted weeks later from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant that the FBI obtained from a federal court, granting it permission to spy on whether the Trump campaign was colluding with Russia to hijack the 2016 presidential election.

That's an opinion piece, PussyBitch, not the results of Horowitz's investigation into the FISA warrants. Even worse for you -- the challenge to you, which you can't handle, was to prove your moronic claim that the dossier was the sole piece of evidence to obtain the FISA warrants; yet here you are, idiotically linking an op/ed bitching about how the FBI didn't inform the FISC of political bias.

You lose because you're a loser.

It's all they have. Make it up then repeat it over and over.

Why was OHR fired?
It's not like the Russian witchhunt is news from decades ago