Trump is not a racist!


NewBlackPantherPartyObamaWebsite.jpg

I wouldn't be surprised if Obama was a racist, but having racists endorse or support him do not mean that he endorses them back. Same thing for all that propaganda that ProggresivePatriot posted. He just wanted to spew anti Trump propaganda to make up for the evidence that he can't post. ProggresivePatriot knows good and well that racists endorsing Obama or Trump are not the same as Obama or Trump endorsing racists back. He wants to derail the thread, and avoid talking about the fact that no evidence has been posted. As you can see in post 313, I was able to accurately predict his post before he even posted.
 
I have never read or heard anything that Trump has ever said that is racist, yet I have seen lefties imply that he is. I assert that Trump is not a racist, but I will retract this if somebody could post a link to an actual quote of Trump saying something racist. I have seen plenty of allegations that Trump said things that are racist, but never an actual verifiable legitimate quote. Anybody got a link to such a quote?


Paul Ryan says Trump is a racist. Those comments he made about Judge Curiel--"He's a Mexican so I won't get a fair ruling out of him, strongy suggests he's a racist." This over the class actiion lawsuit regarding Trump University.



A picture of Judge Curiel who was born in Indiana.

judge-gonzalo-curiel.jpg


cartoon-trump-university.jpg
 
I have never read or heard anything that Trump has ever said that is racist, yet I have seen lefties imply that he is. I assert that Trump is not a racist, but I will retract this if somebody could post a link to an actual quote of Trump saying something racist. I have seen plenty of allegations that Trump said things that are racist, but never an actual verifiable legitimate quote. Anybody got a link to such a quote?
Have you even attempted to look into the topic? There's plenty of material, really, decades worth.

So link it...you do know you're expected to link to back what you say, right?

No, it would be up to YOU to prove it. You're the ones making the claim he isn't a racist. The Department of Justice says otherwise, and they have the law suits to back it up.

Lawsuits are based on allegations with the need to provide evidence to demonstrate proof which leads to a truth. In case you are unfamiliar with our judicial system, an individual is innocent until proven guilty. Liberals have this way of believing because charges are brought that leads to an investigation it must be guilt, without undergoing the legal process of showing proof. The left have it backwards, that the accused must provide facts to prove his or her innocence and that it's the job of the accused to do so, when that is not how our judicial system operates.

The perfect example is this Trump / Russia connection, which is based on assumptions that they allege must be true based on what they hope to find, but have absolutely no concrete evidence that supports their allegations of guilt. So now they feel it's the job of the individual, whom has no clear evidence of wrongdoing, to provide evidence in proving their innocence to satisfy the accuser's lack of attaining any facts to back up their pure assumptions. Now the proper way would be the case of clear emails of then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, being released openly in public that brings to question how the need for secured documents can be so easily attained for all to see. This evidence which led to the investigation of her server. How was it secured? A clear question that led to the discovery of her using a personal server. The finding of clear documented evidence that leads to the need to probe further to uncover her failure to secure government documents clearly addressed only to Mrs Clinton, that was improperly handled according to government document standards and procedures. The vast difference between following clear evidence that leads to guilt or misconduct, compared to producing some form of evidence to prove one's innocence of assumed guilt without providing clear uncovered documentated facts that leads to such inquiry.
 
Last edited:
Liberals have this way of believing because charges are brought that leads to an investigation it must be guilt, without undergoing the legal process of showing proof.
Hysterical coming from someone who probably chanted "lock her up" :2up:
 
I have never read or heard anything that Trump has ever said that is racist, yet I have seen lefties imply that he is. I assert that Trump is not a racist, but I will retract this if somebody could post a link to an actual quote of Trump saying something racist. I have seen plenty of allegations that Trump said things that are racist, but never an actual verifiable legitimate quote. Anybody got a link to such a quote?
Have you even attempted to look into the topic? There's plenty of material, really, decades worth.

So link it...you do know you're expected to link to back what you say, right?

No, it would be up to YOU to prove it. You're the ones making the claim he isn't a racist. The Department of Justice says otherwise, and they have the law suits to back it up.

