Trump: Epstein Conspiracy Theorists Are "Bad People"

[EvilCat Breath]

No one ever saw Katie Johnson so this is a fake. She never dropped a lawsuit after getting multiple death threats or any death threats. The judge ordered the lawsuit dismissed because Johnson refused to have it served. Without service there is no lawsuit. After filing multiple lawsuits and refusing to have any served, Johnson was prohibited from further filings without service, Trump's lawyers even made a special appearance to accept service.

Pick a subject. Any subject. Democrats will lie about it.

 

[Independent thinker]

President Donald Trump has personally called the editor-in-chief of The Wall Street Journal to try to get the paper to spike a story it is working on about Trump’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, Status News reported on Thursday.

And now, there’s a new twist, according to Oliver Darcy of Status, who reported that the Rupert Murdoch-owned Journal has been working on “a potentially explosive” story detailing Trump’s ties to Epstein. The story, which has not yet been published, drew the attention of the White House and prompted an intervention from Trump himself.

Trump Tried to Pressure Wall Street Journal Into Spiking Epstein Story: Report

President Donald Trump personally called the editor-in-chief of The Wall Street Journal to try to get the paper to spike a story it was working on about Trump's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, Status News reported on Thursday.

www.mediaite.com

The walls are closing in around the Orange deviant. Hopefully, the story will take a deeper dive into the child rape lawsuit filed against both Epstein and Trump.

Like we all know, if you’re innocent of a crime the best way to show your innocence is to intimidate the press to kill a story and stop an investigation. Lol

So, you think the Journal should be allowed to report blatantly false information?

 

[Synthaholic]

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Good luck 47, there is no censorship of the press in this country.

Trump is a fascist thug with contempt for a free press.

 

[Zincwarrior]

So, you think the Journal should be allowed to report blatantly false information?

I am sure they would welcome the Discovery process of any Trump suit. In fact they should sue first as he libellously posted they were lying.

 

[Synthaholic]

Trump said that Obama, Biden, Clinton made up the Epstein files.

Then he said the whole Epstein thing was "boring".

Donald Trump wants you to believe that it's a nothingburger, not worth talking about a scandal involving three ex-presidents who are trying to destroy him.

BORING!!!

 

[Independent thinker]

I am sure they would welcome the Discovery process of any Trump suit. In fact they should sue first as he libellously posted they were lying.

In the meantime, it's alright to report information with no evidence to back it up?

 

[Papageorgio]

President Donald Trump has personally called the editor-in-chief of The Wall Street Journal to try to get the paper to spike a story it is working on about Trump’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, Status News reported on Thursday.

And now, there’s a new twist, according to Oliver Darcy of Status, who reported that the Rupert Murdoch-owned Journal has been working on “a potentially explosive” story detailing Trump’s ties to Epstein. The story, which has not yet been published, drew the attention of the White House and prompted an intervention from Trump himself.

Trump Tried to Pressure Wall Street Journal Into Spiking Epstein Story: Report

President Donald Trump personally called the editor-in-chief of The Wall Street Journal to try to get the paper to spike a story it was working on about Trump's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, Status News reported on Thursday.

www.mediaite.com

The walls are closing in around the Orange deviant. Hopefully, the story will take a deeper dive into the child rape lawsuit filed against both Epstein and Trump.

Like we all know, if you’re innocent of a crime the best way to show your innocence is to intimidate the press to kill a story and stop an investigation. Lol

Sorry but a far left media propaganda site is proof on speculation not facts, what mainstream media outlet is confirming the story? They also use another far left website to confirm the story.

No offense but after the many lies the left wing media told over the last several years, I hesitate to believe any of it. I am sure you can understand why I don’t trust them anymore.

 

[JLW]

No one ever saw Katie Johnson so this is a fake. She never dropped a lawsuit after getting multiple death threats or any death threats. The judge ordered the lawsuit dismissed because Johnson refused to have it served. Without service there is no lawsuit. After filing multiple lawsuits and refusing to have any served, Johnson was prohibited from further filings without service, Trump's lawyers even made a special appearance to accept service.

Pick a subject. Any subject. Democrats will lie about it.

Katie Johnson was never prohibited from filing another lawsuit.

As a matter of fact, given that Trump was accused of raping a 13 year old, you'd think he would have sued everyone involved in the case if it was a lie.

