Trump Is Sued in Death of Capitol Police Officer After Jan. 6

[miketx]

You're brain-dead if you don't realize Trump tried to get fake electors sent to Congress AND tried to get his VP to unconstitutional unilaterally reject Biden electors.

You're a lying clueless little howler monkey, aren't you?

 

[Faun]

Project much, doll? Love, beautress.

No, not at all.

 

[protectionist]

Nope thought of that for myself, well to be perfectly honest, it was NEWSMAX not long after Trump's attempted overthrow of the government.

The most "safe bet" in this whole forum, is that Newsmax did NOT say the safe bet is
it was a Trump cult member".

AND Trump didn't try to overthrow the government. He tried to retrieve back from the governmnt what was stolen from him.

 

[protectionist]

You're brain-dead if you don't realize Trump tried to get fake electors sent to Congress AND tried to get his VP to unconstitutional unilaterally reject Biden electors.

To make that claim with any validity or substance, you would have to be knowledgable of WHO these so-called "fake electors" were, that you refer to, or you'd have no idea what you're talking about. You would also need to know WHO the Biden electors were. I'm ready to hear what all their names are.

 

[BWK]

They should sue Pelosi, McConnell, and Ray Epps. Pelosi turned down the National Guard. This is all about greed and it should be dismissed.

Trump Is Sued in Death of Capitol Police Officer After Jan. 6 (Published 2023)

The suit in the death of Brian D. Sicknick seeks millions in damages from the former president, whom it paints as responsible for the violence that day, and two Capitol rioters.

www.nytimes.com

WASHINGTON — The longtime partner of a Capitol Police officer who died after the Jan. 6 attack sued former President Donald J. Trump and two Capitol rioters on Thursday, arguing that his death was a “direct and foreseeable consequence” of their roles in the mob violence that day.

The suit, filed in Federal District Court for the District of Columbia just before the second anniversary of the attack, seeks at least $10 million in damages each from Mr. Trump and two men accused of assaulting the officer, Brian D. Sicknick, with chemical spray on Jan. 6, George Tanios and Julian Elie Khater. Mr. Khater pleaded guilty in the assault, and Mr. Tanios pleaded guilty to misdemeanor charges.

“The horrific events of Jan. 6, 2021, including Officer Sicknick’s tragic, wrongful death, were a direct and foreseeable consequence of the defendants’ unlawful actions,” the suit said, adding that “the defendants are responsible for the injury and destruction that followed.”

Officer Sicknick died the day after the attack, but the Washington medical examiner ruled that it was from natural causes — multiple strokes that occurred hours after the mob confrontation — and prosecutors shied away from linking his death to the assault. But the medical examiner also said that “all that transpired played a role in his condition,” and the Capitol Police consider his death a “line of duty” fatality.

He's also guilty of an insurrection.

 

[protectionist]

He's also guilty of an insurrection.

Him, in addition to Biden ?

 

[Faun]

The most "safe bet" in this whole forum, is that Newsmax did NOT say the safe bet is
it was a Trump cult member".

AND Trump didn't try to overthrow the government. He tried to retrieve back from the governmnt what was stolen from him.

 

[Faun]

To make that claim with any validity or substance, you would have to be knowledgable of WHO these so-called "fake electors" were, that you refer to, or you'd have no idea what you're talking about. You would also need to know WHO the Biden electors were. I'm ready to hear what all their names are.

We know who they are, gramps. The idiots signed their names to fake certificates lime this one...

 

[protectionist]

We know who they are, gramps. The idiots signed their names to fake certificates lime this one...

ABC - Always Better Conjobs......hmmmmpf

 

[Faun]

ABC - Always Better Conjobs......hmmmmpf

Deflection noted.

 

[protectionist]

Deflection noted.

Your deflection is noted. What you posted is not legible, except that it is only from Wisconsin. US contains 50 states.

 

[Faun]

Your deflection is noted. What you posted is not legible, except that it is only from Wisconsin. US contains 50 states.

Republicans in most states didn't try to submit fake electors to Congress.

 

[protectionist]

Republicans in most states didn't try to submit fake electors to Congress.

Most means more than half. Maybe we should ask Joe Biden, but we might not expect a straight answer if >

• he doesn't have his talking points card yet...
• the teleprompter is broken
• Earphone is in the repair shop.
• 

 

[Faun]

Most means more than half. Maybe we should ask Joe Biden, but we might not expect a straight answer if >

• he doesn't have his talking points card yet...
• the teleprompter is broken
• Earphone is in the repair shop.
• 

Poor, senile gramps, Biden has nothing to do with this. Sending fake electors to Congress was Trump's scheme.

 

[protectionist]

Poor, senile gramps, Biden has nothing to do with this. Sending fake electors to Congress was Trump's scheme.

All depends on what one uses as a source to define legitimate or fake. As I recall Trump's source was the US Constitution. Does state legislatures sound familiar ?

 

[Faun]

All depends on what one uses as a source to define legitimate or fake. As I recall Trump's source was the US Constitution. Does state legislatures sound familiar ?

Oh look, gramps proves to be ignorant of the Constitution too, on top of pretty much everything else.

No, idiot, that doesn't sound familiar because it's not true. State legislatures are constitutionally
sanctioned with holding elections, not with sending electors to Congress...

The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof​

 

[protectionist]

Oh look, gramps proves to be ignorant of the Constitution too, on top of pretty much everything else.

No, idiot, that doesn't sound familiar because it's not true. State legislatures are constitutionally
sanctioned with holding elections, not with sending electors to Congress...

The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof​

US CONSTITUTION - Article 2, Section 1:

"Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.'

Back to the 8th grade for you.

U.S. Constitution - Article 2 Section 1 - The U.S. Constitution Online - USConstitution.net

Article 2 Section 1 of the United States Constitution

www.usconstitution.net

 

[Faun]

US CONSTITUTION - Article 2, Section 1:

"Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.'

Back to the 8th grade for you.

U.S. Constitution - Article 2 Section 1 - The U.S. Constitution Online - USConstitution.net

Article 2 Section 1 of the United States Constitution

www.usconstitution.net

Poor, senile gramps, you're not even qualified for the 8th grade. You missed the part where Congress can override that, which they did in 1887.

The Congress may determine the time of choosing the electors, and the day on which they shall give their votes; which day shall be the same throughout the United States.​

And every state in the union has passed laws designating the people in each respective state, not the state legislatures, decide which slate of electors get sent to Congress to be counted.

 

[protectionist]

Poor, senile gramps, you're not even qualified for the 8th grade. You missed the part where Congress can override that, which they did in 1887.

The Congress may determine the time of choosing the electors, and the day on which they shall give their votes; which day shall be the same throughout the United States.​

And every state in the union has passed laws designating the people in each respective state, not the state legislatures, decide which slate of electors get sent to Congress to be counted.

That quote only talks about WHEN, not WHO.

You next statement is unsubstantiated, and states can't pass laws in contradiction to the Constitution. You're still stuck in that 8th grade classroom. Ho hum. yawn****

 

[Faun]

That quote only talks about WHEN, not WHO.

You next statement is unsubstantiated, and states can't pass laws in contradiction to the Constitution. You're still stuck in that 8th grade classroom. Ho hum. yawn****

LOL

Gramps, "unsubstantiated??" Name a state in which the state legislature, and not the people of each respective state, chooses the electors to send to Congress to be counted...