NATO has no intention of taking out Putin.The whole idea is NATO taking out Putin without firing a shot....using the Ukes and supplying them with precision targeting data.
He is providing them somebody to blame all of their shit on.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
NATO has no intention of taking out Putin.The whole idea is NATO taking out Putin without firing a shot....using the Ukes and supplying them with precision targeting data.
I just did some quick searches and AI said DOJ claimed the $7 billion was the cost of arms we gave to the Afghan army. It only claimed the arms that were left were destroyed or disabled. No monetary figure.$7 billion?
$80 billion is probably a fraction of what we left behind.I just did some quick searches and AI said DOJ claimed the $7 billion was the cost of arms we gave to the Afghan army. It only claimed the arms that were left were destroyed or disabled. No monetary figure.
How convenient.
Trump's claimed $80 billion.... that's probably closer to reality than 7
And incredibly short sighted.Advanced, European democracies are resolute.
Yep....those armored vehicles we saw Iran parading around in Tehran looked completely destroyed. LOLHeres the AI:
Distinction between U.S. and Afghan forces' equipment: The DoD clarified that this $7.12 billion figure relates to equipment provided to the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces (ANDSF) and not U.S. military equipment used by American forces. The Pentagon stated that "nearly all equipment used by U.S. military forces in Afghanistan was either retrograded or destroyed prior to our withdrawal".
In not surrendering Ukraine to Putin/Kim/Trump?And incredibly short sighted.
Now you know the reason the CIA labored to destroy the 1st Trump Administration and sought to prevent his re-election BY ANY MEANS NECESSARYUkraine successfully destroyed many millitary planes Russia used to attack Ukraine. Trump says? He is not happy about it and can find no fault with Putin shelling Kiev's civilians in response
WTF?Now you know the reason the CIA labored to destroy the 1st Trump Administration and sought to prevent his re-election BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY
Well your advanced, European democracies are talking about putting boots on the ground.In not surrendering Ukraine to Putin/Kim/Trump?
Supporters of independent, sovereign nations disagree.
Dingle BerryWTF?
No I don't nutbag. What you've just had zero relationship with what you've quoted.
Dingle Berry
The CIA persuaded the Obama-Biden regime to start the Maidan Revolution in November 2023
Yeah, the guy in the back.You are clueless. Maidan Revolution was in 2013-2014.
Do you see any CIA or Americans here?
![]()
I have no problem with advanced European nations talking.Well your advanced, European democracies are talking about putting boots on the ground.
How do think that's gonna go?
Ukraine agreed to unconditional ceasefire, Putin rejected it.
Why? Because Trump's insane defference to Moscow is enabling Putin's war effort.
Without clear, steadfast American resolve to support Ukraine's defense Putin has all the hope for millitary advance.
Why would Putin ever agree to any ceasefire or peace deal if he still thinks he has a chance to simply win millitarily?
When are you going to start using your damn head already? It is diluted, useful idiots like you that are extending this war.
Z agreed to unconditional ceasefire.
P rejected unconditional ceasefire.
Whoops, there goes your bullshit.
I have no problem with advanced European nations talking.
I have a problem with Russian and North Korean boots on the ground in Ukraine.
Some don't, apparently.
Part of Z's dream peace package, even with our boys at the front....Keep talking?I have no problem with advanced European nations talking.