He did not sue Katie Johnson.

He did not sue the lawyers involved.

As a matter of fact, he never said a word about it, unlike Stormy Daniels and every other case he has been involved in.

I wonder why?

The question is how much did he pay Katie Johnson to dismiss the case.

 

[Zincwarrior]

In the meantime, it's alright to report information with no evidence to back it up?

That is only your assumption. I am massively sure they can back it up, else they wouldn't have run it. WSJ is not Breitbart.

 

[Papageorgio]

That is only your assumption. I am massively sure they can back it up, else they wouldn't have run it. WSJ is not Breitbart.

WSJ said nothing of being asked to run or not run the story, that story is coming from a far left wing site that is using information from another far left wing website, it reminds me of Breitbart which is not reliable either. This group just invoked the WSJ and is unconfirmed, but you will run with that?

 

[Zincwarrior]

WSJ said nothing of being asked to run or not run the story, that story is coming from a far left wing site that is using information from another far left wing website, it reminds me of Breitbart which is not reliable either. This group just invoked the WSJ and is unconfirmed, but you will run with that?

I am sure you believe that.

 

[Papageorgio]

I am sure you believe that.

The WSJ ran the story, what proof is there, other than two articles not directly contacting the editors of WSJ that confirm the story?

We were lied to about the Hunter Biden computer, we were lied to about the Steele Dossier, we were lied to about the President Biden’s cognitive abilities, we were lied to that there was absolutely no chance that Covid came from a Wuhan lab and Biden directed his administration to force social media to censure people that dared question the narrative, but you won’t question a far left Brietbart type website and take it at face value?

Seems pretty stupid to continue to believe people that lie to you, of course it fits your agenda and bigotry.

 

[Synthaholic]

 

[Papageorgio]

Can always count on the joke of the board to provide humor.

 

[TimFitz]

'that he once reprimanded President Donald Trump in the 80s for bringing a 19-year-old into the casino with Jeffrey Epstein in the early hours of the morning.

"in the 80s?"


nobody is saying they weren't friends at that time.

that's as silly as saying Bush got a ticket for DUI in the 60s.

and NOT pertinent to current events.

Bush did get a DUI. I don’t remember whether it was before or after he drove the car through the garage door.

Cheney got popped for DUI as well.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

 

[Independent thinker]

That is only your assumption. I am massively sure they can back it up, else they wouldn't have run it. WSJ is not Breitbart.

Trump says stuff all the time "without evidence" and you immediately attack him for it, without knowing whether he has evidence or not.

 

[MisterBeale]

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The President has tried to blame the Democrats, and, more unexpectedly, he has called those in his base who have asked for a fuller accounting “weaklings” and “stupid.”

‘Squirming, the President has tried to dismiss the uproar (“Are people still talking about this guy?”) and to blame it, somehow, on Barack Obama and Joe Biden (the Democrats’ “new SCAM”). More unexpectedly, he has called those in his own base who have asked for a fuller accounting “weaklings” and “stupid,” lamenting that “my PAST SUPPORTERS have bought into this ‘bullshit,’ hook, line, and sinker.” But that has been just blood in the water, both to the Democrats who are now calling for the full release of the Epstein files and to the anonymous Republican strategists who have begun to warn of a drop in turnout in the midterms.
[…]
No wonder Trump sounds so exasperated. (On Thursday, he said that Bondi would produce “any and all” grand-jury testimony from Epstein’s case, though this seems unlikely to satisfy anyone.) The central illusion of his political career has been that, despite his wealth and evident clout, he remains an outsider. But that was always a fiction, and now—with the G.O.P. leadership unified behind him and the Supreme Court mostly backing him—he may feel strong enough to leave some of his movement’s weirdness behind. Second-term Trump is no longer acting as a populist, and the Epstein case is unfolding as a test of how maga responds to this news.’

Behind Trump’s Jeffrey Epstein Problem

The President has tried to blame the Democrats, and, more unexpectedly, he has called those in his base who have asked for a fuller accounting “weaklings” and “stupid.”

www.newyorker.com

It’s true – Trump was never an ‘outsider,’ never a ‘populist’ – Trump is the product of a GOP that’s long been authoritarian and anti-democratic, a GOP motivated by fear, ignorance, racism, bigotry, and hate; Trump is the prefect representative of the Republican establishment.