Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So yo stupid ass go from whining about Trump not using this bailout money as his personal slush fund to now saying there should be no bailout period...Ask Trumpers -- if they had it their way -- and their cult leader daddy could do with this bailout fund as he pleases --- what restrictions on corporations would they want him to enforce.....
It's one thing to just be contrary to what Democrats want just for the sake of being contrary -- but once you get past the juvenile inclinations of "triggering the libs" -- what restrictions would you enforce?
Should corporations (knowing no matter what they do - they will always be bailed out) -- use these funds to increase executive pay and buy back stocks FIRST -- THEN use what is left to maybe keep workers on the payroll? When we claim this is for the "worker" -- that is just bullshit happy talk without "RESTRICTIONS"
How about no welfare, bailouts, entitlements, grants, or subsidies for anybody? None ever from anybody, Republicans or Democrat? That is the right thing to do.
Or do you only support them when the Democrats do it? Like when that asshole Obama spent our money to bailout Wall Street and corporations like GM, Chrystler and Solyndra, just to name a few?
Hell that shithead Obama bailed out all the fucking Illegals that came here in addition to the welfare queens in the big city shitholes that voted for him.
He was a real asshole, wasn't he?
So yo stupid ass go from whining about Trump not using this bailout money as his personal slush fund to now saying there should be no bailout period...Ask Trumpers -- if they had it their way -- and their cult leader daddy could do with this bailout fund as he pleases --- what restrictions on corporations would they want him to enforce.....
It's one thing to just be contrary to what Democrats want just for the sake of being contrary -- but once you get past the juvenile inclinations of "triggering the libs" -- what restrictions would you enforce?
Should corporations (knowing no matter what they do - they will always be bailed out) -- use these funds to increase executive pay and buy back stocks FIRST -- THEN use what is left to maybe keep workers on the payroll? When we claim this is for the "worker" -- that is just bullshit happy talk without "RESTRICTIONS"
How about no welfare, bailouts, entitlements, grants, or subsidies for anybody? None ever from anybody, Republicans or Democrat? That is the right thing to do.
Or do you only support them when the Democrats do it? Like when that asshole Obama spent our money to bailout Wall Street and corporations like GM, Chrystler and Solyndra, just to name a few?
Hell that shithead Obama bailed out all the fucking Illegals that came here in addition to the welfare queens in the big city shitholes that voted for him.
He was a real asshole, wasn't he?
how about your bitch ass and your stupid ass cult leader put yall money where your mouth is and turn down all and any bailout money....or shut the entire fuck up
Trump chips away at Congress' role in coronavirus relief oversight
Trump chips away at Congress' role in coronavirus relief oversight
The $2 trillion coronavirus relief bill establishes a "special inspector general" to review and investigate loan decisions made by the treasury secretary.www.politico.com
"President Donald Trump intends to ignore provisions in the newly passed $2 trillion coronavirus relief bill intended to shore up Congress' oversight of the massive rescue program.
The legislation establishes a "special inspector general" to review and investigate loan decisions made by the treasury secretary as part of the coronavirus relief effort, an accountability measure that was a central part of Democrats' demands to shore up transparency in the bill. The provision requires the inspector general to notify Congress if he or she is "unreasonably refused or not provided" any information.
But in a signing statement issued shortly after he approved the bill, Trump says he'll be the last word on whether this provision is followed.
"I do not understand, and my Administration will not treat, this provision as permitting the [inspector general] to issue reports to the Congress without the presidential supervision required" by Article II of the Constitution, Trump said in the signing statement.
Trump also indicated he would treat as optional a requirement in the bill that key congressional committees be consulted before Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of State or U.S. Agency for International Development spends or reallocates certain funds."
.......................................................................................................................................................................
Even if the Trump admin wasn't incompetent and corrupt it is a reasonable request on the part of congressional Dems to have some degree of accountability for the dispersal of the $500B allocation for corporate relief from any admin. Dems agreed to the package believing Trump would be true to his word in allowing for the oversight mechanisms to be implemented.
They should have known better than to take a conman's word.
You've already proven your idiocy once. Repeating what is essentially the same post just belabors the point.So yo stupid ass go from whining about Trump not using this bailout money as his personal slush fund to now saying there should be no bailout period...Ask Trumpers -- if they had it their way -- and their cult leader daddy could do with this bailout fund as he pleases --- what restrictions on corporations would they want him to enforce.....
It's one thing to just be contrary to what Democrats want just for the sake of being contrary -- but once you get past the juvenile inclinations of "triggering the libs" -- what restrictions would you enforce?
Should corporations (knowing no matter what they do - they will always be bailed out) -- use these funds to increase executive pay and buy back stocks FIRST -- THEN use what is left to maybe keep workers on the payroll? When we claim this is for the "worker" -- that is just bullshit happy talk without "RESTRICTIONS"
How about no welfare, bailouts, entitlements, grants, or subsidies for anybody? None ever from anybody, Republicans or Democrat? That is the right thing to do.
