Trump is not a racist!

[Unkotare]

him is a her-
and he said himself if he wasn't guilty he wouldn't settled, he settled. Either hes a liar or hes guilty of discrimination (or both). Which is it?

Gender noted. Are you saying that he admitted guilt in this case? This is important here, because this thread is about evidence that Trump is a racist. It has nothing to do with whether or not he is a liar, but everything to do with evidence that he is a racist. Did he admit guilt in this specific case?

You asked for evidence that Trump is a racist, not his personal confession. The charges (and he was charged more than once), are proof of racism, and his agreement to settle the cases without fighting them, as also proof of racism. Just because he refused to admit guilt, doesn't mean he isn't guilty.

You seem confused about the meaning of "proof."

lawsuits, witnesses, victims, direct quotes....
what exactly are you looking for if none of these things matter to you?

You also seem confused about logic.

 

[Aries]

him is a her-
and he said himself if he wasn't guilty he wouldn't settled, he settled. Either hes a liar or hes guilty of discrimination (or both). Which is it?

Gender noted. Are you saying that he admitted guilt in this case? This is important here, because this thread is about evidence that Trump is a racist. It has nothing to do with whether or not he is a liar, but everything to do with evidence that he is a racist. Did he admit guilt in this specific case?

You asked for evidence that Trump is a racist, not his personal confession. The charges (and he was charged more than once), are proof of racism, and his agreement to settle the cases without fighting them, as also proof of racism. Just because he refused to admit guilt, doesn't mean he isn't guilty.

You seem confused about the meaning of "proof."

lawsuits, witnesses, victims, direct quotes....
what exactly are you looking for if none of these things matter to you?

You also seem confused about logic.

you're just allergic to reality.

 

[EvMetro]

what exactly are you looking for if none of these things matter to you?

Legitimate evidence, not allegations. Law suits are just allegations. It is reasonable to expect to see something that Trump really did say or do, that can be verified. If it is something that he said, you should be able to wrap quotes around the words that he really did say, not something that somebody else says that he said. Regardless of how you interpret his famous quote about Mexicans and rapists, there is no dispute that he really did say what he said. We know that the Mexicans quote is not about racism, and that it is not relevant to this thread, but it is an example of something he really did say, that can be verified.

Lefties like to go back a half century to the black real estate law suits, since they involve race. When lefties do this, it is a good sign, since they are now looking at the race requirement that needs to be there for there to be racism. Yea, it looks desperate to have to go back a half century, but at least they are looking at race. The reason why this will never work, is that the act of suing somebody does not prove that the person is guilty. It only means that somebody thinks they have something on the person who they are suing. The person who is being sued is entitled to his day in court, and due process. After he gets this, a legal decision is made. This is why I keep asking you what legal decision was made in regard to the Trump Management Corporation.

If a cop pulls you over and writes you a ticket for speeding, you can go to court and present your case. What's cool about this, is that you are considered innocent until proven guilty! If a speeding ticket was considered evidence that you were speeding, we would not even need a court, and cops could just write tickets for anything they want to.

The problem that lefties run into when they start trying to make the lawsuits into evidence, is that not only is it not evidence, but the lawsuits were not even against Donald Trump specifically. They were against Trump Management Corporation, which is not the same as Donald Trump. There is no way to pin down if Donald had anything to do with the alleged racist policies, or if he was even aware that they existed.

 

[Aries]

what exactly are you looking for if none of these things matter to you?

Legitimate evidence, not allegations. Law suits are just allegations. It is reasonable to expect to see something that Trump really did say or do, that can be verified. If it is something that he said, you should be able to wrap quotes around the words that he really did say, not something that somebody else says that he said. Regardless of how you interpret his famous quote about Mexicans and rapists, there is no dispute that he really did say what he said. We know that the Mexicans quote is not about racism, and that it is not relevant to this thread, but it is an example of something he really did say, that can be verified.

Lefties like to go back a half century to the black real estate law suits, since they involve race. When lefties do this, it is a good sign, since they are now looking at the race requirement that needs to be there for there to be racism. Yea, it looks desperate to have to go back a half century, but at least they are looking at race. The reason why this will never work, is that the act of suing somebody does not prove that the person is guilty. It only means that somebody thinks they have something on the person who they are suing. The person who is being sued is entitled to his day in court, and due process. After he gets this, a legal decision is made. This is why I keep asking you what legal decision was made in regard to the Trump Management Corporation.

If a cop pulls you over and writes you a ticket for speeding, you can go to court and present your case. What's cool about this, is that you are considered innocent until proven guilty! If a speeding ticket was considered evidence that you were speeding, we would not even need a court, and cops could just write tickets for anything they want to.

