Would you prefer if he was on the side of the Islamic Terrorists like ISIS and what Obama called the "moderate rebels" aka the al-Nusra Front and the other "moderate rebels" Ahrar al-Sham.
Yes you probably would because your type exist in The Obama Bubble.
Would you prefer that Syria remain as it was Secular, where Muslims, Yazidi's, Druize and Christians live together, you know the Syrian Army is a Secular army that includes Christians in it, of course you don't know that do you, considering you're not educated enough and are completely ignorant of the situation.
You would prefer that Syria falls to Salafi jihadism and Wahhabism which is what ISIS, the al-Nusra Front and Ahrar al-Sham all adhere to and that Syria ceases being how it was Secular and instead becomes an Extreme Islamic foothold and part of The Caliphate.
You probably do not even know what any of these things are unless you Google them, you being so uneducated and completely ignorant of the situation, just babbling the Kool Aid drip fed to you by the MSM Propaganda.
BAATHISM is a secular ideology like NAZISM is a secular ideology In fact NAZISM tolerated
Christianity ALMOST to the same extent that Baathism "tolerates" Christianity. Baathism
does not "tolerate" Hinduism or Zoroastrianism or Judaism. A good example of a BAATHIST
type 'secular' political ideology is INDONESIA. Indonesia DOES CLAIM the same level of
"secularism" as that of BAATHISM. I do not read MSM. I understood the principles of
BAATHISM before al gore invented the net. Both Gamal Abdel Nasser and Saddam
Hussein were ARDENT Baathists. In fact they were FRONT RUNNERS in the institution
of that ideology. Russia has supported Baathist governments since the 1950s. Earlier
admirers included ADOLF HITLER. Loss of Baathist control would be a boon to caliphatists----
but baathism vs caliphatism is half dozen of one vs six of the other