Or do you only support them when the Democrats do it? Like when that asshole Obama spent our money to bailout Wall Street and corporations like GM, Chrystler and Solyndra, just to name a few?
Hell that shithead Obama bailed out all the fucking Illegals that came here in addition to the welfare queens in the big city shitholes that voted for him.
He was a real asshole, wasn't he?
how about your bitch ass and your stupid ass cult leader put yall money where your mouth is and turn down all and any bailout money....or shut the entire fuck up
You are confused Moon Bat.
I am against all kinds of government transfer payments, whether it is done by a Democrat or a Republican.
You dipshit Moon Bats love welfare when it it doled out by the Democrats and hate it (or complain about it) when it the Republicans do it. That is just the kind of shithead hypocrites you Moon Bats are.
I just think it would be cool if Trump managed to get his hands on that filthy Progressive money that the idiot Democrats put in the bill and used it for something usefull, like building more of the wall.
You make a lot of unsubstantiated claims with no evidence to back them up.You creepy little CCD's make lots of threats - not much ability to go through with them...
Yep, Trumpublicans have officially adopted Dear Leader's strategery - They work off of HUNCHES instead of facts.
There are 2 things that lie at the core of why Trump voters continue to support Trump at a cult like level.......I don't blame you for getting tired of hearing the truth about Trump's failures. If I had been dumb enough to vote for him I'd feel the same way.Problem is criticisms of Trump are worn out.
Good! That's what we want!
Of course it is what you want, you want big daddy government to hand out free money to those who will vote the correct way....it is what all you big government statist want.
I am glad to see you come out in the open and proudly proclaim your big government statist leanings.
It's hard to understand why anybody would have an opposition to oversight as to how our tax dollars are spent.
There are 2 things that lie at the core of why Trump voters continue to support Trump at a cult like level.......I don't blame you for getting tired of hearing the truth about Trump's failures. If I had been dumb enough to vote for him I'd feel the same way.Problem is criticisms of Trump are worn out.
1. The first rule of being a conservative is to never admit being wrong, especially if it means that a liberal was right about anything...ever....
2. Support whatever trump does if you think it will trigger the libs......
That is basically it........
Well I guess I'm not a conservative cause I've admitted I have been wrong several times. But I'm not wrong about you being a liar.There are 2 things that lie at the core of why Trump voters continue to support Trump at a cult like level.......I don't blame you for getting tired of hearing the truth about Trump's failures. If I had been dumb enough to vote for him I'd feel the same way.Problem is criticisms of Trump are worn out.
1. The first rule of being a conservative is to never admit being wrong, especially if it means that a liberal was right about anything...ever....
2. Support whatever trump does if you think it will trigger the libs......
That is basically it........
And your evidence is.........................................................?? Just between you and me, I realize you don't have any. I just like embarrassing you by asking.The the democrat party is the bitch of Beijing is no hunch.
Trump's decision to override the requirement that the inspector general report concerns to Congress is reminiscent of his handling of the whistleblower complaint regarding Ukraine that ultimately led to his impeachment last year.
At the time, the intelligence community's inspector general sought to relay to Congress a whistleblower complaint that Trump had abused his power by seeking Ukraine's interference in the 2020 election. But top officials in the Justice Department and White House intervened, blocking the report from reaching Congress until subpoenas and a pressure campaign from House Democrats forced it into the open.
In other words Democrats are still determined to prevent Trump from doing his job.
Trump chips away at Congress' role in coronavirus relief oversight
Trump chips away at Congress' role in coronavirus relief oversight
The $2 trillion coronavirus relief bill establishes a "special inspector general" to review and investigate loan decisions made by the treasury secretary.
"President Donald Trump intends to ignore provisions in the newly passed $2 trillion coronavirus relief bill intended to shore up Congress' oversight of the massive rescue program.
The legislation establishes a "special inspector general" to review and investigate loan decisions made by the treasury secretary as part of the coronavirus relief effort, an accountability measure that was a central part of Democrats' demands to shore up transparency in the bill. The provision requires the inspector general to notify Congress if he or she is "unreasonably refused or not provided" any information.
But in a signing statement issued shortly after he approved the bill, Trump says he'll be the last word on whether this provision is followed.
"I do not understand, and my Administration will not treat, this provision as permitting the [inspector general] to issue reports to the Congress without the presidential supervision required" by Article II of the Constitution, Trump said in the signing statement.
Trump also indicated he would treat as optional a requirement in the bill that key congressional committees be consulted before Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of State or U.S. Agency for International Development spends or reallocates certain funds."
.......................................................................................................................................................................
Even if the Trump admin wasn't incompetent and corrupt it is a reasonable request on the part of congressional Dems to have some degree of accountability for the dispersal of the $500B allocation for corporate relief from any admin. Dems agreed to the package believing Trump would be true to his word in allowing for the oversight mechanisms to be implemented.
They should have known better than to take a conman's word.