The problem that lefties run into when they start trying to make the lawsuits into evidence, is that not only is it not evidence, but the lawsuits were not even against Donald Trump specifically. They were against Trump Management Corporation, which is not the same as Donald Trump. There is no way to pin down if Donald had anything to do with the alleged racist policies, or if he was even aware that they existed.

but we provide direct quotes and then you tell us that's not really racism. (I suspect because you people either can't identify it or, you are racists)

 

[Unkotare]

Gender noted. Are you saying that he admitted guilt in this case? This is important here, because this thread is about evidence that Trump is a racist. It has nothing to do with whether or not he is a liar, but everything to do with evidence that he is a racist. Did he admit guilt in this specific case?

You asked for evidence that Trump is a racist, not his personal confession. The charges (and he was charged more than once), are proof of racism, and his agreement to settle the cases without fighting them, as also proof of racism. Just because he refused to admit guilt, doesn't mean he isn't guilty.

You seem confused about the meaning of "proof."

lawsuits, witnesses, victims, direct quotes....
what exactly are you looking for if none of these things matter to you?

You also seem confused about logic.

you're just allergic to reality.

Run along, kid. You're making a fool of yourself.

 

[EvMetro]

[
but we provide direct quotes and then you tell us that's not really racism. (I suspect because you people either can't identify it or, you are racists)

The catch to providing the winning quote here, is that it has to be a quote that shows Trump believes that his race is superior to another. Providing quotes about Mexicans or Muslims do not work, since they Mexicans and Muslims are not a race. Race absolutely MUST be involved for there to be racism. You may notice that when you say "racism" out loud, you can actually hear the word "race" when you say it. This is because racism is about race, and that word "race" that you hear in racism really is race. Quotes about Mexicans are not about race, so they don't count.

Once we are narrowed down to a situation that actually involves race, we must also identify which of the two races the alleged racist believes to be superior, and which race he believes to be inferior.

If quotes that meet these basic requirements have been posted, I am confident that you would re quote them here, to wave in my face.

 

[EvMetro]

Run along, kid. You're making a fool of yourself.

Indeed she is. If this was the first round of explaining reality to her, it would be different. She learned all this stuff already, right on this thread, which means she is using a lefty tactic that I call "smile and walk a little further". This is where one knows they are wrong, but they are already so committed, they must continue.

 

[EvMetro]

It would appear that post 386 was what it took to finally get through. The usual pattern that I see, is the lefty starts off by posting a bigoted assumption about Mexicans or Muslims being a race, and when that fails, they go back a half century to try using blacks to make a racism case. Once this fails, I am usually called a racist, told I am on ignore, or called a troll. On this particular thread, I saw a new tactic used by lefty polo, the denial that the left ever painted Trump as a racist in the first place.

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

The perfect example is this Trump / Russia connection, which is based on assumptions that they allege must be true based on what they hope to find, but have absolutely no concrete evidence that supports their allegations of guilt

So link it...you do know you're expected to link to back what you say, right?

No, it would be up to YOU to prove it. You're the ones making the claim he isn't a racist. The Department of Justice says otherwise, and they have the law suits to back it up.

Lawsuits are based on allegations with the need to provide evidence to demonstrate proof which leads to a truth. In case you are unfamiliar with our judicial system, an individual is innocent until proven guilty. Liberals have this way of believing because charges are brought that leads to an investigation it must be guilt, without undergoing the legal process of showing proof. The left have it backwards, that the accused must provide facts to prove his or her innocence and that it's the job of the accused to do so, when that is not how our judicial system operates.

The perfect example is this Trump / Russia connection, which is based on assumptions that they allege must be true based on what they hope to find, but have absolutely no concrete evidence that supports their allegations of guilt. So now they feel it's the job of the individual, whom has no clear evidence of wrongdoing, to provide evidence in proving their innocence to satisfy the accuser's lack of attaining any facts to back up their pure assumptions. Now the proper way would be the case of clear emails of then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, being released openly in public that brings to question how the need for secured documents can be so easily attained for all to see. This evidence which led to the investigation of her server. How was it secured? A clear question that led to the discovery of her using a personal server. The finding of clear documented evidence that leads to the need to probe further to uncover her failure to secure government documents clearly addressed only to Mrs Clinton, that was improperly handled according to government document standards and procedures. The vast difference between following clear evidence that leads to guilt or misconduct, compared to producing some form of evidence to prove one's innocence of assumed guilt without providing clear uncovered documentated facts that leads to such inquiry.

You understand there was a huge amount of evidence, so the trumps settled. He said it himself he doesn't settle if he's innocent.

That's a lot of responses from a simple fact liberals love to claim guilt based on the need to start an investigation without any evidence, to try and seek out and create facts. Like I said, it's innocent until concrete documented facts LEAD towards guilt or wrongdoing, that's our judicial system. Hillary Clinton obviously clearly couldn't keep her emails secured, as we had the first Secretary of State in US History where everyone knew of her business and government correspondence. Hell we had "evidence" (you may need a clear definition of what that is) even had her emails on a personal computer of an individual not even entitled to receive them, in a private home for any simpleton off the street to come in and see.

