Trump: Epstein Conspiracy Theorists Are "Bad People"

[citygator]

He signed it and wrote the note. The picture was part of the card. You can’t possibly ignore this:

‘may every day be another wonderful secret”

Let’s be honest. I wouldn’t let anyone who wrote that to Epstein be in the same zip code as my daughter.

All partisanship aside… that is damning.

So now what….seems he was an artist.

 

[Kilroy2]

I just read this story...

Honestly? I don't think he wrote, and I don't think he drew the picture. He's a shitty artist, remember this:

View attachment 1137738


No, I don't think he wrote the note, and I don't think he drew the female form...


But I do think he signed it.


Now I have to ask, so what? At the time, people were unaware of what a scumbag Epstein was, they were friends at the time, and it was the scumbag's birthday. If Trump overreacts about this story, he will be doing himself a disservice.

Don't say anything, just move on... or... own it and move on. A la Clear and Present Danger:

The story was Trump drew the red circle to show were the storm would hit. So he can also predict path of hurricanes with his mighty red marker. They made a map for him showing the path but it was not good enough for Trump so he used his red marker and improvised.

Goes to show the marker is mighter than weather experts

 

[Synthaholic]

 

[Oddball]

 

[whitehall]

All of a sudden the left is on the side of the WSJ pending editorial? times must be tough out there in left land.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

The WSJ story is out...

https://archive.is/6Tsa1 (no paywall)

Trump says it is fake, because Trump did not draw the picture or write the words in the Jeffrey Epstein birthday card album back in 2003

The explosive story turns out to be an old birthday card. WSJ should be embarrassed.

 

[Synthaholic]

 

[popscottpopscott]

the story will take a deeper dive into the child rape lawsuit filed against both Epstein and Trump.

Like we all know, if you’re innocent of a crime the best way to show your innocence is to intimidate the press to kill a story and stop an investigation. Lol

No evidence supporting the allegations was presented in court, and the cases were either dismissed or withdrawn without proceeding to trial.
Nothing like a defamation lawsuit to shut the "Journal" up... this cheap tabloid "Inquiring minds want to know" crap has to stop... coughing up a few million to Trump should shut them up... Ask skank girl Stormy.. first time I've ever heard the hoe paid the john...

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

this one is going to be the one that sinks Trump
View attachment 1137718

 

[Jim H - VA USA]

The explosive story turns out to be an old birthday card. WSJ should be embarrassed.

I tend to think it is fake, simply because Trump is not known to draw pictures and write cute little fictional tales. I was stuck with the feeling of incredulity on the first read, just like I was when I read the obviously fake Russian dossier.

 

[Synthaholic]

 

[Synthaholic]

 

[sartre play]

Authoritarian regimes won't tell you when the Constitution is 'done away with', they'll just ignore the parts of it that get in the way of their agenda. This administration violates the Constitution daily and the Republican majority in congress and the Supreme Court enable him, and they will continue to do so.

SCARY POSIBILITY.

 

[Synthaholic]

 

[Synthaholic]

I tend to think it is fake, simply because Trump is not known to draw pictures and write cute little fictional tales

Folks, this is the result of willful ignorance. This is what happens when you let your brain turn to mush from RW Media. Jim H - VA USA is clueless about what is real and what is fake.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Good luck 47, there is no censorship of the press in this country.

Tell that to Stephen Colbert.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Washington Post chimes in:

A year ago, Florida Circuit Judge Luis Delgado unsealed nearly 200 pages of grand jury testimony related to the 2006 Florida case involving Epstein.

. . .

At the time, we dug deep into the public record and awarded Four Pinocchios to a Democratic lawmaker who suggested Trump’s name was all over the files released by Delgado. Nothing has emerged since then to change our assessment that there is no public evidence of inappropriate behavior by Trump related to Epstein. As a reader service, our findings are presented below.

Democrats and "not Democrats" read the whole article, so you get the service that WaPo is trying to provide.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Democrats and "not Democrats," you are being lied to.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/07/11/trump-epstein-documents-ted-lieu/

“Something I’ve heard that doesn’t seem to be being covered are the Epstein files. These files were released. And, like, Donald Trump is sort of all over this. There are pictures of him with Epstein. He’s taken multiple plane flights with Epstein with young girls on board. He’s in call logs with Epstein. One of the highest trending hashtags on Twitter right now is about Trump and Epstein. … You all might want to look at that. Because that’s highly disturbing.”


— Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.), remarks to reporters, July 9

The Washington Posts says:

But Donald Trump’s name never appears anywhere in the transcripts.
That hasn’t stopped Democrats — perhaps seeking to distract from President Biden’s travails — from suggesting on social media that there’s a disturbing connection between the former president and a sex predator. Some social media posts have claimed that Trump was mentioned in a draft indictment released last week, but that’s false. Only 2006 grand jury testimony was released.

Julie K. Brown, the Miami Herald journalist whose diligent reporting forced a reopening of the Epstein case, has valiantly tried to point out the errors on X, but the misinformation keeps spreading. “I’ve come to believe that the American public won’t pay for the truth,” she lamented. “They would rather believe the lies they get for free on the internet.”

Not surprising that the four Pinochio Democrat referred to in the above post was Ted Lieu.

 

[Seymour Flops]

President Donald Trump has personally called the editor-in-chief of The Wall Street Journal to try to get the paper to spike a story it is working on about Trump’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, Status News reported on Thursday.

And now, there’s a new twist, according to Oliver Darcy of Status, who reported that the Rupert Murdoch-owned Journal has been working on “a potentially explosive” story detailing Trump’s ties to Epstein. The story, which has not yet been published, drew the attention of the White House and prompted an intervention from Trump himself.

Trump Tried to Pressure Wall Street Journal Into Spiking Epstein Story: Report

President Donald Trump personally called the editor-in-chief of The Wall Street Journal to try to get the paper to spike a story it was working on about Trump's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, Status News reported on Thursday.

www.mediaite.com

The walls are closing in around the Orange deviant. Hopefully, the story will take a deeper dive into the child rape lawsuit filed against both Epstein and Trump.

Like we all know, if you’re innocent of a crime the best way to show your innocence is to intimidate the press to kill a story and stop an investigation. Lol

Wow.

I think that . . . this time . . . you finally got him!

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Obviously a fake out. Trump was always at the bar.
The big clue that this was a fake. It's as true as Jeffrey Epstein shape-shifting.