Trump goes TACO max as his policies implode

The exporters DO NOT PAY any of the tariffs. The IMPORTING COMPANY does. THAT'S IT.

The tariff is paid AT THE PORT OF ENTRY BY THE IMPORTING COMPANY. The shipment cannot be released to the importer UNLESS AND UNTIL THEY PAY THE TARIFF.

THAT'S IT.
Everyone on the line from manufacturer importer and seller will have to absorb the tariff cost or their product wont sell. They must sell or go broke. Consumers dont have to buy. Prices drop as demand drops. Thats why inflation is still slowing.
Did you complain about Bidens 9% inflation. No you made lame excuses.
 
Everyone on the line from manufacturer importer and seller will have to absorb the tariff cost or their product wont sell. They must sell or go broke. Consumers dont have to buy. Prices drop as demand drops. Thats why inflation is still slowing.
Did you complain about Bidens 9% inflation. No you made lame excuses.
You missed out the role of the tariff faeries. Its importanr.
They pop into the port warehouses and scrub away the nasty tariffs before the consumer is affected.
Tru,mp factored in their work wjen he made his careful assessment of tariff Impact.
America Is so l;ucky.
 
You missed out the role of the tariff faeries. Its importanr.
They pop into the port warehouses and scrub away the nasty tariffs before the consumer is affected.
Tru,mp factored in their work wjen he made his careful assessment of tariff Impact.
America Is so l;ucky.
I owned two retail stores. I understand wholesale and retail economics. You have no idea
 
Facts aint lies. You are struggling to construct a narrative that absolves Trump. You are trying to push water uphill .
Your making excuses for a failed economy managed by a cognitivly impaired idiot who caused the worst inflation in 40 years
 
How did Biden cause the inflation ?
Spending trillions into a GDP 6.4% Called the American Rescue Plan all funded by borrowed money. The plan was never needed. His spending continued to be all debt based. Then he suppressed oil production keeping it below demand driving up the cost. The goal was force is to buy EV cars. Our entire economy is based on oil not just for gas but its in manufacturing plastics. 1 year later 1.4% inflation was 9.1%
 
Spending trillions into a GDP 6.4% Called the American Rescue Plan all funded by borrowed money. The plan was never needed. His spending continued to be all debt based. Then he suppressed oil production keeping it below demand driving up the cost. The goal was force is to buy EV cars. Our entire economy is based on oil not just for gas but its in manufacturing plastics. 1 year later 1.4% inflation was 9.1%
So he was trying to save the planet. Trump is paid too much by the oil companies to give a shit.
 
So he was trying to save the planet. Trump is paid too much by the oil companies to give a shit.
Youre changing the subject. He isint saving the planet because its not threatened. A major climate change research paper was just retracted as invalid striking a major blow to the fraud. You also never addressed my points because you have no valid argument. Biden caused the inflation and wrecked the economy. Trump is reversing that
 
Youre changing the subject. He isint saving the planet because its not threatened. A major climate change research paper was just retracted as invalid striking a major blow to the fraud. You also never addressed my points because you have no valid argument. Biden caused the inflation and wrecked the economy. Trump is reversing that
Denying scientific reality does not negate science, nor does Trump lying about the Trump economy change the Trump economy.

... And Republicans in Congress are panicking over the long-delayed arrival of TrumpCare.



Screen Shot 2022-08-11 at 7.24.50 AM.webp


GOP lawmakers unhappy with Trump’s affordability message:
‘You can’t call it a hoax!’

 
Denying scientific reality does not negate science, nor does Trump lying about the Trump economy change the Trump economy.

... And Republicans in Congress are panicking over the long-delayed arrival of TrumpCare.




Climate change study proven 100% Bullshit​

Yes, a prominent 2024 climate change study in Nature projecting massive economic damage was retracted in December 2025 due to significant data errors (especially concerning Uzbekistan), which inflated its dire 62% GDP loss estimate to a still-serious but lower 23% figure, though this retraction highlights that such research involves complex modeling and doesn't invalidate core climate science, with revised figures still showing substantial economic risks.
Details of the Retraction:
  • Original Study: Published in Nature in April 2024, it estimated a 62% loss in global GDP by 2100 under high emissions.
  • Retraction Reason: Subsequent analysis revealed data issues with Uzbekistan skewed the results; without that data, the projected loss dropped to around 23%.
  • Authors & Journal: The authors from the Potsdam Institute (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research) acknowledged "substantial" flaws, leading to the retraction by Nature.
  • Impact: The study had been used by central banks for risk assessments, but its retraction shows the challenges of precise economic forecasting, though revised numbers still indicate significant economic harm.

We couldnt afford gas under demented Joe we can today under Trump. In fact we have more money under Trump
 
15th post

Climate change study proven 100% Bullshit​

Yes, a prominent 2024 climate change study in Nature projecting massive economic damage was retracted in December 2025 due to significant data errors (especially concerning Uzbekistan), which inflated its dire 62% GDP loss estimate to a still-serious but lower 23% figure, though this retraction highlights that such research involves complex modeling and doesn't invalidate core climate science, with revised figures still showing substantial economic risks.
Details of the Retraction:
  • Original Study: Published in Nature in April 2024, it estimated a 62% loss in global GDP by 2100 under high emissions.
  • Retraction Reason: Subsequent analysis revealed data issues with Uzbekistan skewed the results; without that data, the projected loss dropped to around 23%.
  • Authors & Journal: The authors from the Potsdam Institute (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research) acknowledged "substantial" flaws, leading to the retraction by Nature.
  • Impact: The study had been used by central banks for risk assessments, but its retraction shows the challenges of precise economic forecasting, though revised numbers still indicate significant economic harm.

We couldnt afford gas under demented Joe we can today under Trump. In fact we have more money under Trump
Climatologists determined that one study overestimated the economic consequences of anthropogenic climate change.

Dogmatic science-hating Trumpwanks like to pretend that negates the science.

Obviously, it does not.
 
12bn bailout for farmers is odd as he told us China was buying lots of beans a few weeks ago.
Then there is selling chips which he put a block on at the same time.

Its almost like he hasnt a clue.
Of course China is buying its beans from Argentina. Maybe they are better beans ?

Economics Jim. but not as we know it.

Troll ^ says what?
 
Climatologists determined that one study overestimated the economic consequences of anthropogenic climate change.

Dogmatic science-hating Trumpwanks like to pretend that negates the science.

Obviously, it does not.
Denialism is a comfort blanket for morons. Funded by Exxon.
 
Denialism is a comfort blanket for morons. Funded by Exxon.
They reject the inherent self-correction of the scientific method based upon the ongoing compilation of empirical data and its analysis by experts. Their dogma is immutable, impervious to information, contemptuous of knowledge-based understanding.

Also, they like to think that they can poop into the heavens with impunity, no adverse consequences whatever.
 
Back
Top Bottom