Trump is on the horns of a dilemma.

berg80 said:
Nice attempt at yet another false equivalence. Cuz, you know, Joe is not diverting small dollar donations to his legal defense expenses. Cuz, you know, he hasn't been indicted. Cuz, you know, there's no evidence he committed a crime. Got it?
Click to expand...
Trump has spent millions on his legal defense. What a waste.
 
berg80 said:
$50M is a staggering amount. But hey, if you commit the crime you have to do the grifting dance to fleece the rubes for more $$$.
Click to expand...

Has Trump returned the $750 in artwork he stole from the US embassy in Paris? Remember? He stayed behind during the memorial for US soldiers who died in France because of his hair do and the rain.
 
ColonelAngus said:
Trump leads Biden in 7 swing states.

CNN claims if the election was today, Trump wins.
Click to expand...

But it's not today, so that's nothing but a fantasy.

Biden campaign didn't even begin to seriously lay a glove on Trump. This aside from Trump facing possible criminal convictions before election.

thehill.com

Majority of swing-state voters in new poll wouldn’t vote for Trump if convicted

A majority of voters in swing states say they wouldn’t vote for former President Trump in the upcoming election if he were convicted of a crime, a poll released Wednesday found. The Bloomberg News/…
thehill.com thehill.com
 
Last edited:
Vote for Joe Biden.

Why do only the living get to be President?

IMG_2539.webp
 
berg80 said:

Trump campaign outraised by Biden, legal bills a drag​


WASHINGTON, Jan 31 (Reuters) - Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump's fundraising slowed in the last three months of 2023 and he was outraised by his likely general election rival, Democrat Joe Biden, disclosures submitted to the Federal Election Commission showed on Wednesday.
The disclosures also showed the heavy drag Trump's legal expenses have become, with the biggest super PAC supporting the former president sending nearly two-thirds of what it raised in the second half of 2023 to a separate Trump group that has been paying his legal bills.

Running for the presidency is enormously expensive. The allocation of resources being one of the more challenging aspects of managing a campaign. The problem for Don being this.

On the one hand, he is running to be prez again because he feels it's his best chance to stay out of jail. As I mentioned, it requires a lot of money. On the other hand, there's the more immediate need to mount a defense against the numerous criminal charges filed against him in numerous jurisdictions in case he loses the election. The #1 priority being maintaining his freedom.

When he ran in 2016 he famously claimed because he is "really, really, rich" he could basically self fund his campaign. Hmmmmmm. These days he's funding his legal defenses with small dollar donations from the rubes. In part by skimming 10% off donations going to his campaign PAC for legal fees. Why not pay for it himself with his vast wealth? It could be because he's facing the payment of nearly half a billion dollars in fines to E. Jean and NY state for fraud and defamation. Not to mention the possibility the Trump Org.'s businesses in NY will be shut down. Like his charitable foundation was when he was caught stealing from it.

Gosh, he's got a lot on his plate. So dig deep minions. Your messiah needs you more than ever. Send $5, $10, $25, or whatever you can afford to his new PAC..........."I can't own the libs from prison."
Click to expand...
Lol, all Trump all of the time.
 
Independentthinker said:
Translation: Trump continues doing better and better in the polls and you guys are utterly terrified.
Click to expand...

Then why cheat?


A bipartisan ethics committee in Wisconsin has recommended felony charges against one of former President Trump's political action committees and Republicans in the state for allegedly skirting campaign finance laws, the committee confirmed to Axios on Friday.

Why it matters: The criminal referrals could spell more legal trouble for Trump, who already faces 91 charges in four cases in other jurisdictions.

The big picture: Trump called to decertify Wisconsin's 2020 election results as part of his wider attempt at subverting the presidential election due to his unsubstantiated claims of election fraud.

Details: The Wisconsin Ethics Commission recommended that local district attorneys investigate and pursue felony charges against several officials and committees.

The commission, comprised of three Democrats and three Republicans, alleged a scheme to evade campaign finance laws during the 2022 midterm elections, the news service Wispolitics first reported.
The commission claimed Trump's Save America PAC, state Rep. Janel Brandtjen and other Republicans steered at least $40,000 to the 2022 challenger of Wisconsin State Assembly speaker Robin Vos.
Vos was challenged by Adam Steen, who heavily embraced Trump and the perpetuated false claims of 2020 election fraud.
State laws allow individuals and most political organizations to give a maximum of $1,000 each to Wisconsin Assembly candidates, though political parties can give candidates unlimited amounts.

The commission alleged that Steen, his campaign, Trump's PAC, Brandtjen and officials with three county Republican parties conspired by coordinating donations to the Langlade County GOP.
The county GOP would allegedly give the funds to Steen or use them to his benefit.
Flashback: Steen, who Trump endorsed, lost to Vos in a 2022 primary by 260 votes.

He then ran as a write-in candidate during the general election that November and finished a distant third, trailing Vos by over 14,600 votes.
Part of Steen's campaign revolved around assertions that Vos wasn't doing enough to address claims of election integrity issues in the state.