Oh and Trump did not ... "settle" ... nor was there ever a huge amount of evidence surrounding the left's need to find a Trump / Russia connection. My reply was clearly directed towards the liberals insistence that Trump HAD to be conspiring with Russia because there was no way all those oversampled democrat polls showing a Hillary lead could possibly be wrong. Hillary was such a shoe in for president. What an embarrasment it must be for much of the liberal media..

Decades-Old Housing Discrimination Case Plagues Donald Trump
Try again.

Try taking a literacy course, then look at the subject my response was addressing before sending another reply dumbass.

 

[EvMetro]

Try taking a literacy course, then look at the subject my response was addressing before sending another reply dumbass.

The lefties on this thread do not care about literacy, or even how stupid their posts are. They are here to throw darts of spite from the lefty collective.

 

[EvMetro]

Here we are a year later, and still not a shred of evidence.

 

[whitehall]

You almost gotta laugh. While the Hussein administration was telling inner city Black people that they were too stupid to obtain a photo I.D., the Trump organization was hiring Black and Hispanic people in decent jobs. Anytime a leftie tries to tell you that secure borders are racist it's useless to talk to them because they are brainwashed and angry and hopeless and thanks to the propaganda arm of the democrat party, the MSM, probably anti-American.

 

[BrokeLoser]

King Hussein- “Give the ghetto folks that worship me a free shitty cell phone and we own them.”

Trump- “Run illegal Mexicans out and open up low-skilled jobs for our struggling urban folks.”

 

[Whocares386]

That article explains us how much Republicans and its supporters tend to be racist, religious fanatics, people who are against the gay rights, women’s rights, immigrants, abortion, etc..

Check here:
Republicans

 

[EvMetro]

That article explains us how much Republicans and its supporters tend to be racist, religious fanatics, people who are against the gay rights, women’s rights, immigrants, abortion, etc..

Check here:
Republicans

Any evidence that Trump is a racist?

 

[TheParser]

"Race" is, of course, the elephant in the room.

Cultured people at school and work try to avoid discussing the topic.

We like to pretend that it does not exist.

*****

Is President Trump a "racist"?

It all depends on your interpretation of "racist."

*****

Some people (like me) believe that President Trump is NOT a "racist." They believe that he wants equal rights for every American citizen and that no group deserves special treatment.

Some people (like most self-identified liberals) sincerely believe that President Trump IS a "racist" because (a) He does have an unfortunate habit of stating matters in a blunt fashion and (b) He refuses to repeat politically correct mantras (such as, "Caucasians should be ashamed of 'White privilege' ").

*****

Whether President Trump is a "racist" or not is something that Americans (citizens only) should decide in clean elections.

The majority should have the last word on this matter.

(Personally, I believe that the Democratic-controlled media and academia have been very successful in pinning the "racist" label on him and that the Democrats will do very well in the November elections.)

 

[Pogo]

That article explains us how much Republicans and its supporters tend to be racist, religious fanatics, people who are against the gay rights, women’s rights, immigrants, abortion, etc..

Check here:
Republicans

Any evidence that Trump is a racist?

Not sure how old this thread is or why it just popped up but what comes to mind is, when the USG was suing the Rump organization for housing discrimination (they wouldn't rent to black people), during a break in the depositions Rump quipped to the federal investigator (who had run the test applicants to prove the case), "come on Ellise -- you don't want to live with them either".

Running close behind is the quote about "black guys counting my money -- I hate it. The only guys I want counting my money are short guys who wear yarmulkes every day" and the more problematic "Laziness is a trait in blacks. I really believe that".

Rump was raised by his equally elitist-authoritarian father to believe that there are 'upper' and 'lower' castes in the general population and that their role is the former, and that they are somehow 'better' than the Untouchables. I'd call that "classist" rather than "racist" because it extends to so much more than race --- Hispanics, Muslims, women, veterans, the media, the congenitally disabled, the poor, anybody who gets low TV ratings, football players, protestors, whatever you want, just plug it in and claim yourself "superior" to it.

Rump is in that way probably the most anti-American POTUS that's ever sullied the office.

 

[Pogo]

I've listened to him for over a year now and have yet to hear him say anything that would lead me to believe he is a racist.

There's an easy fix for this. Turn your speakers up.

 

[my2¢]

Trump is a racist as much as Obama is a Muslim. Take it either way.

 

[EvMetro]

It's been almost 4 years since I started this thread, and nobody has posted a shred of evidence that proves Trump is a racist. All I have seen posted are allegations, dismissed cases, gish gallop, secondhand quotes, and propaganda.