Lawsuits are based on allegations with the need to provide evidence to demonstrate proof which leads to a truth. In case you are unfamiliar with our judicial system, an individual is innocent until proven guilty. Liberals have this way of believing because charges are brought that leads to an investigation it must be guilt, without undergoing the legal process of showing proof. The left have it backwards, that the accused must provide facts to prove his or her innocence and that it's the job of the accused to do so, when that is not how our judicial system operates.

The perfect example is this Trump / Russia connection, which is based on assumptions that they allege must be true based on what they hope to find, but have absolutely no concrete evidence that supports their allegations of guilt. So now they feel it's the job of the individual, whom has no clear evidence of wrongdoing, to provide evidence in proving their innocence to satisfy the accuser's lack of attaining any facts to back up their pure assumptions. Now the proper way would be the case of clear emails of then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, being released openly in public that brings to question how the need for secured documents can be so easily attained for all to see. This evidence which led to the investigation of her server. How was it secured? A clear question that led to the discovery of her using a personal server. The finding of clear documented evidence that leads to the need to probe further to uncover her failure to secure government documents clearly addressed only to Mrs Clinton, that was improperly handled according to government document standards and procedures. The vast difference between following clear evidence that leads to guilt or misconduct, compared to producing some form of evidence to prove one's innocence of assumed guilt without providing clear uncovered documentated facts that leads to such inquiry.
Like most politicians, even sitting President Bush:boohoo:
 
The perfect example is this Trump / Russia connection, which is based on assumptions that they allege must be true based on what they hope to find, but have absolutely no concrete evidence that supports their allegations of guilt
I have never read or heard anything that Trump has ever said that is racist, yet I have seen lefties imply that he is. I assert that Trump is not a racist, but I will retract this if somebody could post a link to an actual quote of Trump saying something racist. I have seen plenty of allegations that Trump said things that are racist, but never an actual verifiable legitimate quote. Anybody got a link to such a quote?
Have you even attempted to look into the topic? There's plenty of material, really, decades worth.

So link it...you do know you're expected to link to back what you say, right?

No, it would be up to YOU to prove it. You're the ones making the claim he isn't a racist. The Department of Justice says otherwise, and they have the law suits to back it up.

Lawsuits are based on allegations with the need to provide evidence to demonstrate proof which leads to a truth. In case you are unfamiliar with our judicial system, an individual is innocent until proven guilty. Liberals have this way of believing because charges are brought that leads to an investigation it must be guilt, without undergoing the legal process of showing proof. The left have it backwards, that the accused must provide facts to prove his or her innocence and that it's the job of the accused to do so, when that is not how our judicial system operates.

The perfect example is this Trump / Russia connection, which is based on assumptions that they allege must be true based on what they hope to find, but have absolutely no concrete evidence that supports their allegations of guilt. So now they feel it's the job of the individual, whom has no clear evidence of wrongdoing, to provide evidence in proving their innocence to satisfy the accuser's lack of attaining any facts to back up their pure assumptions. Now the proper way would be the case of clear emails of then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, being released openly in public that brings to question how the need for secured documents can be so easily attained for all to see. This evidence which led to the investigation of her server. How was it secured? A clear question that led to the discovery of her using a personal server. The finding of clear documented evidence that leads to the need to probe further to uncover her failure to secure government documents clearly addressed only to Mrs Clinton, that was improperly handled according to government document standards and procedures. The vast difference between following clear evidence that leads to guilt or misconduct, compared to producing some form of evidence to prove one's innocence of assumed guilt without providing clear uncovered documentated facts that leads to such inquiry.
You understand there was a huge amount of evidence, so the trumps settled. He said it himself he doesn't settle if he's innocent.
 
250 posts, and not a smidgen of evidence that Trump is a racist. We can use this thread as an official resource now, that shows that all the lefties on this board acknowledge that there is zero evidence supporting the notion that Trump is a racist.
that's your inaccurate opinion. Plenty of examples of his racism have been talked about. Not all, but plenty. Just because you are unable to identify racism when you see it, doesn't mean it isn't there.