Context: Leading up to the 2022 midterms, Trump repeatedly called on voters to support Steen and criticized Vos for not acting on his call to decertify
 
surada said:
Then why cheat?


A bipartisan ethics committee in Wisconsin has recommended felony charges against one of former President Trump's political action committees and Republicans in the state for allegedly skirting campaign finance laws, the committee confirmed to Axios on Friday.

Why it matters: The criminal referrals could spell more legal trouble for Trump, who already faces 91 charges in four cases in other jurisdictions.

The big picture: Trump called to decertify Wisconsin's 2020 election results as part of his wider attempt at subverting the presidential election due to his unsubstantiated claims of election fraud.

Details: The Wisconsin Ethics Commission recommended that local district attorneys investigate and pursue felony charges against several officials and committees.

The commission, comprised of three Democrats and three Republicans, alleged a scheme to evade campaign finance laws during the 2022 midterm elections, the news service Wispolitics first reported.
The commission claimed Trump's Save America PAC, state Rep. Janel Brandtjen and other Republicans steered at least $40,000 to the 2022 challenger of Wisconsin State Assembly speaker Robin Vos.
Vos was challenged by Adam Steen, who heavily embraced Trump and the perpetuated false claims of 2020 election fraud.
State laws allow individuals and most political organizations to give a maximum of $1,000 each to Wisconsin Assembly candidates, though political parties can give candidates unlimited amounts.

The commission alleged that Steen, his campaign, Trump's PAC, Brandtjen and officials with three county Republican parties conspired by coordinating donations to the Langlade County GOP.
The county GOP would allegedly give the funds to Steen or use them to his benefit.
Flashback: Steen, who Trump endorsed, lost to Vos in a 2022 primary by 260 votes.

He then ran as a write-in candidate during the general election that November and finished a distant third, trailing Vos by over 14,600 votes.
Part of Steen's campaign revolved around assertions that Vos wasn't doing enough to address claims of election integrity issues in the state.

Context: Leading up to the 2022 midterms, Trump repeatedly called on voters to support Steen and criticized Vos for not acting on his call to decertify
Click to expand...
YAWN, next.
 
berg80 said:
Nice attempt at yet another false equivalence. Cuz, you know, Joe is not diverting small dollar donations to his legal defense expenses. Cuz, you know, he hasn't been indicted. Cuz, you know, there's no evidence he committed a crime. Got it?
Click to expand...
False. There’s already evidence of criminality by old Joe to justify an impeachment investigation.

Also, you imbecile, you can’t indict a sitting President.

Do you get anything? Evidently, no.
 
berg80 said:

Trump campaign outraised by Biden, legal bills a drag​


WASHINGTON, Jan 31 (Reuters) - Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump's fundraising slowed in the last three months of 2023 and he was outraised by his likely general election rival, Democrat Joe Biden, disclosures submitted to the Federal Election Commission showed on Wednesday.
The disclosures also showed the heavy drag Trump's legal expenses have become, with the biggest super PAC supporting the former president sending nearly two-thirds of what it raised in the second half of 2023 to a separate Trump group that has been paying his legal bills.

Running for the presidency is enormously expensive. The allocation of resources being one of the more challenging aspects of managing a campaign. The problem for Don being this.

On the one hand, he is running to be prez again because he feels it's his best chance to stay out of jail. As I mentioned, it requires a lot of money. On the other hand, there's the more immediate need to mount a defense against the numerous criminal charges filed against him in numerous jurisdictions in case he loses the election. The #1 priority being maintaining his freedom.

When he ran in 2016 he famously claimed because he is "really, really, rich" he could basically self fund his campaign. Hmmmmmm. These days he's funding his legal defenses with small dollar donations from the rubes. In part by skimming 10% off donations going to his campaign PAC for legal fees. Why not pay for it himself with his vast wealth? It could be because he's facing the payment of nearly half a billion dollars in fines to E. Jean and NY state for fraud and defamation. Not to mention the possibility the Trump Org.'s businesses in NY will be shut down. Like his charitable foundation was when he was caught stealing from it.

Gosh, he's got a lot on his plate. So dig deep minions. Your messiah needs you more than ever. Send $5, $10, $25, or whatever you can afford to his new PAC..........."I can't own the libs from prison."
Click to expand...
Trump was running for President long before he was charged with anything so it seems unlikely that the reason he’s running is to avoid going to jail.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

The Republicans (RINOs) are going to completely screw us again with the senate border bill

< Previous Thread

Snoop Dogg v Taylor… who wins?

Next Thread >

Similar threads

g5000
How's It Going?
6 7 8
Replies
146
Views
887
Tumblin Tumbleweed
T
Zincwarrior
Musk may donate $100 million to President Trump's political operation
2 3 4
Replies
66
Views
538
justoffal
justoffal
DonGlock26
Musk Political Group Takes on Local Races (WI) and New Targets
Replies
9
Views
105
jackflash
jackflash
odanny
From Prosperity to Austerity - Trump's Changing Message
Replies
17
Views
140
OhPleaseJustQuit
OhPleaseJustQuit
IM2
Where are the black MAGAS now?
2 3 4
Replies
60
Views
566
Jroc
Jroc

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom