Trump files, jury sees classified files or Trump wins

[Marener]

UNlike their practice with the previous five administrations, they did not offer a NARA facility where the documents could be stored

Nonsense. Trump’s administration turned over a lot of documents to NARA which were stored in their facilities.

I never claimed NARA was responsible for going through records, Second deflection noted.

It’s unclear what you think NARA failed to do for Trump.

 

[Dragonlady]

And you big poopyhead. I win.

So why did they tell him he was on his own? A break with the practice of the preceding five administrations, since the passage of the PRA?

NARA has never helped a President pack up his office. Try again.

 

[Marener]

I question about a claim I never made. Are you done gumming my ankles on this nonsense or do you need to gnaw some more?

A question about what you believe. No more. No less.

 

[Rawley]

Nonsense. Trump’s administration turned over a lot of documents to NARA which were stored in their facilities.

Deflection # 3 Noted

It’s unclear what you think NARA failed to do for Trump.

Which words are you having problems with? Unlike their practice with the previous five administrations, they did not offer a NARA facility where the documents could be stored

 

[Rawley]

A question about what you believe. No more. No less.

So you are not done gumming.

 

[Marener]

Deflection # 3 Noted

Which words are you having problems with? Unlike their practice with the previous five administrations, they did not offer a NARA facility where the documents could be stored

But they did offer a facility for the documents to be stored because there were many documents that were indeed stored at a NARA facility.

I just explained this.

 

[Marener]

So you are not done gumming.

And you’re not done hiding.

 

[Rawley]

But they did offer a facility for the documents to be stored because there were many documents that were indeed stored at a NARA facility.

As you well know, but keep dancing with your lame deflections, in a break in a four decades of practice, NARA declined to provide archival assistance to President Trump’s transition team. This was confirmed by NARA's General Counsel in testimony to Congress.

"***** set me up"

 

[GLASNOST]

Indictments are accusations, not evidence.

You must have studied law because no one else on this forum seems to understand that.

If you admit that you have no evidence, you will be way ahead of your fellow Democrats.

That's a good point and very good advice too.

 

[Marener]

As you well know, but keep dancing with your lame deflections, in a break in a four decades of practice, NARA declined to provide archival assistance to President Trump’s transition team. This was confirmed by NARA's General Counsel in testimony to Congress.

"***** set me up"

What is “archival assistance”?

You said they didn’t offer a facility. That was false. Now you’re backing off and saying something much more vague.

 

[Rawley]

What is “archival assistance”?

You said they didn’t offer a facility. That was false. Now you’re backing off and saying something much more vague.

Deflection #4 noted

We're done on this.

Have a blessed day.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You must have studied law because no one else on this forum seems to understand that.

That's a good point and very good advice too.

But indictments contan statements of fact that are backed by evidence. This evidence was shown to the grand jury. The jury saw it and said **** yeah, charge him.

 

[WEATHER53]

You must have studied law because no one else on this forum seems to understand that.

That's a good point and very good advice too.

Indictments are solely for front page smearing

 

[Marener]

Deflection #4 noted

We're done on this.

Have a blessed day.

I don’t know what you mean by “deflection”. You are seemingly struggle with speaking with clarity and accuracy. Worse, attempts to ask you to clarify are met with hostility.

Yes, we are done but only because you don’t seem interested in a rational and adult conversation at this time.

 

[GLASNOST]

Indictments are accusations, not evidence.

You must have studied law because no one else on this forum seems to understand that.

Indictments are solely for front page smearing

That's another (even more accurate) way of saying "accusation".

 

[Orangecat]

Comprehend what? Are you too stupid to even understand your own claim? What connection are you trying to make between me and projection? Did you ironically not read the post I was responding to?

Let it go, bingo. You're just embarrassing yourself now.

 

[WEATHER53]

That's another (even more honest) way of saying "accusation".

Accusation page 1 in CAPS and resolution page 33 next to tire ads
The libs and Media recognize that and manipulate that

 

[WEATHER53]

Let it go, bingo. You're just embarrassing yourself now.

Dude romances goats and then eats them

 

[Orangecat]

Dude romances goats and then eats them

Whatever he does doesn't require much intelligence, if his posts are any indication.

 

[GLASNOST]

Dude romances goats and then eats them

Yuck!

Whatever he does doesn't require much intelligence, if his posts are any indication.

They are.