Serious question.. are you a racist? Do you think that certain races are superior to others?


1. “Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have.”

2. “Never go outside the experience of your people.”

3. “Wherever possible go outside of the experience of the enemy.”

4. “Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules.”

5. “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.”

6. “A good tactic is one that your people enjoy.”

7. “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.”

8. “Keep the pressure on, with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose.”

9. “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.”

10. “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.”

11. “If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counterside.”

12. “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.”

13. “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”
 
250 posts, and not a smidgen of evidence that Trump is a racist. We can use this thread as an official resource now, that shows that all the lefties on this board acknowledge that there is zero evidence supporting the notion that Trump is a racist.
that's your inaccurate opinion. Plenty of examples of his racism have been talked about. Not all, but plenty. Just because you are unable to identify racism when you see it, doesn't mean it isn't there.

Serious question.. are you a racist? Do you think that certain races are superior to others?


1. “Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have.”

2. “Never go outside the experience of your people.”

3. “Wherever possible go outside of the experience of the enemy.”

4. “Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules.”

5. “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.”

6. “A good tactic is one that your people enjoy.”

7. “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.”

8. “Keep the pressure on, with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose.”

9. “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.”

10. “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.”

11. “If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counterside.”

12. “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.”

13. “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”
Is that suppose to be an answer to my question?
 
Here's why Trump is a racist: Because that's how the DNC labeled him.

"Hi John, Amy forwarded me your email. Here's our basic primer on Trump:"

WikiLeaks - Search the DNC email database
So because the DNC did their research, poor donnie was slandered? Wtf?

You're just another leftist shill, a la Johnny Applesack. You suck.

You're not going to win here. You can't win when you're wrong, sorry.
So no answer, noted.
Winning in trumpland (here) and winning in reality are two very different things- I'll take my chances.
 
250 posts, and not a smidgen of evidence that Trump is a racist. We can use this thread as an official resource now, that shows that all the lefties on this board acknowledge that there is zero evidence supporting the notion that Trump is a racist.
that's your inaccurate opinion. Plenty of examples of his racism have been talked about. Not all, but plenty. Just because you are unable to identify racism when you see it, doesn't mean it isn't there.

Serious question.. are you a racist? Do you think that certain races are superior to others?


1. “Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have.”

2. “Never go outside the experience of your people.”

3. “Wherever possible go outside of the experience of the enemy.”

4. “Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules.”

5. “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.”

6. “A good tactic is one that your people enjoy.”

7. “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.”

8. “Keep the pressure on, with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose.”

9. “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.”

10. “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.”

11. “If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counterside.”

12. “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.”

13. “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”
Is that suppose to be an answer to my question?

No, it's a callout of your lame use of Alinsky tactics. :lame2:
 
250 posts, and not a smidgen of evidence that Trump is a racist. We can use this thread as an official resource now, that shows that all the lefties on this board acknowledge that there is zero evidence supporting the notion that Trump is a racist.
that's your inaccurate opinion. Plenty of examples of his racism have been talked about. Not all, but plenty. Just because you are unable to identify racism when you see it, doesn't mean it isn't there.

Serious question.. are you a racist? Do you think that certain races are superior to others?


1. “Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have.”

2. “Never go outside the experience of your people.”

3. “Wherever possible go outside of the experience of the enemy.”

4. “Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules.”

5. “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.”

6. “A good tactic is one that your people enjoy.”

7. “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.”

8. “Keep the pressure on, with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose.”

9. “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.”

10. “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.”

11. “If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counterside.”

12. “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.”

13. “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”
Is that suppose to be an answer to my question?

No, it's a callout of your lame use of Alinsky tactics.
:boohoo::boohoo:
 
250 posts, and not a smidgen of evidence that Trump is a racist. We can use this thread as an official resource now, that shows that all the lefties on this board acknowledge that there is zero evidence supporting the notion that Trump is a racist.
that's your inaccurate opinion. Plenty of examples of his racism have been talked about. Not all, but plenty. Just because you are unable to identify racism when you see it, doesn't mean it isn't there.

Serious question.. are you a racist? Do you think that certain races are superior to others?


1. “Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have.”

2. “Never go outside the experience of your people.”

3. “Wherever possible go outside of the experience of the enemy.”

4. “Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules.”

5. “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.”

6. “A good tactic is one that your people enjoy.”

7. “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.”

8. “Keep the pressure on, with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose.”

9. “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.”

10. “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.”

11. “If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counterside.”

12. “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.”

13. “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”
Is that suppose to be an answer to my question?

No, it's a callout of your lame use of Alinsky tactics.
:boohoo::boohoo:


We used to have a name for people like you.

What was it? O man..o yeah! "Lamer!" that's it.
 
15th post
Here's why Trump is a racist: Because that's how the DNC labeled him.

"Hi John, Amy forwarded me your email. Here's our basic primer on Trump:"

WikiLeaks - Search the DNC email database
So because the DNC did their research, poor donnie was slandered? Wtf?

What research did the DNC do? Post it on u
that's your inaccurate opinion. Plenty of examples of his racism have been talked about. Not all, but plenty. Just because you are unable to identify racism when you see it, doesn't mean it isn't there.

Serious question.. are you a racist? Do you think that certain races are superior to others?


1. “Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have.”

2. “Never go outside the experience of your people.”

3. “Wherever possible go outside of the experience of the enemy.”

4. “Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules.”

5. “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.”

6. “A good tactic is one that your people enjoy.”

7. “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.”

8. “Keep the pressure on, with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose.”

9. “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.”

10. “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.”

11. “If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counterside.”

12. “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.”

13. “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”
Is that suppose to be an answer to my question?

No, it's a callout of your lame use of Alinsky tactics.
:boohoo::boohoo:


We used to have a name for people like you.

What was it? O man..o yeah! "Lamer!" that's it.

p! :badgrin:

.... I know republicans struggle in the vocabulary department, but really, that's all you could come up with?
 
Here's why Trump is a racist: Because that's how the DNC labeled him.

"Hi John, Amy forwarded me your email. Here's our basic primer on Trump:"

WikiLeaks - Search the DNC email database
So because the DNC did their research, poor donnie was slandered? Wtf?

What research did the DNC do? Post it on u
Is that suppose to be an answer to my question?

No, it's a callout of your lame use of Alinsky tactics.
:boohoo::boohoo:


We used to have a name for people like you.

What was it? O man..o yeah! "Lamer!" that's it.

p! :badgrin:

.... I know republicans struggle in the vocabulary department, but really, that's all you could come up with?

I had to go back, way back, to find the proper adjective for ya. :D

Lamer works!
 
I have never read or heard anything that Trump has ever said that is racist, yet I have seen lefties imply that he is. I assert that Trump is not a racist, but I will retract this if somebody could post a link to an actual quote of Trump saying something racist. I have seen plenty of allegations that Trump said things that are racist, but never an actual verifiable legitimate quote. Anybody got a link to such a quote?


Paul Ryan says Trump is a racist. Those comments he made about Judge Curiel--"He's a Mexican so I won't get a fair ruling out of him, strongy suggests he's a racist." This over the class actiion lawsuit regarding Trump University.



A picture of Judge Curiel who was born in Indiana.

judge-gonzalo-curiel.jpg


cartoon-trump-university.jpg

An allegation is not evidence, and an allegation from Paul Ryan does not carry any more weight. Please keep discussion of Mexicans out of thread, since Mexicans are not a race. This thread is specifically about evidence of racism, so discussion of Mexicans does not belong here.
 
Liberals have this way of believing because charges are brought that leads to an investigation it must be guilt, without undergoing the legal process of showing proof.
Hysterical coming from someone who probably chanted "lock her up" :2up:
How many times, right here on this very thread, have you seen somebody attempt to submit allegations as evidence? Keep this in mind as you craft your response that dodges this question. The reason why you won't actually answer this question is because you don't like the answer. Ok, go ahead and dodge....
 
Back
Top Bottom